Jeffrey Epstein arrested: Israeli-American pedo ring to be exposed?

More details and commentary is starting to come up now.
65 years in prison...reducible to 12. Ridiculous prosecutors handling it. What a circus! These talking heads are like when hungry pigs get to the feeder and there is suddenly loud munching, squealing commotion of heads and bodies - everyone must get a piece of the chow - before the camera and they all manage to say nothing about the real culprits here. Just like at 9/11, reporters weren't allowed to ask, who did you see, only: "..and how did you feel?"

Who were there as guests? Who abused you? Any senate members you saw?

Never will come close to questions of involvement of Clintons, Gates and everybody else. No word of Epstein's plane, the Lolita Express.
In a country, where Trump had no standing before the Supreme Court..
 
In case you didn't notice, the trial records have been sealed. So unless they're leaked, we'll never know who else was involved.

As somebody recently remarked, that we still don't know who killed JFK is how we know who killed JFK. The same is true here: That the record of this trial has been sealed is how we know what's in it.

But of course, we've known that all along. The problem is all the people who don't know, and don't want to know (such as e.g. nearly all my family and friends, who are feeling so comfortable with their "vaccinations") – along with all the other truths they don't want to know. And never will know until knowledge is forced on them. Which is what we're all waiting for. It's coming, bit by bit. Will there be a real "Great Awakening"? Never seen it before, AFAIK. If so, that will be something for the ages.

773b9c5eb18d250a.jpeg
 
65 years in prison...reducible to 12. Ridiculous prosecutors handling it. What a circus! These talking heads are like when hungry pigs get to the feeder and there is suddenly loud munching, squealing commotion of heads and bodies - everyone must get a piece of the chow - before the camera and they all manage to say nothing about the real culprits here. Just like at 9/11, reporters weren't allowed to ask, who did you see, only: "..and how did you feel?"

Who were there as guests? Who abused you? Any senate members you saw?

Never will come close to questions of involvement of Clintons, Gates and everybody else. No word of Epstein's plane, the Lolita Express.
In a country, where Trump had no standing before the Supreme Court..

Agreed. What will become of the connections to intelligence/blackmail cliques, trafficking cartels and the real lowdown on the flight users, and just what they got up to on those trips? It stinks to high heaven. You have to wonder where this leads for further investigations, will this embolden others to find their courage and come forward? I can dream, but there's no doubt the interested parties will try and put a lid on this now. There's a cesspit of corruption going on, and if we value our society it is essential that we cut off this rotten fish from the head. It now once again puts the onus on us all as citizens to continue to pull on the threads and bring optimum information to the public sphere. It's doubtful that we'll ever see full and proper justice, but what more can we do? We do live in a pathocracy after all.
 

Sealed, yes, however unless I'm missing something, it then further states that there was no "showing" by either parties of the actions (deadline December 22, 2021), and thus they will be unsealed to the public record on or about January 3rd, 2022.

Guess will have to see, and maybe they won't reveal much at all - by design, as there was no showing.

Unfortunately, all tip of the iceberg stuff while the blackmailing syndicate do what they always do, cause hurt and get away with it.
 

Ghislaine Maxwell will no longer fight to keep names of 8 ‘John Does’ secret​


Maxwell is not going to fight to keep secret the names of eight customers of her and Epstein in Virginia Roberts' civil lawsuit. That means they'll probably be named in the proceedings. Ouch.

 
Well, well, well: Prince Andrew and accuser Virginia Giuffre have reached an out of court settlement for an undisclosed sum of money in a lawsuit which accused the disgraced UK royal of "rape in the first degree" after she was trafficked by Andrew pals Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell.



"The parties anticipate filing a stipulation of dismissal of the case within thirty (30) days," reads a note to Judge Lewis A. Kaplan.

"In the interim, the parties request that the Court suspend all deadlines and hold the action in abeyance."



"Virginia Giuffre and Prince Andrew have reached an out of court settlement," reads a note attached to the brief filing, which adds that Prince Andrew "intends to make a substantial donation to Ms. Giuffre's charity in support of victims' rights."

Andrew acknowledges that his old friend Jeffrey Epstein "trafficked countless young girls over many years," and he "regrets his association."


The deal comes just weeks before Andrew was to sit for a deposition with Giuffre's lawyers.

So far, Buckingham Palace has declined to comment on the settlement (from Hello!)

 
Sputniknews (emphasis theirs):

Epstein Victim Reveals How She Was Lured Into Convicted Paedophile’s Sex Ring


Apr. 5, 2022

Jeffrey Epstein was arrested for sex trafficking and sexually abusing more than 200 women, including minors, and was awaiting trial when he died in his New York prison cell in August 2019, his death having been officially declared suicide.

One of Jeffrey Epstein’s victims, former model Juliette Bryant, has claimed that she was lured into the web of the late convicted sex offender by a woman who claimed the financier could jump-start her modelling career.

Speaking to The Daily Beast in her first in-depth media interview about surviving Epstein’s sex ring, Bryant said that she was “a silly young 20-year-old and thought it sounded like such an amazing opportunity considering the people he was with”.

She said that her first meeting with Epstein took place in September 2002 at a Cape Town cocktail lounge, where former US President Bill Clinton was also present.

“That’s what gave Epstein credibility. The fact that he was with Clinton,” Bryant noted, adding that the former POTUS holding onto her hand “was like a dream” and “was so bizarre”.

