Methane bubbling up from Arctic

[treesparrow]

Headlines-

Study finds methane bubbling up from Arctic

Large amounts of methane are bubbling up from a long-frozen seabed north of Siberia, raising fears of far bigger leaks, say scientists.

http://www.abc.net.au/science/articles/2010/03/05/2837443.htm

 

[Laura]

Sounds like the increase in earthquake and volcanic activity that can be seen, because it is on land, is also going on under the oceans which cover the majority of our planet. This means that things are "opening up." That means, more heating of the oceans while the upper atmosphere is getting cooler, and it is a deadly mix that inevitably leads to an ice age, preceded for a short period by rapid increase of greenhouse gases and "hot pockets" of lower atmosphere in places, heavy rains, hail, snow, floods, etc. In short, it's just part of what we have been experiencing only it seems to be accelerating.

Reminds me of some things the Cs have said:

22 Feb 97

A: Climate is being influenced by three factors, and soon a fourth.

Q: (Laura) All right, I'll take the bait; give me the three factors, and
also the fourth!.

A: 1) Wave approach. 2) Chloroflorocarbon increase in atmosphere, thus
affecting ozone layer. 3) Change in the planet's axis rotation
orientation. 4) Artificial tampering by 3rd and 4th density
STS forces in a number of different ways. ...

Q: (Laura) All right, were those given in the order in which they are
occurring? The fourth being the one that's coming later?

A: Maybe, but remember this: a change in the speed of the rotation may
not be reported while it is imperceptible except by instrumentation.
Equator is slightly "wider" than the polar zones. But, this discrepancy
is decreasing slowly currently. One change to occur in 21st Century is
sudden glacial rebound, over Eurasia first, then North America. Ice ages
develop much, much, much faster than thought.

Q: (Terry) Is the Earth expanding? That's just putting it bluntly, but,
is the Earth expanding, how did you put that? (Ark) Yes, that's the
theory: the idea is that the continents move away because the Earth is
expanding, and this is much faster than you know, than geologists were
thinking.

A: Continental "drift" is caused by the continual though variable,
propelling of gases from the interior to the surface, mainly
at points of magnetic significance.

Q: (Jan) What causes the change in the axis?

A: By slow down of rotation. Earth alternately heats up and cools down in
interior.

Q: (Laura) Why does it do that? What's the cause of this?

A: Part of cycle related to energy exerted upon surface by
the frequency resonance vibrational profile of humans and others.

15 April 2000

Q: (L) When you described it this way, you were talking about everything "opening up." You mentioned that if the earth's rotation were to slow, even a minute bit, that everything "opens up" gravitationally speaking. But, this seems to be connected to solar activity, and no so much the speed of the earth.

A: The solar and earth activities are interconnected.

31 October 2001

Q: (L) Now according to these guys who are writing this web page about pole shift, they say it can be predicted where the poles will shift to. Is this in fact the case?

A: No.

Q: (L) Why can't pole shifts be predicted? Can't we know where the new pole will end up?
A: Chaotic function here

Q: (L) Okay, in a pole shift does the lithosphere of the planet slide on the core? (A) No. We have to be very precise. There are three possible things that would come under the name pole shift. Only one of them may come, or two, or three, okay? And these are the following - the axis of rotation with respect to stars is changing, straightening out for instance; this is one thing; while all the rest goes with the axis, the lithosphere and the magnetic field. Second, the axis stays where it is, maybe it shifts a little bit; the lithosphere stays where it is - maybe it wobbles - but the magnetic field changes: for instance reverses. Third, axis stays, magnetic field stays, but the lithosphere is moving. So that's three ways a pole shift can happen. And of course there are things that come together. The most dramatic one which is seen from outside is when the axis of rotation changes. The next dramatic one is probably when the lithosphere changes. And the third of unknown consequences is when the magnetic pole changes, okay? So, we want to have an understanding what will be the main change. (L) Well I guess we ought to ask an even more basic question: are we looking at a pole shift happening? That's starting at the beginning. (A) Alright. (L) In the next ten years. Is a pole shift possible in the next ten years?

A: Yes.

