Electric Universe/Thunderbolts Project

[paralleloscope]

Here's the latest thunderbolts release where Thornhill claims that "brown dwarfs are the cosmic wombs of life" and speculates that Saturn was the womb were earth and mars were formed. Also; Gas giants taken out of solar system would become brown dwarfs, I don't think he offers an explanation for that specifically or maybe I missed it? Interesting stuff, nevertheless.

http://<iframe width="640" height="...9g" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

 

[SMM]

Here's the latest thunderbolts release where Thornhill claims that "brown dwarfs are the cosmic wombs of life" and speculates that Saturn was the womb were earth and mars were formed. Also; Gas giants taken out of solar system would become brown dwarfs, I don't think he offers an explanation for that specifically or maybe I missed it? Interesting stuff, nevertheless.

http://<iframe width="640" height="...9g" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

Hmm... I watched the video this morning. His reasoning, if I remember, is that brown dwarfs are not necessary dead stars as we understand them. That electrical interaction between solar systems occur. Mars and Earth are still affected by Saturn's activity... and that fusion doesn't takes place in brown dwarfs?

I think he proposed fission occurs, that satellites such as Titan orbiting Saturn could one day become habitable like Earth.

Wallace mentioned that Mars once being able to sustain life could be explained by its water and nitrogen concentrations. And Venus is a young planet formed from catastrophe, so as current planets "age" they become gas giants then those gas giants become brown dwarfs.

Now that I think of it, I can't remember if he gives an explanation in the details. I'll keep an eye out when I watch it again. Thanks for posting Parallel.

This link gives a pretty good explanation of how outgassing occurs (ie methane becomes more CO2 in the atmosphere). I'm not too well versed on this, but I can see how seismic activity on the ocean floor could significantly increase CO2, even without any interference from man!

Thanks! I understand now. That actually can explain a lot! :)

Thanks Lilou for the link :)

 

[Yas]

Ben Davidson aka. Suspicious0bservers presentation was just published:

I have to say: Good job!

Most excellent video!

Agreed. The evidence is compelling and it was clearly and brilliantly explained.

I also didn't know that Ben Davidson actually is Sispicious0bservers.

Great job!

I've found this video SOOO great that I actually want to translate it so that more people can see it! ;)

I think this one is also very interesting:

http://<iframe width="853" height="...gU" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

 

[cubbie]

I've found this video SOOO great that I actually want to translate it so that more people can see it! ;)

I think this one is also very interesting:

http://<iframe width="853" height="...gU" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

Dr Michael Clarage's findings are extremely interesting. "As above, so below"!

 

[Ares]

Tunnel Vision indeed. My personal opinion is similar too.

I don't think any of the camps (thornbill with electric universe, firestone on comets bringing destruction etc.) have the whole banana because they come from very specific backgrounds and areas of focus. This seems to makes them unintentionally blind to new types of data from diverse sources.

Obviously a lot of things can affect us and bring death and destruction our way. I find the stellar formation of the EU model utterly fascinating ( and seems very logical to me), but then if indeed there is a cyclical bunch of comets entering the solar system at specific intervals, i also seems logical to state that the destruction caused is not just physical/kinetic, but electric in nature.

I think the EU guys seems to be saying that the electrical interaction is much more destructive and common than impact related ones. In their view, the craters on the moon and the valleys of mars for example were created more by electrical interactions than comets impacting their surface. I'm not sure if Thornbill et al have read the works of Firestone and others extensively.

either ways, I guess we shall soon find out.

 

[anka]

oming

I think the EU guys seems to be saying that the electrical interaction is much more destructive and common than impact related ones. In their view, the craters on the moon and the valleys of mars for example were created more by electrical interactions than comets impacting their surface. I'm not sure if Thornbill et al have read the works of Firestone and others extensively.

either ways, I guess we shall soon find out.

I think the point here is that electric interactions between bodies (planet vs even a small or regular comet highly charged) are much, much more common than actual impacts and therefore the claim that most of the landscapes have been formed by those interactions. That does not mean there are no craters created by direct impacts. So both crews can be right and I think they are.

If the potential danger was only coming from direct impacts of lonely big bodies, we could probably sleep happily, hoping that probability is somewhat low. But when it comes to electric discharges, and even more so with humans (electrically active on many levels), we as a species should be running around pretty scared upon realization what the hell we are doing/causing here with our behaviour and what sort of disaster we are attracting upon us - many little "devils" coming at once.

