Emotional & Intellectual Center Learn better together?

Menna

The Living Force
Over the past year and a half I have studied for 6 tests and past 6 tests. When I am studying taking notes and reading over notes I feel that I slowly pick up the material. As I am reading over notes that I wrote last week or last month I remember some information on certain pages better than others. I guess I was more present on those days based on other factors. The one thing that I have noticed that has a dramatic impact on my learning is when I take practice tests or quizzes. Whenever I would receive feedback from the practice exam I would put importance on this feedback as it was an indicator if I was ready to take the actual test if i was going to pass or need to study longer (negative consequence). If I received a red X next to certain answers I would remember those answers better than if I was reading the answer in my note book or hearing information on audio tape. There was no emotional feeling of I am wrong, I need to know this, I might fail, I am upset or frustrated I didn't get it right when looking over the same information on paper or hearing it on tape however the same information in test format indicating right or wrong has had a positive impact on me in terms of learning retention and has enhanced my learning process.

I feel that I learn better when the emotional center and intellectual center are working at the same time when there is an emotional reaction as the intellectual center is working. It leads to a stronger memory/learning process in me.

I am posting in this section because I would like to see if this can be verified from a psychological/cognitive science viewpoint. Instead of me commenting esoterically emotional center this or intellectual center that I want to understand this process how these emotions enhance feedback in the brain.
 
Re: Emotional & Intelectual Center Learn better together?

Learning and memory are indeed enhanced by emotion and mistakes (which can be equated to a form of emotional pain). One can observe that we don't keep in memory every occurrence in our lives unless it's associated with an emotion, t that can be extended to the learning process as well. From the evolution viewpoint, there is an urgency in learning something when a situation triggers emotion, due to novelty or danger. A quick search on SOTT returned many entries relating to this issue, for example:

Emotions directly influence processes of learning and memory in the brain
 
I've always felt that the intellectual center in itself is quite "weak" and uninspiring. Think about dry philosophy.
But when it gets charged with emotion, it suddenly becomes inspiring and able to move people.
Isn't one of the reasons why trauma and grief haunt people for so long because they're always emotionally charged?
After all, we don't remember things our memory considers insignificant- what precisely was on your last shopping list or what numbers were on the car license plates of other cars as you drove down the road last week. That sort of dry information isn't of immediate concern to us and neither does it touch us.
 
And without that emotional charge, there doesn't seem to be much left out of any experience to consider/evaluate.... the memories seem vague and/or no longer of interest... nothing left to process it seems, which does leave one in the present moment more and less in those past memories that 'dog' you otherwise.... the memories are there, but like data points looking for pattern recognition only... unless and/or until another emotion triggers a connected charge again... leading to pattern recognition of its delination, archetype or energy expression.... file it, but once recognized, the charge fades rather fast, and trying to hang on for further analysis or expression just doesn't work. ;) Makes you appreciate that 100x multipler affect when it kicks in.
 
I've been thinking about this also, it seems to me that there are layers of memory, that these levels or layers determine the level of importance,
but as always , a big factor when we are grown or have programs, the information sometimes bounces off or doesn't sink in, because our internal organization is fixed to ideas and so on, preventing assimilation of information, such as the case of cognitive dissonance, consciously or unconsciously refusing the information or putting it on a memory level where it shouldn't belong.

From memory to learning is a long trench, i wanna say the layers or levels of memory are set by mechanical factors, to organize information according to the importance in life, if the information is crucial to one's survival such as eating the body's instinctive center will make the association for us, if is something non escential such as playing a musical instrument the all three centers have to act in unison and memory must be forced, but in the case of the musical instrument you have the person who likes it and the person who doesn't.
The person who likes it, finds it easy to memorize because the joy and pleasure associated with the learning and experiencing of the music,
The person who does not like it, finds a wall or walls, that refuses and rejects the entry of the information or makes it many times less likely to be absorbed.
regardless whether it is the same brain and the same body type, the brain simply refuses to assimilate the information as one level or another, but the same happens when a person who likes music finds himself frustrated by feeling "stuck". the information bounces off and doesn't sink in.

