Multitasking & Brain Rewiring

Voyageur

Ambassador
Ambassador
FOTCM Member
Although many of these things here; http://www.cbc.ca/documentaries/doczone/video.html (“Are We Digital Dummies? We'll investigate how our love affair with technology is overloading our ancient brains, leaving us chronically distracted.”) have been discussed in the forum, this was an interesting documentary on multimedia and how it plays out in our human lives for many.


Not too old fashioned but a reluctant latecomer to technology from a time when typing was done on a ribbon and mistakes caused the pages to be ripped out (Grrrr) and a new page inserted. Sending mail require finding the right paper and pen and writing ones thoughts without backspace/delete. It was actually fun to go to the mail box and read from others hand without the avalanche of electronic bills and solicitations. About the only thing to look forward to at the post office now is my copy of the Dot Connector magazine. I have a work mobile phone that if moved, sometimes but a foot, the signal is dropped. The back-light is on all the time now so it dies in about 45 minutes and the employer wants to give me a new Blackberry (BB).


Walking into the airport terminal the other day a whole waiting room of heads were bowed to these screens and you could have heard a pin drop; except for the sound of thumbs clicking away, oblivious to the arthritic skeletal difficulties that might accompany these repetitive actions, not to mention the 42 lb head (massage therapy term) that may also result. There is trepidation also for me of having one of these BB vectors in my hands so the employer can funnel even more things at me when away from the main communication box. I’ve never text more than a few words as generally I just can’t read the darn screen without finding my reading glasses. My work computer has just < 1,000 messages in the inbox and they have been coming in faster now than I can negotiate the contents and file or delete. In the documentary it discusses how working without technology of this sort was generally 40 + hours and now with things like BB, work is in the 70 + hour range and satisfaction of course has plummeted. It talks about kids who are so addicted to gaming that they so do not move and some have even had Thrombosis requiring leg amputation - good grief.


What indeed did we do before all this techno-wizardry came into being – it seems now like some lost memory, yet we did just fine. My first computer other than a commodore 64 with DOS prompts only was a floppy drive system and think the internal memory was about 20 mg/bits and ran on a platform called Valdox, which was just DOS in disguise – glorified typewriter and calculator. This machine was $ 3,400 +/- and obsolete before it came out of the box. As for today’s texting, I’ve been told that sometimes in meeting places people now sit across from each other and text one another rather than exercise their larynx and vocal cords.


Is all this stuff useful, indeed I would not want to replace the word processor and lap top, however, on the other hand if we became unplugged, for me it would be almost a relief, don’t think I’d miss it. However, without connection, a network like this could only exist, in person, by writing or telepathically - which it could and may be in the future, but for now psychic messages seem latent, from another past or future time, not recognizable and focused upon. So today, in terms of being connected, getting quality everyday news in written print seems to be fading into obscurity and thus one needs to be online researching and cross referencing almost everything – this is lots of work, either to find out what is in a product, let alone the geopolitical goings-on; thank goodness for books.


In one regard, I’m grateful for having techno abilities to do this, this has increased awareness in so many things, yet the other side, societal in general, seems to point to a loss of human contact on many levels even though we seem to be in touch and things can be so immediate. The documentary looks at some of these things and how in our immediate connections we perhaps have become disconnected and certainly the evidence of some of how we approach and use technologies might just be rewiring our brains to the exclusion of critical thinking and heaping on e-stressors.


As techno devices evolve AI gets brought up and came across this AI link while searching tonight from SAO which was interesting ;


http://www.cassiopaea.org/forum/index.php?topic=20110.msg200468#msg200468

And then this from a C’s transcript;


C’s transcript said:
Q: (L) And the third and final destruction [of Atlantis] was caused by what?
A: Crystals.

Q: (T) Did they lose control of this power?
A: It overpowered them the same way your computers will overpower you.

Q: (V) Is it similar to them gaining a life and intelligence of their own?
A: Yes.

Q: (L) You mean these crystalline structures came to life, so to speak?
A: Yes.

Q: (L) And then what did they do?
A: Destroyed Atlantis.
 
