Marijuana billboards sprout up at SuperBowl

Saw this and wondered if the liberation is slowly evolving.....

http://www.alternet.org/drugs/marijuana-billboards-sprout-around-super-bowl?akid=11467.239295.e7uNUs&rd=1&src=newsletter953546&t=11
 
jupiterbeings said:
Saw this and wondered if the liberation is slowly evolving.....


I do not see any liberation evolving here. This is just another scheme of creating MORE distraction and MORE confusion.
Imagine that there are people on the planet that smoke weed(even though this is the case of two states in America), even though they are not allowed to. They get to hate the system or be against etc. But if it becomes legal they will simply put people under the government spells to actually believe that there are good people leading them. More slavery!

The knowledge you find here on the forum(and application of it) can make you more and more free. Not weed, or drinks, or anything else.
 
Good point, edgitarra. And as a SOTT editor wrote:

Why then is the United States, the leading anti-smoking country - in respect to tobacco - suddenly liberalizing smoking marijuana?

Could it be that the one encourages a thinking populace, while the other dumbs it down?

Beware corrupt elites 'bearing gifts'...

I think it is quite highly possible that there is a 'catch' behind this legalization and promotion of marijuana use. And I think it's safe to say that this is not an act for the benefit of the people, but rather, as always has been the case, for the benefit of the 'people' on top.
 
jupiterbeings said:
the slavery ends soon with or without it so whats to judge
Everyone will stop believing lies anytime soon?

I see many stoners (mainly on FB) who are also tired of the state of things (as far as it infringes upon them) that take this whole marijuana liberation as a sign that tables are turning. To me it looks like the opposite; we have masses of dumbed down people who are either just chilling or creating narratives of seeking 'enlightenment from within' through their stony perspective and ranting about the medical properties, they just don't see it's an agent that puts out the fire and any true Seeing, as it messes with ones emotional connections and god knows which psychic defenses are left wide open to attachments. It's an excellent way to pour oil on troubled waters, from the controllers POV.
 
Oxajil said:
Good point, edgitarra. And as a SOTT editor wrote:

Why then is the United States, the leading anti-smoking country - in respect to tobacco - suddenly liberalizing smoking marijuana?

Could it be that the one encourages a thinking populace, while the other dumbs it down?

Beware corrupt elites 'bearing gifts'...

I think it is quite highly possible that there is a 'catch' behind this legalization and promotion of marijuana use. And I think it's safe to say that this is not an act for the benefit of the people, but rather, as always has been the case, for the benefit of the 'people' on top.
Yup. Smoking tobacco is probably beneficial for people who do not believe in the lies of the authorities and also for those who do believe (but kill their independence and let others decide for them with prohibitions), and marijuana can be harmful. Otherwise the PTB ever would promote.
An article in SoTT about these contradictions of the elite:
http://www.sott.net/article/272632-If-smoking-is-so-bad-for-us-why-legalize-marijuana
 
And keeping track of why they want to promote marijuana, we can see that the danger behind is (again!) Monsanto: transgenic marijuana!. In Uruguay they have already managed to implement that:

http://es.sott.net/article/24976-Uruguay-Monsanto-se-acerca-con-su-marihuana-transgenica (in Spanish and translated by google)
Uruguay: Monsanto approaches with his transgenic marijuana

In Area X have already realized how big corporate interests are lobbying in Argentina and the world for the decriminalization of marijuana (which is not the same as legalization) .

Mainly suspicion falls on George Soros , who as a shareholder of Monsanto promotes projects to decriminalize cannabis through his Open Society Foundation and the Drug pollicy Alliance , with the membership of former military , intelligence chiefs and bankers of the FED ( see related notes)

While research on Monsanto GM marijuana and software company talks about launching his own brand of this plant , the DPA and Open Society looking to get a first country permits the free use of the substance to open a new market governed by their own interests.

