How Does Your Country Rate for Press Freedom?

How about this? :curse:

The entire article is here with videos:
http://rt.com/usa/225819-rt-isis-point-view-competition/

RT equated to ISIS for ‘daring to advocate a point of view’


Following comments from the US overseas broadcasting chief listing RT as a challenge alongside the Islamic State and Boko Haram, critics said the outlet was singled out for “daring to advocate a point of view,” as well as for “competing for viewership.”

On Wednesday, the new chief of the US Broadcasting Board of Governors (BBG), Andrew Lack, told the New York Times that RT posed a significant challenge – putting the broadcaster in a list alongside the Islamic State and Boko Haram terror groups.

The comments have since been denounced on social networks and across the media spectrum. Speaking to RT, legal analyst and media commentator Lionel said the channel was being outrageously singled out and equated to the Islamic State for “daring to advocate a point of view.”

“In the history of incoherent statements, this might be the granddaddy of them all. In reading this, he alleges that Russia Today pushes… ‘a point of view,’” he told RT’s Ameera David.

Georgetown University journalism professor Chris Chambers added that Lack’s words were “supremely silly and careless,” especially considering his media background. Lack previously worked for NBC, Bloomberg, and Sony Music.

“This is a guy who has some media savvy, supposedly, even though he’s moved around a lot – maybe this is one reason he’s moved around,” Chambers told RT. “But this was a very careless and silly thing to say considering the prevalence of corporate media here in the United States, and the purpose of BBG’s constitutes like Voice of America, who are supposed to put out all kinds of views.”
While Lack’s comments were roundly criticized, Steven Ellis of the International Press Institute said he was right in one way. “Mr. Lack could have phrased his comments more carefully: RT does indeed pose a challenge to US international broadcasting in terms of competing for viewership,” he said.

Asked about the issue on Friday, State Department spokeswoman Jen Psaki distanced the US government from Lack’s comments, saying it doesn’t agree with the statement.

READ MORE: State Dept disagrees with head of US state media over equation of RT with ISIS

“Would the US government put those three in the same category? No, we wouldn’t,” Psaki said. However, she said there are “concerns” the US does agree with, stating that Russia’s independent media is under pressure and that BBG’s ability to broadcast in the country has become more difficult.

RT’s editor-in-chief Margarita Simonyan condemned the comparison and demanded clarification.

“We are extremely outraged that the new head of the BBG mentions RT in the same breath as the world’s number one terrorist army,” she said. “We see this as an international scandal and demand an explanation.”
 
zh said:
Here in Malaysia it's not free. Banned books, films are common here. You get lawsuit if not jail if you insult the PTB.

Totally agreed ! in Malaysia, the government has a long history of information suppression, and total media control. I can safely say that most urban Malaysian's have an attitude that "if the media denies it, it must be true ! :)"...

Only the internet is not censored in Malaysia, probably to act as a "valve" for Malaysians to vent their frustrations as all other forms of media are tightly controlled and censored...

Currently they are using the archaic Sedition Act to detain/question journalists, activists and opposition politicians that dare criticise the government...
 
Depending on which political party is in power, so is the procedure when it comes to censorship news. The past few years two journalists were killed by placing bombs under the car because they wrote about the Balkan mafia, apparently found too.
Such is the situation in Croatia, some stories out to the public, but journalists threatened, and many are forced themselves to quit.
 
Back
Top Bottom