Q: (L) Is a pole shift of the axis...(A) Honey, you ask if the pole shift is possible, of course it's possible. But suppose it's almost zero probability? 'Is it possible' is not the right question. 'Is it going to happen?' That's a question. (L) Okay you ask, carry on. (A) Are we looking at a pole shift during the next ten or so years with a high degree of probability?

A: Yes.

Q: (A) In this concept of pole shift, what would be the main feature of this pole shift, of all those which we were discussing?

A: New axial orientation, and magnetic reversal.

Q: (L) That's fairly dramatic. (A) Alright, now, change of axis or orientation of axis of rotation: can we say we would straighten up, getting almost perpendicular to the ecliptic? Or the other possibility is that it will fall down being almost parallel to the ecliptic. The third is that we'll flip completely by 180 degrees. We know it's highly unpredictable, but can we have a clue from which one is, so to say, dominate?

A: Perpendicularity will be restored.

Q: (A) We know the axis will change dramatically and magnetic reversal will happen. You didn't mention a change or shift of the lithosphere alone. Can we...

A: Lithospheric shift will feature to some extent.

Q: (A) But, that means eventually that the equator will almost not change because...
A: Correct.

Q: (A) So it will just shift a little bit, but its not going to go to Hawaii? (L) Oh rats! That was my theory! Well, it was a good idea. (A) What about changes in the lithosphere: can we predict a little bit of change in geography, coming from motions in lithosphere and changes in water level?

A: Chaotic features predominate but in general it will be safer inland and in mountainous areas since less folding occurs in such locations.

Q: (A) Now, the major, the change of the orientation of the axis, what would be the main trigger, force, or activity, or what kind of event will trigger this change of the axis?

A: Cometary bodies.

Q: (L) Are the planets of the solar system going to kind of shift out of their orbits and run amok? Is that a possibility?

A: Yes.

Q: (A) Due to cometary orbits alone?

A: Yes. Twin sun also.

Q: (A) When we speak about these cometary bodies, are we speaking about impacts?

A: Some will hit.

Q: (A) What would be - if any - the role played by electric phenomena?

A: Twin sun grounds current flow through entire system setting the "motor" running.

Q: (L) Does this mean that all of the different bodies of the solar system are like parts of some kind of giant machine, and once this electric current flows through them, depending on their positions relative to one another at the time this current flows, that it has some influence on the way the machine runs?

A: Yes, more or less.

Q: (A) I want to ask about this magnetic pole reversal. It's the current theory or understanding of magnetic field of planets in terms of dynamo mechanism, where there is a liquid metal - iron - which is hot - there are convective currents, and there is self-excitation through magnetic field. That's the present model. They were able to model this magnetic pole reversal using this kind of magneto-hydro-dynamics. Is this model essentially correct?

A: Only partly.

Q: (A) What is the main thing that is important, and that is lacking from this model?

A: Crystalline ammonia core.

Q: (A) Everybody thinks that the core is a crystal iron; that's the present thinking. Say it's an ammonia core: is an ammonia core in all planets with magnetic fields? Is this so?

A: From this perspective, no but from the perspective of organic life, yes.

Q: (A) When we speak about crystalline ammonia, do you mean a new kind of crystalline ammonia that is not yet known on Earth to our scientists?

A: More or less.

Q: (L) I think we need to find out something about this crystalline ammonia. (A) What would make it go into the very core? (L) I don't know. We don't know enough about it to even know how to frame a question. I know we thought it was crazy when they were talking about Jupiter and the ammonia, and then of course all this ammonia shows up on Jupiter. And I remember them saying something about this at the time, but I don't think we ever followed up on it because I thought it was even to crazy to think about. Maybe we need to find out something about ammonia, crystalline ammonia. (A) Is there a mini black hole in the center of the Earth?

A: No.

Q: (L) I remember when I was a kid - this is a funny thing - we got this kind of chemistry experiment. You put these chemicals together and it grew crystals. I think ammonia was part of it. I think you had to use ammonia to grow crystals. (A) Okay, now this crystalline ammonia core inside the Earth, can we have idea how big it is, what radius?

A: 300 km.

Q: (L) What is surrounding it, what is the next layer? (A) Normally people would say it's an iron crystal. What is the next layer?

