Evidence Mounts that Our Sun May Have a Companion

Laura

Administrator
Administrator
Moderator
FOTCM Member
http://www.redorbit.com/news/space/481958/evidence_mounts_that_our_sun_may_have_a_companion/index.html


NEWPORT BEACH, CA -- The Binary Research Institute (BRI) has found that orbital characteristics of the recently discovered planetoid, "Sedna", demonstrate the possibility that our sun might be part of a binary star system.

A binary star system consists of two stars gravitationally bound orbiting a common center of mass. Once thought to be highly unusual, such systems are now considered to be common in the Milky Way galaxy.

Walter Cruttenden at BRI, Professor Richard Muller at UC Berkeley, Dr. Daniel Whitmire of the University of Louisiana, amongst several others, have long speculated on the possibility that our sun might have an as yet undiscovered companion.

Most of the evidence has been statistical rather than physical. The recent discovery of Sedna, a small planet like object first detected by Cal Tech astronomer Dr. Michael Brown, provides what could be indirect physical evidence of a solar companion.

Matching the recent findings by Dr. Brown, showing that Sedna moves in a highly unusual elliptical orbit, Cruttenden has determined that Sedna moves in resonance with previously published orbital data for a hypothetical companion star.

In the May 2006 issue of Discover, Dr. Brown stated: "Sedna shouldn't be there. There's no way to put Sedna where it is. It never comes close enough to be affected by the sun, but it never goes far enough away from the sun to be affected by other stars... Sedna is stuck, frozen in place; there's no way to move it, basically there's no way to put it there - unless it formed there. But it's in a very elliptical orbit like that. It simply can't be there. There's no possible way - except it is. So how, then?"

"I'm thinking it was placed there in the earliest history of the solar system. I'm thinking it could have gotten there if there used to be stars a lot closer than they are now and those stars affected Sedna on the outer part of its orbit and then later on moved away. So I call Sedna a fossil record of the earliest solar system. Eventually, when other fossil records are found, Sedna will help tell us how the sun formed and the number of stars that were close to the sun when it formed."

Walter Cruttenden agrees that Sedna's highly elliptical orbit is very unusual, but noted that the orbit period of 12,000 years is in neat resonance with the expected orbit periodicity of a companion star as outlined in several prior papers.

Consequently, Cruttenden believes that Sedna's unusual orbit is something indicative of the current solar system configuration, not merely a historical record. "It is hard to imagine that Sedna would retain its highly elliptical orbit pattern since the beginning of the solar system billions of years ago. Because eccentricity would likely fade with time, it is logical to assume Sedna is telling us something about current, albeit unexpected solar system forces, most probably a companion star".

Outside of a few popular articles, and Cruttenden's book "Lost Star of Myth and Time", which outlines historical references and the modern search for the elusive companion, the possibility of a binary partner star to our sun has been left to the halls of academia.

But with Dr. Brown's recent discoveries of Sedna and Xena, (now confirmed to be larger than Pluto), and timing observations like Cruttenden's, the search for a companion star may be gaining momentum.
 
Thanks for sharing this article and your thoughts Laura,

I had seen this article a little while ago nearer to the original posting date, and thought to myself how it was funny that is was nearly the sixth article on more mainstream sites than usual that were starting to promote the idea of the twin-sun theory that the Cassiopaeans shared with you in your work. From my limited knowledge of stellar mechanics and the working of the universe at large, I would say that it is more likely for our solar system to be part of binary pair star system than a mono-star system. It would help to explain many of the anomalies that have been found and are yet to be found that our current mainstream understanding of our own solar system fails to explain.

I have shared the theories and information from your work here on site with many of my friends and family, whom themselves may think there is something hidden from us about our own solar system and our place in it and think there may be a lot of truth to the work being done on site here.

While I don't really have any further information I could share from my limited knowledge about the related twin star, Im gratefull for mentioning the title of Walter Cruttenden's book ,and I will add it to my growing reading list.

