How All Presidents are related to King John of England

[angelburst29]

How All Presidents are related to King John of England (All the King's Men)
_http://realitybloger.wordpress.com/2014/01/13/how-all-presidents-are-related-to-king-john/

In my attempts to expose the genealogical “royal” bloodline – the passing of pure blood type as opposed to mere genealogical “family tree” relation – I came across a researcher from Ancestry.com named Tim Dowling. On his site, and reproduced below, Mr. Dowling has connected the trees of all U.S. Presidents to the Plantagenet King John circa 12oo A.D.

DIRECTIONS: To see the full charts or tree for each president, click on the “Relationship to King John” link below, and then on the next page click either the “tree” link or the link below that which looks like this:

Ancestry of George Washington, President up to John of England, King See

This presentation will hopefully satisfy those who were not satisfied with my previous presentation of mere cousin relationships between all U.S. Presidents, which can partially be found at this link
_: http://www.geni.com/blog/look-whos-related-george-washington-and-all-the-presidents-325451.html

Please click on the links in this chart for detailed geneology connections to the “royal” blood, and remember…

“It should be noted that Americans whose ancestors came from continental Europe in the colonial period and the 19th Century are unlikely to easily delineate descent from Charlemagne in their background. There was a separation of classes in Europe and the blood of the rulers seldom flowed legitimately into the blood of the nobility and commoners…”

–Jewels of the Crown – “A newsletter of the Order of the Crown of Charlemagne in the United States of America”

Passing legitimate blood type is not the same as being “related” or cousins…


President Obama is:

■William the Conquerer’s 22nd great grandson
■Mary I, Queen of Scots’s 3rd cousin 14 times removed
■Henry V, King of England’s 1st cousin 19 times removed
■Joseph Smith Jr.’s 10th cousin 6 times removed
■Henry VIII, King of England’s 1st cousin 16 times removed
■President John Tyler’s 10th cousin five times removed
■President James Madison’s 3rd cousin 8 times removed
■President Thomas Jefferson’s 10th cousin 6 times removed
■Anne Boleyn, Queen of England’s 1st cousin 15 times removed

 

[Mr. Premise]

I think if you go back that many generations there's a large percentage of people related to any thirteenth century person who reproduced successfully. 32 generations.

 

[angelburst29]

I think if you go back that many generations there's a large percentage of people related to any thirteenth century person who reproduced successfully. 32 generations.

My guess, you're probably correct. My end thought after reviewing a few of the links was mainly, "And look at what the end result is?" They "removed" themselves out of the Human Race.

 

[iam]

i wonder which new candidate running this election is related to george washington? is donald trump part of this line? would h. clinton be voted in because of her her husband's lineage? things that make you go hmm? thanks for sharing. :)

 

[Yupo]

Probably the same can be said for many of us.

 

[seek10]

Probably the same can be said for many of us.

Interestingly, population growth is exponential function. Well, if the descendants continue to survive.
_http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/gnxp/2010/08/1-in-200-men-direct-descendants-of-genghis-khan/#.VogC7fkrLIU

1 in 200 men direct descendants of Genghis Khan

In 2003 a groundbreaking historical genetics paper reported results which indicated that a substantial proportion of men in the world are direct line descendants of Genghis Khan. By direct line, I mean that they carry Y chromosomes which seem to have come down from an individual who lived approximately 1,000 years ago. As Y chromosomes are only passed from father to son, that would mean that the Y is a record of one’s patrilineage. Genghis Khan died ~750 years ago, so assuming 25 years per generation, you get about 30 men between the present and that period. In more quantitative terms, ~10% of the men who reside within the borders of the Mongol Empire as it was at the death of Genghis Khan may carry his Y chromosome, and so ~0.5% of men in the world, about 16 million individuals alive today, do so. Since 2003 there have been other cases of “super-Y” lineages. For example the Manchu lineage and the Uí Néill lineage. The existence of these Y chromosomal lineages, which have burst upon the genetic landscape like explosive stars sweeping aside all other variation before them, indicates a periodic it “winner-take-all” dynamic in human genetics more reminiscent of hyper-polygynous mammals such as elephant seals. As we do not exhibit the sexual dimorphism which is the norm in such organisms, it goes to show the plasticity of outcome due to the flexibility of human cultural forms.

This article is based on multiple surveys based DNA sample analysis. I am not sure of authenticity of it, but this reminded me of some simple calculation I did in excel.

"If a 2 couples lived 2000 years back,each had 2 children, each person lives 50 years and each couple had 2 children at the age of 25 years, How many people will be in now ?". I was shocked to see the population count as 10 to the power of 23. Well, our current population is only 7 or 8 billion (10*9). So, I added 2 or 3 times 99% destruction in between, I ended up 10 *14. This is based on very simplistic calculation. LOT of population decimations happened in between for this calculation to make sense. On the internet there are some population calculator's which seems to confirm the same.
basic population growth equation (A = Pe^(rt))

This made me to think old legends of "All are children of Manu" etc. may have some meaning in it.