Methodical Illusion - 9/11 truth in a fiction novel?

[aragorn]

I saw Kevin Barrett posting about this book on Veterans today, and although I don't generally trust VT that much (Barrett is okayish, osit), I got intrigued. Especially, because the theories presented in the book about what happened with the planes on 9/11 resembles the things the C's said. Well, it could be just another book to muddy the waters, but I think I'm gonna read it - just for fun.


###
Methodical Illusion, Paperback/Kindle – November 3, 2014
by Rebekah Roth (Author)
Link/paperback : http://amzn.com/0982757131 [seems to be out of stock]
Link/Kindle: http://amzn.com/B00PREI4Y8
###

The glamorous life of an international flight attendant can be anything but, as Vera Hanson discovered the morning one of her crew members was found murdered in a Paris hotel room. That morning began to put into focus some of the experiences of Vera's thirty year airline career, which she had purposely been avoiding. It caused her to look more deeply into the questions surrounding 9/11 that never made sense to a flight attendant, but that no one had seriously investigated. With the help of her pilot friend Jim Bowman, they embark on a cross country journey employing their wisdom, experience and intense research to uncover the mysteries of what really happened to the four airplanes and the people on them that fateful day. Written as a novel, Methodical Illusion has been excruciatingly researched from an insider's perspective, utilizing proprietary knowledge of airplanes, universal FAA protocols, standardized fight crew procedures and all hijacking policies. The results are the never before revealed answers to the daunting questions everyone has had, but few had dared ask aloud for fear of the repercussions that undoubtedly follow. Rebekah Roth is right on target with her mind blowing research which is guaranteed to open your eyes.

Here's a snippet of the article by Barrett:

_http://www.veteranstoday.com/2015/01/31/airline911/

Airline whistleblower solves 9/11

By Kevin Barrett, Veterans Today Editor

The truth-seeking community – and the airline industry – are abuzz over Rebekah Roth’s new book Methodical Illusion. It’s poised to break into the top 1,000 worldwide, selling so fast that Amazon may even have tried to stop its rise to bestseller status by falsely claiming “sorry, out of stock.”

We’ve seen this situation before…such as on September 8th, 2013, when the RT documentary 9/11 and Operation Gladio started to go viral and suddenly disappeared from search engines – as emails containing its url began falling into a big black hole in cyberspace.

So what’s all the excitement about? Why would the people whose job is to “disable the purveyors of conspiracy theories” try to limit sales of a potboiler novel by a former stewardess?

hqdefaultHint: It isn’t literary quality they’re afraid of. If you want a 9/11 truth novel by a literary genius, read Thomas Pynchon’s Bleeding Edge. Pynchon’s book has lot of great writing and a modest amount of 9/11 truth, packaged in such a way as not to offend the Tribe that dominates American media.

But if you want a rough-hewn page-turner with more 9/11 truth than anything you’re likely to read this side of David Ray Griffin or Christopher Bollyn (or Veterans Today for that matter) check out Methodical Illusion. Roth boldly goes where no stewardess or novelist has gone before, pinning 9/11 squarely on the Israelis and their American assets, and providing a convincing explanation of how the planes were “hijacked,” by whom, where they went, and what happened to the passengers.

Roth’s book has set off a stampede by her former colleagues in the aviation industry, who are rushing to provide details supporting her revelations. They are confirming the installation of FTS (Flight Termination System) equipment on the models “hijacked” on 9/11, which allowed those planes to be taken over remotely and flown from the ground. When FTS takes over a plane, it completely shuts down that plane’s communications with the outside world. That explains why not one of the four pilots on any of the 9/11 planes managed to flip a toggle switch and squawk the hijack code. Had the aircraft been hijacked in a normal manner, the pilots, who are trained to instantly squawk “hijack” in such an emergency, all would have done so.

The failure of any of the 9/11 planes to squawk the “we are hijacked” message is absolute, conclusive proof that the official story of hijackings by Arabs armed with box cutters is false.

