"Mexico Falls"... Well, Mexico City is actually sinking

[Luis Miguel]

I have been thinking about this "Mexico Falls" lately. It could have many interpretations, but what came to my mind was that the Spaniards built Mexico City over Tenochtitlan, that was built over a lake :P, this not only causes stronger seismic activity, becasue soft or wet sediment tends to amplify seismic waves and create more shaking, but as the water of the lake has been almost depleted for consumption for a long time, the city is loosing support and it's actually sinking.

A 40's newspaper article:

trove.nla.gov.au/ndp/del/article/42632014

How fast is the ground sinking in Mexico City and what can be done about it?
geo-mexico.com/?p=6229

A recent report from researchers at the National Autonomous University of Mexico (UNAM) and the Metropolitan Autonomous University (UAM) confirms that the height of the water table below Mexico City is dropping by about one meter a year, as more water is pumped out of the aquifer than the natural replenishment rate from rainfall.

Mexico's capital is a sinking metropolis

azcentral.com/news/articles/2010/04/08/20100408mexico-city-sinking-flooding-crisis.html#ixzz31kct9NwC
Deep underground, tunneling crews are in a race against time as they try to save the world's third-largest metropolis from catastrophe. Above them, the Mexican capital is sinking into the earth at a record rate, tilting the city's sewage tunnels so they are actually running backward. Crews are rushing to build a 37-mile drainage tunnel to save much of the city from future floods.

Unbalanced in the Sinking City

flightnetwork.com/blog/unbalanced-in-the-sinking-city/

Mexico City shouldn’t even be here. It should really be some pretty little island town surrounded by water, connected to the rest of Mexico by bridges, with volcanic mountains gleaming through the clear air in the distance. In the Museum of Anthropology there’s a giant mural depicting what life was like when the Aztecs ruled in the early 1500s, with water covering most of the area where buildings and streets now sit.

And not only the depleted lake factor, there's also this:

Deep caverns and old mine shafts are giving Mexico City a sinking feeling

globalpost.com/dispatch/news/regions/americas/mexico/140320/cavern-mexico-city-sinkhole

A collapsing mine shaft forced the demolition of a dozen houses and threatened to swallow more than 300 others in one neighborhood in 2007. Another sinkhole nearby consumed two more houses in 2011. Still another that suddenly gaped on a street last summer has spared homes so far.

“There was nothing here when I first arrived. Just fields and mine shafts,” says Orozco, who moved here with her family from the countryside in the 1960s. “If there are caverns beneath all of this, how can we not have collapses?”

City crews have filled in about 900 mines with rock and concrete in recent years, Alaniz says. The work continues as new shafts are discovered, usually when cracks appear in the walls of an affected building or a hole suddenly yawns in a street or yard.

The sinkholes are a constant worry, Orozco and other residents say. Earthquakes pose another one entirely.

Mexico City is sinking! More gigantic earthcracks in Valley of Mexico

thewatchers.adorraeli.com/2011/07/22/mexico-city-is-sinking-more-gigantic-earthcracks-in-valley-of-mexico/

Excelsior was reporting about the crack which appeared on 13 July in Santa Maria Huejoculco in Chalco, State Mexico. The earthcrack has now reached 1500 meters long. Just after survey work was detected in Santa Maria Huejoculco yet another gap of about four km which reaches La Candelaria Tlapala, was found in the community of Miraflores, in Chalco. This event began back 2009 in a small area of this region but since that time, it has grown and opened to devour everything around it. The continued sinking of some parts of Mexico City in response to the over-extraction of water from underground aquifers, and consequent shrinking of the subsoil, has resulted in dozens of cracks in recent years.

One of the big risks of the sinking city, could be a strong enough earthquake that could cause mayor parts of the city to collapse.

 

[Iron]

Another hit for the C's? A literal one this time!

 

[Gaolea]

I actually live in mexico city, what precautions should i take? :/

 

[mabar]

Another hit for the C's? A literal one this time!

I do not think this “Mexico Falls” is related to the“sinking”, since the sinking is been on going way before that session, wasn't it from 94’? ... I have been wondering too, although, found that is not Mexico Falls” it is “Mexico Fall”, that’s a differnece there.