In all cases the emotional center is mechanically design to assist memory with emotions.
In cases where the learning is forced also the reward mechanism is also at play, thus the memory is also stored,
Also , different emotions give character to the information being stored.

Found this on _http://www.human-memory.net/processes_encoding.html

Encoding is the crucial first step to creating a new memory. It allows the perceived item of interest to be converted into a construct that can be stored within the brain, and then recalled later from short-term or long-term memory.

Encoding is a biological event beginning with perception through the senses. The process of laying down a memory begins with attention (regulated by the thalamus and the frontal lobe), in which a memorable event causes neurons to fire more frequently, making the experience more intense and increasing the likelihood that the event is encoded as a memory. Emotion tends to increase attention, and the emotional element of an event is processed on an unconscious pathway in the brain leading to the amygdala. Only then are the actual sensations derived from an event processed.

The perceived sensations are decoded in the various sensory areas of the cortex, and then combined in the brain’s hippocampus into one single experience. The hippocampus is then responsible for analyzing these inputs and ultimately deciding if they will be committed to long-term memory. It acts as a kind of sorting centre where the new sensations are compared and associated with previously recorded ones. The various threads of information are then stored in various different parts of the brain, although the exact way in which these pieces are identified and recalled later remains largely unknown. The key role that the hippocampus plays in memory encoding has been highlighted by examples of individuals who have had their hippocampus damaged or removed and can no longer create new memories (see Anterograde Amnesia). It is also one of the few areas of the brain where completely new neurons can grow.

Although the exact mechanism is not completely understood, encoding occurs on different levels, the first step being the formation of short-term memory from the ultra-short term sensory memory, followed by the conversion to a long-term memory by a process of memory consolidation. The process begins with the creation of a memory trace or engram in response to the external stimuli. An engram is a hypothetical biophysical or biochemical change in the neurons of the brain, hypothetical in the respect that no-one has ever actually seen, or even proved the existence of, such a construct[...]}

Menna
It is very possible that your brain is arranged in a way so as to function under pressure, because this level of stress aids the memory process, as a result of the incoming information not causing enough emotional impact so as to be remembered or stored in the brain. I guess that is very common, but when you explain that some days and some passages or answers you can remember more or less, is because the factors you mention prevented so, so the factors themselves are such that interfere with the learning process because the body emotion and mind of yours was more concerned with processing the aforementioned factors than in the actual study, could very well be that the factors compromised part/parts of you (I's) , physical hunger or had a more important emotional/psychological value than the study.

To me personally it was more important learning the logic behind it so then everything else falls into place, like a map, so if it was math i never did good memorizing bits and pieces, until i understood the logic behind it, i could then learn with relative with little effort. Learning is more important to me that memorizing in the sense that is makes it many times easier. an example is the logic behind multiplication and division of fractions, it never made sense to me until i turned the attention to the actual numbers and the logic behind the formula rather than memorizing the formula. . In that case, then the reward mechanism works by means of anticipation and other processes involving emotional reward and a second effort to actually understand.



A note about psychopaths _http://discovermagazine.com/2016/june/12-psychopath-and-the-hare

Psychopaths' brain scans exhibit little change between neutral and emotional words, and they have much less brain activity, compared with a non-psychopaths brain.

Psychopaths can also make use of memories, as described in the link about memory, the information is stored all throughout the cortex and the amygdala stores the emotions associated with the memory, however the way they are configured does not lead to learning by conscious effort, or lack of emotional significance to an event so their brains allows them to memorize without emotional boundaries, or emotional categorization , but therefore in much worse quality, limited to only physical impulses rather than a full spectrum of sensations possible to non psychopaths.
 
"It seems that when the emotion is social and positive, the brain tells the different areas to work according to one communication protocol. When a different emotion is involved, such a negative emotion of fear as in our experiment, the brain tells the same areas to use a different communication protocol."

