It's the Coldest Winter in Decades

[Jacques]

Read recently

Global Warming? It's the Coldest Winter in Decades

By Tony Bonnici - Daily Express UK
Feb 19, 2008 - 9:53:56 AM


New evidence has cast doubt on claims that the world’s ice-caps are melting, it emerged last night. Satellite data shows that concerns over the levels of sea ice may have been premature.

It was feared that the polar caps were vanishing because of the effects of global warming.

But figures from the respected US National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration show that almost all the “lost” ice has come back.

Ice levels which had shrunk from 13million sq km in January 2007 to just four million in October, are almost back to their original levels.

Figures show that there is nearly a third more ice in Antarctica than is usual for the time of year.

The data flies in the face of many current thinkers and will be seized on by climate change sceptics who deny that the world is undergoing global warming.

A photograph of polar bears clinging on to a melting iceberg has become one of the most enduring images in the campaign against climate change.

It was used by former US Vice President Al Gore during his Inconvenient Truth lectures about mankind’s impact on the world. But scientists say the northern hemisphere has endured its coldest winter in decades.

They add that snow cover across the area is at its greatest since 1966.

The one exception is Western Europe, which has – until the weekend when temperatures plunged to as low as -10C in some places – been basking in unseasonably warm weather. The UK has reported one of its warmest winters on record.

However, vast swathes of the world have suffered chaos because of some of the heaviest snowfalls in decades.

Central and southern China, the USA and Canada were hit hard by snowstorms.

Even the Middle East saw snow, with Jerusalem, Damascus, Amman and northern Saudi Arabia reporting the heaviest falls in years and below-zero temperatures. Meanwhile, in Afghanistan snow and freezing weather killed 120 people.

In Britain the barmy February weather came to an abrupt halt at the weekend as temperatures plunged to -10C in central England.

Experts believe that this month could end up as one of the coldest Februaries in Britain in the past 10 years.

The freezing night-time conditions look set to stay around -8C until at least the middle of the week.

A Met Office spokesman explained: “There has been little or no cloud cover across England and Wales. So there is a capacity for a fair bit of heat to be able to escape at night.

“It has been warmer in Scotland but that’s because it has been cloudy there.

“Until the weekend the temperatures were in the 14s and 15s, and we will see a return to that later this week, though it will look grey and overcast when the clouds return.”

But he added that there was little chance of snow. He said: “When the rain comes it will get warmer.”



Earth Changes Media

 

[ScioAgapeOmnis]

Interesting, of course this comes to mind:

A: Climate is being influenced by three factors, and soon a fourth.
Q: (L) All right, I'll take the bait; give me the three factors, and also the fourth!.
A: 1) Wave approach. 2) Chlorofluorocarbon increase in atmosphere, thus affecting ozone layer. 3) Change in the
planet's axis rotation orientation. 4) Artificial tampering by 3rd and 4th density STS forces in a number of different ways. Be vigilant. Be observant. Be cautious in your planning and be aware. Do not let emotional anomalies cloud your knowledge base. This is not a "time" to let one's guard down. Be especially careful of travel to unfamiliar locators, as well as sleeping in unfamiliar surroundings!!! You are being watched. Or, at least, it is best to assume you are, and act, think, and prepare accordingly. Remember what you have been warned about concerning attack. As you learn more and know more, you become more interesting... and, when your ranks swell, you are more vulnerable unless you are more aware!! Q: (L) All right, were those given in the order in which they are occurring? The fourth being the one that's coming later? A: Maybe, but remember this: a change in the speed of the rotation may not be reported while it is imperceptible except by instrumentation. Equator is slightly "wider" than the polar zones. But, this discrepancy is decreasing slowly currently. One change to occur in 21st Century is sudden glacial rebound, over Eurasia first, then North America. Ice ages develop much, much, much faster than thought.

Q: How does global warming cause glaciers?
A: Increases precipitation dramatically. Then moves the belt of great precipitation much farther north. This causes rapid buildup of ice sheets, followed by increasingly rapid and intense glacial rebound.

