Haredi schoolf rejects Sephardi child because of "stain" in genealogy

B

baklavatsky

Guest
Israel claims it is threatened by worldwide antisemitism, but racist antisemitism is strongest in Israel...

------------------------

http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-3444634,00.html

Haredi school rejects 'Sephardi' child

Talmud Torah school rejects four-year-old due to Sephardi grandfather. Principal says child has ‘stain’ in genealogy

Zvi Alush
09.02.07 / Israel Jewish Scene

Anyone who thinks that racist rules are a thing of the past is wrong, according to the mother of a four-and-a-half year old child who was rejected from a Talmud Torah school because of his grandfather’s ethnicity.

“They are alive and kicking in all their ugliness in Ashkenazi haredi educational institutions,” the mother said.

The child was denied admission to a Talmlud Torah school in Beit Shemesh because of what its principal called a “stain” in his genealogy.

“Tell the child’s dear father that although he himself is completely Ashkenazi, his wife’s father is Sephardic, and we therefore cannot accept his son into our institution. We have to maintain a certain standard,” the principal said.

The child’s mother made several attempts to change the principal’s mind, to no avail.

“I begged the principal. I explained that my child is truly Ashkenazi and looks exactly like his father. Our son also speaks Yiddish, but nothing helped,” the mother said. “They explained to a friend of ours that they didn’t want to ruin their Talmud Torah with ‘damaged goods’.”

The Talmud Torah school had previously given the same explanation to several other frustrated parents who petitioned MK Meir Porush (United Torah Judaism) for help.

The Knesset member tried several times to convince the principal to allow the rejected children admission to the school, but the principal insisted there was “no room” in the institution.

“This is a complicated problem. I don’t deal with condemning these things, just like I don’t condemn kibbutzim, which sometimes select who to accept as a member. There are communities that wish to be strict about their religion or social character. It’s not simple,” Porush said.

The school’s principal, who had previously said he only wanted “100% Ashkenazim” at his institution, told Yedioth Ahronoth he had no idea how many, if any, Sephardic children were enrolled in the school.

“There is no clause in our educational institution’s regulations about this. We only make sure that our students are good children from explicitly haredi families. Whether someone is Sephardic or Ashkenazi makes no difference to me,” the principal said.

In a statement, the Education Ministry issued a statement saying, “The ministry takes any attempt to discriminate against students because of their ethnicity or their sex very seriously.”

“The claims will be looked into, and should investigations show that the students were rejected because of their ethnic group, the ministry will take steps to force the institution to accept them.”

------------------
See also:
Israel 2007
Melting pot or not / Yuval Kinar
An Ethiopian, Arab, Russian, strictly Orthodox, Ashkenazi and Sephardi go out to find a job, rent an apartment and enroll a child in kindergarten. Discrimination? Racism? Absolutely
http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-3443891,00.html
 
So when did the Ashkenazi - the adopted Jews - begin to discriminate against the Jews that adopted them and made them Jews?
 
Laura said:
So when did the Ashkenazi - the adopted Jews - begin to discriminate against the Jews that adopted them and made them Jews?
Yes, exactly! This is something that has been playing around in the back of my mind. And, once again, I will say that it is possible that I am way off. But wasn't it the Sephardi Jews that Hitler (and his controllers) was going after? Or was it just any Jews that didn't want to relocate to Israel?
 
From this post: http://www.cassiopaea.org/forum/index.php?topic=3558.msg22820#msg22820

Second researcher wrote:

I think psychopathy is an X-linked gene and actually asked the question in a
sex and behavior course last spring.

Our study group determined that it was.

...I think there is also the issue of epigenetics.

Epigenetics is a process involving activation and inactivation of genes
based on environmental influences. Which gene is active when epigenetics is
taken into consideration is theorized to be affected by pre and peri-natal
environment AND events during critical developmental stages; think
abductions, wars, rapes, religious programming and rituals.

Genetics may - as I think - "marry with the soul" - but there may be some
flexibility in X linked genes for females. I don't see it as just a
'mutation', however. There seems to be something more. I don't like to
speculate about that because it is too weird.

