Kubrick's Odyssey: How Stanley Faked the Moon Landings

[loreta]

This is an interesting interview with somebody who has studied Stanley Kubrick's films: his vision of the 60's, 70's and 80's also of world conspiracies, manipulation of the viewers and the thinkers. Kubrick was a very special man and director.


_http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_00nQHdOHuw&feature=g-all-u

 

[Cosmos]

do you know who Jay Weidner is ?
If not you might want to make a search here and find out who he is and what he has done and still does.

 

[loreta]

do you know who Jay Weidner is ?
If not you might want to make a search here and find out who he is and what he has done and still does.

No, I don't know and right away I am looking to see who he is. Surely a crakpot? Sorry if he is nuts....

 

[loreta]

Ok, I am sorry, I really did not know who he was. I will read more about it in the links that I saw here. Thanks for the input.

 

[Approaching Infinity]

I think a better look at Kubrick and his films comes from Rob Ager: _http://www.collativelearning.com/FILMS%20reviews%20BY%20ROB%20AGER.html

I don't always agree with his conclusions, but he provides a lot of background, examples, research, and he makes videos too.

 

[loreta]

I think a better look at Kubrick and his films comes from Rob Ager: _http://www.collativelearning.com/FILMS%20reviews%20BY%20ROB%20AGER.html

I don't always agree with his conclusions, but he provides a lot of background, examples, research, and he makes videos too.

Thanks Approaching Infinity.
Maybe you should erase this thread? It was an error of me to put it here. I did not know who was this specimen Jay Weidner.

 

[knowledge_of_self]

I think a better look at Kubrick and his films comes from Rob Ager: _http://www.collativelearning.com/FILMS%20reviews%20BY%20ROB%20AGER.html

I don't always agree with his conclusions, but he provides a lot of background, examples, research, and he makes videos too.

Thanks Approaching Infinity.
Maybe you should erase this thread? It was an error of me to put it here. I did not know who was this specimen Jay Weidner.

Fwiw, I don't think that's necessary since this is a learning forum and you didn't know who JW was but you learned that through this thread. If others like you who are interested in Kubrick films/that video happen to come across this thread they might learn something too. That's what networking is all about. ;)

 

[loreta]

Yes, it is a good lesson. We learn making mistakes.

 

[Approaching Infinity]

And speaking of Rob Ager and Jay Weidner, check out this comment Rob made on one of his videos:

_http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mAQnfOXqiR0

Jay weidner's analysis is more on the money.

joemoe23 3 weeks ago

Weidner as in staged moon landing? The moon landings weren't filmed with front screen projection because the camera often moves about freely. FSP requires stationary cameras. I caught Jay using multiple accounts on my vids a couple of years ago posting comments such as what you've posted. He'd sent me a batch of nasty emails saying my work plagiarized his, which was quite insulting. If I were going to plagiarize I'd pick a decent source.

robag88 in reply to joemoe23 2 weeks ago 3

I know it was Weidner because the first account used was one that had his vids posted and all the others used accounts set up on the same day. And all of them came immediately after his nasty emails and were on the very video he was complaining about.

 

[Kaigen]

;) Something funny but put a new light on the Moon landing fake theory.
From the film maker perspective.

collins is not sure if men went to the moon. but he is sure they could not have faked it.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sGXTF6bs1IU&feature=player_embedded#!

 

[Nook]

;) Something funny but put a new light on the Moon landing fake theory.
From the film maker perspective.

collins is not sure if men went to the moon. but he is sure they could not have faked it.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sGXTF6bs1IU&feature=player_embedded#!

Thanks for sharing, Kaigen. His conclusions at the end are especially interesting to note.

(It's like you need to cling to your belief system with all your might against the overwhelming evidence of your own rational mind. And some people do.)
What's dangerous about that is that it blinds you to the real conspiracies that authorities are perpetrating on you right now...as we speak. Things that are a lot more important than whether or not some guys went to the moon. I mean I'm not America but if I were, I would much rather have you be questioning Apollo 11 and not questioning the Patriot act, the Iraq war, the financial industry bailouts and the right to indefinite military detention without charge. Those things are real.

He's definitely got a point there.

At the end he grabs a mail and says: 'Excellent, my check came from NASA!' :D