Reading the Wiki entry just now, and first impression of the concept is the lack of the law of probability... vs possibility... if that's a law... can't remember, just like Mr. N. ;)
The director described the scale of the film, "My producers don't like me saying it, but it's really a big-budget experimental film about the many different lives one person can live, depending on the choices he makes. It's about the infinite possibilities facing any person. There are no good or bad choices in life. It's simply that each choice will create another life for you. What's interesting is to be alive."[12]
See what I mean? infinite possibilities? Yes, in a way, but remember anything might be possible (in some context), but not nearly as much is probable (in any given context).
At the end when it assumes that the universe is on the precipice of ultimate chaos, making use of the Big Crunch theory, time halts, and it begins to reverse.[28] Thus signalling the absolute freedom Nemo had been seeking – being able to live a life without choice, for while you never choose all things remain possible.[29] The tale of Nemo Nobody reflects a life of choices, whether or not we made the correct choice and what would happen if we could go back and change them. In the reveal Mr. Nobody age 118 states that it doesn't matter what we choose, because each choice, once made has just as much significance as any alternate choice.[30] The film portrays a life where we are all subject to chance, to the dimensions by which we construct our reality (height, length, width and time), and to the imagination of our former selves.
Well, this is from Wikipedia, so the zionist influence can be seen, though, without tracking the statement to the many footnotes listed, it's hard to determine who is really making this statement, is it the director et al on the production team or some wiki editor, either way, it seems this film is about not making choices, something the PTB would likely encourage if we aren't making one in their direction.

Perhaps, as usual, these projects turn into an expression of the befuddlement of their creators? Again the knowledge problem, as the meaning of our lives is up to us to determine by means of the expression of choice... that process of the m/b/s complex as Ra made mention of in relationship to the archetypes portrayed in the major arcana of the Tarot. The development of bias leading to choice which solidifies into the transformation of our individual and collective environment. This film seems like one who has stopped along the path, entranced by some folly of interest, one playing with the issue of choice. As a member of the audience, of the film and its creator, we are allowed to witness his journey of the mind, using the form best known to him, film.
As usual, I haven't seen this film

but I wonder if anyone really thinks the parents left this 'choice' to young Nemo (Mr. Nobody)? Can you explain how that scene was setup? This type of scene seems suspect, as happens so often in these storylines, as the writer needs some kind of unusual event to get the story going. How absurd is this scene at the train station in which young Nemo is told to choose suddenly between the two parents, one staying and the other leaving on that train? The trailer shows no luggage, which again seems like some last second setup, which seems again rather absurd, which says something about the film don't you think? Any setup is one with immense limitations, and the available choices seem to most of us, rather the same. I don't know this storyteller/director/creator, but isn't this whole concept more dreamlike than real? So, it seems destined for the dissociative file, don't you think? No wonder the project got the green light. ;) Maybe I'm wrong? You've seen the film, what do you think?