According to the author’s hypothesis, the FTS-captured-and-silenced planes landed at a nearby Air Force base with gigantic hangars, which Roth identifies and a colleague who was there confirms happened, less than 20 minutes after takeoff. Once on the ground, selected flight attendants and passengers were guided (or forced) to place cell phone calls, during which they read from scripts prepared by the perpetrators.

This scenario is very similar to one planned by the entire Joint Chiefs of Staff in 1962: the infamous Operation Northwoods. And it is entirely plausible. The main counter-argument – that the FAA tracked the two Boston aircraft from takeoff to crashes – has been disproven, since we now know that the 9/11 perpetrators were inserting false blips onto FAA controllers screens and thereby controlling what they saw.

According to this scenario, the Twin Towers would have been hit by military aircraft and/or missiles, not passenger jets.

[...]

It may be a novel, but truer words have never been spoken.

 

[Charade]

Rebekah Roth is featured in an interview at www.redicecreations.com on March 18, 2015. The second edition of her book should be out next week.

This caught my attention as I am a flight crew member. Rebekah Roth's background and connections to the airline industry have put her in a position to have a unique perspective from which to investigate 9/11. Her research sounds like it is quite extensive and she is a very articulate speaker. I highly recommend listening to the interview.

The book is written as fiction to afford her "plausible deniability" to the facts she uncovered and has interwoven into the novel's story. I haven't read her book. It does prompt me to want to investigate the phone calls because she makes the valid point that there are obvious contradictions and that the most important observations to flight crews in an emergency situation are not what is reported in those calls. We have protocols that are drilled into us through our yearly training and, as she states, much of our training procedures would have changed due to what was reported from this event. Our training continues to be based on the official 9/11 narrative as are several of the recent airline disasters. It makes me cringe to have it accepted as such by the our official airline channels.

Just today, our company released that TSA can board our flight, prior to passenger boarding and while we are on a break, and ask to search our bags. According to the Security Department "TSA has increased random security inspections as part of their "playbook". They are increasing random inspections of all employees and vehicles due to insider threat mitigation. This can be expected and employees need to comply with the screening requirements". Entrapment of crewmembers has officially been allowed, especially during stops in Canada, since 9/11. But in this renewed stepping up of crew scutinization, it leads one to expect an planned airline insider false flag operation in the "playbook".

Roth doesn't have the C's information to guide her away from some erroneous conclusions ie. what happened to MH370. The pilots that I know are most comfortable believing the hijack scenario as well. She does name some companies and individuals involved in 9/11 and continuing to be players in current events. Good connecting the dots, as far as I can tell.

In my line of work, the tyranny continues against Americans that simply want meaningful employment to provide for our families , yet we're being targeted as the next terrorist threat.

 

[aragorn]

I've now read the book, it was a fairly quick read.

As a novel, leaving out the 9/11-truth angle, it wasn't that good. And that's okay, I guess it wasn't the point of writing this book. The storyline jumps too fast from one thing to another, without any "build ups", and without describing the characters or surroundings. So, if you're looking for a great suspension novel, there are better ones, I have to say.

However, the point with this book (also according to the author) was to present important information about the 9/11 event. You have to read quite many pages, until the author gets to this "juicy stuff"! As for the "revelations", for someone who has done his/her homework on 9/11, there isn't that much new. The author brings up a few good points, that at least I hadn't thought of, but that's it. I hate to say, but this book left me a bit disappointed.

Having said that, I think that this is a good book for someone who hasn't doubted the official 9/11 conspiracy theory, or someone who is still "sitting on the fence" with the thing. In summary, this is not for the serious researcher, but a good primer for anyone who has a suspicion that "something's not right in Denmark."

I think, that every book that raises the awareness of people is good. So thanks to the author for putting this book together. :)

 

[Charade]

Yes, that is the emphasis of the author, during the interview, as to why she wrote the book. To gently wake up any part of the population that might be ready. To pull the curtain back and expose the 'wizard" through her extensive research for truth. She felt an obligation to the people who were used and killed by this outrageous event to present the flaws of the official story. I think it's more evident when you listen to her with out having to sift through fiction. The audience on these forums are well acquainted with 9/11 but she was fun to listen to.

