neonix said:
Does Julian Assange and Edward Snowden are MKUltra products?
Probably yes, but there can be positive elements.
He (Snowden) undermine trust for govermnt and corporations on the whole globe.
The Pleiadians channeled by Barbara Marciniak 12 21 13
_https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i9nmx6-DJuE
50:50 One percent of Snowden revelations are already created very fiery/spiritual energy all over the planet.
54:24 Some people thing he may be part of MKUltra project, revelation of the method, he's definitely connected in some way but theres more to the story than anyone recognizes.
Programmed To Kill/Satanic Cover-Up Part 49 (Is Julian Assange an Disinformation Agent?)
_https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YHCrZe_yElE
Webster G. Tarpley on CoastToCoastAM about Julian Assange
_https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qAaWtFG5_O4
Webster Tarpley & Julian Assange
_https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLl0TOigGurf39CPYGq8Mn7KHEnjiIB_Sg
Snowden Saga Decrypted: NSA Leaker or Distraction
_https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SrCEq7S4se0
neonix,
I listened to all of your linked-to material this morning and wanted to thank you for posting this.
Without having to research the subject too deeply I concluded a long time ago that Snowden is nothing more than an agent, but this last video deepens my understanding of just how that plays out in terms of mass perception.
The material I've read by Webster Tarpley over the years I've found to be exceptional in connecting the dots and introducing facts, as per European journalism in particular, pointing to the manufacture of a "synthetic" opposition. Instinctively, I've never trusted this Assange spectacle, and these videos help to flesh out the substance of my apprehensions. The MKUltra aspect adds an interesting layer to the mix, as well.
In both cases (Assange and Snowden), one needs to unearth the core data/issues the PTB are seeking to deflect from in their manufacture of a convincing opposition. Certainly, the EMF based surveillance that's being employed is far scarier than what Snowden's material has thus far introduced, which itself (as pointed out in the video) is nothing new to those "who have been paying attention," as Max Maverick puts it. As a matter of fact, I recall encountering info. on the powerful surveillance capability of the government's Promise software (I believe was the name) in the early to mid 90's.
Actually, at some point I'd like to post some commentary on some Tarpley material (as well as some other info.) that talks about infighting at the top, since one's understanding of this gives a further means of analyzing how things are playing out, even when the two sides have similar overall objectives.
Along these lines, I'm wondering (and I guess this is a long shot) whether Dick Cheney won't make a play for president in the final hour, even w/ his poor health, given the book he's just written, which is highly critical of Obama's approach on Iran -- which is to say that Cheney is representing the Neocon, hard-liner approach, while Obama and Hillary Clinton represent the CIA old guard, headed by George Bush Sr., which is more multilateral--on the face of things, at least--in approach. The timing of Bush senior's autobiography could feed into this theory as well, given his harsh criticism of Cheney and Rumsfeld.
.. in other words, such infighting is good to keep in mind, especially when things seem particularly "illegible" out there. I'd note as well that it was Tarpley's work that got me interested in Putin after 9/ll. In fact, as per Tarpley's book-- the 3rd edition of 9/11 Synthetic Terror, 2005/6--it may have been due to the level headedness/KGB experience of Putin that we didn't see a nuclear confrontation in the Middle East at that time.
Anyway, thanks again for these links, neonix.
--oh. Just looked up the possibilities of a Cheney candidacy and found this:
http://www.breitbart.com/video/2014/03/13/ed-schultz-predicts-2016-dick-cheney-presidential-run/
"Ed Schultz [liberal MSNBC host] Predicts 2016 Dick Cheney Presidential Run"
.. (hmm)..
