Russia
(...) I have a feeling that this area will be a neutral area [Donetsk, Lugansk, etc.]. This is how Russia wants to win so that the occupied territories will have their own autonomy and may be able to claim their own statehood. Russia will not want to turn these lands into the Russian Federation. Russia will want to prove that it acted in a liberating and not an occupational way. If there are talks between Ukraine and Russia, it will be a bargaining chip for Ukraine to agree to this solution.
Russia will create a "pact". A "pact" with various Arab countries will be a trade, business, and economic pact. This can be very dangerous for the present world order because Russia aims to create an international force that will be able to impose certain trends in world economies, which many countries that have these trends in the rule may lose.
(...) I have the impression that Russia will try to influence the Arab countries and balance something with oil. Perhaps not only Russia, but other states will also want to make the market competitive. I have the impression that it would be a very great economic power and Russia could influence the possibility of restrictions on other states, the great ones, of this fuel.
Europe
First impression - shaky. In Europe, there are quite ongoing preparations for "One State". Not all of Europe will become "One State", but some countries. The crisis will worsen. Many decisions will be made deliberately in favor of the crisis so that Europe will find itself in economic and economic trouble. Then when there is a deep crisis in Europe, and this can happen quickly, then an idea will arise (which is already being arranged): some countries will agree to "One State". This will cause the European Union to shrink. Countries that fail to do so will become satellites in this "diminished" European Union. It will be a smart procedure because the EU will want to get rid of the countries that it does not tolerate. It will not take away other states' rights, but it will "pluck" them. (...) A creation will arise where the countries not fully accepted will not be fully accepted in the "One State". These countries are going to fall, but some will get caught. Those that the "One State" deems to fall away will fall off. Great Britain will enter this "One State". There will be no Poland, Poland will be a satellite.
This "One State" will enter into completely different economic principles, there will be no social benefits, and there will be a radical return to the practice of pure capitalism. Surprisingly, it will bring positive results very quickly. Countries that fail to do so will notice that they have made a mistake. They will have to introduce a similar policy at home, and it will not be easy, I don't know why, but this is how I feel.
China
China's policy will be on a "deterrent" principle. I have a conclusion that Russia in this economic war took on its shoulders such "bullying", while China will try to show its military power. (...) China is weakening world economies, they will continue to do so. China is struggling in a way to undermine the world industrially. They have to do it quickly, only in this way can be effective, because a long-term method would build up their base in relation to China. He could then become self-sufficient. They do it quickly, with a certain morality.
[I've omitted talk about the same matters all over again]
Israel
(...) Israel awaits an exodus in the future. (...) It is a very important moment for Israel, this period, what is happening. (...) The exodus of some people from Israel will not be caused by something bad in Israel, but by Israel's expansion in the world.
Middle East: Turkey, Iran, Syria
The first thing that came to my mind was a strange thing. I felt that if there were to fall "nuclear" anywhere, it is the Middle East. South of Iran. So from the side of Pakistan and Afghanistan. In my opinion, these regions are endangered. Iran will be attacked, it will be a very silent attack, it will be sudden, and it will not be heard that it is about to be attacked. There will be no threats. The matter will radically arise, and interestingly it will be prefabricated [I didn't understand what he meant later, but he was telling something about Afghanistan and weapons USA left there]. The world will also be surprised by what will happen in Iran. What happens in Iran will move some people from Israel to another place. But nothing bad will happen to them [Israelis].
Poland
The first thing that threatens us is that Poland will suddenly start to lose economically in the European arena. It will become a very deep and widely understood crisis, which will be bigger than in other European countries. It will come to the point that the editors and the television will notice it, they will ask the Government, and the Government will try not to notice it, to downplay it. He will say that this is propaganda, a short-lived trend. Poland plays a unique role in this situation. There is no war ahead of our country, there is a threat ahead. Let's not go into what the threat will be [he obviously didn't want to talk about it on YouTube]. It will be such a threat that all threats from 2020 will be small in relation to what awaits us. The arrangement of this threat will be aimed at making us believe it. (...) I have the impression that whoever succumbs to this fear or uncertainty and makes "moves", leaves, leaves something for a while to feel safe, and then comes back, these people will lose from this threat. I have a feeling that if that happened, we should be on our guard. A trick awaits Poland. Or maybe differently: a trick awaits Polish citizens. I won't say more. We need to be extremely vigilant. [Is this connected to the "Israeli exodus"?]
Mesopotamia. God knows why something made me print it ...
I find it nonsense ... The third and second millennium BC ... Strange. And when THIS [nuclear attack] with Iran is fulfilled, there will be crowds of people "no one needs". People who cannot be helped ... After this event, in several places around the world there will be such “cemeteries of people” that cannot be helped. May I be wrong here!