M
Magus
Guest
Greetings, Cherished Sibling Forumites and Good Reader Friends,
Not only do they participate in internet censorship and Cointelpro, Google LIES about each and every search. Here's the reality, verifiable with any Google Search you care to do on any topic of your choice. The same results are guaranteed to be yours, first time and every time.
SEARCH TOPIC:
> Types of Depression
AT THE TOP OF THE LAST SEARCH PAGE PROVIDED, USING THE EXTENDED/ADVANCED SEARCH MODE APPEARED:
> Results 971 - 980 of about 24,000,000 for Types of Depression. (0.33 seconds)
NOTE PLEASE THAT THE LAST PAGE HAS BEEN OPENED:
> Result Page:
> Previous
> 88
> 89
> 90
> 91
> 92
> 93
> 94
> 95
> 96
> 97
> 98
>
And there you have it, my friends. GOOGLE LIES. All of the time, every time. They always tell you that your search has gotten thousands or, as above, even millions of "hits." However, don't bother attempting to find any hits beyond their actually very limited number.
Another part of the Great Google Search Rip-Off too is that each and every page you do get will contain many of the same "hits." Of the tiny percentage you actually get, as opposed to all of those results they say are out there and found, only about half to two-thirds of the delivered ones are unique, individual links. The rest are the same links as found on pages one through 5, repeated on page after page after page... Then, when you start trying them out, of those unique links that are provided, there are about one in four that are no longer valid, leading to no web site or referal, just lots and lots of "Error 404: Page not found" notices, or transfers to commercial web sites totally unrelated to the topic, or offers to make you a good deal if you want to buy the web site domain name you've just clicked on. Doing an intensive web search with Google can get rather hairy.
Isn't it time to demand some Truth in advertising from these clowns?
Just to be fair, let's repeat the process with something even simpler and guaranteed to get even more "hits" from the Google Lie Machine. How about the topic of Dogs?
> Dogs
> Results 991 - 998 of about 133,000,000 for Dogs. (0.23 seconds)
> Result Page:
> Previous
> 90
> 91
> 92
> 93
> 94
> 95
> 96
> 97
> 98
> 99
> 100
My first search on "Dogs" netted this:
"Results 1 - 10 of about 221,000,000 for Dogs [definition]. (0.09 seconds)."
On the very last page, number 87 that time, they asked if I wanted to include the results that had been left out. Of course I did, and the repeated, "expanded" search, netted about 78,000,000 fewer alleged listings, but another 11 pages of links. Something is very off with that result.
Does anyone else find it very interesting that the total number of real "hits" from the search on "Dogs" was almost the same as the one on "Types of Depression"?? So was the total number of hits on a number of other topics. It ranges from about 50 pages to 100 pages. But no more than 100 have ever been delivered, not to this searcher at least. My e-mails to Google asking about this curious set of incongruities have never gotten a reply either.
But that is it: There is NO Page 101. No matter the claims of 133,000,000 "hits" on the "expanded" results for the topic of "Dogs," the searcher can have exactly 998 of them, with roughly a third of those being repetitions. It seems very likely that the "expanded" search netted me the 11 extra pages because Google never had more than 998 total results to provide. All the rest is most likely "smoke and mirrors" or, in other words, just plain LIES, BS and hype.
That may well be the truth behind the Google lies. What links you do get may be ALL the links that Google has to offer. Otherwise, why would they just stop at some arbitrary number of listings? And why would there be fewer returns claimed on an expanded search unless both of the claimed numbers of search results were fictitious?
To check out the Google Truth, just keep clicking to the highest number offered at the bottom of each page. From page 10, to 19, to 28, and upward it will go, but not ever will it provide you the full number of links that Google claims to have found. It leads this searcher to have concluded that Google has never actually found all of those links, that, in truth all of those thousands or millions of links do not exist. They very likely make up those huge results numbers just to keep the suckers, (oops, I mean searchers) coming back for more cheating and repeating. If that is not the case, if Google does have the ability to provide the huge numbers of "hits" they claim to have found, then they should make them all available, without restriction, to any who request them.
Do we, the customers out here, not have the right to demand they either put up, provide all of the links they claim, or else admit they've only got a few hundred links all total? (Again, bear in mind that a good third of the "hits" from any Google search are repeats.)
Either way, now we know. Google LIES, with and about every search. If they do this with their quantitative results, one wonders indeed how much qualitative "filtering" out of various information sources is also going on? If someone comes up with a simple and easily repeated means to check on that, please share it. It would be very informative if we could somehow find out whether there are active, known web links to various information sources that should, logically, be included in a specific topical category but are not "found" by a Google search.
After all, they have, in their Chinese internet set-up and "service", become true masters of the censored search, and in both Canotonese and Mandarin as well as English, no less. Why not use it here? Who's to know?