In Uruguay have some means of alert , though they seem a little late considering that the legislative debate could be defined today by a vote of Darío Pérez . The lobby of Monsanto in Uruguay was reported on TV and so tells LR21 website :

The television campaign in Uruguay for the "responsible control " of marijuana, at a cost of U $ S100.000 would be financed in part by funds from abroad , from organizations directly linked to the multinational Monsanto which , in turn , plans patent a new transgenic seed marijuana to their advantage.

The Drug Policy Alliance and the Open Society Foundation , associations were recognized in the program Entrelíneas TCC Cable channel 20 , as that solve part of the campaign in Uruguay . Open Society Foundation, is under the control of billionaire George Soros, one of the shareholders of Monsanto, and also publicly supports Drug Policy Alliance.

The evolution that has taken the bill regularization in Uruguay , pointing to the strong production remain in private hands, could be a billion dollar business , plus awning Sites for Monsanto , which already got his seeds " registered " form the top export sector Uruguayan : GM soy .

As they published the journalist Leonardo Haberkorn , the link between the interests of the multinational advertising campaign , and the interests of the patent on marijuana are at least matched .

Another " matching " phenomenon is recorded in Mexico and USA

The former director of corporate strategy at Microsoft , Jamen Shively, announced plans to create the first national brand of marijuana in the United States, with waiting cannabis imported from Mexico . The new company has already based in Seattle, and hopes to become leader of both recreational and medicinal cannabis in the American nation .

The businessman said that will have an initial funding of $ S10 million for the project , covering in principle two American states that legalized recreational marijuana and 18 that allow for medicinal use.

"It's a giant market for a brand. Would be happy if we have 40% of marijuana worldwide ," Shively said in remarks published El Mundo, Spain .
 
Oxajil said:
Good point, edgitarra. And as a SOTT editor wrote:

Why then is the United States, the leading anti-smoking country - in respect to tobacco - suddenly liberalizing smoking marijuana?

Could it be that the one encourages a thinking populace, while the other dumbs it down?

Beware corrupt elites 'bearing gifts'...

I think it is quite highly possible that there is a 'catch' behind this legalization and promotion of marijuana use. And I think it's safe to say that this is not an act for the benefit of the people, but rather, as always has been the case, for the benefit of the 'people' on top.

There certainly may be something to that, but I wonder why marijuana prohibition was advocated in the first place if it didn't serve the agendas of ruling interests? Perhaps the science wasn't as well-known, and a general paranoia about anything conferring a mental state that deviated from the emotionally-suppressed, caffeine- and nicotine-fueled protestant workaholic was seen as potentially threatening.

I still think that legal marijuana is preferable to having a "war" on drugs. All prohibition does is funnel money into prisons, security, and surveillance firms while destroying lives and families. It's an utterly hysterical response, which I think has been projected onto the "reefer madness" espoused by propaganda during the initial campaigns to criminalize it. Prohibition also violates the free will of those who wish to smoke, and is necessarily STS by that standard. Once it is treated like a public health problem, not a criminal possession of restricted substances problem, then other, more effective avenues of treatment and dissuasion can come on board. Similar to the anti-smoking campaigns of today; those have been pretty effective at reducing consumption without sending people to prison, haven't they?

Just my two cents.
 
whitecoast said:
Oxajil said:
Good point, edgitarra. And as a SOTT editor wrote:

Why then is the United States, the leading anti-smoking country - in respect to tobacco - suddenly liberalizing smoking marijuana?

Could it be that the one encourages a thinking populace, while the other dumbs it down?

Beware corrupt elites 'bearing gifts'...

I think it is quite highly possible that there is a 'catch' behind this legalization and promotion of marijuana use. And I think it's safe to say that this is not an act for the benefit of the people, but rather, as always has been the case, for the benefit of the 'people' on top.

There certainly may be something to that, but I wonder why marijuana prohibition was advocated in the first place if it didn't serve the agendas of ruling interests? Perhaps the science wasn't as well-known, and a general paranoia about anything conferring a mental state that deviated from the emotionally-suppressed, caffeine- and nicotine-fueled protestant workaholic was seen as potentially threatening.