A: Correct.

Q: (A) There is this ammonia - crystalline... (L) Surrounded by iron crystal. Is it crystal iron? (A) Probably at this pressure that is here, it may very well be crystal. (L) Okay, is the iron surrounding the ammonia, is it crystalline?

A: Yes.

Q: (L) What's the next layer?

A: Molten iron.

Q: (A) Okay, now we know that some planets have this crystalline ammonia, and some do not. When we consider planets that have this crystal ammonia inside, how did it get there? Was it a kernel first around which the planet was formed, or first the planet was formed and then during some processes the ammonia sank and crystallized inside? I would like to know how it got there?

A: It is the natural formation process for ammonia to accrete iron from supernovae.

Q: (L) I read somewhere - about supernovae - that the only reason we have iron is because it's produced in supernovas. That would mean that our solar system is formed from a supernova, right? In which case what blew up and when? (A) I understand that this crystalline ammonia core - 300 km radius - must have certain magnetic properties which are important. Because it was mentioned that it was lacking in dynamo theory or certain very important properties concerning heat convection. So there are these two main things in dynamo theory - conductivity and electric properties - on the other hand heat convection properties. Why is this ammonia important for the magnetic field because of what properties?

A: Super conducting.

Q: (A) According to what we know it's very hot inside the earth because of the pressure. Now, is this ammonia also hot, as much as iron?

A: Grows alternately cold and hot.

Q: (A) Is it super conducting even if when it is very hot?

A: No.

Q: (A) When it gets cold, how cold does it get?

A: 55 degrees below absolute zero.

Q: (L) What is absolute zero? (A) That is something you can't get below. That's why it's called absolute zero. It's a new thermo-dynamics. (L) How often does it alternate?

A: Close to hour long periods.

Q: (L) So when it gets so cold and becomes super conducting, the act of super-conducting is what heats it up? Is that it?

A: Yes.

Q: (L) Well once it heats up, how does it then get cold again?

A: It stops conducting.

Q: (L) What is it conducting? When something is super conducting what does it conduct?

A: Electrons.

Q: (A) The point is, you see, that when something is super conducting it offers no resistance. Which means that the current it flows through it, is not heating it. Well we learned that it gets hot because it's super conductive, right? Which is somewhat contradictory because when it is super-conducting there's no reason for it to be hot except it can become hot because there is the hot external shell of iron. So that is very likely why it would become hot. Because by the very definition of super conductivity you don't become hot when you conduct, see? Well, if there are big, very big currents, then okay, they can stop super conductivity, then it gets warm.

A: Currents of this nature set the surrounding iron to vibrating which produces heat, not heat produced by the current.

Q: (A) Now, I want to go back to this 55 degree below absolute zero. And here I would like to have a confirmation of this 55 degree below zero. Because. according to the current knowledge of physics, the absolute zero was set by definition, as the temperature on the scale, according to the science of thermo-dynamics, which is - so to say - nothing moves so you cannot go below this temperature. If you say 55 degrees below zero it means we have to redo physics and redo thermo-dynamics.

A: You have entered a different realm.

Q: (A) What?

A: Lack of movement as measured by physics is based upon 3rd density conventions.

Q: (A) What causes this appearance of new physics in the center of the planet? We do not see this need for new physics around us. But somehow there are specific conditions, apparently, in the center of the planet that cause necessity of entering this new physics.

A: Windows.

Q: (L) Let me ask this, if it was possible to measure a temperature of something that was being subjected to a very intense electro-magnetic field what would it show? (A) Well the question is different, you see, because we asked first about why there is this ammonia crystal inside, okay? The answer was it was a natural process. But now we see there is this window inside. What is the reason that there is this window inside? Now you suggest, honey, that the widow inside is because there are - or because who knows what causes what - but there are very strong electro-magnetic fields. Is the window inside related to the fact that we have to go beyond standard physics? Is it related to the fact that there are very strong electro-magnetic field inside?

A: Reciprocal function.

4 July 1998

Q: (A) I am trying to write down some things about a
cosmology, and I have some questions mainly about the
coming events. First there was the story of the sun's
companion brown star which is apparently approaching the
solar system, and I would like to know, if possible,
details of its orbit; that is, how far it is, what is its
speed, and when it will be first seen. Can we know it?
Orbit: how close will it come?

