While at the same time, beaten by the impossible competition, less and less humans artists are going to be impregnating the AIs training algorithms with the genuine creative sperm of new and original art.
Yes, unfortunately.
I can use AI to improve my workflow in terms of video editing and photography. In that sense it is absurdly surprising the working hours that have been reduced.
I have been an artistic illustrator since a very early age. I have left it with time and with the AI I do exactly, in style, what I have wanted to do for years, and a drawing that lasted to make months, even years. Now I do it in less than 5 minutes and with more than one different result... it's amazing really, but obviously it doesn't feel like something I've created as by drawing on paper, it will never be the same.
The other advantage, I can do it without spending a lot of money on a wacom board or buying programs, especially because I can't afford it because of my geographical location, which AI has been an advantage in that sense. But it is certainly leaving aside that "human essence". It is not the same whether one is the one who is behind giving indications, it is not the same, that lack of effort, of energy invested, the process of thinking about the process, will never be the same and will be lost for choosing the most comfortable. We see it every day on YouTube "without the need for you to study, or read books, just ask chat gpt"... the tool that, in my opinion, is "think for me"...
This change will obviously come according to people's awareness of preferring something less real, of giving it a meaning that makes it valid according to their beliefs and how disconnected it is even from itself because it is a tool that is based more on "making our desires/whims/base instincts come true/" It is in itself a self-gratification app and that in a certain sense serves as a catalyst to our desiring thoughts, according to its use.
You can create whatever you want.
As for replacing the strong work of other artists, well, that's the dilemma even with copyright. And yes, it is a problem because I have already seen models to use according to the style of great artists such as centuries ago and Moderna. Many centuries of art within reach of a prompt.
As far as I have observed, most people only create for leisure because we are talking about people
who don't even have the ability to draw, to take a photo, to edit video, etc. That's the pot of gold in all this because AI now allows them to access "the creation" of their desires. Some have already used them to generate fake news. A freelance journalist
no longer needs a photographer to go to the scene, he creates it with AI and we have people hooked on that as well.
And we have these kind of people, which is what I think should be maintained but we already know that it won't be like that:
https://edition.cnn.com/style/article/ai-photo-win-sony-scli-intl/index.html
The German photographer Boris Eldagsen rejected last week the Sony World Photography Awards photography award, in the Creative category, for having created the winning image with artificial intelligence, as revealed on his website by the artist himself.
The German photographer Boris Eldagsen rejected last week the Sony World Photography Awards photography award, in the Creative category, for having created the winning image with artificial intelligence, as revealed on his website by the artist himself.
Eldagsen said he hoped his actions would open up the conversation around this issue and lead to "separate contests for AI-generated imagery."
He continued: "Artificial intelligence images and photography should not compete with each other in an award like this. They are different areas. Artificial intelligence is not photography. Therefore, I will not accept the award."
While they improve the Ai in terms of hands, eyes and size, with some arrangements in photoshop to simulate the finishes and effects left by a brush, it would be suitable for an AI museum and goodbye Caravaggio
So let's go to the same as always, the problem is not the tools themselves,
it's the use they are given.
Historically according to what I read in the book of "T
he secret history of the world", there is a very exact theme about it and that today we are modernly precensing
"the spiteful destruction of beauty".
One thing led me to another.