But then, that's what was meant to be. Above is reflected below and vice versa. Most of us are sleeping rats and get what we deserve. Nothing wrong with that in the grand cosmic scheme. And if some of us find the way out, it will be through the process of learning and hard work. Anyone up for having fun? ;)

>> suggestion to the mods >>
Shouldn't this thread be merged with the little forgotten Electric Universe Theory?
_http://cassiopaea.org/forum/index.php/topic,1574.0.html

 

[mkrnhr]

For those interested in monitoring the Sun and the eventual event-related weather/seismic on Earth, Suspicious0bservers are releasing a series of videos on the different manifestations of Solar activity that can be monitored from Earth (through the internet to be exact). You can check out the series here: _https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLHSoxioQtwZcJj_9clLz7Bggso7qg2PDj

 

[Voyageur]

For those interested in monitoring the Sun and the eventual event-related weather/seismic on Earth, Suspicious0bservers are releasing a series of videos on the different manifestations of Solar activity that can be monitored from Earth (through the internet to be exact). You can check out the series here: _https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLHSoxioQtwZcJj_9clLz7Bggso7qg2PDj

Thank you, looks good (bookmarked for further study).

 

[STARSEED]

Plasma cosmology of the formation of the Universe.
One aspect describes a time when Earth and a couple of other planets orbited Saturn not Sol. The Zone and condition of Saturn was such that Saturn was in Glow mode and and our planet was in that field of energy this had a number of features no day/night, no seasons and bathed in a permanent Purple light .....The Garden of Eden.
A wandering star Sol with a couple of planets appeared and all the planetary spheres rearranged around Sol including Saturn. The Fall.

 

[Steph_rivers]

Plasma cosmology of the formation of the Universe.
One aspect describes a time when Earth and a couple of other planets orbited Saturn not Sol. The Zone and condition of Saturn was such that Saturn was in Glow mode and and our planet was in that field of energy this had a number of features no day/night, no seasons and bathed in a permanent Purple light .....The Garden of Eden.
A wandering star Sol with a couple of planets appeared and all the planetary spheres rearranged around Sol including Saturn. The Fall.

Secret History of the world and Comets & the Horns of Moses can provide additional info on the historical aspect of "Saturn" as a influence on our ancient planet.

 

[axj]

One aspect describes a time when Earth and a couple of other planets orbited Saturn not Sol.

That is one of the things that seems to be incorrect among the theories of the Thunderbolts group.

Their research on the plasma discharge origin of the Martian landscape is very impressive though - not just the Valles Marineris, but also the shield volcanoes like Olympus Mons clearly originated from interplanetary plasma discharges.

 

[Kadam303]

Explore how plasma storms might have shaped Earth's landscape. This Thunderbolts Project video examines geological formations, comparing electric universe theories with established science. Jupiter's storms offer surprising parallels to ancient Earth events.

Proving that plasma winds electrically scoured the Earth, built mountains and carved canyons, is a tall order in the face of more than a century of consensus science saying otherwise. In prior times, Electric Universe theories (i.e.– the EU Model) might have been readily accepted, since religions and mythologies explicitly state the gods of creation were storms, lightning and thunder.Modern scientists think ancient myths express the superstitious anxieties of people ignorant of cause and effect. They dismiss any notions about cycles of catastrophe by insisting geology is an exceedingly slow process of change due primarily to chemistry and erosion, insisting that time itself is the proof—billions of years—so, who can argue with that?The EU Model views the Earth, Sun, Solar System, and in fact, the entire Universe, as a composition of connected electric circuits, and the electric charge as the cause of all the effects. The weather did actually shape the landscape of Earth, much as mythologies say, during highly kinetic plasma storms.Author and engineer Andrew Hall accepts the challenge from geologist Myron Cook (link below) to provide an alternative to the classic geological theory of how the Sheep Mountain anticline was formed in Wyoming USA. Andy sees evidence of Plasma Orogeny, a process in which a section of the earth's crust is folded and deformed by lateral compression, as a verifiable simple and elegant confirmation—whereas the consensus requires a narrative built of dogmas and unverified assumptions.Please compare Myron Cook's explanations to Andy Hall's and determine for yourself which fits best—then feel free to share your thoughts in the YouTube comments.