A: Flat eliptical.

Q: (A) But how close will it come?

A: Distance depends upon other factors, such as intersecting
orbit of locator of witness.

Q: (L) What is the closest it could come to earth... (A)
Solar system... (L) Yes, but which part of the solar
system? We have nine planets... which one? (A) I
understand that this brown star will enter the Oort
cloud... (L) I think they said it just brushes against it
and the gravity disturbs it...

A: Passes through Oort cloud on orbital journey. Already has
done this on its way "in."

Q: (A) You mean it has already entered the Oort cloud?
A: Has passed through.

Q: (A) So, it will not approach...

A: Oort cloud is located on outer perimeter orbital plane at
distance of approximately averaged distance of
510,000,000,000 miles.

Q: (L) Well, 510 billion miles gives us some time! (A) Yes,
but what I want to know... this Oort cloud is around the
solar system, so this brown star, once it has passed
through... (L) It must already be in the solar system?
(A) No, it could have passed through and may not come
closer. Is it coming closer or not? Is it coming closer
all the time?

A: Solar system, in concert with "mother star," is revolving
around companion star, a "brown" star.

Q: (A) So, that means that the mass of the companion star is
much...

A: Less.

Q: (A) Less?

A: They are moving in tandem with one another along a flat,
eliptical orbital plane. Outer reaches of solar system
are breached by passage of brown companion, thus
explaining anomalies recently discovered regarding outer
planets and their moons.

Q: (A) But I understand that the distance that the distance
between the sun and this brown star is changing with
time. Eliptical orbit means there is perihelion and
aphelion. I want to know what will be, or what was, or
what is the closest distance between this brown star and
the sun? What is perihelion? Can we know this, even
approximately. Is it about one light year, or less or
more?

A: Less, much less. Distance of closest passage roughly
corresponds to the distance of the orbit of Pluto from
Sun.

Q: (A) Okay. Now, this closest pass, is this something that
is going to happen?

A: Yes.

Q: (A) And it is going to happen within the next 6 to 18
years?

A: 0 to 14.

Q: (A) Okay, that's it. I have some idea about this. Now, I
understand that, either by chance or by accident, two
things are going to happen at essentially the same time.
That is the passing of this brown star, and this comet
cluster. These are two different things?

A: Yes. Different, but related.

Q: (L) Is there a comet cluster that was knocked into some
kind of orbit of its own, that continues to orbit...

A: Yes.

Q: (L) And in addition to that comet cluster, there are also
additional comets that are going to get whacked into the
solar system by the passing of this brown star?

A: Yes.

Q: (A) I understand that the main disaster is going to come
from this comet cluster...

A: Disasters involve cycles in the human experiential cycle
which corresponds to the passage of comet cluster.

Q: (A) I understant that this comet cluster is cyclic and
comes every 3600 years. I want to know something about
the shape of this comet cluster. I can hardly imagine...

A: Shape is variable. Effect depends on closeness of
passage.

Q: (L) So, it could be spread out... (A) We were asking at
some point where it will be coming from. The answer was
that we were supposed to look at a spirograph.

A: Yes.

Q: (A) Now, spirograph suggests that these comets will not
come from one direction, but from many directions at once.
Is this correct?

A: Very good!!!

Q: (A) Okay, they will come from many directions...

A: But, initial visibility presents as single, solid body.

Q: (A) Do we know what is the distance to this body at
present?

A: Suggest you keep your eyes open!

Q: (A) I am keeping my eyes open.

A: Did you catch the significance of the answer regarding
time table of cluster and brown star? Human cycle mirrors
cycle of catastrophe. Earth benefits in form of periodic
cleansing. Time to start paying attention to the signs.
They are escalating. They can even be "felt" by you and
others, if you pay attention.

Q: (L) We have certainly been paying attention to the signs!
A: How so?

Q: (L) Well, the weather is completely bizarre. The fires,
the heat...

A: Yes.

Q: (L) I notice that the tides are awfully high all the time
with no ostensible explanation...