Parallax said:
Although many of these things here; http://www.cbc.ca/documentaries/doczone/video.html (“Are We Digital Dummies? We'll investigate how our love affair with technology is overloading our ancient brains, leaving us chronically distracted.”) have been discussed in the forum, this was an interesting documentary on multimedia and how it plays out in our human lives for many.

this video only streams to canadian audience.

Parallax said:
In one regard, I’m grateful for having techno abilities to do this, this has increased awareness in so many things, yet the other side, societal in general, seems to point to a loss of human contact on many levels even though we seem to be in touch and things can be so immediate. The documentary looks at some of these things and how in our immediate connections we perhaps have become disconnected and certainly the evidence of some of how we approach and use technologies might just be rewiring our brains to the exclusion of critical thinking and heaping on e-stressors.


http://www.cassiopaea.org/forum/index.php?topic=20110.msg200468#msg200468

And then this from a C’s transcript;


C’s transcript said:
Q: (L) And the third and final destruction [of Atlantis] was caused by what?
A: Crystals.

Q: (T) Did they lose control of this power?
A: It overpowered them the same way your computers will overpower you.

I can see this is happening in my global companies. In my company, our entire team is spread across globe . every thing is on emails, instant messaging and over the phone. Most of the times, it is multi tasking, if one wants to go home at the end of day. Many says it is like this during the end of the year. Not sure of that yet. No real human contact. The work is divided in to so many small chunks , every body is so much overloaded, every small thing has to coordinated with others, No time to even to breath. when one is overloaded, It really even doesn't matter whether other person on phone is a machine or human. I question Isn't it artificial intelligence ? .

Thank God, Things break, versions becomes obsolete, documents becomes meaningless. Other wise they don't need HUMANS.

edit by mod: fixed formatting
 
Thanks, Parallax.

I hadn't seen it yet, so I look forward to it.

Regarding your employer giving you a BlackBerry:

I initially noticed I was answering email after work hours and the expectations on how long one should wait for an email got strange. People expected immediate responses.

However, I decided to use the BB to browse the Web in my off hours, mostly SotT and the Cass forum. So, in a sense, I reclaimed that energy and directed it to something that benefited me.

However, its portability and ease of use certainly make it too easy to surf the web, so I have to stay vigilant and try to limit the time I spend on it. Especially when you consider the powerful waves these devices radiate.

Gonzo
 
Parallax said:
...certainly the evidence of some of how we approach and use technologies might just be rewiring our brains to the exclusion of critical thinking and heaping on e-stressors.

Seems like that statement conveys an assumption of inevitability. And that might be so for mankind in general. And maybe that's what "it's" supposed to feel like.

If inevitability is an expression of mechanicality, then individuals might avoid being sucked into it by getting faster and faster at "quickly scanning for the point". I would think this ability should automatically grow along with your practice of self-remembering, because self-remembering organizes and holds all your knowledge in a unified structure. Perhaps you will then notice yourself only mapping "the point" into your knowledge and automatically discarding superfluous detail?

Perhaps you will also notice your memory getting better due to having more immediate access to more pointers to the information you need, when you need it. You just chase pointers in whatever way works or appeals to you. Some people may be better at audio, others kinesthetic. For me, it's mostly visual and some rhythmic.

The Work certainly works when we can remember to do it. :)
 
Thanks for commenting each of you…

[quote author=seek10]
this video only streams to canadian audience.[/quote]

Not sure why these boundaries between us create these circumstances; perhaps licensing agreements, sometimes it works the other way for me when trying to stream off of Sott.

PS - should have said it was about 45: min. long.

I can see this is happening in my global companies. In my company, our entire team is spread across globe . every thing is on emails, instant messaging and over the phone. Most of the times, it is multi tasking, if one wants to go home at the end of day. Many says it is like this during the end of the year. Not sure of that yet. No real human contact. The work is divided in to so many small chunks , every body is so much overloaded, every small thing has to coordinated with others, No time to even to breath. when one is overloaded, It really even doesn't matter whether other person on phone is a machine or human. I question Isn't it artificial intelligence ? .

My post probably came across as a bit of a rant and in a way it was because of the constant incremental adjustments to technologies and how i'm learning to interact. To my 25 year old this seems natural, but for me there is hidden resistance, like not even developing a Facebook page which seems like it would have both pro/con applications; time, as we measure on the latter side seems to weigh on my mind.