I was sent a curious text message by my partner yesterday I thought I'd share. It explained how an Aunt of hers had told her that she knows, or knows off, two British scientists who claim to have found a small planetoid type object rotating around the sun between the sun and earth which orbits so fast that it makes it very hard to spot it. I was instantly interested as I have a recollection of reading in your work with the Cassiopaeans that there may be a sort of large space-ark type object orbiting near the sun, and wondered if there was a connection, as apparently the government has coerced these people into silence and tried to shut them up. So I thought Que bono?

I realise this could just be another bunk rumour, but I felt it was worth sharing as the BBC and British press only today have released a cover story claiming they think UFO's aren't real. Im hoping to get a chance to talk to my partner's aunt in more detail about some of her beliefs and things she knows soon. It is starting to feel a bit like the control system is slowly starting to let the truth slip out in small and obscure ways to prepare for what comes next.

All I know from my own small little corner of the world is that there has been some mighty strange and unusual bollide/meteoric shows in the skies in my home area of Essex, UK, coupled with some staggering amounts of high altitude chem-trails in the past 8 weeks creating cloudy skies to compensate.
 
Read during my lunch:

From Earth Changes Media

Breaking News
Astronomers Discover Sun's Twin at McDonald Observatory
By McDonald Observatory News Release
Nov 10, 2007 - 3:56:27 PM

t_hip_56948.jpg



FORT DAVIS, Texas — Peruvian astronomers Jorge Melendez of The Australian National University and Ivan Ramirez of The University of Texas at Austin have discovered the best “solar twin” to date, using the 2.7-meter Harlan J. Smith Telescope at McDonald Observatory. Their findings suggest that the Sun’s chemical composition is not unique, as some previously thought.

The star, HIP 56948, is more like the Sun than any yet seen, and is 200 light-years away in the constellation Draco, the dragon. The star may be a billion years older than the Sun.

Only three solar twins were previously known: 18 Scorpius, HD 98618, and HIP 100963. But while they were all like the Sun in many ways, there was one major difference: the amount of lithium they contained. They all had several times more than the Sun. Astronomers wondered if the Sun was unique in its low amount of lithium.

The discovery of this new solar twin puts that question to rest: it has the same low lithium content as the Sun. The study turned up another solar twin, HIP 73815, that contains a similarly low amount of lithium.

The question of chemical peculiarities in the Sun is related to the “anthropic principle” — is there something special about the Sun that has allowed life to spring up in our solar system? Their findings don’t answer that completely, but they do show that when it comes to the Sun’s chemical composition, the answer is an emphatic “no.”

Melendez’ and Ramirez’ findings suggest the opposite, so-called “Copernican” view: It is possible that life is common elsewhere in the universe. They suggest that stars like HIP 56948 would be good targets for SETI (Search for Extra-Terrestrial Intelligence) researchers.

The star already has been studied by the McDonald Observatory Planet Search led by University of Texas at Austin astronomer Bill Cochran. His team found that, like our Sun, HIP 56948 does not host any “hot Jupiter” planets, those massive, short-period planets orbiting close to their parent stars, so common among the more than 200 stars found to date that host one or more planets.

Searches for “solar twins” are important because astronomers use the Sun as a baseline for many other types of studies. But they cannot study the Sun the same way they do the distant stars. It’s too close, and too bright.

The solar twins discovered at McDonald will be useful for many areas of astrophysics. In particular, they will help astronomers who study the chemical compositions of stars, as well as validate theoretical models of stars’ interiors, and theoretical models of stellar evolution.

Earth Changes TV
 
Well, that's not a real companion star. They are talking about a "twin" in the sense that it is very much like our sun, not that it "belongs" to our sun.
 
Laura said:
Well, that's not a real companion star. They are talking about a "twin" in the sense that it is very much like our sun, not that it "belongs" to our sun.
Thanks for clarifying that. I didn't realize the distinction either.
 
