Bi-Directional Gravity

[velita]

In 1979 Walter C Wright wrote a book about his theory, "Gravity is a Push". He was a radar technician from Fairfield, California, and talking to his two young sons he admitted
to himself that Newton's idea didn't convince him. "We were strictly novices and we didn't know Venus from Di Milo or Pluto from Plato, but it did seem odd to us that if gravity was a pull, then why weren't heavenly bodies all stuck together like a bunch of grapes?" The force of attraction or repulsion between charged objects is known to be immensely larger than the attraction, if any! Due to matter .Wouldn't this be the sustaining factor? He then started to think of ways that the sun could be generating magnetism, for example by friction drag trough rotation, or also bi-metal junction point energy (two different temperatures in the sun indicating two different metals).He also had to assume that the sun was made of anti-matter, so that the lines of force leaving the south pole of the sun would enter the south pole of a planet, and like poles repulsing each other, voila, you have gravity as a form of magnetism.
Planets are maintained at different distances according to their metallic composition, orbiting into grooves of a magnetic field that is the result of the sun's field and all other fields coming from the rest of the universe.
I would appreciate any comment! Please check the web site associated: http://www.feandft.com/20%20Bi-Directional%20Gravity.htm

 

[dancho]

Gravity is the result of time dilation, according to the General Theory of Relativity. The presence of matter (or energy) causes a gravitational field, the primary result of which is the dilation of time. Any matter or energy in the field "lingers" a bit due to the gravitational effect, resulting in a motion towards the source of the field, from a region of lower field density to a region of greater field density.

Here's a metaphor that may be helpful. Imagine a football field with wall around it. Imagine that it is covered with dry grass over most of its surface, except for a flooded area in the center of the field, with a deep, muddy, slimy hole at the very center of the field. Now imagine some trucks are placed on the field, which are driven by robots and they drive randomly around the field. If they encounter the wall, they bounce off and head back onto the field. The wheels on the trucks turn at a constant speed. These trucks lose traction as they approach the muddy center of the field, and so they slow down as they wander into the mud, and it takes them longer to leave that part of the field. At the very center of the field, the muddy spot is so slippery that the trucks barely move. Over time, all the trucks would "mysteriously" migrate to the center of the field, even if no force pulls them there. A time-lapse film would show them "condensing" at the center. Furthermore, the spinning wheels of the trucks would "chew up " the field, increase the muddiness, and actually generate a stronger "gravitational field" in that region.

In this illustration, the trucks represent particles, moving at random. They "lose traction" in strong gravity and "linger," leading to "drift" toward the source of the gravitational field.

I hope this is helpful. :D

 

[SoCurious]

I've been having second thoughts about gravity and am leaning more towards the push theory. This is why....

A: We are timeless, so therefore, timely as well!! Gravity is the foundation of all material existence. Therefore, gravity waves are of instantaneous imprint, as they rule all time in extant by nature.

Over and over the C's tell us that gravity binds everything. It is the foundational force of all forces. It is the media of communication.

So, there's that famous diagram of a rubber sheets marked with a grid and a planet lying on the sheet. The sheet is space/time and space/time stretches around the planet.

But what if the sheet is not space/time but rather gravity? If we picture the sheet as being very very thick, by placing a planet (or star or any object) inside the sheet we displace gravity from that area. Like an object being put into water, the mass determines how much gravity is displaced.....Eureka!

But hey! The gravity doesn't like being displaced and pushes against the planet trying to reclaim it's spot. As it pushes it also gets reflected by the planet and the interference of waves pushing and reflecting results in areas of "troughs and peaks" and it is in these bands we find the areas of Maximum Orbital Probability (my term but you can use it :) ) or Planetary Orbital Bands (I'm on a roll).

Why would waves be pushing? In my mind with nothing inside the sheet it just sits there nice and quietly. But once moving objects are racing around inside it shimmers and trembles with the movement resulting in waves moving in all directions and gathering in force closest to objects.

"As above, so below". Are solar systems the same as atoms in different scale?

I'm no mathematician so I have no way of coming close to showing the validity or error of this idea but perhaps Ark or someone else could.

 

[dancho]

I hope my "football field" analogy wasn't just confusing. In the General Theory, any wave or particle causes space to alter. This alteration causes time to "dilate"--in this case the dilation results in "speeding up" time so that objects move less in a given period of time. The greater the concentration of energy/mass in a single region of space, the greater the effect. In an infinitely dense gravitational field, zero motion would occur but infinite time would pass. This speeding of time can't be measured directly, using a stopwatch for example, but it can be measured indirectly, using two clocks. Clocks on the Earth's surface (in a stronger gravitational field) run slower than clocks in orbit.

This effect is all that is needed to understand most gravitational phenomena. The only missing part is what could be illustrated by those trucks on the football field, if you imagine them roaming around at random and if they enter the muddy spot at an angle, the wheels on the side that is in the mud would lose traction and the whole truck would turn in towards the mud (skidding, like the Japanese "drift" racers). ;D This is the way that wave fronts react to gravity and when incorporated into the General Theory it fully explains all motion. When Einstein realized this, he said "It was the happiest day of my life."

I highly recommend reading the original Einstein papers on the subject. He was a great writer. They have been collected together in a book titled "The Principle of Relativity" by Einstein, et al.