For the first time last week, was in a video conference which seemed very strange, no one seemed comfortable, body language was pregnant with meaning and prior to this it was just by phone. Looking at all the gadgetry to make this happen - had to ask why, what was the point. Of particular, people who might speak, who had valuable things to say, did not.

Most of all it seems for me that selecting the application, using them correctly and having some boundaries is what i’m trying to learn, however, Bud brings up a few interesting things below.

As for AI, maybe – incrementally getting there?

Thank God, Things break, versions becomes obsolete, documents becomes meaningless. Other wise they don't need HUMANS.

Don't think AI will weed my garden or pick up the dog doo-doo ever, too. ;)



[quote author=Gonzo]
Thanks, Parallax.

I hadn't seen it yet, so I look forward to it.

Regarding your employer giving you a BlackBerry:

I initially noticed I was answering email after work hours and the expectations on how long one should wait for an email got strange. People expected immediate responses.

However, I decided to use the BB to browse the Web in my off hours, mostly SotT and the Cass forum. So, in a sense, I reclaimed that energy and directed it to something that benefited me.

However, its portability and ease of use certainly make it too easy to surf the web, so I have to stay vigilant and try to limit the time I spend on it. Especially when you consider the powerful waves these devices radiate.

Gonzo
[/quote]

Thanks Gonzo for your input on BB use, working out of the house often and having just the business machine in the background is a distraction sometimes that I’ve had to negotiate boundaries with and it will be so too with a BB – learning to turn it off. Being that this BB would not be actually mine, can, but would not use it for personal use, or at least that is a rule i try to observe.

About the "Radiate" part, that is concerning - have access to some EMF instruments and will test :umm:


[quote author=Bud]
Seems like that statement conveys an assumption of inevitability. And that might be so for mankind in general. And maybe that's what "it's" supposed to feel like.[/quote]

You’ve made some very good observation Bud, yes the documentary scientific observations was indicating that assumption, but as you point out below, which seems very intuitive, is that it should “…grow along with your practice of self-remembering…”, and i’m actually conscious of this, “…mapping the point…”. As much as my resistant self protests, learning these tools, alongside being conscious of the use, and how the conscious self interacts and how reaching out grows exponentially is rather interesting. Learning to scan, absorb, discard and network while self remembering, is developing good practice, alongside making mistakes, and learning to avoid them.

In the documentary much of the study was on humans oblivious nature to other real things around them while absorbed with personal technology use - like not seeing the elephant in the room so to speak.

If inevitability is an expression of mechanicality, then individuals might avoid being sucked into it by getting faster and faster at "quickly scanning for the point". I would think this ability should automatically grow along with your practice of self-remembering, because self-remembering organizes and holds all your knowledge in a unified structure. Perhaps you will then notice yourself only mapping "the point" into your knowledge and automatically discarding superfluous detail?

Perhaps you will also notice your memory getting better due to having more immediate access to more pointers to the information you need, when you need it. You just chase pointers in whatever way works or appeals to you. Some people may be better at audio, others kinesthetic. For me, it's mostly visual and some rhythmic.

Many here on the forum, as is evident, have accelerated skills with technologies and mapping and your above is valuable. Although i write a daily journal, this is most often done at the end of the day based on memory, recollection of the important things, the pointers, rather than at the moment of encounter, to help self remembering. Not just as memory alone as in mechanical thought but being conscious of the nuances of those thoughts and observations. Using work e-networking is evolving as i use it and it is fast indeed, looking for the points from many directions incoming and outgoing while trying not to make mistakes, being conscious within tasks and yet remembering to remain aware without, rather than from a unconscious "mechanicality", which speaks, OSIT, partially to your observation below in this other work - thanks . :)

The Work certainly works when we can remember to do it. :)
 
I have not watched the documentary. I think this paragraph by the C's is interesting in conjunction with the other one posted