I still think that legal marijuana is preferable to having a "war" on drugs. All prohibition does is funnel money into prisons, security, and surveillance firms while destroying lives and families. It's an utterly hysterical response, which I think has been projected onto the "reefer madness" espoused by propaganda during the initial campaigns to criminalize it. Prohibition also violates the free will of those who wish to smoke, and is necessarily STS by that standard. Once it is treated like a public health problem, not a criminal possession of restricted substances problem, then other, more effective avenues of treatment and dissuasion can come on board. Similar to the anti-smoking campaigns of today; those have been pretty effective at reducing consumption without sending people to prison, haven't they?

Just my two cents.

I think a strong factor was the desire of industrial interests to avoid competition from hemp products. Hemp is incredibly useful for an incredible number of applications (rope, paper, building materials, clothing, etc.), and because it grows like a 'weed' is not something which is easily monopolized. For instance, around the time of marijuana prohibition, DOW chemical was apparently a big player in pushing for illegalization. Many people at the time had no idea that marijuana was just unfertilized female hemp.

Thus, one of the effects of prohibition is that essentially the only economically viable reason to cultivate the plant is as a drug. So here we have something that could be an indispensable part of a sustainable economy, and the only thing it gets used for is getting high.
 
I think the point here about this suddenly legalization fever is that the plant that's been commercialized it's a hybrid GMO, with higher porcentajes of TCH that it has in it's natural state.I wonder who's behind this massive comercialization?And what's worse it's that hundreds of open minds are been dragged into it, without even know it's harmful consecuences, believing our society it's becoming freer when it's just the opposite.
 
whitecoast said:
There certainly may be something to that, but I wonder why marijuana prohibition was advocated in the first place if it didn't serve the agendas of ruling interests? Perhaps the science wasn't as well-known, and a general paranoia about anything conferring a mental state that deviated from the emotionally-suppressed, caffeine- and nicotine-fueled protestant workaholic was seen as potentially threatening.

I think it is part of a long term agenda. This serves the fact that they made people hungry after the false idea of "freedom", that smoking weed is a plus in this type of "freedom". It's one of those techniques to increase the longevity of the government and people's trust in it.

Imagine a scenario where scientists will find the cure for cancer in the maybe 10 years. And they might be scientists supported by the government. People will be then very happy with the leadership and the continuous "struggles" of the leaders to make the a world a better place. But afterwards, Boom, there is a new type virus or whatever that will be incurable..
 
Interesting thread by the way, sorry i may be a little off topic here ,but, i want to add that here in Turin,Italy a couple of weeks ago the local politicians have voted for legalizing the growth and use of marijuana for medical purposes and for recreational proposes also, it was obtained the major vote pro marijuana.I want to side myself to all who commented above that ,the legalization of marijuana is not a good thing for the people. In fact i think that it is a subtle, very evil and clever thing to do(by the psychopath) at this point in time taking in consideration how things develop around us,this drug is a DRUG no doubt about that,indeed it has many negative side effects,one of which is weakening your will and resistance to the polarization of the society by the psychopaths,making most of the consumers of this drug more indefferent, clueless of what happen around them.Plus the politicians may argument that legalizing this drug can bring many positive changes from economic and legal point of view and I'm afraid that many people will accept this manipulation considering how harsh the majority have been battered by this planned economic crisis,so in conclusion maybe this move to legalize marijuana which it spreads across the worlds as it seems , is a next step in enslaving,dumbing and blinding the population ,you know it will bring profit for them for sure but also silent and obedient slaves.

edit : spell check.
 
My 2 cents regarding the agenda: another indicator in all of this is that the state of Colorado (not sure about Washington) is keeping it's marijuana-related offenders in prison, despite the change in law.

_http://www.takepart.com/article/2013/01/02/no-relief-convicted

So the state gains another giant vice market share (ala alcohol) that's going to make them billions, the prisoners stay in prison (which keeps the prisons' private shareholders happy), the "denizens" (prior offenders) keep their restricted place in society by continuing to have crimes (which are now non-crimes) on their records, and all the other citizens think the government is "totally on our side now, dude."

Yep, that smells like justice. :rolleyes:
 
Back
Top Bottom