Rhythmik said:
I guess so. He might be away and ask me to feed it.
Hi Rhythmik,
Who's names are on the lease/mortgage? The reason I ask is because if it's your name only or even both of your names, I think he should at least ask the people he lives with if this is okay as this would show some consideration of our feelings as well. In this case, the type of pet being considered would almost be beside the point. It would also not be your responsibility to take care of it if he goes somewhere and is unable to provide adequate care for it which if I'm understanding your question, is your main concern.
Many people get pets because they "like" what the animal says about them to others - maybe they think they appear tougher or stronger or something. In other words, the pet subconsciously meets some unfulfilled quality they feel they lack. It should probably be closer to the opposite - that they get the pet in order to serve it's needs. Because domesticated animals are at a disadvantage in nature, if given proper care and attention, they tend to do better living amongst humans and are generally a safer choice for all concerned.
With pythons, I don't know, people do have them, but I wonder if they might not be better off in general living in their natural habitat although I could be wrong. Knowing the kind of animal and it's specific nature is important because it gives us the opportunity to see the animal as it is, make more responsible choices regarding our care of it and shows that we respect it's life. Or so I currently think.
So is your question really about the moral/ethical implications of you being put in a position to feed the python live mice? If so, I'd say if you have a problem with it or anything else regarding that issue, you may want to consider discussing this with your roommate and letting him know that you feel uncomfortable with that. Others may feel differently, so for what it's worth.
Added: Just saw clerck de bonk's post and agree.