From what I have read from the forum and the Cass material, and my limited knowledge on astronomy, a companion star to our sun should not only pose some hard question on our blue marble here, but might also downright scare some sheeples. Of course these kind of information is kept underwraps by our controll system, like what Appollynon has mentioned earlier

Appollynon said:
I would say that it is more likely for our solar system to be part of binary pair star system than a mono-star system. It would help to explain many of the anomalies that have been found and are yet to be found that our current mainstream understanding of our own solar system fails to explain...

...It is starting to feel a bit like the control system is slowly starting to let the truth slip out in small and obscure ways to prepare for what comes next.
I too have wondered why they would keep info like this from the masses and then slowly introduce it to the public when the time is right for their mission. I sort of see the same invisible hand in issues such as the earth was flat theory and the center of the universe, of course that could have just been ignorant human beings used as usual.

I just wonder how the masses will react when it is reveal there is a companion star, depending on how the world media plays it out, but also the events that could be happening surrounding this event. A lot of "could" and "should" said on my part, but this is exciting and unkown science, so y'all will have to excuse me. osit
 
Hello,


I am Athanasius, a new member here.
At first and foremost: I very happy about to find this forum, SOTT homepage, and all related pages: its been a clear luck for me - it seems now - because I hadnet received informations about SOTT before. My English is far from perfect, so please forgive my when you see faults in my posts.
One of my interest even from my childhood (my friends feels this strange) the meteor impacts in History, the possible results of that impacts, the constant danger of them for Humanity... about a decade ago I convinced about the so-called binary star system theory, I mean, I believe that there is really a brown dwarf (let say, Dark Sun) which times-to-times get closer to the inner solar system. First time I started to investigate the possibilities after read 1-2 Sitchin's books and after found the homepage of Andy Lloyd (I know, some of you are familiar with that homepage).
I especially fond of the articles of Laura: Laura, you seems to reach the same results on the end of your reasonings and after you received related informations from the C's. Even I think that there is relatively low the chance of own planets of the brown dwarf (Nibiru) but who knows - there seems some interesting information about this (I will add some words on this below) and also I myself feel pleased that I read in your articles about the comet or asteroid cloud(s) which are related to the moving of Nibiru but not on the same timing as the brown dwarf (naturally, I pleased not because of the effect but because I never before met this clear show, except in the Kolbrin Bible and in articles of Greg Jenner).

So, I would like to describe in this post of a Theory, a timing of Nibiru apearance and also a possible timing of the comet/asteroid cloud(s).

Lets remain in the 3600 years intervals (even I will keep this 3600 years-circles below, despite of that I read in one of the C's suggested post that the circle of the asteroids/comets probably different than the 3600 years period of Nibiru).

I split into three part the arrivals of the astronomical objects (all three kind of arrivals I counted here as 3600 years long cycles):

N means Nibiru: the brown dwarf which close to the solar system (roughly as close as the route of Pluto). Causes disturbulances of the elliptical orbits of the planets of our outer solar system, seems from Earth 15-16 months at average (included periods when even seems at daylight from Earth) with pointed reddish rays into four direction (origin of the Winged Disc simbol of various ancient cultures). Not causes earthquakes, major atmospherical problems in Earth, or not causes asteroid shower but probably causes changes in Sol cycle of astronomical-life period.

B means Bombardment by asteroids/comet shards. We could near say: a 1000 years pass and Satan will releashed from his chains... except that literate people write 1000 years (yes, it sounds more nice than my estimation of 957 years plus/minus a few years after Nibiru arrival).

P means Post-asteroid/comet shards bombardment... effectively, it seems a different course of asteroids/comets but also circling in the trail of Nibiru... or perhaps in a different cycle but as you will see the dates are (mostly) surprisingly match datas of meteor impacts and catastrophes of the historical/geological records. 520 years interval before Nibiru arrival to the outer limit of our known solar system also in every 3600 year.

Let start the timing and short explanation - I will go back to the past as you see:

2012 AD : strong possibility of B-type event - not brown dwarf arrival (not arrive of Nibiru) but arrival of deadly asteroids/comets, will cause danger to us of many years from the year of 2012. Maybe we will see the brothers/sisters of the asteroids what bombarded Egypt in Moses' time.

