This is a drawing I did a few weeks ago:
My sister is studying Art Therapy and while I was visiting her she told me about some of the exercises they do with their patients to assess them in different ways. This was one of them. Its called the bridge drawing. She said that it is supposed to be useful for looking at how someone relates to goals and where they are going in life. She thought it notable that the landscape is bleak, the bridge is long and narrow and high up in the air. She also said that most people draw the direction of travel from left to right, but I am moving from left to right in my drawing, but she wasn't sure if that necessarily meant anything, just that it is out of the ordinary.
This blog page has some more information about the exercise:
Questions, comments, insights are welcome :)
My sister is studying Art Therapy and while I was visiting her she told me about some of the exercises they do with their patients to assess them in different ways. This was one of them. Its called the bridge drawing. She said that it is supposed to be useful for looking at how someone relates to goals and where they are going in life. She thought it notable that the landscape is bleak, the bridge is long and narrow and high up in the air. She also said that most people draw the direction of travel from left to right, but I am moving from left to right in my drawing, but she wasn't sure if that necessarily meant anything, just that it is out of the ordinary.
This blog page has some more information about the exercise:
http://sara-crafton.blogspot.com/2008/10/bridge-drawing.html said:Bridge Drawing
Reference: Hays, R. & Lyons, S. (1981) The Bridge Drawing: A projective technique for assessment in art therapy. Arts in Psychotherapy. (8) pp. 207-217.
Purpose: Bridge Drawing is a projective assessment that may provide insight into a person’s functioning, perception of his/her environment as a stable place, and perception of movement or stagnancy.
Ages: No age limit specified.
Materials: 8 ½ X 11 blank, white paper; drawing utensils of choice
Administration: The evaluator hands the client a piece of paper and requests that he or she “Draw a bridge going from some place to some place.”
Inquiry:
Ask artist to draw an arrow representing directionality.
Ask the artist to identify his/her location on the bridge with a dot.
Ask the artist to write or speak a few short sentences about the bridge.
Interpretation: Examiner may look for the following indicators.
Directionality: The drawn arrow typically represents left to right travel.
Placement of self: The location of the person may be indicative of how that person is approaching problems/goals.
Places drawn on either side: These places may include named land masses, symbolic connections, and un-named land masses.
Solidness: It is common to see the right side (which may represent the future) depicted as less grounded than the left side (which may represent the past).
Emphasis by elaboration: Certain areas may be given greater emphasis than other areas. Which areas are emphasized?
Construction of bridge: The construction of the bridge may imply the stability and security of the bridge. For instance, what materials were used to build the bridge?
Type of bridge: Most people draw familiar bridges. In some cases, arch bridges represent femininity whereas suspension bridges represent masculinity.
Matter under bridge: What is under the bridge? It is typical to see water. If water is present, is it calm or turbulent?
Vantage point of viewer: If the bridge is seen from above, the person may wish for control. If the bridge is seen from a worm’s-eye view, feelings of insecurity/inferiority may be present.
Axis of paper: A horizontal page is more typical. A vertical page may indicate passivity.
Consistency of Gestalt: Are there indications that parts of the picture don’t fit? Incongruence is noted.
Written Associations: The evaluator reads or listens to the picture’s verbal caption, and asks questions where deemed appropriate.
Strengths: The Bridge drawing does not necessarily take much time to create, and in most cases, can be completed in one session. It is likely to stimulate a conversation about movement or stagnancy, and goals.
Limitations: The Bridge drawing has not been proven to be significantly valid or reliable. It only produces one picture, which does not provide a lot of information to make an accurate evaluation of how the person is functioning.
Reflection: I like the Bridge drawing even though it is not a precise and proven measurement tool. I perceive the Bridge drawing more as an intervention than as an assessment. The interpretation considerations would aid in observation and in processing.
Questions, comments, insights are welcome :)