The C's have said that the Gospel of Mark, like Matthew, Luke, and John were written by "Greek Enforcers" somewhat similar to our FBI.
This link from this modern "Marcionite Church of Christ" claims the gospel Marcion had in his possession contained one (or more) statements from Matthew but in a reversed form, and proposes that Marcion's gospel might have been some kind of "Super Evangelion" that was used by others to created the other synaptic gospels:
marcionitechurchofchrist.org
This got me thinking of the C's comment, and wondering of the known gospel of Mark isnt already a redaction, and if Marcion's gospel could have been an earlier version of Mark, or both derived from an earlier version.
This is also an interesting quote in general, from scholar David Litwa's site:
"But in this case we have a surprisingly clear statement from Tertullian, Against Marcion 4.4.4
I continue to be floored by this remark. If I’m reading it correctly, then in his Antitheses, Marcion accused his early catholic opponents of inventing a fictional Christ."
mdavidlitwa.com
This link from this modern "Marcionite Church of Christ" claims the gospel Marcion had in his possession contained one (or more) statements from Matthew but in a reversed form, and proposes that Marcion's gospel might have been some kind of "Super Evangelion" that was used by others to created the other synaptic gospels:
But both Adamantius and Isidore of Pelusium report that Marcion’s Gospel preserved a reversed form of this saying:“Think not that I am come to destroy the law, or the prophets: I am not come to destroy, but to fulfil.”
“Think not that I am come to fulfil the law, or the prophets: I am not come to fulfil, but to destroy.”
Marcionite Church of Christ - Birthplace of the first Christian Holy Bible
Birthplace of the first Christian Holy Bible and home of the oldest inscription bearing the name of Jesus Christ.
This got me thinking of the C's comment, and wondering of the known gospel of Mark isnt already a redaction, and if Marcion's gospel could have been an earlier version of Mark, or both derived from an earlier version.
This is also an interesting quote in general, from scholar David Litwa's site:
"But in this case we have a surprisingly clear statement from Tertullian, Against Marcion 4.4.4
| Marcion per Antithesis suas arguit ut interpolatum a protectoribus Iudaismi ad concorporationem legis et prophetarum, quo etiam Christum inde confingerent | Marcion in his Antitheses argues that [his Gospel] was falsified by the defenders of Judaism to become one body with the Law and Prophets, and from this [falsification] they fictionally invent even Christ. |
Marcion: the Best Evidence for Ancient Mythicism
What I recently discovered is that external critics of Christianity were not the only ancient mythicists. There were Christian mythicists as well: Christians who said that the Jesus of other Christ…
mdavidlitwa.com