For television news, the kids aren't all right

Mark

Administrator
Administrator
Moderator
FOTCM Member
I wonder why this guy has a problem with news coverage about pedophilia and missing persons...

http://www.variety.com/VR1117942664.html

For television news, the kids aren't all right

Sun., May 7, 2006, 6:00am PT
by Brian Lowry

ALLEGATIONS OF RAPE AT DUKE UNIVERSITY provided the media a "perfect storm of race, class and sex," wrote the Boston Phoenix, omitting another key ingredient in that unsavory broth: Youth.

In the eyes of TV news, the kids most definitely are not all right, as cable coverage in particular plays to fears that they are simultaneously imperiled and going to hell in a handbasket. Yet if the media preoccupation with youth hardly warrants a "Fox News Alert," what's striking is how these channels focus so intently on the young when their audience is more likely to mull prescription drug benefits than shoot tequila during spring break in Cabo.

The major nightly newscasts and newspapers continue to grapple with the need to "get younger," from the "CBS Evening News' " planned makeover and the obscene drift of primetime magazines in television to shorter stories and increased page one "pop culture" coverage in top dailies. Beyond reaching the young adults advertisers covet, the concern is that the next generation needs to develop the news-consuming habit.

Seldom mentioned, however, is the fact that cable news is equally geriatric. Indeed, Fox News Channel and CNN are two of only three leading basic networks (the other being the Hallmark Channel) whose median viewer age is over 60. Headline News rings in next at 59.9, and MSNBC is still on the rickety side at 57.

This is the dirty little secret cable news would rather not discuss -- namely, that half their viewers graduated from the 18-49 demographic during the first Bush administration. Nevertheless, their primetime hours are replete with the young, restless and at risk -- whether it's a missing girl in Aruba, spring break shenanigans or alleged rape at a prestigious university.

In that context, Fox and CNN's content sounds more like retirement-home residents lamenting what's wrong with kids today than catering to their audience. It also proffers a skewed vision of teens and young adults, whom the network newsmags also present as being either constantly threatened by Internet miscreants (see "Dateline's" "To Catch a Predator" series) or determined to kill themselves (witness "20/20's" "binge-drinking coeds" expose).

Pedophiles, in fact, have become the de facto star of the May rating sweeps, low-lighted by KCBS-TV in Los Angeles promoting a piece about child molesters living near Disneyland. It's the most cynical kind of scare tactic ("Your children might be in danger!") designed to reel in young women, mirroring Fox News host Greta Van Susteren's obsession with the Natalee Holloway case.

Admittedly, such appeals are easier and cheaper to do than substantive reporting. Just don't put lipstick on the pig, as Van Susteren did last year by calling missing persons "an epidemic." It's only an epidemic, frankly, if you glean all your news from her nightly police blotter and sister of woe Nancy Grace on CNN Headline News.


The cable nets' older profiles have also yielded absurd exchanges about demographic superiority, such as the boast that more young adults view MSNBC's Keith Olbermann than CNN's Paula Zahn. Whichever midget is taller, the truth remains that the vast majority of young adults have no interest in either.

What should be troubling for everyone in news is that even with all their pandering to the under-30 crowd, precious little entices them to tune in.

So the news bizbiz continues to pound its collective head against the demographic wall -- a scenario that brings to mind the Billy Wilder classic "Sunset Blvd.," where writer Joe Gillis tells aging star Norma Desmond, "There's nothing tragic about being 50. Not unless you're trying to be 25."

Gillis, a good-looking young fellow, wound up floating face down in a swimming pool. Not the most dignified way to go, but Greta, Nancy and "20/20" would be all over it.
 
Heh i dont watch the news because its all bullshit and propoganda, ya know, stuff for old people.
 
Cyre2067 said:
Heh i dont watch the news because its all bullshit and propoganda, ya know, stuff for old people.
I'm 43 and ya know what: I dont watch the news because its all bullshit and propoganda, ya know, stuff for stupid people.
 
I watch because first of all it sometimes gives me a comedic interlude and things to laugh about are difficult to come by these days, and secondly I like to know what those people are spewing because that helps me understand what some other people think and why they might think it. Sort of like seeing a cattle drive without having to head out to a ranch.

Watching or listening or reading news and analyzing it in a bigger perspective is part of learning to see objectively. If we can't see then we're blind and subject to blind and/or psychothic leaders.
 
I agree, and it offers a nice overall perspective of how 'they' want us to see a particular issue. Of course, pretty quickly a pattern emerges for those of us who try to be more objective about the news and I can understand why many people feel it is better to avoid it completely as a waste of time.
 
just don't spend too long in there or you'll be 'assimilated' into the hive-mind of hysterical trivia-reactionary superficial and pathocratic preocupations and your brain will turn to jelly :-)

I do find it useful to 'dip in' from time to time to see 'what they're up to' , to test the water, so to speak. but it usually turns out to be pretty slimy smelly water, so I don't hang around!
 
Mark wrote:
Watching or listening or reading news and analyzing it in a bigger perspective is part of learning to see objectively. If we can't see then we're blind and subject to blind and/or psychothic leaders.
I agree with you man. You need to see/hear/read news to know what is going on around you. I get my news from tv, newspaper & internet.

sleepingboy
 
This is a very interesting report in that it gives one example of the complex mix of a kind sexual cointelpro that is so prevalent in most aspects of our western societies right now.

On the one hand you have indications that there are organised high-level child molesters operating above the law, while at the same time you have serious cases of abuse taking place within the family, yet most of these are actually physical abuse and neglect. Yet sexual abuse gets consistent and sensationalist airplay both in the U.S. and in Europe with schlok programmes such as the one mentioned in the report. They only serve to whip up a climate of fear, viglantism and "moral panics." These stem form the tension between the sexualisation of society and the anti-sexuality brigade and the knee-jerk reactions based on media led campaigns that often make no distinction between the very wide variety of sexual offences, many of which are not sexual offences at all. The net result is the to push child molesters underground and the continual ignorance of the root causes as to WHY these sexual predators exist and are allowed to flourish in our societies.

It seems that while crime appears to be going down (though this may be a moot point) abuse is on the up and seems to mirror the pathological systems upon which societies are based. The Pathocrats are ensuring that their own predations taking place behind closed doors are allowed to continue by relying on the scapgoating of the populace at a large which is exhibiting this same learned pathology, while also sending down many innocent people in the process. Check mate!

And as these manipulations increase, so too the real psychopaths are coming out of the woodwork more and more but not as the isolated child molester on the street corner, but in the form of a neighbour or good ole Uncle Benny who was always so good with the children... Thus paranoia fear and overprotection of children partnered with the denial of your everyday garden vareity psycho in positions of instituional influence ensures a fertile ground for the establishment of the next phase of Pathocracy. By maintaining a vice-like grip on our understanding of sexuality, love and creativity the continuing deformations and distortions must be one of the most fundamental reasons why the primary psychopath is able to the Lord of all he surveys...

J.
 
everyone watches tv you have to star thinking in the "movement of the ideas" if we r gonna talk about its effect on people seeds on the path of your thoughts but you allways decide what to think


dont lie to yourself
 
Back
Top Bottom