Christians join Muslims in Condemning $75Million Blockbuster "Noah"

H-KQGE

Dagobah Resident
I admit, this gave me more than a chuckle, check the link to see why...

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2578931/Christians-join-Muslims-condemning-Russell-Crowes-new-75million-blockbuster-Noah-portrayal-Biblical-figure.html

Christians join Muslims in condemning Russell Crowe's new £75million blockbuster Noah for its portrayal of Biblical figure

By Dan Bloom and Damien Gayle
08:21 12 Mar 2014, updated 11:17 12 Mar 2014

·Censors for Qatar, Bahrain and UAE said it went against teachings of Islam
·Cairo's Al-Azhar said it objected to any depictions of God's messengers
·Test screen viewers in U.S. complained Noah's depiction was 'too dark'
·Noah revered by Muslims as well as Christians and has a chapter in Koran
·Paramount Pictures admitted the film takes 'artistic license' with ark legend
·Biblical epic depicting axe-wielding Crowe is due to premiere on March 28

The Hollywood epic about Noah's ark has managed to unite Christians and Muslims.

Members of the two religions - at odds for more than a thousand years - are singing with one voice to condemn the £75million film Noah for its take on the Biblical hero.

The blockbuster has already been banned in three Arab countries after religious leaders complained that it depicted the Biblical figure - who is also a prophet in the Koran.

Due to première later this month, the film will not show in Qatar, Bahrain or the United Arab Emirates and several other countries are expected to follow suit.

But it appears that America's devout Christians are also annoyed about the portrayal of the antediluvian patriarch, claiming after test screenings that director Darren Aronofsky had made him 'too dark'.

In exchange for his eight-figure budget, the auteur filmmaker was forced to allow backer Paramount to conduct as many as half a dozen test screenings to test the waters while work was still in progress.

A representative of an Australian pentecostal megachurch present for one warned The Hollywood Reporter: 'If you're expecting it to be word for word from the Bible, you're in for a shock.

'There can be an opportunity for Christians to take offence.'

Another viewer at a separate test screening was more blunt, saying it depictued Noah as a 'crazy, irrational, religious nut' who is obsessed with apparently modern day problems like overpopulation.

The criticisms come as of the world's most respected Islamic institutions issued a fatwa against the Hollywood epic because it 'contradicts the teachings of Islam'.

Islam forbids representing holy figures in art, instead using conceptual line patterns and lettering to adorn the walls of mosques.

A whole chapter of the Koran is devoted to Noah, who legend tells built an ark which saved himself, his family and many pairs of animals from a great flood.

He also features prominently in the Biblical book of Genesis and is revered by Christians and Jews.

The fatwa - a ruling or injunction under the laws of Islam - was made by the influential Al-Azhar institution in Egypt's capital Cairo, a centre of Sunni Islam thought which was founded in around AD970 and includes a university and a mosque.

'Al-Azhar... renews its objection to any act depicting the messengers and prophets of God and the companions of the Prophet (Mohammad), peace be upon him,' it announced in a statement.

The fatwa added that the depictions 'provoke the feelings of believers... and are forbidden in Islam and a clear violation of Islamic law'.

The film also stars Anthony Hopkins and Emma Watson and will premiere in the U.S. on March 28.

Depictions of the Prophet Mohammad in European and North American media have repeatedly sparked deadly protests in Islamic countries over the last decade, fanning cultural tensions with the West.

The worst riots were triggered after the Prophet Mohammad was depicted in a Danish newspaper in 2006. It sparked protests in the Middle East, Africa and Asia in which at least 50 people died.

A spokesman for Paramount Pictures said: 'Censors for Qatar, Bahrain and the UAE (United Arab Emirates) officially confirmed this week that the film will not release in their countries.

'The official statement they offered in confirming this news is because "it contradicts the teachings of Islam",' the representative said, adding the studio expected a similar ban in Egypt, Jordan and Kuwait.

Perhaps wisely the filming took place nowhere near the Middle East, instead being carried out in New York State and in Southern Iceland.

Harry Potter star Emma Watson plays the adopted daughter of the prophet, while screen legend Anthony Hopkins stars as his sagely grandfather.

Jennifer Connelly will play Naameh, Noah's wife. She won an Oscar for best supporting actress for her appearance alongside Crowe in A Beautiful Mind (2001).

The title role was reportedly offered to Michael Fassbender and Christian Bale - both of whom declined.

