notanothermonday
Padawan Learner
Now this is interesting, okay maybe not but yet more s*** and shinola from the race for the Office front. Good old Mitt.
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,275446,00.html
Yes he said this:
ROMNEY: Well, I was really shocked to see that ABC News reported a covert action being taken against Iran. Obviously, I wasn't shocked that we were taking covert action against Iran, but that they would report something of that nature when Iran is engaged in developing a nuclear weapon,
Not what I heard from an interview with the IAEA (not that I trust these guys with the number of times they contradict themeselves). They stated that Iran was not, from what they witnessed, involved in the development of a nuclear weapon and that if they were pursuing such things they were a long ways off.
He goes on:
ROMNEY: when they're supplying a support to people who are attacking our troops in Iraq,
Once again unproven. What documentation is relying on. The ones that were proven to be falsified back a couple of months ago.
And on:
ROMNEY: when you have leadership of Iran that is denying the Holocaust,
Which is not something that should be against the law, especially since Mitt is running for president in a country
that prides itself or at least flaunts the idea of free speech.
And on:
ROMNEY: that's trying to develop a weapon to potentially carry one out. I mean, this reality suggests that disclosing a covert action is something which has the potential of harming our national interests and potentially affecting lives.
And this is so much different than the tough sanctions we placed on Iraq during the 90's when 100's of thousands of children died as a result of inadequate health care and availability of life saving technology due to such sanctions. This so much different than an attack on a country that was accused of having or making weapons of mass destruction and killing 100's of thousands of people and displacing millions more, by the way they did not have weapons of mass destruction or any capabilities to manufacture such things. How about us not knowing about the covert operation and it turning into an international incident because of the results of the operation that leads to another war in the name of prevention.
By the way that was one hell of a statement by Mitt. In one blurb he basically dismissed the idea that a covert operation was being taken but justified the existence of said operation if indeed we did have such a plan all the while stoking the fires of fear so as to promote the NWO.
There is so much more and is evidence of:
Meet the new boss, same as the old boss
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,275446,00.html
Yes he said this:
ROMNEY: Well, I was really shocked to see that ABC News reported a covert action being taken against Iran. Obviously, I wasn't shocked that we were taking covert action against Iran, but that they would report something of that nature when Iran is engaged in developing a nuclear weapon,
Not what I heard from an interview with the IAEA (not that I trust these guys with the number of times they contradict themeselves). They stated that Iran was not, from what they witnessed, involved in the development of a nuclear weapon and that if they were pursuing such things they were a long ways off.
He goes on:
ROMNEY: when they're supplying a support to people who are attacking our troops in Iraq,
Once again unproven. What documentation is relying on. The ones that were proven to be falsified back a couple of months ago.
And on:
ROMNEY: when you have leadership of Iran that is denying the Holocaust,
Which is not something that should be against the law, especially since Mitt is running for president in a country
that prides itself or at least flaunts the idea of free speech.
And on:
ROMNEY: that's trying to develop a weapon to potentially carry one out. I mean, this reality suggests that disclosing a covert action is something which has the potential of harming our national interests and potentially affecting lives.
And this is so much different than the tough sanctions we placed on Iraq during the 90's when 100's of thousands of children died as a result of inadequate health care and availability of life saving technology due to such sanctions. This so much different than an attack on a country that was accused of having or making weapons of mass destruction and killing 100's of thousands of people and displacing millions more, by the way they did not have weapons of mass destruction or any capabilities to manufacture such things. How about us not knowing about the covert operation and it turning into an international incident because of the results of the operation that leads to another war in the name of prevention.
By the way that was one hell of a statement by Mitt. In one blurb he basically dismissed the idea that a covert operation was being taken but justified the existence of said operation if indeed we did have such a plan all the while stoking the fires of fear so as to promote the NWO.
There is so much more and is evidence of:
Meet the new boss, same as the old boss
