Iran's device
- Thread starter RobertB
- Start date
RobertB said:
I assume you mean the nuclear bomb?
The question would be: how many countries have one? and I would say many.. the fact that they have one doesn't mean that they are going to use it.. and that doesn't mean that they are not enrichment uranium for other purposes either.
The subject of Iran having a nuclear bomb is very popular because of Israel and EE.UU are using this as an excuse to attack Iran and invade it.
curious_richard
Jedi Master
I think it is possible that Iran bought one or more nuclear devices when the USSR was falling apart. There were rumors that the Red Army was selling nuclear devices for the right price.
I think it is very unlikely that Iran would actually use their device. It could have great value as a defensive deterrent. But if they actually used it, then they would not have it anymore!
I think it is very unlikely that Iran would actually use their device. It could have great value as a defensive deterrent. But if they actually used it, then they would not have it anymore!
For what is worth, that just goes to show that all the media talks about how careful all the world must be to make sure Iran doesn't get a bomb is just a distraction. I read the following article (just consider the information that Iran has a bomb and that they are indeed targeting Russia):
http://russia-insider.com/en/iran-nuclear-deal-another-moronic-attempt-hurt-russia/ri7588
http://russia-insider.com/en/iran-nuclear-deal-another-moronic-attempt-hurt-russia/ri7588
Rennie564
Padawan Learner
I would like to point out that Keshe is Iranian and claims that he has given all of his research to Iran. They are negotiating for a "peaceful nuclear" program. One of the things claimed by Keshe is that free energy-plasma reactors are possible and can run on nuclear waste. He also has claimed that Ivan's ability to capture a U.S. drone was made possible with technology. But as for proof? I have yet to find anything conclusive.
Nević Nenad
The Living Force
curious_richard said:
If Iran have one, that would mean that they have technology to make it. If they have technology, that would mean that they probably have more than one piece of it :)
Technology is not very big problem, India haves it from the 1970s (just as a illustration). The problem is uranium, plutonium, and other radioactive elements, which are rare. Thats probably where the enrichment comes into place. Of course, not to be forgoten that Iran have nuclear power reactors, which also could use enrichment.
But my opinion is that "the enrichment" is just been used as the excuse from the West to attack and influence Iran.
And, I also think that the countries who posses the nuclear weapons are targeting ALL others who has it. Just in case. Just like the Risk board game.
Though India had nuclear weapon since 1970's but it looked lost interest ( though it still worked on it later without attenton to avoid parts import embargo) in it after wards. I guess the reason is its 1970 war victory over Pakistan and creation of Bangladesh . It didn't find the need of display until late ninghties through pokran tests after victim of terrorism in Punjab in 80's and Kashmir sincce 90's. The man credited for testing n-bomb at pokran apj kalam called it ' strength respects strength' . I don't think any body will use it. More over as some body pointed out it spoils the harvest. If there is any body that gets overly paranoid about nuclear weapons, it is western countries who used to has/ still as good living standards, fear of losing it and this fear is fed by MIC through its cod war 1 propaganda. Others fear of nuclear weapons for sure but not to the point of western world. Probably they don't have too much to lose or too preoccupied with daily struggles. In the case of Iran, there is no incentive to showoff( if it has or still developing), news will feed Israel and hurts Iran due to business sanctions.
