Dee's Calendar vs. Gregory's Calendar

Mikey

The Living Force
Laura said:
James Henry said:
I also think a new calendar with marks for important dates and astronomical observances with some chose pictures would be a great idea. Each year a new one could be purchased as a reminder of our true point in history and another way to help the efforts of The FotCM.

Ya'll might want to read Bill Napier's action thriller "Shattered Icon" about another calendar system that we may want to implement.

Attached are the relevant 3 pages from the book. Napier is introducing Dee's Calendar into his story, which is identical to the Gregorian Calendar, but with improved distribution of leap years, keeping better in sync with the astronomical seasons. Our current Gregorian calendar will deviate from the astronomical seasons by 1 day in 3,300 years (or 1 day in 7,700 years with precession of the equinoxes considered).
 

Attachments

I just finished reading Bill Napier's book, Shattered Icon last night. He mentions another book, Marking Time by Duncan Steel, an English space scientist, which may help to explain the significance of calenders.

"Our various calendars are part of the music and art of life, not stark science." —Duncan Steel Did you know?… Russia’s October Revolution in 1917 actually occurred on November 7th For centuries, Britain and the colonies rang in the New Year on March 25th The Roman Empire originally observed an eight–day week The anno Domini (A.D.) year–counting system is wrong, and Jesus’ birth actually occurred some years before December 25, I B.C. These are just a few of the little–known facts that you will find in acclaimed author Duncan Steel’s eye–opening chronicle of the evolution of the calendar, Marking Time: The Epic Quest to Invent the Perfect Calendar. Steel takes you across the full span of recorded history, behind the seismic shifts within politics., religion, and science, and examines the ways in which people and events forged the calendar that we have today. Starting with Stonehenge and the first written records of the year and the day by the Sumerians around 3500 B.C., Marking Time charts the calendar’s ever–changing, erratic trajectory—from the Egyptians’ reliance on the star Sirius to the numbering of the years, linked to the celebration of Easter in Christian churches. You will also gain insight into: The mystery of the missing ten days The Venerable Bede and the origins of the anno Domini dating system How and why comets have been used as clocks Julius Caesar’s 445–day–long Year of Confusion Why there is no year zero between I B.C. and I A.D. Whether the year 2100 should be a double–leap year A provocative history lesson and a unique, entertaining read rolled into one, Marking Time will leave you with a sense of awe at the random, hit–or–miss nature of our calendar’s development—a quality that parallels the growth of civilization itself. What results is a truthful, and, above all, very human view of the calendar as we know it. After reading Marking Time, you will never look at the calendar the same way again. --This text refers to an out of print or unavailable edition of this title.

http://www.amazon.co.uk/Marking-Time-Invent-Perfect-Calendar/dp/0471404217/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1409418696&sr=1-1&keywords=marking+time+duncan+steel

I can understand to an extent how important an accurate calender is, to record events, see patterns over a long period of time etc (like correlation of cyclical catastrophes / prevalent psychopathic systems) but I am struggling to fully understand the significance of wanting to implement another calender. Aside from the fact that the current Gregorian calender which I gather was politically motivated, there is a deviation (1 day in 3,300 years) issue - and is not therefore accurate (particularly as the earth is slowing down!).

On time scales of thousands of years, the Gregorian calendar falls behind the astronomical seasons because the slowing down of the Earth's rotation makes each day slightly longer over time

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gregorian_calendar#Accuracy

(Pierre) Maybe you can ask this question. Caesar was born roughly 2,114 years ago according to our official calendars. In reality, how many years ago was Caesar born?

A: 1635. {Difference of 479 years}

So having a calender based on scientific and historical facts (as much as possible), allowing for deviations (such as Earth slow down), modified as necessary - is more aligned with Truth. Essentially then, by adopting such a calender, I wonder would we be creating a different reality?
 
Back
Top Bottom