I've noticed with this storm over the weekend here in Cape Town, is that bursts of heavy rain seem correlate very strongly with thunder and lightning. I don't just mean that there tends to be heavier rain when it thunders in general, it's really as though the lightning triggers rain somehow and possibly vice versa.
It wasn't to find data on just such a correlation:
_http://www.gr.ssr.upm.es/~jambrina/rayos/www.nwstc.kc.noaa.gov/d.HMD/Lightning/Hvyrain.htm
and the actual paper:
_http://www.nwas.org/digest/papers/1993/Vol18-Issue3-Dec1993/Pg2-Kane.pdf
Everyday experience tells us that thunderstorms bring rain, but this shows a correlation locally within storms. Nowhere do you ever hear about such tight correlations between different parts weather that occur within a system, as though we are to take for granted that it's all a random smörgåsbord of events. Not surprising as rain, snow, lightning, etc, are all taught as isolated phenomena, that they are more or less caused by similar factors but have little to do with each.
The idea that I have at the moment is that the increased precipitation has something to do with the discharge of electricity, or perhaps release of energy in a more general sense. Further research along this line could bring us closer to understanding how rain gets to be conductive in the first place (note the C's comment in the recent session was "rain can conduct")
It wasn't to find data on just such a correlation:
_http://www.gr.ssr.upm.es/~jambrina/rayos/www.nwstc.kc.noaa.gov/d.HMD/Lightning/Hvyrain.htm
A study by Kane (1993) showed the temporal and spatial relationships between CG [cloud-to-ground] lightning and precipitation during an isolated slow-moving nocturnal thunderstorm over the Mid-Atlantic states. The thunderstorm propagated slowly southward and resulted in a localized precipitation maximum of 11 cm (over 4 in). The lightning flash density field was compared to the rainfall pattern and the volumetric and spatial distribution of rainfall were related to the concentration of CG strikes. Kane found that the maximum rainfall coincided well with those areas which received the highest concentration of CG strikes. The greatest concentration of CG strikes (57% of the total storm CG strikes) produced just over half of the total volumetric precipitation over only 16% of the area that received rainfall. The heaviest rainfall at the National Weather Service forecast office in Sterling, Virginia began just after the 5 min CG lightning peaked within 6, 9, 12 mi. (10, 20, 30 km) radii of the office. The greatest rainfall rate was recorded in the 5 to 40 min period following the peak in the 5 min CG lightning at the office.
and the actual paper:
_http://www.nwas.org/digest/papers/1993/Vol18-Issue3-Dec1993/Pg2-Kane.pdf
Everyday experience tells us that thunderstorms bring rain, but this shows a correlation locally within storms. Nowhere do you ever hear about such tight correlations between different parts weather that occur within a system, as though we are to take for granted that it's all a random smörgåsbord of events. Not surprising as rain, snow, lightning, etc, are all taught as isolated phenomena, that they are more or less caused by similar factors but have little to do with each.
The idea that I have at the moment is that the increased precipitation has something to do with the discharge of electricity, or perhaps release of energy in a more general sense. Further research along this line could bring us closer to understanding how rain gets to be conductive in the first place (note the C's comment in the recent session was "rain can conduct")