1054-1055 AD N event. So, Nibiru has been here. Please, read the analysis on _http://www.grahamhancock.com/forum/BourneWP1.php which analysis convinced me. Really, it worth the time of yours if you havnt know it before.

535-536 AD P event. Very detailed good book about this by David Keys (Catastrophe): he has written about the possibility of impact event but beleives a vulcan-originated chain of catastrophes. I think that the meteor/asteroid fall is a more logical explanation (perhaps the meteor which destroyed Antiochia in 526 AD - a few years before - had been a kind of messenger-asteroid of that greater and deadlier kind of.

1648 BC (and many years from that until about 1600 BC - based on this I think what I have written above that from 2012 there will be trubled times for us in our Earth): B kind of asteriods arrive. See Kolbrin Bible (note: Kolbrin explain meteorite showers - as in the Bible - and tsunami(s) but not wrote the Destroyer (brown dwarf in a period when closer to Earth in its closest route, so not as peacfull appearance as in 1054-1055).

2605 BC: N event: Nibiru has been here. Note (an interesting idea for somebody who are open to think on the possibility that Nibiru has habitable planet as many investigator believes): Sitchin has written before that before the arrival of Nibiru (in the many years when Nibiru approach our Earth) the Annunaki arrives to Earth because after Nibiru depart it need them to go home because after it would be difficult to run after the Planet which moving away (OK, Sitchin idea is a Planet not a brown dwarf, but from this explanation doesnt matter). So, I throw up an idea to chew: Annunaki could arrive about 400-370 years before the arrival of Nibiru (which means 120-150 years after the usual B type events which causes floods, meteorite impacts and general destruction of most of the civilisations on the surface of Earth). It would meant that between 3000 BC and 2605 BC (perhaps few years more if there are some yearsleft as buffer-years before finally need to depart to their homeword) need to be active... and voilá, this period showed interesting times: Old Kingdom Egypt (hard-to-explain by archeologists the sudden level of great level of knowlwdge what they attain after the predinastic period), Gilgamesh Sumer, legendary time of the Yellow Emperor in China (chinese legends says that beings from the sky had been here short before the time of the YE). Peak of so-called civilisating activities, building (or renovation?) of the Great Pyramids started. Time of creation the world-famous clay picture in Sumer : the four-pointed star in the sky watch by field workers.
Naturally, the logical question would be: Is it any sign of arrivals before the above mentioned 1055 N-event, means from 700-720 AD? I say yes. Probably you read about the many interesting tales about the visitors from the clouds in the 700s and early 800s of Western Europe (time of Peppin the Little and later Charlemagne) which seems to a present day reader as a kind of UFO-mania in medieval french for many decades. No serious buildding activities started.... there. But started the build of Angkor Wat in the East (you can read about this in the book of Graham Hancock, Mirror of Sky... yes, GH not believes in Alien-inflience, he tell us about many-thousand years building plan realisations).

3125 BC P-event. Start of Mayan calendar roughtly about that time(3114 BC). Presently found sumerian clay astrological table shows huge asteroid impact in 3123 BC. As I remember there are ancient datas from India about calendar count start about 300 BC. These are years of asteroid impacts (note: even it would be logical the difference of calendar starts of cultures if different parts of the world receive different years impact from the asteroid/comet cloud. (Secondary note: I appointed originally 3125 BC because of the 3600 years distance from 535 AD).

5308 BC B-event kind of bombardement (close to the approx. 5200 BC peak about you Laura mentioned in previous analisises).

6265 BC N-event (naturally only if we accept that Nibiru is here count back 3600 years intervals from 1055 AD)

6785 BC P type catastrophes. I havent at hand the book of Graham Hancock (The Underworld) but as I remember sometimes between this time and between 6265 BC there had been calendar start in Ancient India and legends about the Respected (9?) Sages who start to civilise the dekkan area.