Found this post Laura wrote related C's prophecies:

It's kind of a strange subject. When you consider the Cs attitude toward prophecy - that it is almost impossible to make accurate predictions unless you are connected to the forces that intend to fulfill them - and that the future is always open, expecting that they would make such a specific prediction is not likely. Of course, our approach to the Cs experiment was as skewed as most people's approach to the "other realms" in the beginning. We had the idea that everything was fixed at some immutable level and all we had to do was access that level. The idea of many universes, infinite possibilities, and quantum wave collapses, Schroedinger's Cat and all that, didn't occur to us. We also didn't realize that there probably was a lot more information we could have obtained about things from an STO source IF we had known how to ask the precise question. But then, that would have meant that we had some idea that something was going to happen so that we COULD frame the question!

So, there we were, quite often trying to wring definite prophecies out of the Cs, and they were telling us over and over again that the future was open. Meanwhile. various individuals attending the sessions were often skewing the information with emotional beliefs and expectations.

Also there is the issue of "Frank" and his efforts to really counter the effectiveness of the information.

Then, there are the issues of larger, cosmic events vs local events such as 9-11. For example:

7 Jan 1996

{...}
Q: (P) I would like to know about the apparitions of the
Virgin Mary at Conyers, GA, as well as this book "Mary's
Message to the World" and all the other messages about the
End Times that are coming out all over?

A: The forces at work here are far too clever to be
accurately anticipated so easily. You never know what
twists and turns will follow, and they are aware of
prophetic and philosophival patternings and usually shift
course to fool and discourage those who believe in fixed
futures.

Then, there is this:

26 Nov 1994

{...}
Q: (T) One last question. How do I know you are telling me
the truth?
A: Open. For you to decide. Listen: Revelations follow.
Now would be a good "time" for you folks to begin to
reexamine some of the extremely popular "Earth Changes"
prophecies. Why, you ask. Because, remember, you are
third density beings, so real prophecies are being
presented to you in terms you will understand, I.E.
physical realm, I.E. Earth changes. This "may" be
symbolism. Would most students of the subject understand
if prophecies were told directly in fourth density terms?
Q: (L) Is this comparable to my idea about dream symbolism.
For example, the dream I had about the curling cloud which
I saw in a distance and knew it was death dealing and I
interpreted it to be a tornado, but it was, in fact, a
dream of the Challenger disaster. I understood it to be a
tornado, but in fact, what I saw was what I got, a death
dealing force in the sky, a vortex, in the distance. I
guess my dream was a fourth density representation but I
tried to interpret it in terms I was familiar with. Is
this what you mean?
A: Close. But it is easy for most to get bogged down by
interpreting prophecies in literal terms.
Q: (L) Is there more information you plan to deliver on this
subject?
A: Okay.
Q: (L) Let me ask a quick one. Did the Gulf Breeze Six, as
they are called, who were supposedly receiving information
via the Ouija board, did they receive prophetic
information of some sort?
A: Yes.
Q: And, from what source did they receive this information?
A: Mixed.
Q: (L) Was their information accurate?
A: Mixed.
Q: (L) Why were they, their board, their transcripts and so
forth confiscated?
A: Paranoia.
Q: (L) In terms of these Earth Changes, Edgar Cayce is one of
the most famous prognosticators of recent note, a large
number of the prophecies he made seemingly were erroneous
in terms of their fulfillment. For example, he prophesied
that Atlantis would rise in 1969, but it did not though
certain structures were discovered off the coast of Bimini
which are thought by many to be remnants of Atlantis.
These did, apparently, emerge from the sand at that time.
A: Example of one form of symbolism.
Q: (L) Well, in terms of this symbolism, could this be
applied to the remarks you made about the two little boys
who were missing in South Carolina.
A: Yes.
Q: (L) And the symbolism was that you were reading the event
from 3rd density into sixth density terms and then
transmitting it back into 3rd, and while the ideation was
correct, the exact specifics, in 3rd density terms, were
slightly askew. Is that what we are dealing with here?
A: 99.9 per cent would not understand that concept. Most are
always looking for literal translations of data. Analogy
is novice who attends art gallery, looks at abstract
painting and says "I don't get it."
Q: (L) Well, let's not denigrate literal translations or at
least attempts to get things into literal terms. I like
realistic art work. I am a realist in my art preferences.
I want trees to look like trees and people to have only
two arms and legs. Therefore, I also like some
literalness in my prognostications.
A: Some is okay, but, beware or else "California falls into
the ocean" will always be interpreted as California
falling into the ocean.
Q: [General uproar] (F) Wait a minute, what was the
question? (L) I just said I liked literalness in my
prophecies. (F) Oh, I know what they are saying. People
believe that California is just going to go splat and that
Phoenix is going to be on the seacoast, never mind that
it's at 1800 feet elevation, it's just going to drop down
to sea level, or the sea level is going to rise, but it's
not going to affect Virginia Beach even though that's at
sea level. I mean... somehow Phoenix is just going to
drop down and none of the buildings are going to be
damaged, even though its going to fall 1800 feet... (T)
Slowly. It's going to settle. (F) Slowly? It would have
to be so slowly it's unbelievable how slowly it would have
to be. (T) It's been settling for the last five million
years, we've got a ways to go in the next year and a half!
(F) Right! That's my point. (T) In other words, when
people like Scallion and Sun Bear and others say
California is going to fall into the ocean, they are not
saying that the whole state, right along the border is
going to fall into the ocean, they are using the term
California to indicate that the ocean ledge along the
fault line has a probability of breaking off and sinking
on the water side, because it is a major fracture. We
understand that that is not literal. Are you telling us
that there is more involved here as far as the way we are
hearing what these predictions say?
A: Yes.
Q: (T) Are we understanding what you are saying?
A: Some.
Q: (T) So, when we talk about California falling into the
ocean, we are not talking about the whole state literally
falling into the ocean?
A: In any case, even if it does, how long will it take to do
this?
Q: (LM) It could take three minutes or three hundred years.
(T) Yes. That is "open" as you would say.
A: Yes. But most of your prophets think it is not open.
Q: (J) Yeah, because they think they have the only line on
it. (T) Okay. So they are thinking in the terms that one
minute California will be there and a minute and a half
later it will be all gone. Is this what you are saying?
A: Or similar.
Q: (T) So, when we are talking: "California will fall into
the ocean, which is just the analogy we are using, we are
talking about, as far as earth changes, is the possibility
that several seismic events along the fault line, which no
one really knows the extent of...
A: Or it all may be symbolic of something else.
Q: (L) Such as? (J) All the fruitcakes in California are all
going to go off the deep end together. (L) Symbolic of
what?
A: Up to you to examine and learn.
Q: (L) Now, wait a minute here! That's like sending us out
to translate a book in Latin without even giving us a
Latin dictionary.
A: No it is not. We asked you to consider a reexamination.
Q: (L) You have told us through this source, that there is a
cluster of comets connected in some interactive way with
our solar system, and that this cluster of comets comes
into the plane of the ecliptic every 3600 years. Is this
correct?
A: Yes. But, this time it is riding realm border wave to 4th
level, where all realities are different.
Q: (L) Okay, so the cluster of comets is riding the realm
border wave. Does this mean that when it comes into the
solar system, that its effect on the solar system, or the
planets within the solar system, (Jan or us), may or may
not be mitigated by the fact of this transition? Is this
a mitigating factor?
A: Will be mitigated.
Q: (T) Is this what the Star Trek movie, "Generations" is
telling us?
A: Possible.
Q: (T) Are you or someone in the Federation influencing the
writers of that program?
A: Open.
Q: (L) Does any of this mean that the earth changes that have
been predicted, may not, in fact, occur in physical
reality as we understand it?
A: You betcha.
Q: (L) Does this mean that all of this running around and