For example: There is one species of voles that seems to indicate that
genetic tinkering and not random mutations are responsible for some
behavioral variation. The problem is the tinkering would have had to happen
before we - our current civilization, that is - had the knowledged and means
to do so according to standard theory. This makes a lot of scientists very
uncomfortable.

Voles are socially very similar to us in parental and mating behaviors. Also
the way Laura talks about the possibility of pheromones as a means for
differentiating psychopaths from normal people is not farfetched: prairie
voles use this method to differentiate a good parent from bad in their mate
selection!

Anyway, a female can have the super Selfish and the super Giving - (good
parent) genes at the same time! Epigenetics and recombination determines
which one is ruling the roost.

Males on the other hand can be influenced by epigenetics but whatever is X
linked is what he has to work with - that's it.

If the psychopath gene is on X we have a problem. I believe this to be the
case and we all agree we have a problem.

I looked at a study were some sociopathically linked traits are common to
males and their maternal uncles. Epigenetic effects on mental disorders
like schizophrenia are hotly debated in the research community but should
also be considered as part of this psychopathy business. Lobaczewski alludes
to this when he describes the levels of psychopathy and schizoidal
personality...

There is also the resistant personality type. What is it that makes some
people not succumb to psychopathic behavior despite exposure to abuse,
suffering and psychopathy throughout development?

We have speculated among ourselves that the difference may lie in the fact
that some individuals have souls and some don't. In terms of research, it
would be interesting to look for genetic similarities or differences between
such people. I know of a proposed study that was recently turned down for
funding that sought to research this very issue. Somebody doesn't want this
getting out there.


I think your post is timely because I was reading Controversy of Zion and
since I often mentally substitue "psychopaths" for "jews" I began thinking
about things you (Laura) covered in Secret History as well as a book I re-
read this summer called the iceman inheritance.

The data regarding jews and kazars seems so confusing because the issue goes
beyond Kazaria, and these footprints if you may, are distorted during times
of mass upheavals. Natural disasters, wars, or dark ages it seems, are
used by the psychopaths to reinvogorate themselves genetically. It even
seems to be conscious, which is a scary thought. It only makes sense to me
when looked at in terms of efforts against all odds to maintain a particular
genetic make up with 'jewishness' as the foil - the screen - the ideology
being used as the "excuse" - regardless of nationality.

This may have also happened during the exodus period, the babylonian
captivity, the roman period and now the ongoing facist period in the west.
An example of how this reinvigoration process works was a series of early
1990's articles about dwindling jewish cultural identity due to mixed
marriages in the US. These pieces were often juxtaposed with ads for jewish
singles events NYC.

Anyway, as we already know the most recent message they are broadcasting
seems to have upped the ante in order to preserve some "semitic" (read:
psychopathic) bloodlines and destroy others by playing on the fears left
over from the last persecution of the common jew - WW II.. The message is
that anti-semitism is on the rise and support of and moving to Isreal is the
best protection. This stuff is supposed to trigger mass movements of
those with the the diluted strain. As modern history demonstrates, the
social upheaval model that is used to trigger these mass movements drives
those with the strain into the arms of others with complementary strains to
result in a re-concentrain of genes.

It looks like psychopathic men (substitue this for jews), many descended
from the priestly caste of jews, were moving all over the old world, via this
process mentioned above. The latest concentration was on the eurasian
continent. They mated with the women they encountered from various ethnic
groups as they moved across the continent but did so in a manner that
indicated something - call it pheromones if you will - caused increased
matings with women carrying the psychopathic gene.

I also started thinking that some women for whatever reason may have had a
relative resistance to bearing genetically psychopathic children and it may
be indicated by high miscarriage rates; but then there is also the influence
of environment and culture that can make someone behave like a psychopath.

I started thinking about this because of what I know about Rh negs . I
don't think that this Rh gene has anything to do with psychopathy or
resistance to it BTW, since we don't really know what the Rh positive gene
does other than having something to do with ammonium clearing but that is
speculation. The process of it is what is interesting and may apply to a
psychopathy gene if such exisit as we think. There are, after all,
resisters to psychopathy in the population as we well know.

