Islamic finance rides the storm

Ryan

The Living Force
FOTCM Member
Something interesting from Fairfax's "Business Day":

Islamic finance rides the storm

Clancy Yeates
October 11, 2008

A thriving financial sector sounds like an oxymoron these days. Even Australia's banks - among the most profitable in the world - kept a fifth of this week's interest rate cut to cushion their margins. But there is one sector that has tongues wagging in the hubs of commerce: Islamic finance.

While the Western world's financial system has been imploding, this small but rapidly growing share of world capital has weathered the storm.

Sharemarkets in London and New York are a third off their peaks. Dow Jones's Islamic financials index, in contrast, rose 4.75 per cent in the most recent September quarter and lost a modest 7 per cent in the previous year.

Not only has the industry been resilient; it's also on the cusp of serious expansion. It is growing faster than any other subset of world banking, at 15 to 20 per cent a year. The Economist estimates Islamic assets under management are worth $US700 billion ($1000 billion). This figure could hit $US1 trillion - about the Australian sharemarket's current value - by 2010.

What's more, all this growth has come from a model of lending that rejects interest payments and shuns speculation and heavy borrowing.

In short, Islamic finance bans some of the excess that has brought the West's financial system to its knees, and is looking wise indeed, or at least lucky.

Islamic finance takes its guidance from sharia.

The biggest markets are in the Middle East and Muslim countries, but global banks have opened sharia-compliant branches. Locally, the Muslim Community Co-operative is one of a few lenders offering the service.

Justice, partnership and opposition to excessive risk are the main principles guiding Islamic banks. Outright speculation and dealing with any party that has a balance sheet more than a third of which is debt are forbidden, as are investments deemed unethical by Islamic scholars, such as casinos.

But if these rules sound tough, the biggest difference is a ban on interest.

Charging interest is immoral because it does not take into account how changes in the value of the loan's security can affect the borrower, sharia says. Home owners who bought near the peak are now experiencing this harsh reality: interest gives banks a steady payment from the borrower, regardless of the property market's state.

However, profit is fine, and Islamic banks have devised ways to make money from lending. Instead of demanding interest, they buy the asset outright on behalf of the borrower. The borrower pays off the loan (the principle) and a fee for using the asset (rent, for example) until the amount is repaid and ownership transfers to the borrower.

Just like mortgage-backed securities, the rights to loan repayments can be sold as an Islamic bond, or sukuk. But instead of a yield, the bondholder receives repayments on the loan, and some rent. As a result, Islamic lenders have not had to venture into money markets that have recently blown up.

For depositors, putting your money with an Islamic bank is more like being a shareholder. Rather than interest, depositors get a cut of any profits.

Understandably, Western governments are casting around for ideas on how to run a more robust financial system. But what could they possibly learn from such a different approach?

Islamic finance's more prudent rules on debt look attractive in hindsight. But more fundamentally, proponents say it provides a better way to link the financial system to the "real" economy.

Because Islamic banks keep ownership of the asset until the loan is repaid, they have a greater incentive to make sure borrowers do not bite off more than they can chew. The bank shares in the risks of the entrepreneur but also its failures, the argument goes.

I am not suggesting we switch to a lending system without interest payments. But a big gripe emerging in recent weeks is that finance has become out of whack with the needs of the rest of the economy.

In the most extreme cases, it seems investment bankers devoted themselves to developing inventive ways to get higher bonuses rather than facilitating productive investment. Islamic finance shows one way of ensuring savings are put to more useful ends.

Some even say banning short selling of shares reflects sharia thinking, because it stops traders dealing with assets they don't own. "Banning short selling is one of the decisive elements in Islamic finance, so it seems almost that the conventional markets are looking at the Islamic techniques, which so far did not play any role in conventional markets," a financial journalist from Dubai, Gerard Al-Fil, told ABC radio last month.

Sceptics say Islamic finance just dresses up Western finance with different titles. It is also worth noting that the system is not immune from creating bubbles, although the method of lending makes it harder for investors to pile in through debt. A conflict between its religious goals and the goal of turning a profit is another tension, The Economist notes.

Nevertheless, it is booming. High oil prices have filled the coffers of Gulf states, and the region is crammed with capital works projects in need of funding. Muslims account for 20 per cent of the world's population, but Islamic finance makes up less than 1 per cent of world capital, suggesting huge room for growth.

The Islamic bond market has tapered off in the credit crunch, but this appears to be a blip. About $US14 billion in Islamic bonds were issued in the eight months to August, down from $US23 billion in the same time last year, but Standard & Poor's expects issuance to hit $US25 billion next year.