 

[Aeneas]

I haven't read the book, but just watched an interview that she did 3 days ago with the SGT report. In that interview, she comes across quite well and with quite a bit of information about the Israeli art students. She mentions as Charade said that she is writing fiction novels in order to wake people up as they contain a lot of truth in them.

Personally I am not much for reading fiction anymore, but I can see that so many family members, friends and colleagues who are not interested in the news, read novels...and lots of them. So it may have some merit as an approach.

Perhaps worth interviewing for Sott Blog Radio on "Behind the Headlines"?

The latest interview is here:

http://<iframe width="420" height="...5M" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

 

[aragorn]

As you can see from the video-thumbnail, Rebekah's new book is called Methodical Deception (first one was called Methodical Illusion).

Link: http://amzn.com/B014NE6UWU

It has received pretty good reviews.

 

[Yupo]

Here is some information to consider about Rebekah Roth, published today in World Affairs Brief:

Here is the link to the video mentioned below: _https://tobefree.wordpress.com/2016/01/12/kurt-haskell-final-report-on-rebekah-roth-part-1416-ep-13/

Last year I ran a story about the claims of a retired flight attendant, going by the name of Rebekah Roth, who made the case (correctly) that none of the flight attendant or cell phone calls from hijacked passengers could have been made from altitude. She said they had to have been faked, as I have claimed for many years before. Sadly, it turns out that Roth is not her real name; In fact, she has numerous aliases. She was a fugitive from justice and probably has ties to the dark side of the CIA. Kurt Haskell, the former US attorney who blew the whistle on the “underwear bomber” being escorted onto the US bound plane by an intelligence operative, has become a full time 9/11 researcher. In this 4 part video (about an hour total) he documents his investigation into the questionable background and multiple identities of of KoriAnn Ashley (aka Rebekah Roth).


Haskell confirms that she was a flight attendant for 30 years, and that what she says on her 9/11 posts and book are mostly true. I agree, but it's a common tactic of the Deep State to induce a compromised individual to play the role of a 9/11 truther, who can later be discredited as a fraud. In that manner, Snopes.com or other conspiracy debunkers can say that the substance of her claims must also be false—which doesn’t necessarily follow.


They used the same tactic to debunk the true claims about George W. Bush failing to show up at Air Force Reserve training and drills (which he joined to avoid the draft). The CIA produced a fake letter from his former Commanding officer, confirming the misconduct and then fed the proof to the media that the letter was a fake, thus discrediting the substance of the letter, which happened to be completely true. It’s a slick and devious tactic. I think that’s what’s behind the fake Roth persona and book. “Roth” has now been widely exposed and has gone back into hiding and out of the 9/11 truth movement.

 

[Laura]

Well, that's certainly disturbing. I thought her fiction was bad, but through that vehicle, she really laid out some fascinating material. When she was putting that in the book, her writing was excellent.

Of course, I'm always reminded of my own situation vis a vis attacks and attackers: they will look for ANYTHING they can take and twist out of all recognition and then MAKE STUFF UP that is completely untrue.

 

[Keit]

Haskell confirms that she was a flight attendant for 30 years, and that what she says on her 9/11 posts and book are mostly true. I agree, but it's a common tactic of the Deep State to induce a compromised individual to play the role of a 9/11 truther, who can later be discredited as a fraud. In that manner, Snopes.com or other conspiracy debunkers can say that the substance of her claims must also be false—which doesn’t necessarily follow.

That is very unfortunate, as what she said is so interesting and disturbing!

 

[Laura]

Haskell confirms that she was a flight attendant for 30 years, and that what she says on her 9/11 posts and book are mostly true. I agree, but it's a common tactic of the Deep State to induce a compromised individual to play the role of a 9/11 truther, who can later be discredited as a fraud. In that manner, Snopes.com or other conspiracy debunkers can say that the substance of her claims must also be false—which doesn’t necessarily follow.

That is very unfortunate, as what she said is so interesting and disturbing!

Yes. And my question would be: why would this Kurt Haskell go digging around about her in that way? Reminds me of Vinnie Bridges.

