Please forgive me if this has been mentioned before, but I was shocked by this article I stumbled across regarding Civil asset seizure in the US.
That is to say the right of oridinary police to take any amounts of cash or property believing them to be illegaly gotten gains, amd keeping them without pressing any criminal charges, and without any foundation or concrete suscpicions.
The Local Police or Federal government can take the money or sell goods for their own funding. The onus is on the individual to prove they have a legitmate claim.
Another example of state bullying that individuals are almost powwerless to resist, They PTB really can do anything they want. Scary.
In an extract from the article
Probabaly my naivety, and everyone knows about this, but I was shocked by it.
I have looked in the Search - but if this has been covered elsewhere on SOTT or the Forum, I would be fery grateful for a steer to the location
Here is alink to the first article I read
http://www.commdiginews.com/politics-2/civil-asset-forfeiture-highway-robbery-by-the-police-26677/
That is to say the right of oridinary police to take any amounts of cash or property believing them to be illegaly gotten gains, amd keeping them without pressing any criminal charges, and without any foundation or concrete suscpicions.
The Local Police or Federal government can take the money or sell goods for their own funding. The onus is on the individual to prove they have a legitmate claim.
Another example of state bullying that individuals are almost powwerless to resist, They PTB really can do anything they want. Scary.
In an extract from the article
in a typical case, a 55-year-old Chinese-American restaurateur from Georgia was pulled over for minor speeding on Interstate 10 in Alabama and detained for nearly two hours. He was carrying $75,000 raised from relatives to buy a Chinese restaurant in Lake Charles, Louisiana. He got back his money 10 months later, but only after spending thousands of dollars on a lawyer and losing out on the restaurant deal. Why was the government not obligated to reimburse this innocent citizen for his legal fees?
Last year, The New Yorker detailed how overzealous officials in Tenaha, Texas shook down out-of-state drivers by, among other things, threatening to take their children away from them, and then funneled the confiscated cash into officer bonuses and popcorn machines.
Probabaly my naivety, and everyone knows about this, but I was shocked by it.
I have looked in the Search - but if this has been covered elsewhere on SOTT or the Forum, I would be fery grateful for a steer to the location
Here is alink to the first article I read
http://www.commdiginews.com/politics-2/civil-asset-forfeiture-highway-robbery-by-the-police-26677/
In the ensuing conversation, the cop said "we're the biggest gang here in America now and we can do what we want!" So they even admit it and we had to pay the $65. 