mada85
The Cosmic Force
Children seem to be bearing the brunt of the ponerisation of society. They are bullying each other, fighting each other, being forced to fight each other, and killing themselves and each other. We live, on this planet, in a nest of vipers: the vipers are our so-called leaders; their influence filters down through the whole of society, with results like the following stories which I found on the BBC website today. Both took place in the UK.
The article titles are linked to the originals on the BBC UK website.
Adult goads boys into web fight
The case only came to light because the children's father, who had returned on leave from Iraq, discovered the video footage in the camera and gave it to Social Services, who notified the police.
The sentences in the case were appealed against as being too lenient, but were upheld:
Toddler goading sentences to stay
This looks again like conscienceless pseudo-humans closing ranks to protect their own. They write the laws, they appoint the officials to administer the laws (from among the ranks of their own kind), and repeat the lie ad nauseam until people believe that the law is The Law.
The article titles are linked to the originals on the BBC UK website.
Adult goads boys into web fight
Toddler fight family spared jailBBC said:Detectives and social workers are investigating "appalling" footage on the internet showing two young boys being forced to fight each other.
The children, aged between 10 and 12, punch, kick and headbutt one another, while the man filming the attack goads them into becoming more violent.
[…]
The man says to the boys: "You're fighting like girls. Fight properly."
[…]
During one section of the footage, one of the boys looks into the camera and asks: "Kicking is allowed, isn't it?"
One of the boys shouts, "he's crying", after punching the second child in the face.
[…]
Did you get that? The mother in question, Zara Olver, forced her own children to fight each other.BBC said:A mother who goaded her two toddlers to fight each other [and recorded the results with] a video camera has received a 12-month suspended sentence, along with her mother and two sisters.
Zara Olver, 21, her 48-year-old mother Carole, and sisters Serenza Olver, 29, and Danielle Olver, 19, all admitted child cruelty at Plymouth Crown Court.
In the footage, a boy in a nappy was called a "wimp" for not hitting his sister back after she struck him.
The women laughed as the children hit each other with brushes and magazines.
But the footage was found by chance by the toddlers' father, on leave from the army, and he told social services.
The boy, aged two, is seen crying after being punched in the face by his three-year-old sister and is told by one of the four women in the room "not to be a wimp or a faggot" and to hit the girl back.
The court heard that, when interviewed by police, Carole Olver said: "I didn't see any harm in toughening them up - I done the same with my own children."
[…]
The case only came to light because the children's father, who had returned on leave from Iraq, discovered the video footage in the camera and gave it to Social Services, who notified the police.
The sentences in the case were appealed against as being too lenient, but were upheld:
Toddler goading sentences to stay
The women were 'condemned' for their conduct. That will be very effective, and really make them and others think twice about doing it again. Yeah, right.BBC said:The Attorney General has said the sentencing of four women who filmed two toddlers fighting will not be referred to the Court of Appeal.
[…]
MP [Member of Parliament] Mike Penning had requested the Attorney General look at the case.
The Attorney General said while the women's conduct "fully deserved" the condemnation it received, the judge was entitled to make the decision he did.
[…]
[Mike Penning] asked the Attorney General to use his powers to appeal against what he claimed was the leniency of the sentence, saying if the case had involved a dog fight the women would have gone to prison.
The Attorney General's statement said the trial judge had considered the evidence "carefully" and reached a decision "that, in the Attorney's view, he was entitled to take in the exercise of his independent judgment.
[…]
This looks again like conscienceless pseudo-humans closing ranks to protect their own. They write the laws, they appoint the officials to administer the laws (from among the ranks of their own kind), and repeat the lie ad nauseam until people believe that the law is The Law.