GWF A320 Diversion

[Esote]

Following are two exerts from my posts in the "Session 4 April 2015" and "Crash of German Wings Flight over French Alps" threads, about the diversion mentioned by the C's and the so-called witnesses...
It might only be a detail, but it has some importance toward the integrity of the transcripts, OSIT.
If it appears to you as a waste of time to ask the C's about this topic in the next session, may be some of you may give their insights concerning this question...

...(L) What was the smoke and the boom?

A: Diversion.

Q: (L) Who created the diversion?

A: Jets in area. It was realized that something along this line was happening because a "warning" had been given in advance. They just did not know where and when...

How could this diversion be done ? Jets creating sounds and smoke around the plane ?..


Why a diversion and by who actually ? From the French government it seems, after receiving a "warning", in order to divert any investigation toward this secret threat...

Then, we are not in high strangeness mode here, so that it must be possible to understand how it really happened.

What is right and what is wrong in the accounts about this catastrophe ?
Witnesses have been reported to hear strange noises when the plane flew over them. One guy is supposed to have seen smoke... At the same time in the same place, a close friend of mine was in his garden and didn't hear or see anything... And what about this witness from the Méolans-Revel area, at the other end (north) of these first high mountain ranges toward the south and the west (Estrop-Blanche), who would have seen the plane when it's totally impossible from his location, given the actual crash site...

 

[Cosmos]

Can you explain your point or question a bit more?
I don't quite get what you are asking for here...

 

[Joe]

You should remember EOS that eyewitness reports are notoriously unreliable.

 

[Esote]

You should remember EOS that eyewitness reports are notoriously unreliable.

That's exactly what I mean Perceval !

Can you explain your point or question a bit more?
I don't quite get what you are asking for here...

My point is basically : How was this diversion done ? Jets creating sounds and smoke around the plane ? Or what ?..

 

[Nienna]

Can you explain your point or question a bit more?
I don't quite get what you are asking for here...

My point is basically : How was this diversion done ? Jets creating sounds and smoke around the plane ? Or what ?..

It could be that there were no sounds, nor smoke. That is the diversion. Keeping people asking questions about something that never occurred. fwiw

 

[Esote]

My point is basically : How was this diversion done ? Jets creating sounds and smoke around the plane ? Or what ?..

It could be that there were no sounds, nor smoke. That is the diversion. Keeping people asking questions about something that never occurred. fwiw

If this was the diversion, that there were no sounds, nor smoke, why then give the statement that it was due to jets in area ? I don't get it at this point...

 

[Joe]

You should remember EOS that eyewitness reports are notoriously unreliable.

That's exactly what I mean Perceval !

Can you explain your point or question a bit more?
I don't quite get what you are asking for here...

My point is basically : How was this diversion done ? Jets creating sounds and smoke around the plane ? Or what ?..

Possibly just another plane in the area, maybe an unmarked jet, sonic booming, maybe trailing smoke, who knows. It takes very little to confuse eyewitnesses.