Mossad’s Murderous Reach: The Larger Political Issues

Mossad’s Murderous Reach: The Larger Political Issues

by James Petras
VoltaireNet
22 February 2010


The recent assassination of Hamas top military commander Mahmoud al-Mabhouh is consistent with Israel’s traditional policy of extrajudicial killings targeting Palestinian resistance fighters abroad. It raises the fundamental issue of violating the sovereignty of other countries, overriding their laws. Moreover, Israel’s cynical use of dual citizens to achieve its murderous goals, as in this case, also raises the question of allegiance and to what extent the second passport-issuing countries are willing to look the other way to guarantee Israel’s impunity.

On January 19 Israel’s international secret police, the Mossad, sent an eighteen member death squad to Dubai using European passports, supposedly ‘stolen’ from Israeli dual citizens and altered with fake photos and signatures, in order to assassinate the Palestinian leader, Mahmoud al Mabhouh.

The evidence is overwhelming: The Dubai police presentation of detailed security videos of the assassins was corroborated by the testimony of Israeli security experts and applauded by Israel’s leading newspapers and columnists. The Mossad openly stated that Mabhouh was a high priority target who had survived three previous assassination attempts. Israel did not even bother to deny the murder. Furthermore, the sophisticated communication system used by the killers, the logistics and planning surrounding their entry and exit from Dubai and the scope and scale of the operation have all the characteristics of a high-level state operation. Furthermore, only Mossad would have access to the European passports of its dual citizens! Only Mossad would have the capacity, motivation, stated intent and willingness to provoke a diplomatic row with its European allies, knowing full well that Western European governments’ anger would blow over because of their deep links to Israel. After meticulous investigation and the interrogation of 2 captured Palestinian Mossad collaborators, the Dubai police chief has stated he is sure the Mossad was behind the killing.

The Larger Political Issues

Israel’s policy of overseas assassination raises profound issues that threaten the basis of the modern state: sovereignty, rule of law and national and personal security.

Israel has a publicly-stated policy of violating the sovereignty of any and all countries in order to kill or abduct its opponents. In both proclamation and actual practice, Israeli law, decrees and actions abroad supersede the laws and law enforcement agencies of any other nation. If Israel’s policy becomes the common practice world-wide, we would enter a savage Hobbesian jungle in which individuals would be subject to the murderous intent of foreign assassination squads unrestrained by any law or accountable national authority. Each and every state could impose its own laws and cross national borders in order to murder other nation’s citizens or residents with impunity. Israel’s extra-territorial assassinations make a mockery of the very notion of national sovereignty. Extra-territorial secret police elimination of opponents was a common practice of the Nazi Gestapo, Stalin’s GPU and Pinochet’s DINA and has now become the sanctioned practice of the US “Special Forces” and the CIA clandestine division. Such policies are the hallmark of totalitarian, dictatorial and imperialist states, which systematically trample on the sovereign rights of peoples.

Israel’s practice of extra-judicial, extra-territorial assassinations, exemplified by the recent murder of Mahmoud al Mabhouh in a Dubai hotel room, violates all the fundamental precepts of the rule of law. Extra-judicial killings ordered by a state, mean its own secret police are judge, jury, prosecutor and executioner, unrestrained by sovereignty, law and the duty of nations to protect their citizens and visitors. Evidence, legal procedures, defense and cross examinations are obliterated in the process. State-sponsored, extra-judicial murder completely undermines due process. Liquidation of opponents abroad is the logical next step after Israel’s domestic show trials, based on the application of its racial laws and administrative detention decrees, which have dispossessed the Palestinian people and violated international laws.

Mossad death squads operate directly under the Israeli Prime Minister (who personally approved the recent murder).The vast majority of Israelis proudly support these assassinations, especially when the killers escape detection and capture. The unfettered operation of foreign state-sponsored death squads, carrying out extra-judicial assassinations with impunity, is a serious threat to every critic, writer, political leader and civic activist who dares to criticize Israel.

Mossad Murders - Zionist Fire

The precedent of Israel killing its adversaries abroad, establishes the outer boundaries of repression by its overseas supporters in the leading Zionist organizations, most of whom have now and in the past supported Israel’s violation of national sovereignty via extra-judicial killings. If Israel physically eliminates its opponents and critics, the 51 major American Jewish organizations economically repress Israel’s critics in the US. They actively pressure employers, university presidents and public officials to fire employees, academics and professionals who dare to speak or write against Israeli torture, killing and systematic dispossession of Palestinians.

So far, most critical comments, in Israel and elsewhere, of Mossad’s recent murder in Dubai focus on the agents’ “incompetence”, including allowing their faces to be captured on numerous security videos as they clumsily changed their wigs and costumes under the camera gaze . Other critics complain that the bungling Mossad is “tarnishing Israel’s image” as a democratic state and providing ammunition for the anti-Semites. None of these superficial criticisms have been repeated by the US Congress, White House or the Presidents of the Major Jewish American organizations, where the mafia rule of Omerta, or silence, reigns supreme and criminal complicity is the rule.