O lord it looks like my memory and learning process is better when a negative emotion arises in me when studying such as getting an answer wrong or fear that I won't pass a test or that I wont complete the assignment on time. It seems that my mind works better this way. This is exactly the habit that I would like to break to not use negative emotions to enhance learning. It looks like I have some nurological pathways to change. After reading "When the body says no" the last thing I want to do is seek out or rely or have a habit of inducing negative emotional state to learn more efficiently.
 
Menna said:
O lord it looks like my memory and learning process is better when a negative emotion arises in me when studying such as getting an answer wrong or fear that I won't pass a test or that I wont complete the assignment on time. It seems that my mind works better this way. This is exactly the habit that I would like to break to not use negative emotions to enhance learning. It looks like I have some nurological pathways to change. After reading "When the body says no" the last thing I want to do is seek out or rely or have a habit of inducing negative emotional state to learn more efficiently.

Hi Menna,
Have you read "Thinking: Fast and Slow"? It is discussed in this thread and the first few posts discuss the relation between emotional state and system2. In a nutshell, there is a certain optimal level of alertness/awareness where learning is facilitated. Too much fear or negative emotion hinders learning, and so does an overly pleasurable or positive mood. This can be verified from experience. A slight negative bias may, in general, be the state where learning is efficient. At least that is what statistical observations say.
 
Menna said:
"It seems that when the emotion is social and positive, the brain tells the different areas to work according to one communication protocol. When a different emotion is involved, such a negative emotion of fear as in our experiment, the brain tells the same areas to use a different communication protocol."

O lord it looks like my memory and learning process is better when a negative emotion arises in me when studying such as getting an answer wrong or fear that I won't pass a test or that I wont complete the assignment on time. It seems that my mind works better this way. This is exactly the habit that I would like to break to not use negative emotions to enhance learning. It looks like I have some nurological pathways to change. After reading "When the body says no" the last thing I want to do is seek out or rely or have a habit of inducing negative emotional state to learn more efficiently.

I think when I'm interested in what I'm learning I get excited to some degree when I learn, and excitement is an emotion. When I'm not interested in what I'm learning I get bored, and I find it hard to concentrate.

FWIW
 
BDNF seems to be important for learning because it helps grow your neurons, like fertiliser for the brain. I found this study online which seems to say that fear also stimulates the expression of BDNF. Another way to stimulate BDNF expression is exercise.

http://m.molpharm.aspetjournals.org/content/72/2/235.full
Despite the traditional popularity of the hippocampus in all matters of learning and memory, there is increasing empirical support for the role of another structure—the amygdala—in the types of synaptic changes facilitated by BDNF. In particular, mounting evidence now indicates a role for BDNF signaling in the basal and lateral nuclei of the amygdala (Rattiner et al., 2004a; Ou and Gean, 2006), areas known to be necessary for the formation of learned fear associations (LeDoux, 2000). Because the amygdala has been implicated in many pathologic conditions, including post-traumatic stress (Garakani et al., 2006), anxiety (Rauch et al., 2006), and autism spectrum disorders (Baron-Cohen et al., 2000; Bachevalier and Loveland, 2006), considerable efforts have been devoted to the characterization of this circuitry as a central site for emotion-induced neuronal plasticity (LeDoux, 2000; Maren, 2001; Paré et al., 2004; Wilensky et al., 2006). A number of studies have shown, using Pavlovian fear conditioning paradigms, that the physiological basis for such changes begins with the relay of sensory information from the medial geniculate nucleus of the thalamus to the lateral amygdala (LA), where the initial association is made via an LTP-like mechanism, followed by the intra-amygdala transfer of signals to the central nucleus of the amygdala, which facilitates the expression of a fear response by way of projections to brainstem and hypothalamic targets (Davis, 1997; LeDoux, 2000; Paré et al., 2004). Together, these findings support the notion that changes in synaptic strength are required for the acquisition of emotional memories. At a more profound level, however, our knowledge of these larger-scale anatomical modifications remains bound by our more limited comprehension of the molecular machinery governing those changes.
 

Trending content

Back
Top Bottom