A: And low, too.

Q: (L) Yes. I have noticed that particularly. (F) I have
too. Not too long ago I noticed that the tides were so
incredibly low for this time of year. (L) And also the
signs in people - these kids killing their parents, all
these people going berserk - you know...

A: Spike.

Q: (L) What do you mean spike?

A: On a graph...

Q: (L) Just spikes, not the biggie...

A: Spikes are big.

Q: (A) I have a last question which I have
prepared. So, we have these two physical disasters or
events, the coming brown star and the comet cluster, but
we have been told that this time it is going to be
different because this time it is accompanied by a plane
convergence.

A: Yes. Magnetic field alteration.

Q: (A) This plane convergence, or this magnetic field
alteration, it's supposed to be related to realms crossing
or passing. A realm border.

A: Realm. What is root of "realm?"

Q: (L) Reality.

A: Yes. How does the magnetic field "plug in?" Other
planchette, please. Carbon disturbance, as someone
"melted" crystal on top. [We replaced planchette.] We
want to stay on this general subject matter through this
session, for your sake.

Q: (L) Okay, in terms of these signs, these things going on
on the planet, these fires and so forth - you never said
anything about all these fires in Florida. You said
Arizona was going to burn, but you never said Florida was
going to burn...

A: We did not say it would not.

Q: (L) I know. But, it is really oppressive. I have read a
couple of signs in the last day or so that we are going to
have a change in the weather, a break, is my little method
of predicting...

A: Reverse extreme?!?

Q: (L) Oh! Floods again! Well, I guess floods are better
than fires... but, maybe not!

A: Italy and Greece are burning too.

Q: (L) Yes, we noticed that in the paper today. Is there a
relationship between Italy and Greece and where we are on
the planet? Some kind of psychic link?

A: Just same current malady.

Q: (L) Okay, back to the comet cluster and realm border...

A: Not yet.

Q: (L) Well, which direction should we take right now?

A: Step by step.

Q: (L) Okay, you just said we are going to have a reversal in
our weather. Are there any other conditions that we
should be aware of at the present time?

A: Point is to watch, look, listen.

Q: (L) When we are watching, looking and listening, is there
some particular thing we are supposed to be watching for
that is to give us a clue about something?

A: All.

Q: (L) Is there something we are supposed to do at some point
when we perceive a particular clue or event at some point?

A: What would you suggest?

Q: (L) I don't know that I would suggest anything except to
keep a low profile and keep on working until we figure out
the answer. It is like a race against time. We have to
figure out the answer because, obviously, you are not
going to tell us...

A: No. No race needed.

Q: (L) Well, I sometimes feel completely inadequate for all
of this.

A: Stop thinking 3rd density!

Q: (L) Well, I don't want to just live in LaLa land and say,
'oh yes, I'm watching. I see the signs! I'm looking! I'm
listening! And then count them off on my fingers and say:
but I'm not gonna think about it because that's 3rd
density!' See what I am saying here?

A: No, because you are still thinking 3rd density. Better to
have a "front row seat," and enjoy!

Q: (L) But I feel like I am not supposed to be enjoying
myself so much! I feel guilty!

A: Why not?

Q: (L) Well! I'm supposed to be DOING something!

A: You are.

Q: (A) When you watch, look and listen, you are getting some
signals, and these signals cause a certain pattern of
thinking which were not yet able to emerge, but now, after
you receive certain signals, you start to think in a
different way. So, you cannot now think in a different
way, but when you learn this and this has happened, then
you start to think in a different pattern. So, you cannot
now do things, but you always have to be ready to change
your thinking at any moment when you understand more, when
you see more, when you notice more, when you put things
together which are not yet together. Then, there may be a
big change of perspective, a total change. And this we
have to keep our minds and thinking patterns open and
ready to change, and work and put the puzzle and mosaic
together. And, this is all that counts. It is this work
that we are now doing that counts, not some future big
thing: oh! Now we go on a ship! No, it is only doing our
best, and what is it? Our best? It will change. I
believe so. That is the idea. So, everything depends on
this.

A: Yes. You see, my dear, you cannot anticipate that which
is not anticipatable.