8968 BC (or around that) theoretised time of B type bombardement. (Destruction of Atlantis?)

9925 BC Nibiru appearance (?)

10.445 BC P type catastrophic kind of event. (again: I counted back until this date from 535 AD by 3600 year-leaps) Note: 10.445 BC almost exactly hit the date of 10.450 BC mentioned many time by Graham Hancock (as I remember, Robert Bauval and others also) the date which shows by the Pyramids of Gizeh (orion belt theory, presently accepted by mainstream archeology). And note: Graham H. and others also reached the point that this date had been some kind of great catastrophe on the surface of Earth (and the ancients tried to point the date because of this).

12.628 BC B type bombardement. (end of Ice Age in North Europe?)

13.538 BC Nibiru showned its Glory(?)

And so on...

A summary again, only by years:

B type : 2012 AD - from 1648 BC - 5308 BC - 8968 BC - 12.628 BC - ....

P type 535 AD - 3125 BC - 6785 BC - 10.445 BC - ... (note: P type - generally - seems deadlier for us from evidences than B type events)

/ If we take into consideration the periodical show of Nibiru : 1055 AD - 2605 BC - 6265 BC - 9925 BC - 13.585 BC, with additional Alien(Annunaki?Ancient Astronauts/Sailors?) appearances above... hey, the sky-sailor appearences between 730-830 AD in French are really freak kind of events... and even if we dont see Angkor Wat, whats about the start of the diver-like appearance Kappa's myth of IX. century Japan? /


I dont fight for this timing till the knife-edge (as the hungarians says) but if you pair this timing above with the facts and events about that you have written many articles in SOTT pages and other places then a very interesting lije of coincidences and paralellities emerge.

The explanations above could be more detailed (and I try to add more - if I can - when you feel the urge to ask specificatios) but I think its good enough to start thinking about it. More importanly: perhaps you have many datas in hand regarding the suggested years (or let say the approx. suggested years) above, so it wouldnot be useless to give more informations added into this list... even if the added informations would prove that the timing of mine is basically illogical - or perhaps part of it maybe illogical but that wouldnt mean automatically the other parts are also incomplete - that would be usefull because for me the really important goal is to know Truth & not to earn proofs for 'my timing' egoistically.



Athanasius
 
A correction: Nibiru/brown dwarf possible appearances back from 1054-1055 AD would be the next if we count back by 3600 years:

2546 BC - 6146 BC - 9746 BC - 13.346 BC - ....

So, the calculations (Nibiru orbit, B type event, P type events) have made by me based on the 3660 years circle theory (I have read this alternative orbit on various places and the calculations seemed to be more fit than with the 'other canonised method' of 3600 years.
This is an open to debate. Perhaps 3600 really the good calculation method... or 3600 onlz for Nibiru but 3660 for P and/or B type of events.
 
This just posted on Huffington Post about a gas giant in the Oort Cloud:
_http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/02/14/tyche-hidden-planet_n_823028.html
 
I should have posted the piece with the link. Here it is:

Tyche, Giant Hidden Planet, May Exist In Our Solar System
Dean PraetoriusThe Huffington PostFeb 14, 2011
We may have lost Pluto, but it looks like we might be getting Tyche.

Scientists may soon be able to prove the existence of the gas giant, which could be four times the size of Jupiter, according to astrophysicists John Matese and Daniel Whitmire from the University of Louisiana at Lafayette. The two first proposed Tyche's existence in order to explain a change in path of comets entering the solar system, according to The Independent.

From the The Independent:

Tyche will almost certainly be made up mostly of hydrogen and helium and will probably have an atmosphere much like Jupiter's, with colourful spots and bands and clouds, Professor Whitmire said. "You'd also expect it to have moons. All the outer planets have them," he added.
For a graphical representation of Tyche, click here.

So how could we have missed such a massive planet in our own solar system?

Well, it's 15,000 times further from the sun than Earth, according to Gizmodo. Tyche (if it does exist) lies in the Oort cloud, the outer shell of asteroids in our solar system.