Conclusion


While the critics bemoan the clumsy Mossad job, making it harder for Western powers to provide Israel with diplomatic cover for its operations abroad, the fundamental issue is never addressed: The Mossad’s acquisition and alteration of official British, French, German and Irish passports of dual Israeli citizen’s underscores the cynical and sinister nature of Israel’s exploitation of its dual citizens in the pursuit of its own bloody foreign policy goals. Mossad’s use of genuine passports issued by four sovereign European nations to its citizens in order to murder a Palestinian in a Dubai hotel room raises the question of to whom ‘dual’ Israeli citizens really owe their allegiance and just how far they are willing to go in defending or promoting Israel’s overseas assassinations.

Thanks to Israel’s use of British passports to enter Dubai and murder an adversary, every British businessperson or tourist traveling in the Middle East will be suspected of links to Israeli death squads. With elections this year and the Labor and Conservative parties counting heavenly on Zionist millionaires for campaign funding, it remains to be seen whether Prime Minister Gordon Brown will do more than whimper and cringe!

source: VoltaireNet
 
Today I was at work reading the main newspaper of national circulation in Argentina, which is "Clarin - The argentine newspaper"
In their electronic version, they published a short article about the murder of Hamas official Mahmud Al-Mabhuh. As this news is of interest for me, and after translating Joe's article to spanish, I stopped to read it.

I always take what the mainstream news with a grain of salt, but in this case what really shocked me was the complete omission of the word 'Mossad' or even 'Israel'. :O

The newspaper only refer to them as: "the group" or "the team' :evil:
They do not even address what the origin of this group might be! Not a single word!

Here's the link: _http://www.clarin.com/diario/2010/02/24/um/m-02147050.htm

I made a raw translation:

A video shows how the group that murdered Hamas official worked

Dubai police have crucial clues in their hands to elucidate the murder of Hamas leader Mahmud Al-Mabhuh. A series of images would help them uncover the crime occurred in January 19. The video show in detail all the movements made by the victim and his murderers during the 19 hours prior the assassination.

The video, broadcasted by GNTV, compile the images from Dubai Airport’s CCTV, from the hotel in which was murdered and even from other hotels where the group individuals stayed during the event.

According to officials from Dubai, a group of eleven people with European passports followed the Hamas official from the airport to the hotel where he was found dead.

Along the 28 minutes of the video it shows the different members of the group that carried on the operation arriving at the airport and making the check in at the hotel, which later turned out to be the place of the crime.

As reported, the suspects never made direct calls between them, but they did a big number of calls to Austria.

In the video that circulates in Internet it can be seen how, in some cases, different members of the operation head to other hotels to make some changes in their physical appearance.

The arrival to the airport of leader Mahmud Al-Mabhuh is also recorded, but by then he’d been already located by the team. In fact, he arrives to the hotel accompanied by two other individuals of the operative whom follows him to his room. Moreover, there are images showing that two of the accused whom were keeping an eye on him entered in the same elevator with him.

According with this videos, the suspects divided in four groups to observe the victim, while a fifth team carried out the crime. Some speculate they could have entered in his room posing as hotel personnel or deactivating the room code with an electronic device.

After dying by asphyxia the criminal members of the team escaped Dubai.

Hundreds of Palestinian refugees assisted to the bury of Al-Mabhuh on january 30, in Syria, where he lived from 1989.
 
Thanks Peche. That's a magnificent example of how the media twists the truth without strictly telling a lie (although they may do that too, especailly if they are just repeating the pathocrats' story). Not only did they fail to mention Mossad and Israel, instead they decided to report that the murderers were carrying European passports. Which of course gives a very distorted version of events to the casual reader.
 
go2 said:
Hi Peche,

Who owns the Clarin?

Hi go!
Clarin belongs to a big media outlet, called, "Grupo Clarin" which covers vast areas of media as Newspapers, TV, Radio, Internet.

I found a Wikipewdia entry in english that sums it very well: _http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grupo_Clar%C3%ADn

Overview
Established as such in 1999, it includes the Clarín newspaper (the most-widely circulated in Latin America), Papel Prensa (the nation's principal newsprint manufacturer), the Artear media company, and numerous other media outlets.[2]

Rooted in the successful, 1945 launch of the centrist daily, Clarín, by the late Roberto Noble, the group is active within the publishing, newspaper, television, radio, and telecommunications industries. Its largest shareholder is Ernestina Herrera de Noble. Other major shareholders include Héctor Magnetto, José Antonio Aranda, Lucio Rafael Pagliaro, and the investment bank Goldman Sachs. Magnetto is the President and CEO of the media group, while Ernestina Herrera de Noble directs the flagship Clarín newspaper.