Q: (L) Well, swell. Okay, you want to stay on this subject,
so let us move another step.

A: We are glad you noticed this birth of the spike. ...
27 days of record heat out of 30, oh my oh my! Suggest
you awaken your internet pals, as they are too busy
chasing "goblins" to notice.

Q: (L) So, I should have something to say about this?

A: In Florida now, where to next? How about a shattering
subduction quake in Pacific Northwest of U.S.? We
estimate 10.4 on the Richter scale. We have warned of
Ranier. Imagine a 150 meter high tsunami in Puget
Sound...

...
Q: (L) Now, you have mentioned this earthquake. I know that
you don't usually give predictions, why have you done so
now?

A: We do not give time tables.

Q: (L) Anything else other than a tsunami in Puget Sound and
a big subduction quake... 10.4 on the Richter scale is
almost inconceivable.

A: Ranier... caldera.

Q: (L) What about the caldera?

A: Expect one.

Q: (L) Other than floods, anything else for Florida upcoming?

A: All areas experience accelerating "freak weather
patterns."

Q: (L) Okay, all of these freaky weather patterns and bizarre
things going on on the planet, how does it relate to the
comet cluster and the brown star? Is it related?

A: Human experiential cycle intersects.

Q: (L) Any specifice physical manifestation of either this
brown star or this comet cluster or this realm border,
that is related to these events on the planet?

A: Approach of wave stimulates precursor activity which in
turn causes effects which in turn stimulates further
"heating up" of activity...

Q: (L) I thought it was curious that you used the term 'birth
of the spike.' Is there something or someone that was
born at that particular time?

A: No. Spike is as on a graph...

Q: (L) Okay, is there anyway we could graph this ourselves,
and if so, what types of events would we include to create
the background data?

A: "El Nino, La Nina," etc...

Q: (L) Is this El Nino thing connected to sunspot cycles?

A: No.

Q: (L) It has its own cycle. I don't think it has been
tracked for long enough to get...

A: Global warming, a part of the human experiential cycle.

Q: (L) I read where Edgar Cayce said that a slight increase
in global temperature would make hurricanes something like
5 times stronger... given a baseline temperature. Does
this mean we are going to have stronger and more frequent
hurricanes?

A: Yes.

Q: (L) Will they hit land more frequently, or just spin out
in the ocean?

A: Either, or.

Q: (L) Does this quest I have been on, this bloodline and
grail business, does that have any connection with this
cycle business?

A: Only indirectly.

Q: (L) Is that something that I should put aside for the time
being and work on something else?

A: You may do as you wish, just keep one eye and one ear
tuned to current events. And, very important, log dreams.
Arkadiusz too!

Q: (L) Is there going to be some communication to us through
our dreams?

A: Visions.

Q: (L) Where will these visions originate from?

A: Ether.

 

[Johnno]

Sounds like the increase in earthquake and volcanic activity that can be seen, because it is on land, is also going on under the oceans which cover the majority of our planet. This means that things are "opening up." That means, more heating of the oceans while the upper atmosphere is getting cooler, and it is a deadly mix that inevitably leads to an ice age, preceded for a short period by rapid increase of greenhouse gases and "hot pockets" of lower atmosphere in places, heavy rains, hail, snow, floods, etc. In short, it's just part of what we have been experiencing only it seems to be accelerating.

Reminds me of some things the Cs have said:

22 Feb 97

A: By slow down of rotation. Earth alternately heats up and cools down in
interior.

Q: (Laura) Why does it do that? What's the cause of this?

A: Part of cycle related to energy exerted upon surface by
the frequency resonance vibrational profile of humans and others.

Interesting that the "Opening Up" is happening on a geological level and a human level. Seems to be quite a bit of activity under the surface with a lot of the negative toxins (emotional, physical, mental) being released.

As above so below.

 

[Joe]

Interesting that the "Opening Up" is happening on a geological level and a human level. Seems to be quite a bit of activity under the surface with a lot of the negative toxins (emotional, physical, mental) being released.

As above so below.

Very interesting observation Johnno, I never thought of the "as above so below" relating to above and below the surface of the planet too!

 

[Laura]

Very interesting observation Johnno, I never thought of the "as above so below" relating to above and below the surface of the planet too!