hopping and jumping to go here and go there and do this
and do that is...
A: That is strictly 3rd level thinking.
Q: (L) Now, if that is 3rd level thinking, and if a lot of
these things are symbolic, I am assuming they are symbolic
of movement or changes in energy.
A: Yes.
Q: (L) And, if these changes in energy occur does this mean
that the population of the planet are, perhaps, in groups
or special masses of groups, are they defined as the
energies that are changing in these descriptions of events
and happenings of great cataclysm. Is it like a cataclysm
of the soul on an individual and or collective basis?
A: Close.
Q: (L) When the energy changes to 4th density, and you have
already told us that people who are moving to 4th density
when the transition occurs, that they will move into 4th
density, go through some kind of rejuvenation process,
grow new teeth, or whatever, what happens to those people
who are not moving to 4th density, and who
are totally unaware of it? Are they taken along on the
wave by, in other words, piggy-backed by the ones who are
aware and already changing in frequency, or are they going
to be somewhere else doing something else?
A: Step by step.
Q: (T) In other words, we are looking at the fact that what's
coming this time is a wave that's going to allow the human
race to move to 4th density?
A: And the planet and your entire sector of space/time.
Q: (T) Is that what this whole plan is about, then, if I may
be so bold as to include all of us here in this. We, of
the beings of light who have come here into human form, to
anchor the frequency, is this what we are anchoring it
for, for this wave, so that when it comes enough of us
will be ready, the frequency will be set, so that the
change in the planet can take place as it has been
planned?
A: Yes.
Q: (L) When this happens, will we piggy-back all those who
are still unaware?
A: Open.
Q: (T) Okay, when the people are talking about the earth
changes, when they talk in literal terms about the
survivors, and those who are not going to survive, and the
destruction and so forth and so on, in 3rd, 4th, 5th level
reality we are not talking about the destruction of the
planet on 3rd level physical terms, or the loss of 90 per
cent of the population on the 3rd level because they died,
but because they are going to move to 4th level?
A: Whoa! You are getting "warm."
Q: (T) Okay. So, we are anchoring this. So, when they talk
about 90 per cent of the population not surviving, it is
not that they are going to die, but that they are going to
transform. We are going to go up a level. This is what
the whole light thing is all about?
A: Or another possibility is that the physical cataclysms
will occur only for those "left behind" on the remaining
3rd level density earth.
Q: (T) Okay, what you are saying, then, is that we are
anchoring the frequency, so that when the wave comes, we
move to 4th level density as many people as possible, in
order to break the hold the "Dark T-shirts" have got on
this planet, those who remain behind will not have enough
energy left for the "Dark T-shirts" to bother with the
planet any longer. There will be less of them so the
planet will be able to refresh and they will be able to
move on in their lessons without interference?
A: Close.
Q: (L) At this point of dimensional transition, is what we
are doing, anchoring a frequency, are we creating a sort
of "super string" network that will literally create
another earth in 4th density, which will then exist in 4th
density, and the old 3rd density earth -- almost like the
splitting of a one celled organism, only in this splitting
one half of it moves into another dimension and is
energized and quite literally created by the anchoring
frequency, while the old one remains and experiences 3rd
density reality?
A: Step by step.
Q: (L) Are we anchoring frequency to create a split?
A: One developing conduit.
Q: (L) We are developing a conduit?
A: Yes. One.
Q: (J) How many conduits do we need?
A: Open.
Q: (T) Is this conduit going to allow those who remain behind
to be able to move to 4th density easier when they are
ready?
A: No.
Q: (T) What is the conduit for?
A: You and those who will follow you.
Q: (T) Oh, this is for those of us who will move to 4th
density. We will move through and they will follow us
through the conduit. (J) Oh, others who are ready?
A: Your group here tonight.
Q: (L) Does this mean we will have followers or just us here
now?
A: Open. Up to you.
Q: (L) This conduit. Is this a conduit through which an
entire planet will transition?
A: You are one. There are others.
Q: (L) There are other planets...
A: No. Conduit.
Q: We are one conduit and there are conduits...
A: No. Developing at this point.
Q: (J) So, at this point we are developing a conduit?
A: Yes.
Q: (T) There are other groups on this planet developing their
own conduits?
A: Yes.
Q: (T) These are conduits for us to move to 4th density in?
A: Knowledge is the key to developing a conduit.
Q: (T) I am working on the assumption that all of us here are
part of the family of light, is this true?
A: Yes.
Q: (T) And we have been drawn together in order to develop
this conduit from where we are?
A: Yes.
Q: (T) Are there others in this area?
A: Yes.
Q: (T) Are they supposed to join with us or are they working
on their own?
A: Open.
Q: (T) Okay, so it is up in the air as to whether we join
with them, they join with us, or we all work
independently.
A: It is up to how much publicity you manage to get.
Q: (T) Do we want publicity on this?
A: Open.
Q: (L) Would it help us?
A: Open.
Q: (T) We're developing a conduit to move us from 3rd density
to 4th density. Once we have moved through the conduit
does that mean we have completed what we came here to do,
and that is anchor the frequency?
A: Partly.
Q: (T) Is the conduit kind of like an escape hatch for us?
A: Close.
Q: (L) Let me get this straight. When we move through this
conduit, are the other...
A: You will be on the 4th level earth as opposed to 3rd level
earth.
Q: (L) What I am trying to get here, once again, old
practical Laura, is trying to get a handle on practical
terms here. Does this mean that a 4th density earth and a
3rd density earth will coexist side by side...
A: Not side by side, totally different realms.
Q: (L) Do these realms interpenetrate one another but in
different dimensions...
A: Close.
Q: (L) So, in other words, a being from say, 6th density,
could look at this planet we call the earth and see it
spinning through space and see several dimensions of
earth, and yet the point of space/time occupation is the
same, in other words, simultaneous. (J) They can look
down but we can't look up.
A: Yes.
Q: (L) So, in other words, while all of this cataclysmic
activity is happening on the 3rd dimensional earth, we
will be just on our 4th dimensional earth and this sort of
thing won't be there, and we won't see the 3rd dimensional
people and they won't see us because we will be in
different densities which are not "en rapport", so to
speak?
A: You understand concept, now you must decide if it is
factual.