Despite what the scientists believe they will find in the data (which will be released in April and was collected by NASA Wise space telescope), there is at least one flaw in their theory. Theoretically, a planet of Tyche's size should seriously disturb comets in the inner Oort Cloud, but that effect is yet to have been observed, according to The Independent.

But even if it does exist, it still may not be deemed a planet.

_http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/02/14/tyche-hidden-planet_n_823028.html

And here is the story in The Independent:

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/science/up-telescope-search-begins-for-giant-new-planet-2213119.html

Up telescope! Search begins for giant new planet
Tyche may be bigger than Jupiter and orbit at the outer edge of the solar system

If you grew up thinking there were nine planets and were shocked when Pluto was demoted five years ago, get ready for another surprise. There may be nine after all, and Jupiter may not be the largest.

The hunt is on for a gas giant up to four times the mass of Jupiter thought to be lurking in the outer Oort Cloud, the most remote region of the solar system. The orbit of Tyche (pronounced ty-kee), would be 15,000 times farther from the Sun than the Earth's, and 375 times farther than Pluto's, which is why it hasn't been seen so far.

But scientists now believe the proof of its existence has already been gathered by a Nasa space telescope, Wise, and is just waiting to be analysed.

The first tranche of data is to be released in April, and astrophysicists John Matese and Daniel Whitmire from the University of Louisiana at Lafayette think it will reveal Tyche within two years. "If it does, John and I will be doing cartwheels," Professor Whitmire said. "And that's not easy at our age."

Once Tyche has been located, other telescopes could be pointed at it to confirm the discovery.

Whether it would become the new ninth planet would be decided by the International Astronomical Union (IAU). The main argument against is that Tyche probably formed around another star and was later captured by the Sun's gravitational field. The IAU may choose to create a whole new category for Tyche, Professor Matese said.

The IAU would also have the final say about the gas giant's name. To the Greeks, Tyche was the goddess responsible for the destiny of cities. Her name was provisionally chosen in reference to an earlier hypothesis, now largely abandoned, that the Sun might be part of a binary star system with a dim companion, tentatively called Nemesis, that was thought responsible for mass extinctions on Earth. In myth, Tyche was the good sister of Nemesis.

Tyche will almost certainly be made up mostly of hydrogen and helium and will probably have an atmosphere much like Jupiter's, with colourful spots and bands and clouds, Professor Whitmire said. "You'd also expect it to have moons. All the outer planets have them," he added.

What will make it stand out in the Wise data is its temperature, predicted to be around -73C, four or five times warmer than Pluto. "The heat is left over from its formation," Professor Whitmire said. "It takes an object this size a long time to cool off."

Most of the billions of objects in the Oort Cloud – a sphere one light year in radius stretching a quarter of the distance to Alpha Centauri, the brightest star in the southern constellation – are lumps of dirty ice at temperatures much closer to absolute zero (-273C).

A few of these are dislodged from their orbits by the galactic tide – the combined gravitational pull from the billions of stars towards the centre of the Milky Way – and start the long fall into the inner solar system.

As these long-period comets get closer to the Sun, some of the ice boils off, forming the characteristic tails that make them visible.

Professors Matese and Whitmire first proposed the existence of Tyche to explain why many of these long-period comets were coming from the wrong direction. In their latest paper, published in the February issue of Icarus, the international journal of solar system studies, they report that more than 20 per cent too many of the long-period comets observed since 1898 arrive from a band circling the sky at a higher angle than predicted by the galactic-tide theory.

No other proposal has been put forward to explain this anomaly since it was first suggested 12 years ago. But the Tyche hypothesis does have one flaw. Conventional theory holds that the gas giant should also dislodge comets from the inner Oort Cloud, but these have not been observed.

Professor Matese suggests this may be because these comets have already been tugged out of their orbits and, after several passes through the inner solar system, have faded to the point that they are much harder to detect.

So if it is real, Tyche may not only be disrupting the orbits of comets, it may also overturn an established scientific theory.
 