Before the advent of rhogam ( an anti anti-positive serum ) Rh neg women had
high miscarriage rates when the fetus was Rh positive. What this meant was
that the Rh trait was often passed on via the male. It is interesting though
that a proposed origin of the Rh gene is the black sea area, but it is
found today mostly in north western europeans AND north africans with a few
in east africa!! The highest concentration is in basques and people of the
pyrenees region. It is almost absent in asian and southern and western
africans.

Was there originally a similar issue for mating between those with
psychopathic genes and those more inclined to conscience? If so did some
genetic tweak (epigenetics) result in the capacity for more individuals to
carry this gene? Is the semitic gene itself a remnant of resistance to
breeding psychopaths but is now very diluted post-tweak?

If a there was a similar process with the psychopathy gene in that the
tweak occured in the females on the X-linked gene then the issue of
miscarriage would have been eliminated.

For the eastern european group many of these women that the elite
psychopatic 'semites' i.e aaronite line delibeately mated with were probably
kazar. Women from other groups too were probably forced by their families
into marriages in order to consolidate power or secure peace from the
dominant kahzars or others, groups who raped, pillaged and terrorised
people. From these activities Y chromosome data will show sephardic and
distant israelite genetic links in the modern ashkenazi males especially the
priestly line, while in mtDNA you find eastern kazar as well as other
european links.

The weird thing is that by jewish law these children would not be jewish
because jewishness is passed through the female line. Maybe something else
was being passed which the term 'jewishness' is used to mask and the poor
everyday jew pays the price of the psychopathic power elite's maneuvering,
all the while thinking that their suffering is because of their specialness
the elites tell them about. This is sort of what Reed proposed in C of Z.

This is anectdotal but I find it interesting that within the past two years
two females I know have converted to judiasm. It was the only way they could
marry their then boyfriends who were jewish. One did marry the guy and the
other one broke up with her boyfriend after being treated badly by the women
in the synagoge. The one that got married is diagnosed with a personality
disorder, has had years of abuse, by a drug addicted prostitute mother and
her johns. It was only when her mother died that she had a semblence of
freedom and managed to complete her degree (phi beta kappa). The woman is
now a school teacher- scary. For a long time I felt very sorry for her
because of her life experience until she almost got everyone fired from our
jobs in the lab due to her deceptions and manipulations for power for
herself.

I write about this because there must be something that involves genes and
social situation that perpetuate this craziness; this woman is teaching
elementary school kids! How many more like her in such positions?

This "something" seems to have been known throughout history by the elites
who perpetuate it. Occasionally the the questing type will stumble on it and
immediately get slammed for being crazy. It is that that some people must
dominate and control with no regard for others - the psychopath.

Semites but mainly the branch that became jews are used to keep it going - a
perfect corral for consolidation of the gene pool - after infiltration by
psychopaths early in their history (sarai and abraham situation, perhaps?)
and it has spread genetically and culturally ever since because they may
well have been the ones with a genetic ability to carry both this gene and
the means for resisting it. A cruel, cruel trick.

Whatever, the case, such strong strains of opposing forces within any given
group is bound to make them stand out or seem "special". If you want a more
potent psychopathic strain, a decline in the resistant strain and a steady
supply of the normal strain, you need females with the psychopathic strain
mated to males who already have it.
So in reality we have three types of
humans not just two I think. It is the only way to keep the food supply
going (from normal people), get rid of the competition (resisters) and
consolidate their (the psychopaths') power. The sicko nazi experiments and
forced childbearing was along these lines probably because it wasn't
happening fast enough. Common people just don't always do things the way the
PTB wants unless forced via fear and terror. Maybe there is something to
the name AshkeNAZI and the current war on terror.

...In summary, I think epigenetics and human greed make men go out and conquer
while women become carriers who pass on the conquerer's X linked genes.
Women epigenetically manipulated to be the first carriers of the psycho gene
I think, but this first group also had carriers of the resistant gene.

God it's all a sicked mixed up and confusing game.
So it's like the school said. The wife's father is not askenazi so they cannot accept the son. They have to maintain a certain standard.
 
Back
Top Bottom