Having said all that, my thought is that the very first prediction the Cs made probably related to 9-11 in some way:

16 July 1994

Q: [Unknown question.]
A: Go to Denver airports.
Q: (L) When is all this going to happen?
A: Scandal - Scandal - Denver Airport.
Q: (L) What about the Denver airport?
A: Scandal.
Q: I don't understand.
A: New Denver airport.
Q: I don't understand.
A: Pay attention.
Q: Okay, we are paying attention. What are you trying to tell us?
A: Denver new airport big, big, big, big scandal.
Q: (L) What kind of scandal?
A: Government.
Q: (L) Specifically what?
A: You will see. Dallas airport is secret base; Orlando too; Miami Too.
Q: (L) What about Denver airport and how does it relate to prophecies?
A: Denver reveals the government. Look for it. Pay attention.

Very next session, there was a strong "pull" among all those present to get prophecies... and so:

22 July 1994

Q: (L) Do you have information for us this evening?
A: Space invasion soon. Four to six years. Battle between forces good and evil. Wait near. Look far. Listen. Mexico fall; Ethiopia quake; September - both - New Near - January- Paris bomb - London Blizzard - 109 die - Plane down -Tahiti - Cholera - Montana - January 1995 - government US - behind California quakes - Three soon - Oklahoma political abduction -February 95 - Big news.

Now, if you look at the mishmash of words above - which I really didn't know how to separate because this was only the second appearance of the Cs and they were not yet doing their own punctuation - you see something about an "invasion" in 4 to 6 years. Well, this was 1994 and 6 years later was 2000. The only BIG thing that happened in 2000 was that George Bush and his gang stole the election which set the stage for 9-11 to happen. Well, was that a "space invasion"? Was it a battle between the forces of good and evil? Sorta seems that way in retrospect but only if you understand what they are saying as often being symbolic.

You also see the word "September" in there... and "plane down" and government. But all that is stretching. What is of greater interest is "Oklahoma political abduction -February 95 - Big news."

As it turned out, on February 25 of 1995, we were given a warning of a terrorist bomb attack within a month.

25 Feb 1995

Q: (TM) What I am trying to find out is if it is good to be
around this person.

A: Those are personal questions. There will be a terrorist
attack in the U.S. month; bomb.

Q: (T) There is going to be a terrorist attack in the United
States in a month?

A: Yes!!! [planchette flies off board]

Q: (T) In a month?

A: Yes.

Q: (T) Where in the United States?