Well, there's also this:

9 Jan 2005

Q: (L) Regarding the recent earthquake and tsunami, there is a huge buzz on the net that this was not a natural phenomenon. Some say it could have been a meteor; others say it was a US nuke; others say it was India and Israel playing around in deep sea trenches. Then there is the speculation on an EM weapon of some description. The New agers are saying it was the start of the final 'Earth Changes". So what really caused this earthquake that happened one year minus one hour after the earthquake in Iran?

A: Pressure in earth. Not any of the proferred suggestions. But remember that the human cycle mirrors the cycle of catastrophe and human mass consciousness plays a part.

Q: In what way does mass consciousness play a part?

A: When those with higher centers are blocked from full manifestation of creative energy, that energy must go somewhere. If you cannot create "without" you create "within".

 

[Johnno]

So the earth is kind of "passing gas" with all this methane.

So also I was wondering, what would a pole shift's effect be on the iron in our blood? There was some mention of currents and superconductivity on a geological level. Is the magnetic field currently "upside down" having a physical effect of we humans seeing the world upside down too?

There's this from July 11 1998

http://www.cassiopaea.org/cass/earth2.htm

Q: (A) We have been told that there is going to be a change of the magnetic field of the earth. Does this mean that the magnetic pole will shift?
A: Yes.
Q: (A) About this shift of the poles, is it going to be a complete pole reversal?
A: Yes.
Q: (A) What is going to happen inside Earth that could cause this magnetic pole reversal?
A: Is caused by disturbances in the mineral content of the substrata rock, brought on by the interaction of Earth with outside forces.
Q: (L) What specific outside forces?
A: Those already discussed.
Q: (L) What is going to be the specific mechanism of this disturbance? Can you describe for us the steps by which this pole reversal will take place?
A: Pole reversal is cyclical anyway, these events merely serve as trigger mechanism.
Q: (L) Let me ask it this way: is there a charge that builds up in the mineral substrata that requires discharge, or that becomes excited to the point that it discharges and then reverses? Is this what we are talking about in terms of the mechanism?
A: Examine what is needed to magnetize metal. Ask Arkadiusz.
Q: (A) What is needed to magnetize metal. One has to align the spins of the atoms which means one has to strike the metal, or one has to bring a magnetic field close. (T) Strike as in annealing... heating and striking metal or rock which causes the crystalline structure to decompose so that the metal becomes pliable. Then, each time it is hit, it reforms until it cools again. (L) Is this what we are talking about here?
A: Close.
Q: (A) One can also have an external magnetic field to align. But, where is it going to come from?
A: Guess.
Q: (L) The wave?
A: All are interconnected.
Q: (T) Now, this is just a thought: where would an external magnetic field strong enough to do something like that come from? On the earth, if you supercharge the ionosphere, you create an extremely intense magnetic field. That's what the ionosphere basically is. That is what the HAARP group of programs is about. That is what Tesla was into - the ionosphere - cause there is a large charge there. (L) Is the HAARP project involved here?
A: No.
Q: (T) They are monkeying around with that stuff. (L) Do the people in charge of the HAARP project know about all of this and are they constructing this HAARP array to utilize this energy in some way?
A: Those who know are at foundation.
Q: (T) To protect us?
A: HAARP is for mind control. It is hoped it can be successful in 4th density too!
Q: (L) Well, if these people are aware that this sort of thing is getting ready to happen... never mind. (A) We have been told that this magnetic disturbance is closely related to this realm border crossing, and you asked us the question 'what is the root of realm' and it is reality. Now, realm has an m at the end. Does this have something to do with magnetic?
A: Realm border is when the reality shifts for all.
Q: (A) Yes, but why is this reality shift related to magnetic field disturbance? What is the connection?
A: Your physiology and etheric orientation are both tied into the magnetic state of your environment.
Q: (L) Okay, you said before that the magnetic field is going to reverse...
A: Magnetic poles reverse.
Q: (L) Okay, what is the magnetic field going to do. It is going to change in some way. Is it going to increase, decrease... is this to a degree - something other than direction - amplification? (T) Will anything change in the strength of the field?
A: Let us illustrate. Now: Earth. [A circle is drawn with radiating spikes all around fairly close to the surface.] Earth after: [A circle is drawn with double radiating spikes with those in polar regions considerably longer than the others.]
Q: (T) So, it is the same, except it is larger?
A: Close.
Q: (T) Are you indicating that the magnetic field will be stronger?
A: Broader and larger.
Q: (L) What is the cross in the middle?
A: Geodirectional grid reference. You incorrectly added circle on side. Lines of magnetic field alignment should be shown as longer at poles. "Crosshairs" in illustration are for directional reference only.
Q: (T) Does this mean it will be stronger also?
A: Larger and broader.
Q: (A) People work near strong magnets much stronger than the Earth's magnetic field, yet nothing happens to them that we can see.
A: Not true. Body chemistry is altered. Is not long term or permanent exposure.
Q: (L) So, apparently long term and permanent exposure can make a big difference.
A: Yes.
Q: (A) Now, you say that this brown star and the comet cluster are coming into our solar system at the same time, and you have said that they are different events, but that they are related. Now, what is the relation, if not just the point in time, the deeper relation between these two phenomena?
A: Picture biorythm graph.
Q: (A) What is the period of pole shift?
A: 100,000 years, roughly.
Q: (A) Now, about the relation between the phenomenon of physical disasters that are going to happen and psychic changes related to the realm border. What is cause and what is effect?
A: One precedes the other.
Q: (L) Okay, so disasters happen and then the reality changes in psychic terms?
A: Yes.
Q: (T) Is the approach of the realm border, is the change in the magnetic field... does the reversal of the poles and the broadening of the magnetic field, is that going to be before the realm border crossing?
A: Intersection.
Q: (L) So, in practical terms, it may be that, what we observe will be a series of cataclysms, disasters, the 'cleansing' of the Earth...
A: This has already begun.
Q: (L) So, it is already happening. It will accelerate and intensify. And what we will observe is all of these things happening. And, as a result of the intersecting of these various energies, this realm border, this reality change, this change in the magnetics because of the interaction with the comet cluster, the sun's companion, the realm border, and so forth, it will then have an effect upon the people left on the planet who will then change in some way as a result of this, is that correct?
A: Your Bible says that there will be many wonders on the Earth and in the Heavens in the last days.
Q: (L) Okay, this period of time after this realm border, is this period a preliminary to the total end of the Earth and all life on it?
A: No.
Q: (L) After all of this change, those people who continue to be on the Earth will be in a new environment, and it will be almost like having to grow gills to live in water, and some people will have the ability and some will not. Is that it? It will be more gradual in terms of individual physical structures and psychic structures?