Hi Ghostdoghaiku,

The Huffington Post article you posted is dated February 14, 2011

You may want to read the topic Another Hit ? - Solar System Structure over here: http://cassiopaea.org/forum/index.php/topic,27793.0.html

In it, bngenoh cites a list of 12 planets given by the C's in Session September 30, 1994: http://cassiopaea.org/forum/index.php/topic,25860.0.html.

Some of those may correspond to the supposed planet Tyche you mention. Most notably these three:

NI=Montonanas, 570,000,000,000 miles from Sun; solid matter; 7000 miles diameter.
NII=Suvurutarcar, 830,000,000,000 miles from Sun; 18000 miles diameter; hydrogen, ammonia.
NIII=Bikalamanar, 1,600,000,000,000 miles from Sun; 46000 miles diameter; hydrogen, ammonia.


Maybe the topics could be merged?
 
Thanks Palinurus. I will. I haphazardly posted those link without checking publication dates. Sloppy reporting on my part. My apologies to everyone who went to the trouble of reding them, who were already aware.
 
The correlations are stinking. Mr.Broussards interpretation of (past and present) global situations with the current up evil we are all seeing and experiencing.

BY: Gill Broussard
_http://www.timetobelieve.com/catastroph/is-planet-x-biblical/
Is Planet-7X Real & Is It Biblical?
My main focus is to inform viewers of new findings in the field of Biblical astronomy and how these resulting anomalies correlate to biblical records. Three years of research along with astronomical software models of each event that have a repeating overlay to a depth and degree to which the data cross-validated itself was beyond expectations! Videos Include Charts, graphs and other data supporting the existence of a “mystery planet” which I call Planet-7X (for 7 times Earth’s diameter).
There is very strong evidence indicating it’s IMMINENT END TIME APPEARANCE.




Planet X 2015 Forbidden History of Nibiru
Published on Sep 19, 2015

What is planet X or also known as Nibiru and what does it mean for us on planet earth? Is there a biblical connection and does it play a roll in the end-times? Is a 2015 nibiru cataclysm imminent ? Discover many startling revelations concerning planet X and our destiny!

 
Some interesting stuff I've recived link on from Russian researcher on Electric Universe subject. He said he sceptical on Nemesida (Companion) subject, but if he were, he would get claws into that:

http://phys.org/news/2015-12-discovery-large-outer-edges-solar.html

Two separate teams of researchers (one from Mexico, the other Sweden), have incited skepticism among the astronomy community by posting papers on the preprint server arXiv each describing a different large object they observed in the outer edges of the solar system. Both teams made their observations after reviewing data from ALMA—a cluster of radio dishes in the Chilean mountains.
One of the objects was found to be near W Aquilae in the night sky—the other adjacent to Alpha Centauri . Both groups report being skeptical at first regarding a faint glow, but monitored what they had seen nonetheless—to their surprise they found that the objects appeared to mover relative to the stars behind them, which suggested they might be relatively close and that they might be orbiting the sun. Neither group was able to gain much evidence regarding the properties of the objects they had spied, because both of them were only able to make two observations, but both teams suggest there was enough data to allow for ruling out the object being an ordinary star.

The Swedish team nick-named the object they observed Gna, after a Nordic God known for its swiftness, and have told the press they had no intention of suggesting they had found the mythical Planet X which supposedly lies somewhere beyond Pluto. Instead they suggest it might be a large asteroid. The team from Mexico went a little further suggesting that the object they observed might possibly turn out to be a brown dwarf.

There is also the possibility, as some astronomers who have read the two papers suggest, that either or both of the objects are merely illusions, random blips or noise that for a moment or two appeared to take the shape of a very far away object. Some have even tweeted their opinions, insinuating that jumping on the Planet X bandwagon would be sheer folly.
Despite the skepticism, it is likely that other research groups will be training their instruments on the piece of sky where the objects were possibly seen, to prove or disprove their existence and to put a stop to the conjecture. Both of the teams involved have voiced their support of such efforts, noting that they would like an explanation for what they observed.
 
Back
Top Bottom