A: Washington D.C.

Q: (T) Well, they filed bankruptcy now they are going to blow
it up and collect the insurance.

A: Trial ongoing.

Q: (BP) O.J.? (TM) Oh, that's because of the terrorist trial?
(T) Yes, the terrorist trial in New York. (TM) Yes, they
are guarding Wall Street heavily because they are
threatening to blow that up. (J) Oh, okay. (BP) Is the
CIA or the FBI involved in this terrorist bombing?

A: No.

Q: (T) Do they know about it?

A: No.

Q: (BP) Is it Moslem terrorists?

A: Yes.

Q: (BP) Are we talking about a nuclear bomb?

A: No.

Q: (T) We should be so lucky. (J) Can you pinpoint where the
bomb is going to be in Washington? (BP) Congress?

A: No.

Q: (BP) Will it be in the Capitol?

A: No.

Q: (BP) Will it be in the White House?

A: No.

Q: (BP) Will it be in a federal office building?

A: Maybe.

Q: (BP) So, it is variable as to whether it will be
successful or not as well as other aspects?

A: Yes.

Q: (T) Do the authorities have an idea that this is going to
happen yet?

A: Some.

Q: (T) Some authorities or some idea?

A: Idea.

Now, that was totally bizarre. Connecting that back to this mention of Oklahoma "political abduction," and we find a curious relationship to the bombing which occurred in a Federal building in Oklahoma, NOT in Washington DC. Those who follow the information dug up by independent investigators will note that there is a definite connection between the OK bombing and 9-11. Also, in one of the earliest reports of the capture of Timothy McVeigh, he was quoted as saying that he was under the control of an implant that was in his hip, and that he believed he had been abducted and programmed by the government. And it was, indeed, BIG news!

Since it was around 94/95 perhaps it already happend and we didn’t even noticed... al least not as following a prophecy ...

It ocurres to me to think that around those years was the assesination of Colosio, the PRI Party candidate, nowadays ruling party, and he was quite a threat to established system, I had heard that he was going to change many things that were not suppose to be changed.
But checking time lines, Ca's session was on July 1994 and the assassination of Colosio was on March 1994, now considering that exact times are relative, It comes to my mind that, it may be possible that “Mexico Fall” -even thought months may be inverted, it could be related to the assassination of Colosio and most precisely, what came after that turn in our national history.

I was in college by that time, and was along with PAN ideology, but this event marked me, I even had a nightmare that day because, I woke up thinking that the president was killed –he was still a candidate-,all mexicans knew that it was the continuum, it did not even cross any mind that the other party could win, and Colosio was going to do great ---for everyone--- things.

The assassination was some sort like Kennedy's, an X guy wanted to killed him because he dislike his hat (??), yeap!, no one believed it, though, but that is the official version. _http://www.eluniversal.com.mx/in-english/2014/colosio-rumors-murder-85406.html. A movie about his murder came out two years ago, here, an article from it: _http://www.economist.com/blogs/prospero/2012/06/new-film-colosio-el-asesinato

 

[mabar]

I actually live in mexico city, what precautions should i take? :/

That question is difficult for me to answer, it is like earthquakes you will never know when is going to be, but you know that there are many possibilities to occur. It could help to notice/observe sings where you live/job (building/s, street), there are colonies which are known to have more muddy soils, like Colonia Roma. Read SOTT news, there had been a lot of sinkholes around the globe, and we had had them here too (Mexico City). It had helped me to observe/ be aware of other things.

 

[Windmill knight]

Another hit for the C's? A literal one this time!

I do not think this “Mexico Falls” is related to the“sinking”, since the sinking is been on going way before that session, wasn't it from 94’? ... I have been wondering too, although, found that is not Mexico Falls” it is “Mexico Fall”, that’s a differnece there.

I think it's an interesting idea. I had considered it in regards to earthquakes but not sinkholes. It is true that they have been talking about the sinking of the city for a long time, but the more frequent appearance of sinkholes around the globe is quite new. What logos is pointing out makes you wonder if large sinkholes will make chunks of downtown Mexico City quite literally fall!