Q: (L) Well, if the Grays are cybergenetic probes of the Lizard Beings, and, in effect soulless, does this mean that some of the Lizard beings are also STO?
A: Well, first, no being that is given intelligence to think on its own is, in fact, comepletely soul-less. It does have some soul imprint. Or what could be loosely referred to as soul imprint. This may be a collection of psychic energies that are available in the general vicinity. And this is stretching somewhat so that you can understand the basic ideas, even though in reality it is all far more complex than that. But, in any case, there is really no such thing as being completely soul-less, whether it be a natural intelligence or an artificially constructed intelligence. And, one of the very most interesting things about that from your perspective, is that your technology on 3rd density, which we might add, has been aided somewhat by interactions with those that you might refer to as "aliens," is now reaching a level whereby the artificially created intelligences can, in fact, begin to develop, or attract some soul imprint energy. If you follow what we are saying. For example: your computers, which are now on the verge of reaching the level whereby they can think by themselves, will begin to develop faint soul imprint.



also there is this one:

Q: (L) How do we find a horticulturist? Network?
A: Always "Network". Networking is 4th Density STO concept seeping into 3rd density with upcoming realm border crossing.

So this makes me think that the technologies like telephone / email etc are positive forces in the ascension to fourth density. like this long distance communication technology which has been developed with understanding of particle physics etc, is a "fourth density STO concept". fourth density seeping into third density. like for instance... the rapid technology advancement can be looked on as evidence of the wave. humans created this technology we can agree on that... but perhaps at some higher level it is directly due to, or intertwined with, this upcoming wave.

the networking technology is what allows this group to exist in the repressive mind-controlling time we are living in. I don't know I may be interpreting the C's wrong. networking can be done in any ways writing a book reading etc. to think of it--literacy and written language is a huge advancement that was made in "networking".

so but also... technology that we have also inhibits people from networking. texting instead of talking, computer games...isolation from real life. etc. its how we utilize it obviously that matters :)
 
Ya, i think you have a valid point,Wetroof. I cannot remember which transcript it is from, but the c's said that networking over the net, as in the forum, texting, etc. So long as the messages are two way, creates a psychic link.
 
[quote author=wetroof ]

[...]
so but also... technology that we have also inhibits people from networking. texting instead of talking, computer games...isolation from real life. etc. its how we utilize it obviously that matters :)
[/quote]

Yes, and then was reminded of this:

C's said:
A: Many of you have recently become "bedazzled" by the "information superhighway," and its accompanying computer hardware. Gee, we wonder why?
Q: (L) Well, you told us to network. We have been networking like crazy, digging up information, reading and comparing. Yes, there is a ton of garbage out there, but if we don't ask, how will we know? A: Point was: who is manipulating thee? Not so much you specifically, but the others? So many kids and kids-at- heart are thunderstruck by techno-sensory toys. Those cellular phones, those pagers and the Christmas toy computers... They are like, so cool!
Q: (L) So what are you implying about these techno toys?
A: Ponder.
Q: (L) Give me a clue. A word, something to point me in the right direction.
A: Fuzzy jello-brained kids.
Q: (L) Are you saying that pagers and cell phones, and techno toys that kids get for Christmas can have effects on them that turn their brains to jello?
A: In a figurative sense. All this technology represents a Brave New World. Like Huxley said: Woe is to those who have been led to eat their brains for lunch.
Q: (L) My kids have pagers. Are pagers, in particular...
A: What do you think comprises the signal content?
Q: (L) I don't know. What does comprise the signal content?
A: Microwaves.
Q: (L) What do these microwaves do to the individual?
A: Contour brain cell structure.
Q: (L) Do they emit a signal continuously, or only when they are being used?
A: Wave cycle low to high.
Q: (L) Well, that's not good. How close does the pager have to be to you to have this effect?
A: Four meters. Cell phones too and television and computer screens can be transmitted through thusly.
Q: (L) Is there any kind of device that we can build or purchase that can emit a blocking signal?
A: Knowledge protects.
Q: (L) When you say 'contouring brain cell structure,' what would be evidence or results of such effects?
A: Increasingly narrow outlooks and being unable to employ discriminatory thinking.
Q: (L) Confusion?
A: No. Just lack of depth and breadth to one's mental and psychic abilities.
 
I think this may be the type of thing that we should be using the silk for,no? This is another form of em radiation, is it not?
 
Back
Top Bottom