Indigenous Australians were here first?

[Inquorate]

Here's an interesting article that appears to show evidence that the Australian aboriginal may have been the first human in earth.

They mistakenly posit that other races diverged from them , but interestingly give the dates of other races arriving.

Most interesting

_http://humansarefree.com/2014/08/the-first-human-race-came-from.html?m=0


"In 1982 she examined the mitochondrial DNA of 112 Indigenous people, including twelve full-descent Aboriginals, and the results were in total opposition to what they assumed was fully resolved.
Nevertheless, Cann was obliged to contradict a central tenet of their paper, stating that “mitochondrial DNA puts the origin of Homo sapiens much further back and indicates that the Australian Aboriginals arose 400,000 years ago from two distinct lineages, far earlier than any other racial type.” [8]
Not only was the emergence of Aboriginal Homo sapiens “far earlier” [9] than any Africans, she provided a sequence and motherland.

The Australian racial group has a much higher number of mutations than any other racial group, which suggests that the Australians split off from a common ancestor about 400,000 years ago. "

 

[Inquorate]

Even more interesting,

"Not far from the Lake Vasequillo footprints Gonzales investigated is another site that was deliberately ignored for close to 30 years after a comprehensive investigation conducted by Cynthia Irwin-Williams.

The dates are so sensational and numerous, and so obviously associated with objects made by Homo sapiens artists, the archaeologists downed tools and clipboards and vowed never to return.

The dates returned by a variety of sound geological analyses were far too ancient, not only for occupation, but well outside the assumed period when Homo sapiens first appeared.

To some extent the issue isn’t just a matter of whether these numbers are feasible, but more a case of open antagonism between two competing branches of science.

Christopher Hardaker, author of The First American, created a fictional conversation between the two competing parties that graphically highlights how the argument over which group of academics is right has blinded the combatants.

ARCHAEOLOGIST: You are asking us to believe that the sophisticated art and technology of the Upper Palaeolithic was actually invented over 200,000 years ago in Central Mexico by Homo erectus? Ridiculous.

GEOLOGIST: You are asking us to believe that Science is off by a magnitude of 10? Ridiculous. [26]

Often the result of cutting-edge technology, the chemicals analysed and computations made came from extremely reputable institutions and individuals.

Some of the offending techniques and dates (which came from the layer of volcanic ash and debris deposited above the artefacts/or footprints) include:

Uranium Series Dating (200,000 years); Zircon Fission Track (170-640,000 years); mineral solutions (200,000 years); Diatom analysis (80,000 years); U-Th/He (200,000 years); tephrahydration (250,000 years); magnetic shifts in rocks (790,000 years); and argon argon (1,300,000 years).

The facts, and large figures, demand a response. What if just one date is actually right? "

 

[rrraven]

Indigenous Australians have always stated that they evolved here and did not walked here
this website -http://forgottenorigin.com/ says

50,000 years ago, the very first Homo Sapiens set sail from Australia. These people were responsible for the development of religion, art, agriculture, seafaring, surgery, and many of the cornerstones of civilization as we know it.
Steven and Evan Strong have spent over 20 years assembling facts from archaeological finds, explorers’ accounts, genetics information, traditional Australian (Ab)Original mythology and many more sources to develop one coherent and controversial theory: Australian Original people exported civilization to the world-at-large.

 

[rrraven]

-https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=332194630270585&set=gm.654256061331714&type=1

From the book Göbekli Tepe: Genesis of the Gods, by Andrew Collins. Symbol of pillar 28 at Göbekli Tepe same as symbol painted on the torso of Worgaia medicine man from central Australia

 

[1peacelover]

Along the same lines are this article:

LUZIA - Second Oldest Human Skeleton Ever Found In The Americas

The skull was later re-discovered by Brazilian Prof. Walter Neves and analyzed. He also excavated more remains in the same cemetery-like site where the original "Luzia" had been found. Neves named the ancient lady "Luzia" in analogy to the famous and much older African "Lucy" - the press and a wider public much preferred the new name to the skull's cumbersome official designation "Lapa Vermelha IV Hominid 1".

The face of "Luzia" was reconstructed using modern forensic methods and its morphology painstakingly analyzed by craniometric measurements. The reconstruction brought to light and and the measurements confirmed that "Luzia" was not a mongoloid Amerindian but had features indicating a possibly Australoid or southeast Asian ancestry. When it was dated to around 11,500 to 12,500 years ago (the oldest human remains found so far in the Americas), the sensation was perfect.

Read the rest @ http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1283339/posts

Another interesting video is one on the people of Tierra del Fuego & their journey. Many of the rock art paintings immediately reminded me of Australia right off. Check this out: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r6IrMjfbh6E.