She admitted that she was “completely conned” by the convicted paedophile, and that she “wouldn’t go with some random man to the Caribbean”.

“[Epstein] seemed legitimate. Clinton gave him credibility,” the former model reiterated, separately arguing that the financier preferred to share a hotel suite with the 42nd US president and was concerned about being poisoned.

“Epstein always had platters because I think he was scared of being poisoned. There were platters of food for everyone, and he’d pick off other people’s plates. It was weird,” Bryant said.

The Daily Beast interview came after Bryant - now a business owner and mother based in South Africa - spoke to BBC Two for its new series about Epstein’s former girlfriend and now-convicted accomplice Ghislaine Maxwell. The broadcaster’s “House of Maxwell” premiered on Monday.

She told the BBC about her staying on Epstein’s so-called “Paedophile Island” in the Caribbean, asserting that she “was being ordered to his bedroom at least three times a day”.

“I just checked out of my body and let him do what he wanted because I didn’t know what else to do […] It was just like a factory […] he was running a machine and Ghislaine Maxwell was the one operating it,” the former model claimed.

Bryant spoke after filing a lawsuit in 2019 against Epstein’s estate, alleging that the convicted sex offender raped her repeatedly for years at his homes in Paris, Palm Beach, and New York, as well as at his compound in New Mexico and private island in the US Virgin Islands.

As for Epstein, he served a 13-month sentence in the United States on charges of soliciting an underage girl for prostitution in 2005. In July 2019, he was arrested again, on suspicion of running a sex-trafficking ring that lured underage girls to his New York and Florida estate to attend sex parties.

Later that month, Epstein, who was facing up to 45 years behind bars upon conviction, committed suicide in his prison cell during his pre-trial detention in Manhattan's Metropolitan Correctional Centre, according to the official version.

The cause of his death, however, remains disputed and conspiracy theories have speculated that he was murdered to prevent him from testifying against his high-profile friends, who, as well as Bill Clinton, included former US President Donald Trump and Prince Andrew.
 
One could only hope this exposes more people that are involved in human trafficking. Although, I doubt any big names will be brought up, almost all of the elites partake in these activities. Epstein and Ghislaine are just one among the many that are part of this labyrinth, and seeing how Epstein was offed so easily, it just shows how they really don't matter. The victims could also be payed hushed money and that's it, the same pattern continues. Lets see what happens to Ghislaine after all of this, maybe she'll share the same fate as Epstein?
 
Numerous procurers and perpetrators integral to Epstein and Ghislane Maxwell’s crimes against children have not been indicted, and current officials are finding new ways to obfuscate the sordid truth.

Mark Crisper Miller offers some words and a video featuring Maria Farmer interviewed by Nick Bryant. Although the opening words focus on Covid (masks, vaccines etc. for children) it is much more than that:


What do the FBI, "our free press" and the #MeToo movement have in common? They all could not care less about the rape of children​

Maria Farmer talks about her long ordeal as a victim of the trafficking network run by Jeffrey Epstein/Ghislaine Maxwell for (as she points out) "the feds"​


Why is it that the fate of trafficked children matters not at all to those three entities?

And, for that matter, why was the misery of children under lockdown not a thing throughout Year COVID (2020), despite the skyrocketing of suicide among the young? And why, these last two years, has it been not just acceptable, but obligatory, and a sign of “virtue,” to make little kids wear masks, and sit six feet apart, all day in school? (As I’ve observed before, the suffering of deaf children in a world of masks was also not a thing.)

Those who had, and have, no problem with such nasty superstitious practices are also perfectly okay with “vaccinating” children, even though “the science” has long since made crystal-clear (to anyone who’s bothered reading it) that COVID-19 doesn’t sicken children, who, moreover, don’t transmit “the virus” to adults.

And those supporting such gratuitous injection—of children overall, and even their own children—also have (of course) seemed startlingly indifferent to the lethal toll that those “vaccines” have taken, and are taking now, on countless children, many “dying suddenly” of massive heart attacks. (What seems to be indifference to that toll is actually denial.)

If we are to judge societies by how they treat their children (as I believe we must), ours is surely doomed, and maybe damned, like those that sacrificed their children to the likes of Baal and Moloch.

So, as we think back on the Epstein/Maxwell operation, let’s observe the continuity between the way it was not properly reported or investigated, and the vast attack on children under COVID. (And maybe we could also give a thought to how the FBI/“our free press” also collaborated to protect the traffickers, or the alleged traffickers, behind the Franklin scandal, the McMartin pre-school scandal, and the white-hot one we know as “Pizzagate”—all three having quickly been laughed off and/or deplored as fake, despite the evidence that there was something there.)

 
a video featuring Maria Farmer interviewed by Nick Bryant.
Wow, Maria must be super old to have both grandfathers sign the Declaration of Independence! So, how is one to believe what she says? I was going to share until she said that about her grandfathers. And that crazy comment from her, throws more doubt onto stories of the abuse of children by powerful people. Is she mind controlled?
 
Wow, Maria must be super old to have both grandfathers sign the Declaration of Independence! So, how is one to believe what she says? I was going to share until she said that about her grandfathers. And that crazy comment from her, throws more doubt onto stories of the abuse of children by powerful people. Is she mind controlled?
She may be referring to this - the national archives allows anyone to add a signature to foundational documents.
 
Back
Top Bottom