GLAST (NASA) Mission Possibility

goshawks

A Disturbance in the Force
I was just reading 'Aviation Week' magazine for Dec. 10, 2007, and spotted an interesting anomaly, for those with a conspiratorial bent.

On p.23, there is a news note on the NASA Gamma-ray Large Area Space Telescope (GLAST) mission. It states, "Glast has been diverted to the Naval Research Laboratory (NRL) in Washington for thermal-vacuum testing after being bumped by a classified spacecraft also under development by General Dynamics in Gilbert, Ariz." Plus, "Glast already has undergone successful vibration and electromagnetic field testing in Gilbert." (The news note does not mention whether the craft is to be returned to GD or sent directly to launch facilities.)

Like in the DAWN post, if I wanted to 'adjust' something on the spacecraft, this would be the perfect situation. It could be anything - 'shutter control', additional data streams, new software capabilities to be field tested, or various ways to assume control of the craft. It could even include small additional sensors.

So, just a 'heads up' in case of future peculiarities happening with this craft...
 
Hmm, I thought you 'withdrew' after this thread - http://www.cassiopaea.org/forum/index.php?topic=7816.msg55935#msg55935 - yet you return with information that you find 'conspiratorial' and that sounds almost, verbatim, like this post of yours:

http://www.cassiopaea.org/forum/index.php?topic=7702.msg54855#msg54855

So - perhaps you could explain why you think it is acceptable to attack this forum and its moderators and then return as if nothing at all had happened? As far as your conspiratorial musing about these 'aviation week' magazine articles - it is rather unclear that what has been published in 'aviation week' really reveals anything at all.

It's highly likely that every single spacecraft that is launched from the surface of the planet has been "adjusted" - in a myriad of ways - for the purposes of the PTB - it is a wholly controlled theatre of operation, for goodness sakes - wholly controlled - and, as has been revealed time and time and time again, what is revealed to the press about what is really going on is almost always harmless or it would not be revealed by the press.
 
Back
Top Bottom