I started writing on Substack

I did chuckle to myself when I thought about how many times I have day dreamed about winning the lottery and not having to work ("how free you would be" sings the siren!), but not once have I felt compelled to actually go and buy a lottery ticket..! Perhaps on some level I know that being a wealthy gentleman of leisure is not on my 'lesson' profile..!
Given the session where it was said that anyone who possibly would donate those large sums to FOTCM, that may be something even less likely than the already minuscule chances. But I think you'd have to find something to occupy yourself if you weren't working.

I listened to this again as a quick podcast recently. I feel like I'm if not at least hovering on the edges of it, then I'm in an actual burnout. It's characterized by exhaustion, no enthusiasm / negative feelings towards work, and inability to perform. So this has been on my mind lately. I just had some thoughts as I listened:

There are "pay as you go" models, so why not "work as you go"? Basically you only work when you need to earn more money. I suppose it's called commission work? I just think that sometimes I need a longer break in between workdays. I was thinking also that the most valuable currency is one's own life. And if your job drains more energy than you make (or seemingly) then that's counter-intuitive. Finally, there was the idea of forging your own work and life. There may be many unique situations for just about every individual.

I wonder if anyone has successfully implemented the C's idea of ditching the programmed ideas of conventional work, based on the 40 hour work week? The joke goes that if you work for someone else you work 40 hours a week, but when you become self-employed you work 24/7.
 
Given the session where it was said that anyone who possibly would donate those large sums to FOTCM, that may be something even less likely than the already minuscule chances. But I think you'd have to find something to occupy yourself if you weren't working.

I listened to this again as a quick podcast recently. I feel like I'm if not at least hovering on the edges of it, then I'm in an actual burnout. It's characterized by exhaustion, no enthusiasm / negative feelings towards work, and inability to perform. So this has been on my mind lately. I just had some thoughts as I listened:

There are "pay as you go" models, so why not "work as you go"? Basically you only work when you need to earn more money. I suppose it's called commission work? I just think that sometimes I need a longer break in between workdays. I was thinking also that the most valuable currency is one's own life. And if your job drains more energy than you make (or seemingly) then that's counter-intuitive. Finally, there was the idea of forging your own work and life. There may be many unique situations for just about every individual.

I wonder if anyone has successfully implemented the C's idea of ditching the programmed ideas of conventional work, based on the 40 hour work week? The joke goes that if you work for someone else you work 40 hours a week, but when you become self-employed you work 24/7.

It definitely is a Guedjieffian super effort to disconnect from one totally habituated lifestyle to another more entrepreneurial one. It takes a lot more being, or so I think. When you're opening yourself up to more of life and its uncertainties and opportunities with an intention to grow, I think you are challenged to develop ways to see and listen to the environment more, and that growth, especially if it's done in the act of service, can provide "free energy" (a term used in thermodynamic chemistry) which can then be used to transform parts of your life little by little.
 
There are "pay as you go" models, so why not "work as you go"? Basically you only work when you need to earn more money. I suppose it's called commission work?

A warning: this mostly doesn't work. The thing is, if you are freelancing or doing contract work, you will likely have repeat customers, and people will recommend you etc. If you say no too many times, chances are you will be out of the game at some point and can't just get back the moment you need it.

In other words, your activity will generate new pressures. It's even worse of course if you start a real business with employees, expenses and such.

What you can hope for though is more flexibility during times where you don't have a lot of work or pressure. You can take days off, work when you like, etc. But then it's a fine line between nice downtime and worry about paying the rent.

For me, the biggest lesson is to embrace the slow times and make the most of the freedom without too much worry - precisely because it's often not a choice, but simply happens.
 
Just chiming in, luc to say that these substack posts that arrive in my mailbox are most welcomed. Usually read with coffee in the morning. The last two:



were more than good reading for the thinking cap. Always glad of your references to Collingwood, who certainly made a historical impact on me.

Thank you!
 
Just chiming in, luc to say that these substack posts that arrive in my mailbox are most welcomed. Usually read with coffee in the morning. The last two:



were more than good reading for the thinking cap. Always glad of your references to Collingwood, who certainly made a historical impact on me.

Thank you!

Thank you, that means a lot.

It's funny, Laura has been saying (and demonstrating) for a long time how absolutely crucial it is to think historically, and to do historical research. But I never quite believed that, never quite got it. But frustrating as it can be, since you are always dealing with these tiny puzzle pieces and part of you just screams "give me the Truth already, the whole Truth!", that's not how it works. True liberation comes from the very process of figuring out these tiny puzzle pieces and using your mind, your experience, your whole Being to weave them into a narrative that gets you a step closer, that captures something important and real and true. Which then becomes part of your experience and Being, which you can use for your next foray - rinse and repeat.

