At first on reading the above article I thought "that's outrageous", now I am not so sure. The photos in the article were very misleading, showing someone with a nice set-up for collecting rainwater off their roof into a few smallish containers. This is actually still legal in Oregon. What Gary Harrington was collecting was enough water to fill 20 Olympic size swimming pools, through constructing 10 or 20 foot high dams. His argument seems to be something like that it wasn't affecting any actual natural water-courses, but was just channeling rainwater:
I think if a stream runs through one property, it is reasonable to have laws about how much water can be taken out by the landowner. Legalized water rights on rivers allow fairer distribution of water for e.g. irrigation purposes, and hopefully safeguard environmental values. Otherwise an upstream farmer could take all the water to irrigate their property, and leave downstream farmers and ecosystems lacking water.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.