Having become the largest newspaper distributor in the Spanish-speaking world by 1980 (when its revenues topped US$300 million),[2] the group diversified itself significantly in 1990, when it entered into television sector with the acquisition of Channel 13, and into radio with the purchase of Radio Mitre. Following the expansion into cable television in 1992 (Multicanal), Todo Noticias, the group's cable news channel, was established in 1993 and remains one of the most influential in its sector. The conglomerate also controls Patagonik Film Group and numerous regional newspapers (notably Los Andes of Mendoza and La Voz del Interior of Córdoba).[2]

Grupo Clarín was listed in the Buenos Aires and London Stock Exchanges in 2007, upon which a 20% share in the group was made available to stockholders (leaving 9% for Goldman Sachs, and 71% for its private shareholders).[3] The group's revenues in 2009 were accounted for mainly by its cable television units (principally Cablevisión and Multicanal), which accounted for 60% of sales. Its numerous publishing interests netted 22% of the total, and rights to broadcasting, programming and digital content accounted for most of the remainder.[1]

And here's a graphic I saw once showing the scope of action of this monopoly. Big one, eh?

mapa_clarin.jpg


Hope it helps!

Thanks!
 
Thanks Peche,

Peche said:
And here's a graphic I saw once showing the scope of action of this monopoly. Big one, eh?

Yea... Psychological operations are big business.


US Department of Defense said:
"The planned use of propaganda and other psychological actions having the primary purpose of influencing the opinions, emotions, attitudes, and behavior of hostile foreign groups in such a way as to support the achievement of national objectives."

Adolphe Cremioux said:
“Capture the press!” Through it everything will come to you in the natural course of events.

"Israelites : No matter where fate should lead - though scattered all over the earth, you must always consider yourselves members of a Chosen Race. The net which Israel is throwing over the globe of the earth is widening and spreading daily, and the momentous prophecies of our Holy Books are at last to be realized. The day is not distant when all the riches and treasures of the earth will become the property of the children of Israel."

Peche, do you know the work of the Argentinian, Adrian Salbuchi?

_http://www.asalbuchi.com.ar/2009/10/bombings-of-the-amia-and-israeli-embassy-bldgs/
 
Thanks for quotes go! Very illustrative and sad.

go said:
Peche, do you know the work of the Argentinian, Adrian Salbuchi?

_http://www.asalbuchi.com.ar/2009/10/bombings-of-the-amia-and-israeli-embassy-bldgs/

I saw a couple of videos some time ago about economy. I've not seen this one about the bombings of amia and the embassy. Will watch them! Thanks!
 
I just read this article by Jonathan Cook on the conflicts of interest in journalism dominated by a special interest group seeking to conceal and distort the truth concerning the crimes of Israel and those complicit in these crimes. This topic is getting more public examination on internet news sites. I copied a few paragraphs that summarize the
article. I would like to note that I haven't purchased or read a New York Times for many years, after I became aware of their bias.

http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=17819

Jonathan Cook…Reporters With Conflicts of Interest said:
A recent assignment of mine covering Israel’s presumed links to the assassination of Hamas leader Mahmoud al-Mabhouh provoked some more thoughts about the New York Times reporter Ethan Bronner. He is the Jerusalem bureau chief who has been at the centre of a controversy since it was revealed last month that his son is serving in the Israeli army. Despite mounting pressure to replace Bronner, the NYT’s editors have so far refused to consider that he might be facing a conflict of interest or that it would be wiser to post him elsewhere.

Last week, when suspicion for the assassination in Dubai started to fall on the Mossad, a newspaper editor emailed to ask if I could ring up my “Israeli security contacts” for fresh leads. It was a reminder that Western correspondents in Israel are expected to have such contacts. The point was underlined later the same day when I spoke with a leftwing Israeli academic to get his take on Mabhouh’s killing. I had turned to this Ashkenazi professor because he counts many veterans of the security services as friends. At the end of the interview, I asked him if he had any suggestions for people in the security services I might speak with. He replied: “Talk to Eitan Bronner. He has excellent contacts.” Naively, I asked how I could reach this expert on the veiled world of the Israeli security establishment. Was he employed at the professor’s university? “No, ring the New York Times bureau,” he responded increduously. Oh, that “Eitan”!

Yes, Ethan Bronner is “the rule”, as my informant notes, because any other kind of journalist -- the goyim, as many Israelis dismiss non-Jews -- will only ever be able to scratch at the surface of Israel’s military-political-industrial edifice. The Bronners have access to power, they can talk to the officials who matter, because those same officials trust that high-powered Jewish and Israeli reporters belong in the Israeli consensus. They may be critical of the occupation, but they can be trusted to pull their punches. If they ever failed to do so, they would be ejected from the inner sanctum and a paper like the NYT would be forced to replace them with someone more cooperative.

When in later years, these Jerusalem bureau chiefs retire from the field of battle and are promoted to the rank of armchair general back at media HQ – when they become a Thomas Friedman paid to pontificate regularly on the conflict -- they can be trusted to talk to those same high-placed officials, explaining their viewpoint and defending it. That is why you will not read anything in the NYT questioning the idea that Israel is a democratic state or see coverage suggesting that Israel is acting in bad faith in the peace process.

This is a conflict of interest of the highest order. It is also the reason why they are there in the first place.
 
Back
Top Bottom