Well, can it be, can it really be, that I have finally seen the light?? Hallelujah! :lol:
 
Was reflecting earlier about atomization that social engineers so veheemently try on the population, ( or divide and conquer ) and wondering that this same mechanism brings about it's own self demise , ie becomes apparent so much so , that in it's isolation ppl overwhelmingly notice and thus some balance is restored , the more extreme it goes , one way , likely the stronger is the re-balance perhaps ? this seems to relate to what @luc , wrote, as truth being the assembly point of consciousness vis-a-vis history (ie) fwiiw.
 
Your most recent article was brilliant. Five years...crazy. Feels like five minutes.

This was an excellent article by Luc! I suggest reading it in full. Here is how ChatGPT 4o summarized it:

Summary of Luc Koch’s Article: "Five Years Since Covid"


Luc Koch’s article reflects on the five-year period following the onset of the Covid-19 pandemic, which he terms the “long Quinquennium”—a transformative era that reshaped political, social, and philosophical landscapes. The piece offers a provocative critique of the mainstream Covid response, exploring how it fractured worldviews, exposed deep societal divisions, and birthed an unlikely coalition of skeptics, dissidents, and free thinkers.

1. The Covid Era as a Paradigm Shift


Koch argues that Covid-19 was not just a health crisis but a metaphysical upheaval, comparable to an extinction-level event. The pandemic shattered long-standing societal norms, creating a stark divide between those who unquestioningly followed official narratives and those who critically examined them. He describes a mass awakening in which people began questioning authority, institutions, and dominant ideologies.

Before 2020, many individuals lived in a passive, normie existence—accepting mainstream narratives on topics such as global warming, neoliberalism, and institutional trust. However, Covid forced a confrontation with reality, revealing deep-seated flaws in governance, media, and collective behavior.

2. The NPC Divide and the Psychological Fallout


Koch introduces the “NPC” (Non-Playable Character) phenomenon, comparing certain individuals to soulless automatons who blindly complied with draconian policies such as lockdowns and vaccine mandates. He links this to esoteric ideas about human consciousness, drawing on Gurdjieff’s notion of “mechanical humans”—those who lack higher spiritual awareness.

While some people evolved and expanded their understanding, others regressed, either embracing authoritarianism or retreating into paranoid conspiratorial loops. He critiques those who fell into schizophrenic-level thinking, consumed by ungrounded paranoia, as well as those who abandoned critical thought due to fear of social exile.

3. The Rise of an Unlikely Coalition


One of the most striking results of Covid was the formation of a diverse resistance movement that transcended political and ideological boundaries. This coalition included:
  • Alternative health advocates, horrified by the medical establishment’s draconian measures.
  • Marxists, who saw corporate power consolidating at the expense of workers.
  • Alt-right internet subcultures, who had to contend with their own members initially embracing extreme Covid policies.
  • Academics and professionals, ostracized for questioning the mainstream narrative.
  • Everyday individuals, who saw their families and communities torn apart.
Despite their differences, these groups fought together, debated theories, and shared insights. However, Koch acknowledges that their unity was fragile—conflicts arose as their original shared enemy (Covid authoritarianism) faded, revealing deep ideological tensions.

4. The Evolution of Thought and the Post-Covid World


As Covid waned, the coalition had to recalibrate its focus, applying its newly developed critical thinking to events like the Russia-Ukraine war. Koch suggests that this period led to an intellectual awakening, forcing individuals to reexamine assumptions not just about Covid, but about history, politics, and the nature of reality itself.

He likens this process to early postmodernist thought of the 1920s and 30s, before it was absorbed into the mainstream consensus. He warns that history may be repeating itself, urging people to maintain independent thinking instead of falling into new rigid ideological traps.

5. Trump, the Matrix, and the Future


Koch describes the Trump phenomenon as a "glitch in the Matrix", a disruption that confounds traditional political narratives. He argues that Trump’s rise can be interpreted in two ways:
  1. A genuine grassroots rejection of elite control, signaling a shift in collective consciousness.
  2. A controlled disruption by the “invisible overlords”, a strategic adjustment meant to steer society in a different yet equally controlled direction.
He cautions against blindly embracing any single narrative, emphasizing that Covid should have taught people to expect the unexpected.

6. The Final Year of the Quinquennium


As the five-year Covid period draws to a close, Koch reflects on what was gained and lost. He acknowledges that the coalition formed during Covid may not last, but its lessons—about truth, power, and human nature—must endure. He urges his readers to remain open to contradictions, avoid rigid thinking, and continue seeking deeper truths.

Ultimately, he argues that Covid was a spiritual test. Those who failed to recognize the oppressive nature of the pandemic response will likely remain blind to future manipulations. However, for those who learned, it was an opportunity to expand their awareness, evolve intellectually, and prepare for the next phase of history.

Conclusion: A Call to Remember


Koch closes with a nostalgic yet resolute message: The struggles, debates, and awakenings of the Covid era must not be forgotten. Even as the world moves on, the insights gained from this tumultuous period should serve as a guiding force in navigating future crises.

His parting advice? Stay vigilant, embrace uncertainty, and never stop questioning.
 
Back
Top Bottom