Jane Burgermeister threatened with Court Supervision

Perhaps it would be useful to describe the case and situation for other readers? Otherwise, this thread is just noise.
 
Jane Burgermeister has been fearless in speaking out about issues which threaten individual and societal freedom and safety. She was particularly vocal about the spurious claims regarding the Swine Flu and the danger and wrongness of forced vaccinations in view of the fact that the vaccinations had not been properly tested. What set her apart from other journalists and probably brought on the wrath of the power elite was her willingness to legally challenge the individuals and agencies (including Baxter Laboratory) who were behind the campaign.

In a recent interview, she describes the shape of things to come from her perspective:

_http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tg37HzIOe1g&annotation_id=annotation_171805&feature=iv
 
I watched the first interview you posted and, while her information on the swine flu virus seems correct, her threatening to kill herself if she is put under supervision of the court certainly plays into the judge's hands. She's acting like a crazy person. If she were simply calm about things and presented herself as reasonable, she might not have the issues she's currently having. In short, while her swine flu info looks ok (didn't read it in detail, just a cursory read) there is other information on her page (like the 'fog' that brought down the Polish president's plane) that is 'out there' to say the least.

I think that she may be an intelligent woman with psychological problems - at least her suicide threat and inability to know when to crusade and when to abide by what will keep her out of jail comes into play. I think that's unfortunate, but, all in all, in that video, she presents as exactly the type of person that they would declare 'insane'. If I get the time, I'll check the other interview out as well to see if she comes across as more stable in that one. Just my two cents.
 
She sued WHO (World Health Organization) and the UN(United Nations) and some influential officials
in Politic and economy (and I think Baxter too)because of Bioterrorism and attempted genocide againts US citizens and the World!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

And she not only asserted that, but also has hard evidence of it !!!!!!!!!

Take a look at this : _http://www.infowars.com/media/17044769-Evidence-of-the-Use-of-Pandemic-Flu-to-Depopulate-USA.pdf

After she sued them she was fired (worked as a Journalist)

She is about to be under disability (12 August!)!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! and therefore be with out any civic rights !: http://birdflu666.wordpress.com/

And could you please search a little bit on her, if she speaks the truth (I think so) she has more evidence !?

And if this is true, than this is a big injustice put on her !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! (for what she had uncovered!)

Please spread this as much you can (If you think she is right !). That must be spread, on as many people as possible if that is true !
 
I made a mistake that should mean:.......because of Bioterrorism and attempted genocide againts US citizens and the World!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Can somebody fix that?
 
Pashalis said:
I made a mistake that should mean:.......because of Bioterrorism and attempted genocide againts US citizens and the World!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Can somebody fix that?
Click to expand...

Done
 
It's unfortunate that the same "passion" that led Jane Burgermeister to become involved in controversial issues and challenge the Establishment could be the very thing that undermines her effectiveness.
 
anart said:
I watched the first interview you posted and, while her information on the swine flu virus seems correct, her threatening to kill herself if she is put under supervision of the court certainly plays into the judge's hands. She's acting like a crazy person. If she were simply calm about things and presented herself as reasonable, she might not have the issues she's currently having. In short, while her swine flu info looks ok (didn't read it in detail, just a cursory read) there is other information on her page (like the 'fog' that brought down the Polish president's plane) that is 'out there' to say the least.

I think that she may be an intelligent woman with psychological problems - at least her suicide threat and inability to know when to crusade and when to abide by what will keep her out of jail comes into play. I think that's unfortunate, but, all in all, in that video, she presents as exactly the type of person that they would declare 'insane'. If I get the time, I'll check the other interview out as well to see if she comes across as more stable in that one. Just my two cents.
Click to expand...

Here is her video made in Krakow, Poland, after the crash. That's true, there was a total mess then when it comes to information and a lot of speculations was in the air. That's understandable. The more, one would expect of her a little bit more reasonable voice in the midst of all that noise - if she was a serious activist. But for her video she picked nearly everything possible, all that BS and pure speculations. Now, she has a lot of fans/followers, also in Poland. Those are people who in majority are unable to discern who may be misleading them and become dangerous. JB, JA, DI, Moore, Chomsky, Zeitgeist, 9/11 (but forget about Mossad and a few other sacred cows!), landing on the Moon, Illuminati, anything you can think of is - - good (because not mainstream). That's completely black and white thinking about black and white world. I mean, completely. So naturally, she only added fuel to the flames with her video. [And that's exactly my impression about her: it's not that much about winning/ succeeding as it is all about stirring and being in the center of attention; you can call it "passion" although I'm afraid there are more accurate terms for it.]

To give you one but very unequivocal example of how she manipulates data: At the beginning she is talking about the volcano ash stuff and says that Merkel took it as an excuse to abandon her plan to attend President Kaczynski's funeral in Krakow. Then JB says: but it's only 400 km from Berlin to Krakow and only a couple of hours of driving. She wants to leave people with a specific impression - it was sooo easy to arrive anyway. Now, the real distance is 600 km and you can hardly make it in less than 7 hours. Makes a difference, doesn't it? That's not nitpicking on my part as there is much more of nonsense in what she says. But here are just numbers which are indisputable.

Well, I'm not that well familiar with all those flu and other issues in details as I am with the crash, so I can't say anything for sure. But in my opinion, she uses data and manipulates it in such a way that can serve her agenda. If she did it in the crash case, why should I assume she doesn't do the same with anything else?

Why does she do it, that's entirely different question. What's good to keep in mind is that the world isn't b&w and the same applies to JB until proved otherwise, osit.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Trending content

Back
Top Bottom