 

[PepperFritz]

Over the past ten years of so, we have had incredibly mild winters here in southwestern Canada. Then, suddenly, this year we are having the coldest, snowiest, stormiest winter we have seen in a long, long time....

 

[Regulattor]

There was recently massive fish dying off in Taiwan waters, because of unusually low sea temperatures.

_http://youtube.com/watch?v=4tlhjm_wJlM&feature=user

 

[SiO4]

There was recently massive fish dying off in Taiwan waters, because of unusually low sea temperatures.

_http://youtube.com/watch?v=4tlhjm_wJlM&feature=user

private video.



And Texas remains Temperate! This last cold month of February has been pissing me off, but tomorrow the expected high is 91 F !

 

[Third_Density_Resident]

One change to occur in 21st Century is sudden glacial rebound, over Eurasia first, then North America. Ice ages develop much, much, much faster than thought.

This quote from the C's has always left me confused. The terms "glacial rebound", "post-glacial rebound" or "isostatic rebound" are commonly accepted by scientists the world over to mean the rise which occurs in landmasses after overlying glaciers melt. This happens because the huge weight of the glaciers actually causes the land beneath to sink. "Glacial rebound" does not refer to a sudden return of glaciers. Do a Google search, and you will not find a single example of "glacial rebound" being used in the context that the C's have used. It was my understanding that the C's were well versed in correct terminology and context, so this is one of those quotes which I simply don't understand.

 

[christx11]

One change to occur in 21st Century is sudden glacial rebound, over Eurasia first, then North America. Ice ages develop much, much, much faster than thought.

This quote from the C's has always left me confused. The terms "glacial rebound", "post-glacial rebound" or "isostatic rebound" are commonly accepted by scientists the world over to mean the rise which occurs in landmasses after overlying glaciers melt. This happens because the huge weight of the glaciers actually causes the land beneath to sink. "Glacial rebound" does not refer to a sudden return of glaciers. Do a Google search, and you will not find a single example of "glacial rebound" being used in the context that the C's have used. It was my understanding that the C's were well versed in correct terminology and context, so this is one of those quotes which I simply don't understand.

Well I cannot say for sure but from what I understand the C's use acronyms, misspell on purpose on occasion, say things that are only for a specific person to understand, give clues that are to make you think and aren't neccesarily THE answer you were looking for. I think you are making a mountain out of a molehill here. It is usually us that doesn't put things in the proper context. 15 months later the C's said it again and it seems to me anyway that it is pretty clear that the use of the word rebound is intended to mean sudden glacial return. Sometimes it is common sense that is intended. So if we want to insist that they are talking about the rebound of landmass horizontally in relation to glaciers when there are no glaciers on top of the landmass to melt, common sense would tell us that is not what they meant.

A: Yes, but many other places too. Remember, the sea level was several hundred feet lower then...
Q: Why was the sea level several hundred feet lower? Because there was ice somewhere or because there was not as much water on the earth at that time?
A: Ice.
Q: Was the ice piled up at the poles? The ice sheet of the ice age?
A: Yes.
Q: So, Atlantis existed during the ice age?
A: Largely, yes. And the world's climate was scarcely any colder away from the ice sheets than it is today.
Q: Well, how could that be? What caused these glaciers?
A: Global warming.
Q: How does global warming cause glaciers?
A: Increases precipitation dramatically. Then moves the belt of great precipitation much farther north. This causes rapid buildup of ice sheets, followed by increasingly rapid and intense glacial rebound.

 

[Regulattor]

There was recently massive fish dying off in Taiwan waters, because of unusually low sea temperatures.

_http://youtube.com/watch?v=4tlhjm_wJlM&feature=user

private video.

It wasn't private when I watched. Anyway, here is another link for same story. Sorry.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/player/nol/newsid_7260000/newsid_7260200/7260230.stm?bw=bb&mp=wm&asb=1&news=1&ms3=54&ms_javascript=true&bbcws=2