How a book is both a particle and a wave

Sometimes when you are reading a book a sentence will strike you as peculiar. Peculiar thoughts leads one to peculiar and interesting ideas you think to yourself. However, it is not the sentence that is peculiar but the thought contained in the sentence and how it is connected to the paragraph. If you continue to walk along this tightrope of logic you realize that thought is neither the sentence nor the paragraph but both at the same time. Thought is contextual. Con-textual. It is a con to think that text itself is the thought, rather, it is thought which has considered or soldered itself meaning to the text. A meaning embedded within the fabric, much like pen into paper.

After awhile you cross your legs and out of convenience or to minimize effort you flip over.the open book and balance its spine or, rather, its fold of the pages upon your legs.

Immediately you note how the fold looks much like a wave to you, at.the same time you cognize that the reality must be that it is both at the same time. Even the sharpest of blades are rounded and smooth when examined closely.

What a cryptic thought. What does it mean that even the sharpest of blades are rounded and smooth? You recognize this as a boundary. A fuzzy boundary. An entanglement of two worlds. Perhaps, it is the interface of the physical with the non-physical? 99.999% empty space you think to yourself. You conjecture that the universe itself is 99.999% empty space and what we see of.it is but a reflection of this binding, this entanglement. Particles and waves observing each other. An eternal hug giving rise to time and space.

When you flip your book back over you notice how the fold connects the fabric of two sides. The folds of.the page are convex towards the center while sloping down and away and.then up again into a slight curl. You notice a merging of the concave with the convex. Its boundary is fuzzy yet you know it exists but.where? You cognize that it is the location of two rates and that the precise location at which the two merge would give an acceleration of zero. The inflection point of time and space. The point that has no point and the wave which has neither time nor space. You conjecture that this is the.interface, but not the interface itself but.the boundary, the tunnel of entanglement that is neither physical nor non-physical. You conjecture that in all mergings which contain non-physical and physical boundaries the approach which gives rise to partial physicality are those which occur at the inflection point with rates whose acceleration has approached zero.
The two rates being those frequency vibrations which resonate with each other and the interface of the non-physical reality to.which it.has become entangled.

You conjecture that the universe behaves much like an atom and that in all possible universes tunneling is its bond and.occurs if.and.only.if the criteria for.the previous conjecture has been met.
You think to yourself if.eyes are windows to.the soul then neutrons are the window to everything that exists. You conjecture that the nucleus of all atoms provide an.interface to all possible universes, access occurs only in those states whose frequency vibration allows sharing of electrons with spins that satisfy a valance bond structure yielding orbital hybridization.
 
SeekingtheTruth said:
Sometimes when you are reading a book a sentence will strike you as peculiar. Peculiar thoughts leads one to peculiar and interesting ideas you think to yourself. However, it is not the sentence that is peculiar but the thought contained in the sentence and how it is connected to the paragraph. If you continue to walk along this tightrope of logic you realize that thought is neither the sentence nor the paragraph but both at the same time. Thought is contextual. Con-textual. It is a con to think that text itself is the thought, rather, it is thought which has considered or soldered itself meaning to the text. A meaning embedded within the fabric, much like pen into paper.

After awhile you cross your legs and out of convenience or to minimize effort you flip over.the open book and balance its spine or, rather, its fold of the pages upon your legs.

Immediately you note how the fold looks much like a wave to you, at.the same time you cognize that the reality must be that it is both at the same time. Even the sharpest of blades are rounded and smooth when examined closely.

What a cryptic thought. What does it mean that even the sharpest of blades are rounded and smooth? You recognize this as a boundary. A fuzzy boundary. An entanglement of two worlds. Perhaps, it is the interface of the physical with the non-physical? 99.999% empty space you think to yourself. You conjecture that the universe itself is 99.999% empty space and what we see of.it is but a reflection of this binding, this entanglement. Particles and waves observing each other. An eternal hug giving rise to time and space.