 

[Laura]

_https://ballotpedia.org/Kurt_Haskell

Kurt R. Haskell was a 2012 Democratic candidate who sought election to the U.S. House to represent the 7th Congressional District of Michigan.
Biography

Haskell was born and raised in Pinconning, Michigan. Upon graduated from Pinconning High School in 1989, he earned his B.S. in Biology from Saginaw Valley State University. He then went on to earn his law degree from the Thomas M. Cooley Law School and his master's degree in tax law from Wayne State University Law School. He worked for the Internal Revenue Service in Toledo, Ohio for 6 years before he opened Haskell Law Firm, where he practices bankruptcy law, estate planning, and social security law.

In Decemeber 2009, while flying back to the U.S. from Amsterdam, Haskell witnessed the "Underwear Bomber" who tried to blow up the plane. It was an incident that Haskell credits with "fundamentally changing his life."[1]
Career

Attorney at Haskell Law Firm (2001-present)
Attorney at the Internal Revenue Service (2000-2006)

Elections
2012

See also: Michigan's 7th Congressional District elections, 2012

Haskell was defeated by incumbent Tim Walberg.[2] Haskell ran in the 2012 election for the U.S. House to represent Michigan's 7th District. He defeated Ruben Marquez in the August 7 Democratic primary. He faced Republican incumbent Tim Walberg, Ken Proctor (L), and Richard Wunsch (G) in the general election on November 6, 2012.[3]

_http://www.thepowerhour.com/bio/KurtHaskellBiography.pdf

In 2014, Kurt and Lori decided to escape the US and moved to Costa Rica where they continue to reside.

_http://www.mlive.com/news/detroit/index.ssf/2009/12/flight_253_passenger_kurt_hask.html

_http://911blogger.com/news/2011-10-06/kurt-haskell-looks-ill-be-witness-defense-underwear-bomber-case

_https://gellerreport.com/2012/03/christmas-underwear-conspiracy-theorist-crazy-kurt-haskell-to-run-for-congress.html/


_https://jamesperloff.com/2016/01/02/some-in-truth-movement-are-asking-questions-about-rebekah-roth/

_https://haskellfamily.blogspot.fr/

_http://911blogger.com/topics/kurt-haskell

So, I dunno. It looks pretty damning for Roth and one just has to wonder WHY???

 

[Keit]

So, I dunno. It looks pretty damning for Roth and one just has to wonder WHY???

Well, to be fair, he doesn't discredit what Roth has to say. He claims that Deep State uses her background against her to discredit her and other truth speakers like her. Something like her past has caught up on her, and all that.

What is perplexing is Roth's reaction and also Haskell's interest in this whole story. What is really going on? Is it possible that "they" would do something like this, put up some good and true information out there, just to make it ridiculous by discrediting their own agent? Or we are talking about different factions and conflict of interests here? And why would someone like Roth go along with that?

 

[Laura]

So, I dunno. It looks pretty damning for Roth and one just has to wonder WHY???

Well, to be fair, he doesn't discredit what Roth has to say. He claims that Deep State uses her background against her to discredit her and other truth speakers like her. Something like her past has caught up on her, and all that.

What is perplexing is Roth's reaction and also Haskell's interest in this whole story. What is really going on? Is it possible that "they" would do something like this, put up some good and true information out there, just to make it ridiculous by discrediting their own agent? Or we are talking about different factions and conflict of interests here? And why would someone like Roth go along with that?

I'm trying to put myself in her shoes and imagine a scenario that makes it all rational, but so far, no luck. She needs to come out of the closet and tell the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth.

 

[Laura]

It just occurred to me: what if Roth is NOT the author of the books but was put up to publishing them as if she were? Meanwhile, she's just a nobody trying to get by with all her little games and such?

Kinda reminds me of Santilli and the Alien Autopsy video.

 

[findit]

How disappointing. She had to have known that researchers would be investigating her background. She's had more than enough time to come forward with the truth and she hasn't. At this point, I wonder if there are other flight attendants that would be willing to come forward verifying the statements that she has made. James Perloff mentioned a group, but I've never heard of them before.