 

[mabar]

I think it's an interesting idea. I had considered it in regards to earthquakes but not sinkholes. It is true that they have been talking about the sinking of the city for a long time, but the more frequent appearance of sinkholes around the globe is quite new. What logos is pointing out makes you wonder if large sinkholes will make chunks of downtown Mexico City quite literally fall!

It might be, although ... I suppose, it will be more likely that chunks around the down town of Mexico City would fall, or what you mean by "downtown Mexico City"? Considering these images, down town of Mexico City was constructed upon the pyramids (archaeological site of Templo Mayor in down town of Mexico City, _http://www.templomayor.inah.gob.mx/ --in spanish, but has images of the Templo Mayor.

... around the down town of Tenochtitlán, nowadays down town of Mexico City (zócalo) was water, shown in these two maps from 1500's.

The map of "Mexico1524" is the 1524 Nuremberg Map of Tenochtitlan, the first map shown to Europe among with Cortés letters, of course, as it is mentioned here _http://www.latinamericanstudies.org/aztecs/aztec-capital.pdf (english)is a fantasy, conquest was just in 1521 and Tenochtitlán did not ended like that (reconstructed so quickly), funny is the some sort of "pyramid castle" at it's center. Quite interesting document, had not finished reading.

---

As one of the guys from above links say _http://www.flightnetwork.com/blog/unbalanced-in-the-sinking-city/ “Who is crazy enough to build a colonial capital city on muddy marshlands, on unstable ground surrounded by volcanoes, sitting on an earthquake fault line?”, the likes of us to live here, right?

Fwiw … for all those who live in Mexico city, and for those who want to come?, this link shows the geological danger maps of Mexico City, from the General Direction of Civil Protection of Federal District (aka Mexico City) site … –in Spanish _http://www.proteccioncivil.df.gob.mx/mapas_sgm/mapas_sgm2.html …considering the last map “Mapa de Zonificación Geotécnica “(Geotechnics Zone Map) … I live and work in the lacustrine near the transition area :O ... the green areas (small hillocks) are nearer to other asleep volcanoes and/or caves ---like the recently founded one this year from link above.

I suppose, I would not like to think that I/thousands? will fall, and I do not know much about the soil in which I live/work and need to found/search more information, and still, is in my perception that fall (quick) does not denote nor connote sink(slow), that's why I thought and still think is/was something else. There is also the issue about "Mexico" word ... in my perspective is as country not as city, even though, the costum is to centralized many things in the capital, and/or what happend in 85 with the big earthquake, Mexico City literally almost crumpled with so many buildings coming down, if it was said "Mexico fall(s) again" it would be more understandable. But, is in the context of other predictions in that particular session, that I still have this "worm of doubt" about the sinking.

Modify: Spell check

 

[mabar]

There has been two earthquakes today, in the Alvaro Obregon's delegacy within Mexico City, from National Seismological Service _http://www.ssn.unam.mx/ultimos.html

Date Time Lat. Long. Depth (km) Magnitude
2014-08-03 15:17:51 19.42 -99.21 11.0 2.83 km al NOROESTE de V ALVARO OBREGON, DF
2014-08-03 09:02:08 19.37 -99.211 2.0 3.04 km al SUROESTE de V ALVARO OBREGON, DF

Deep caverns and old mine shafts are giving Mexico City a sinking feeling

globalpost.com/dispatch/news/regions/americas/mexico/140320/cavern-mexico-city-sinkhole

A collapsing mine shaft forced the demolition of a dozen houses and threatened to swallow more than 300 others in one neighborhood in 2007. Another sinkhole nearby consumed two more houses in 2011. Still another that suddenly gaped on a street last summer has spared homes so far.

“There was nothing here when I first arrived. Just fields and mine shafts,” says Orozco, who moved here with her family from the countryside in the 1960s. “If there are caverns beneath all of this, how can we not have collapses?”

City crews have filled in about 900 mines with rock and concrete in recent years, Alaniz says. The work continues as new shafts are discovered, usually when cracks appear in the walls of an affected building or a hole suddenly yawns in a street or yard.

The sinkholes are a constant worry, Orozco and other residents say. Earthquakes pose another one entirely.