When you flip your book back over you notice how the fold connects the fabric of two sides. The folds of.the page are convex towards the center while sloping down and away and.then up again into a slight curl. You notice a merging of the concave with the convex. Its boundary is fuzzy yet you know it exists but.where? You cognize that it is the location of two rates and that the precise location at which the two merge would give an acceleration of zero. The inflection point of time and space. The point that has no point and the wave which has neither time nor space. You conjecture that this is the.interface, but not the interface itself but.the boundary, the tunnel of entanglement that is neither physical nor non-physical. You conjecture that in all mergings which contain non-physical and physical boundaries the approach which gives rise to partial physicality are those which occur at the inflection point with rates whose acceleration has approached zero.
The two rates being those frequency vibrations which resonate with each other and the interface of the non-physical reality to.which it.has become entangled.

You conjecture that the universe behaves much like an atom and that in all possible universes tunneling is its bond and.occurs if.and.only.if the criteria for.the previous conjecture has been met.
You think to yourself if.eyes are windows to.the soul then neutrons are the window to everything that exists. You conjecture that the nucleus of all atoms provide an.interface to all possible universes, access occurs only in those states whose frequency vibration allows sharing of electrons with spins that satisfy a valance bond structure yielding orbital hybridization.

Hi SeekingtheTruth, I'm wondering how your weaning yourself off of the adderall is going? I realize this is the creative acts section, but your thinking in several of your latest posts is a bit concerning.
 
Your comment reminds me of this feedback given to you recently.

SeekingtheTruth] [quote author=Shijing said:
Buddy said:
What I can say with some assurance is that if you don't have a genetic basis for such a diagnosis (at least that oddly shaped DRD4 dopamine receptor gene or the R7 allele) then you're probably flooding your brain (not to mention every other D2 and D4 dopamine receptor in your basal ganglia, which includes your "gut brain") with so much excess dopamine you could have hallucinations.

SeekingtheTruth, I think that Buddy is exactly right about this. From what you describe above, you've been unbalancing your brain chemistry continuously over the course of several years with amphetamines (that's essentially what Adderall is), and it's affecting your perception of reality (including a strong tendency to engage in magical thinking). For your own health and safety, I think it's very important for you to try to start getting things back into balance. I know you just quit Adderall today, which is great -- but if you find that it's hard to stay away from it, you might need to look for some professional help with that outside of the forum. If you haven't already, you might do a web search on "Adderall addiction" and see if you recognize any of the symptoms in yourself.

I agree that it has caused me to engage in "magical" thinking. When I am engaged in magical thinking there is another observer that is observing it if that makes sense. In other words I do not accept it as objective reality but I do leave my mind open to accept it as a possibility or way of getting to the objective one. If anything can be made from anything then something can be made. If something can be made then there must be a rule to the making of that something. My magical thinking is my way of trying to understand the objective rule which has allowed the making of the magical.
[/quote]

Since this is the "Creative Acts" section, I wonder how you see your post here as a productive use of your energy towards your process. I personally see it as a loquacious, "lost in the head", meandering diatribe, getting tangled in the allure of whimsical thoughts and woven words which really lead to nothing.
 
The idea of duality originated in a debate over the nature of light and matter that dates back to the 17th century, when competing theories of light were proposed by Christiaan Huygens and Isaac Newton: light was thought either to consist of waves Huygens or of particles Newton. Through the work of Max Planck, Albert Einstein, Louis de Broglie, Arthur Compton, Niels Bohr, and many others, current scientific theory holds that all particles also have a wave nature and vice versa.
 
ronak said:
The idea of duality originated in a debate over the nature of light and matter that dates back to the 17th century, when competing theories of light were proposed by Christiaan Huygens and Isaac Newton: light was thought either to consist of waves Huygens or of particles Newton. Through the work of Max Planck, Albert Einstein, Louis de Broglie, Arthur Compton, Niels Bohr, and many others, current scientific theory holds that all particles also have a wave nature and vice versa.

Is this in reference to the origin of wave-particle duality?
 

Trending content

Back
Top Bottom