Jerry A. Johnson, president of a conservative National Religious Broadcasters (NRB) group, said last month he wanted to 'make sure everyone who sees this impactful film knows this is an imaginative interpretation of Scripture, and not literal.'

Paramount responded by agreeing to issue a disclaimer on advertising for the film.

'While artistic license has been taken, we believe that this film is true to the essence, values and integrity of a story that is a cornerstone of faith for millions of people worldwide,' it reads.

The film is not the first to stoke controversy among Muslims.

Mel Gibson's 2004 film The Passion of the Christ, showing Jesus's crucifixion, was widely screened in the Arab World despite objections by Muslim clerics.

A 2012, an amateur Youtube video deriding the Prophet Mohammad which was produced in California stoked protests throughout the region, and may have contributed to a deadly militant raid in Libya which killed the U.S. ambassador and three other American staff.

Here are the 2 best comments from the comment section:

The hypocrisy of these people with a religious axe to grind never ceases to amaze me. They always seem to conveniently forget that all religions teach tolerance of others.

And

Everyday people pick and chose what part of their own religion they want to follow. Bend rules to justify wars and hate but as soon as Hollywood want play with it it's a no no. get a grip!

I wasn't interested before, I sure am now!
 
Gimpy said:
SeekinTruth said:
Why do they call a movie that's not yet released a "blockbuster?"

I think its part of priming people to 'eat mental-junk-food.'

Yeah. That's typically based on the movie's budget. It's also something the studio's advertising will push to increase ticket sales. If it's a blockbuster, no one will want to miss it, otherwise you're the odd one out when everyone around you is talking about it! :rolleyes:
 
Inspired by God, made by Jew, condemned by both Christians and Muslims, this year, comes a story that is a cornerstone of faith for millions of people worldwide, like you've never seen before!

:D
 
Heimdallr said:
Gimpy said:
SeekinTruth said:
Why do they call a movie that's not yet released a "blockbuster?"

I think its part of priming people to 'eat mental-junk-food.'

Yeah. That's typically based on the movie's budget. It's also something the studio's advertising will push to increase ticket sales. If it's a blockbuster, no one will want to miss it, otherwise you're the odd one out when everyone around you is talking about it! :rolleyes:
Exactly. And it's like that the movie is already sold before being carried out, as part of deviant "create the reality" and make more money (same with the food industry or big pharma). That also reminds me the laughs recorded for sitcoms. That is, you have to laugh! It's a great show!, don't give you other options to thinking differently.
Thanks for the article, Gimpy. Very interesting.
 
Yeah, exactly. I understand what they're up to. But it struck me as particularly obvious manipulation to state that the premier is coming up while calling it a blockbuster and including that in the title of the article as well. For all we know, it will flop at the box office. But at this point, I don't think many people notice this kind of constant nonsense and obvious manipulation by the media.
 
SeekinTruth said:
But it struck me as particularly obvious manipulation to state that the premier is coming up while calling it a blockbuster and including that in the title of the article as well. For all we know, it will flop at the box office. But at this point, I don't think many people notice this kind of constant nonsense and obvious manipulation by the media.

So, if it flops it will then be flopped blockbuster which never blockbusted. :lol:
 
Funny, as mentioned above.... it's only a 'blockbuster' if it is a 'smash' at the box office at least during opening weekend... thus busting the block... not busting the budget, which happens quite often and would seem to make many films 'blockbusters', no matter how little they return in sales.... if sales are slow but continue to come in, it receives the title of a 'sleeper', which isn't a bad thing, but if your investment starts at $75 million before distribution costs even begin, then you're looking at a minimum of $100 million just to break even, and sleepers take a long time to do just that.

Some people are going to go to some film that weekend, unless Mother Nature prevents them, so the contest is between the new opening films vs those held over from previous week/s... thus the screenings and phone/internet etc surveys to determine interest in the film, it's stars, subject matter etc. Seems the Daily Mail is jumping the gun a little here, perhaps intentionally per contractual obligations to promote the film? Making it seem controversial and build up some interest, which will continue to be assessed by those tracking surveys up to and thru it's opening weekend, after which it goes to the continuing list and the next set of potential moneymakers get the prime push for the public's attention, not to mention the push for advertising of the product, as the distributor doesn't want to throw good money down the drain on a film that looks to be a dud, if the surveys etc don't come back with a minimum amount of interest, then the marketing dept will tighten the belt on any further expenditure of funds and that seems to be the play on this project currently, a test of the market.
 
Back
Top Bottom