Edit: Added link.

 

[Galaxia2002]

Interesting that the "Opening Up" is happening on a geological level and a human level. Seems to be quite a bit of activity under the surface with a lot of the negative toxins (emotional, physical, mental) being released.

As above so below.

Very interesting observation Johnno, I never thought of the "as above so below" relating to above and below the surface of the planet too!

Could it be related also with the other population of humans under surface? maybe are the things also heating up there in a esoterical sense?

 

[rylek]

Sounds like the increase in earthquake and volcanic activity that can be seen, because it is on land, is also going on under the oceans which cover the majority of our planet. This means that things are "opening up." That means, more heating of the oceans while the upper atmosphere is getting cooler, and it is a deadly mix that inevitably leads to an ice age, preceded for a short period by rapid increase of greenhouse gases and "hot pockets" of lower atmosphere in places, heavy rains, hail, snow, floods, etc. In short, it's just part of what we have been experiencing only it seems to be accelerating....

So pretty much the 'fun' in store for the planet hasn't even properly started yet.

 

[go2]

Russian scientists report vast plumes of methane rising from the arctic seabed. I don't know much about the implications, but the scientists appear surprised and concerned by the findings.

 

[MnSportsman]

It seems to me that the latest (SOTT) article seems like a "repeat" of the OP'ed one.

It is not important that I mention it, I suppose. I am likely mistaken, but to me they seem to be similar articles/reports.

I understand the earth is changing.

I will re-read both, perhaps I missed something in the newest one.