 

[mabar]

NOTE: I was with the intention to came back due to a mistake in a refresh while making the post, but didn't had enough time, this is the continuation.

There has been two earthquakes today, in the Alvaro Obregon's delegacy within Mexico City, it was weird hearing it the news, I hadn't hear it before. I think it was in Alvaro Obregon's delegacy where the caverns were seen back in April. Although, nowadays authorities seem clueless about the earthquakes, is something that scientists had investigated before.

Found this study from 2007 -in Spanish- _http://usuarios.geofisica.unam.mx/cruz/Sismociones_Libres/Biblio_Sismocion/SismicidadYEfectosDeSitio.pdf that talks about the seismic monitoring in Alvaro Obregon's delegacy, their conclusion is that the vibration measurements shows that, the within the system of the Failure of Sierra de las Cruces exists evidence of tectonic activity in some of the failures.

There is a map within that shows other earthquakes in the area, in the last 40 years. and the failure identified by Mooser et al., (1986).

 

[cubbex]

Just because it was before the session doesn't mean is not related. The wave and the weather stuff has been going since before the sessions in subtle ways. Now, if the DF falls, it may be symbolic. Of all the states i've been, that place has the nastiest people i've met. They make you feel you are between hounds that try to prove who's best, who's the most successful, dominant, the most handsome, the most cool and meaner. Is like a lot of them are living in some sort of TV illusion.

 

[mabar]

There has been two earthquakes today, in the Alvaro Obregon's delegacy within Mexico City, from National Seismological Service _http://www.ssn.unam.mx/ultimos.html

Date Time Lat. Long. Depth (km) Magnitude
2014-08-03 15:17:51 19.42 -99.21 11.0 2.83 km al NOROESTE de V ALVARO OBREGON, DF
2014-08-03 09:02:08 19.37 -99.211 2.0 3.04 km al SUROESTE de V ALVARO OBREGON, DF

Deep caverns and old mine shafts are giving Mexico City a sinking feeling

globalpost.com/dispatch/news/regions/americas/mexico/140320/cavern-mexico-city-sinkhole

A collapsing mine shaft forced the demolition of a dozen houses and threatened to swallow more than 300 others in one neighborhood in 2007. Another sinkhole nearby consumed two more houses in 2011. Still another that suddenly gaped on a street last summer has spared homes so far.

“There was nothing here when I first arrived. Just fields and mine shafts,” says Orozco, who moved here with her family from the countryside in the 1960s. “If there are caverns beneath all of this, how can we not have collapses?”

City crews have filled in about 900 mines with rock and concrete in recent years, Alaniz says. The work continues as new shafts are discovered, usually when cracks appear in the walls of an affected building or a hole suddenly yawns in a street or yard.

The sinkholes are a constant worry, Orozco and other residents say. Earthquakes pose another one entirely.

There were several small earquakes (a "big one" of 3.4 and after shocks) in Mexico City this day. From National Seismological Service _http://www.ssn.unam.mx/ultimos.html:

2014-12-01 04:45:48 19.353 -99.237 4.02.23 km al NOROESTE de LA MAGDALENA C, DF
2014-12-01 04:02:13 19.361 -99.247 5.02.33 km al NOROESTE de TLALPAN, DF
2014-12-01 03:12:16 19.36 -99.234 4.02.13 km al NORESTE de LA MAGDALENA C, DF
2014-12-01 02:50:07 19.371 -99.232 5.03.42 km al NOROESTE de LA MAGDALENA C, DF


Hadn't been able to hear what the experts are going to say, though. But those were quite near from the ones above, wouldn't be impossible to think that are/could be related to the caverns and mines in the area.

 

[Navigator]

Well, they didn't say "Mexico City", right? They said, "Mexico" which extends the possibilities to another 2 million square kilometers :P What I've been thinking is that this could be the same as the "Ukraine prediction" which turned out to be not quite exactly what they said, but in the ballpark.

What really gets me suspecting a "fall" is that it could be related to what is happening right now with the recent wave of protests for the 43 dissappeared students which is just the tipping point for people who are tired of the exponential levels of violence and corruption the narco-government has brought this country and that has been experiencing very openly for the last 8 years, but that has been prevalent and in everyone's mind for decades.