As can be seen beyond the invisible?

[Eongar]

"Kant showed that the causes of our sensations are in the outside world, and we can not know these causes nor ever met. Kant established the fact that everything is known through the senses is known as a function of space and time, in terms of space and time, and that outside time and space do not we learn anything through the senses, time and space are necessary conditions for sensitive responsiveness. The extension in space and existence in time are not properties which belong to things, if not of our sensitive responsiveness, things exist independently of time and space, and we are not able to perceive beyond that. Time and space are forms our sensitivity. " Tertium Organum.

This idea makes me think of several things. If time does not exist, and indeed, from a 3rd density, space is strangely all in one place while not stop moving, then, what are we living? How do you conceive this idea?
Perhaps we can understand the concept-which is a mistake, since that is the problem, to conceptualize things that are beyond thought, but I certainly feel it complicated. If we are configured physically and mentally to live what we are perceiving and feeling, how change is brought about? I realize that there is "something" beyond what I perceive and feel, but how to feel? What to do? If we are locked in the prison's own body and not just outside, Where to begin?

It would be my pleasure to give me your opinion on these issues, I doubt that alone is progress possible.

Thank you very much

 

[Buddy]

Hi Eongar. I don't know if this addresses your questions exactly, but it seems to me that we first need a bit of grounding in the concepts that deal with how the nervous system interacts with the raw data of existence to allow us to experience anything at all, from simply observing to conceptualizing, forming theories and testing for predictability and extrapolation.

Toward that end, I am curious if you have read the Wave...especially the sections that describe the workings of the "predator's mind" and what role emotions, brain chemicals and beliefs play in what we "see".

Additionally, we need to understand the idea and dynamics of narcissism to get at the root of "social reality" and how subjectivity, fear and other negative emotions distort the reality "as it is."

Apologies if this sounds like some kind of brush off...it's not, but it's hard for me to understand the kinds of ideas you mention without exposing and clearing up some basic errors first.

For example, "space is strangely all in one place while not stop moving, then, what are we living? How do you conceive this idea?"

To me, there is the concept "space" that we form from the data we, as observers, interact with, and then there is "whatever is actually there." In such an example, one could probably say that "space" is entirely local, in that it only exists where you are, because we create the 'idea of space by interacting with it', whereas what is actually there might be quite unknowable from our 3D perspective and from our available knowledge, at this particular level of development.

Having said that, someone more knowledgable than I could come around and say 'it is this', or 'it is that' and be perfectly correct and understandable, so I'm not sure at all.

Hope this didn't confuse things even worse. :)

 

[Eongar]

Hi Buddy
Thanks for your reply. I have read the wave in Spanish, and unfortunately not all information that could be available in English. I use a translation tool which translates from Spanish into English correctly, but from English into Spanish does not convince me.

Read information related to narcissism, to see what ideas can bring you. On the mind of the "predator", yes I have read, have a mind that is not ours and that they take from us in our decisions and actions. To that also could be called ego. Shamanic practice and one of the most important is the destruction of the Ego, movement and awareness of emotions, and so on. Obviously, if we allow ourselves to be possessed by an emotion or subjectivity itself distort reality. The problem of subjectivity is when we know when we are objective, if still limited by our feelings, perceptions and concepts is difficult to go further. I refer to Ouspensky:

The fundamental unit of our receptivity is a sensation. This sensation is an elementary change in the state of our psyche, produced, as it seems to us, or by a change in the state of the external world in relation to our consciousness, or a change in the state of our psyche in relation to the external world. Feeling the sense we assume that appears to reflect a change in the external world.
The accumulated memories of sensations begin to meet at linking in consciousness in groups, and according to their similarity tend to associate, to join, or oppose, with memories of sensations, perceptions are formed.
Perceptions are ensembles, memories of sensations. During the formation of perceptions of sensations are polarized in two directions specified. The first address in the formation of groups reflects the character of sensations sensations. The second direction due to the time of receipt of the sensations. When various sensations, constituting a single group, and form a perception, enter simultaneously, then the memory of this group defined sensation is attributed to a common cause. This "common cause" is projected to the outside world as the object, and it is said that the perception reflects the real properties of this object. This memory is perception.
The memories of perceptions are combined in various ways: by joining, opposing, forming several groups, forming concepts.
The formation of perceptions leads to the formation of words, and the emergence of language.

Assuming that language is linked to our subjectivity, and that higher densities becomes obsolete, because the language is dual and that translates into subjective, how can we explain things without words? The analogies could be an answer, but still have an explanation of 3rd density. I mean something deeper than emotion or subjectivity: all this belongs rather to something non-conscious, not knowing himself. Gradually, a person who is leaving behind works programs that turned into a robot, it becomes something to be thought begins to think for himself, discerning, begins to be conscious. What would be the next step? Once you are awake, is uprooted from the emotions and programs, what to do next? Could it be that we are really flying blind, going from one side to another, without more? Sometimes I reach a point of reflection in which I get lost, do not understand.

Thanks again for your reply.