This potential has not crept past Western banks unnoticed, and many have fast-growing sharia-compliant arms. London is vying to capture the market and has changed its laws to allow the different property transfers required for the lending. British media report growing interest even among non-Muslims because of perceptions that it is a more ethical approach to finance.

So expect to see more Islamic banks in years ahead as global banks try to cash in on this growing field. Given the present financial mess, the industry's resilience only makes it harder to ignore.
 
Yup! That's another 'strike' against the Muslims; they have a viable financial sysem - based on sharia

At least one Muslim cleric has called for the replacement of capitalism with the Islamic system, from:

_http://www.dailystaregypt.com/article.aspx?ArticleID=17058

Replace capitalism with Islamic financial system, says Qaradawi

By AFP
First Published: October 13, 2008

Sunni cleric Sheikh Yusuf Al-Qaradawi.




DOHA: Muslims should take advantage of the global financial crisis to build an economic system compatible with Islamic principles, influential Sunni cleric Sheikh Yusuf Al-Qaradawi said on Sunday.

"The collapse of the capitalist system based on usury and paper and not on goods traded on the market is proof that it is in crisis and shows that Islamic economic philosophy is holding up," said the Egyptian-born, Qatar-based cleric.

"The Western system has collapsed and we have a complete economic philosophy as well as spiritual strength," he said at Sunday's opening of a conference on Jerusalem.

"All riches are ours... the Islamic nation has all or nearly all the oil and we have an economic philosophy that no one else has," Qaradawi said.

He urged Muslims to "profit from the crisis to bring about the triumph of the (Islamic) nation, which holds the spiritual and material resources for victory."

The phrase 'rubbing noses in it' comes to mind!
 
Too bad we can't take all the best "social rules" from the various religions, combine them, and ditch the religions altogether. It's not about what God wants, it should be about what is good for the majority of human beings and for good and healthy social structures.
 
I agree. I thought it interesting that a "moral" form of banking (even if the basis for that morality comes from a religion) appears less exposed to the recent market manipulations and upheavals than the predatory "free market" capitalist institutions.
 
I think you've got it there. A 'moral' form would be guided by the ideas of service and fair exchange. The Predatory system we have seems to be more about the appearance of a service which is actually trying to siphon off as much of your cash as it can. As mentioned in the article "it seems investment bankers devoted themselves to developing inventive ways to get higher bonuses rather than facilitating productive investment".
 
Islamic Finance has indeed been a boom market for a few years now with most international banks, including European and American ones, having some involvement. What has been interesting is to watch the consistent pressure being applied by western financial and political forces to break the spirit of Islamic banking. Islamic finance is entirely asset based - there is no possibility of lending for any means that doesn't provide for a steady income generated by the use of an asset.

Traditionally, the asset can be an aircraft, a ship, a crane, a truck - anything for which a readily identifiable income stream exists and therefore for which there is a reasonable and defined rent that can be agreed between the provide of finance and the operator of the asset. A broader range of assets have been included in recent years, including harbours, airports, factories and commercial property as these too generate defined income streams. The principle of Islamic finance is that the financier shares in the risk and rewards relating to the asset purchased with his money. Western pressure has been towards bending and twisting the rules in increasingly desperate attempts to weaken the principles of shared risk and impose increasingly interest-like features into Islamic financing arrangements.

At the head of the push to weaken Islamic principles wherever possible have been the IMF. So successful have they been that in Indonesia (the most populous Muslim nation) that the Islamic finance sector represents only a small portion of all finance, the western interest and fractional reserve lending model being the dominate form. Malaysia, a country whose previous Prime Minister, Mathatir Mohammed, had no illusions as to the evil nature of the IMF and as to who caused global crises has a robust Islamic finance sector but again one that is dwarfed by the western model.

It is only in the Middle East where the Islamic model holds sway. and only then in relation to the domestic economy.

In the absence of interest there is no inbuilt inflationary pressure in the economy (there may be other inflationary pressures but, absent interest, these can be dealt with through linking the money supply to real domestic production growth). If this principle is then combined with a banking system based on banks only lending what money they really have and no being able to lend multiples of it (the fractional reserve system) then the is no incentive for banks to create asset price bubbles. With the addition of there being no finance for speculators under a pure Islamic financial system it is no wonder that the western financial powers have sought to ensure that Islamic finance is little known and understood in the west and is always under attack in its home markets.

That the current western financial collapse is a deliberate, engineered and inevitable result of western system, it seems reasonable to have people ask themselves why and how this is. Our financial, legal and religious systems all have inevitable consequences - they enrich a tiny elite and enslave the rest of us in body, mind and spirit. That so much could flow, at least in part, from a simple concept such as "interest"!! :scared:
 
Back
Top Bottom