Good Searching to All,
M
Not only do they participate in internet censorship and Cointelpro, Google LIES about each and every search. Here's the reality, verifiable with any Google Search you care to do on any topic of your choice. The same results are guaranteed to be yours, first time and every time.
SEARCH TOPIC:
> Types of Depression
AT THE TOP OF THE LAST SEARCH PAGE PROVIDED, USING THE EXTENDED/ADVANCED SEARCH MODE APPEARED:
> Results 971 - 980 of about 24,000,000 for Types of Depression. (0.33 seconds)
NOTE PLEASE THAT THE LAST PAGE HAS BEEN OPENED:
> Result Page:
> Previous
> 88
> 89
> 90
> 91
> 92
> 93
> 94
> 95
> 96
> 97
> 98
>
And there you have it, my friends. GOOGLE LIES. All of the time, every time. They always tell you that your search has gotten thousands or, as above, even millions of "hits." However, don't bother attempting to find any hits beyond their actually very limited number.
Another part of the Great Google Search Rip-Off too is that each and every page you do get will contain many of the same "hits." Of the tiny percentage you actually get, as opposed to all of those results they say are out there and found, only about half to two-thirds of the delivered ones are unique, individual links. The rest are the same links as found on pages one through 5, repeated on page after page after page... Then, when you start trying them out, of those unique links that are provided, there are about one in four that are no longer valid, leading to no web site or referal, just lots and lots of "Error 404: Page not found" notices, or transfers to commercial web sites totally unrelated to the topic, or offers to make you a good deal if you want to buy the web site domain name you've just clicked on. Doing an intensive web search with Google can get rather hairy.
Isn't it time to demand some Truth in advertising from these clowns?
Just to be fair, let's repeat the process with something even simpler and guaranteed to get even more "hits" from the Google Lie Machine. How about the topic of Dogs?
> Dogs
> Results 991 - 998 of about 133,000,000 for Dogs. (0.23 seconds)
> Result Page:
> Previous
> 90
> 91
> 92
> 93
> 94
> 95
> 96
> 97
> 98
> 99
> 100
My first search on "Dogs" netted this:
"Results 1 - 10 of about 221,000,000 for Dogs [definition]. (0.09 seconds)."
On the very last page, number 87 that time, they asked if I wanted to include the results that had been left out. Of course I did, and the repeated, "expanded" search, netted about 78,000,000 fewer alleged listings, but another 11 pages of links. Something is very off with that result.
Does anyone else find it very interesting that the total number of real "hits" from the search on "Dogs" was almost the same as the one on "Types of Depression"?? So was the total number of hits on a number of other topics. It ranges from about 50 pages to 100 pages. But no more than 100 have ever been delivered, not to this searcher at least. My e-mails to Google asking about this curious set of incongruities have never gotten a reply either.
But that is it: There is NO Page 101. No matter the claims of 133,000,000 "hits" on the "expanded" results for the topic of "Dogs," the searcher can have exactly 998 of them, with roughly a third of those being repetitions. It seems very likely that the "expanded" search netted me the 11 extra pages because Google never had more than 998 total results to provide. All the rest is most likely "smoke and mirrors" or, in other words, just plain LIES, BS and hype.
That may well be the truth behind the Google lies. What links you do get may be ALL the links that Google has to offer. Otherwise, why would they just stop at some arbitrary number of listings? And why would there be fewer returns claimed on an expanded search unless both of the claimed numbers of search results were fictitious?
To check out the Google Truth, just keep clicking to the highest number offered at the bottom of each page. From page 10, to 19, to 28, and upward it will go, but not ever will it provide you the full number of links that Google claims to have found. It leads this searcher to have concluded that Google has never actually found all of those links, that, in truth all of those thousands or millions of links do not exist. They very likely make up those huge results numbers just to keep the suckers, (oops, I mean searchers) coming back for more cheating and repeating. If that is not the case, if Google does have the ability to provide the huge numbers of "hits" they claim to have found, then they should make them all available, without restriction, to any who request them.
Do we, the customers out here, not have the right to demand they either put up, provide all of the links they claim, or else admit they've only got a few hundred links all total? (Again, bear in mind that a good third of the "hits" from any Google search are repeats.)
Either way, now we know. Google LIES, with and about every search. If they do this with their quantitative results, one wonders indeed how much qualitative "filtering" out of various information sources is also going on? If someone comes up with a simple and easily repeated means to check on that, please share it. It would be very informative if we could somehow find out whether there are active, known web links to various information sources that should, logically, be included in a specific topical category but are not "found" by a Google search.
After all, they have, in their Chinese internet set-up and "service", become true masters of the censored search, and in both Canotonese and Mandarin as well as English, no less. Why not use it here? Who's to know?
Good Searching to All,
M
