New Cassiopaea.org video on YT titled "What are 4D STS Beings?"

[Noctu]

When I saw the video, I felt concern as I saw what I perceived to be an image of a Gray (around 10 seconds in), and the story that I make is that it may be misleading to depict a Gray when talking about 4D STS BEings (hence my concern) as Grays, in my understanding, are artificially created and have no souls, and thus differ from 4D STS Beings (Lizzards).

I might be operating from the assumption that if something has no soul, it cannot be called a "being".

This might be a semantic thing. Semantics are important, however. I would call a Gray a creature, as it is created. That's me, of course. AND, I believe it's important to use clear words to convey meaning A that is understood to be meaning A by the greatest possible number of people.

Some questions:

1. Is it true to call a soulless "being", a being?

2. a. What makes a being, a being?
2. b. What can we call soulless beings and what's a good name for beings with a soul, just to have clarity and differentiate both from each other?

3. Maybe a question for Chu and others versed in phonosemantics: If we were to dissect BE-ING phonosemantically as was done with the words "Vallirana" and "esclavo" in "Sounds and Meaning - Part 3: Each syllable has meaning!" -- what would we get?

4. a. Are all 4D STS beings either Lizzards or Grays?
4. b. Are there others?

 

[Ricardo]

(...)

4. a. Are all 4D STS beings either Lizzards or Grays?
4. b. Are there others?

No ( maybe read the wave ? ) and densities are infinity at each level , so there are others indeed , all of them eh.

 

[BlueKiwi]

@Noctu Do you have a link to the video we could review ? Just so those of us who choose can have some more context.

 

[Noctu]

@Noctu Do you have a link to the video we could review ? Just so those of us who choose can have some more context.

 

[seek10]

When I saw the video, I felt concern as I saw what I perceived to be an image of a Gray (around 10 seconds in), and the story that I make is that it may be misleading to depict a Gray when talking about 4D STS BEings (hence my concern) as Grays, in my understanding, are artificially created and have no souls, and thus differ from 4D STS Beings (Lizzards).

I might be operating from the assumption that if something has no soul, it cannot be called a "being".

This might be a semantic thing. Semantics are important, however. I would call a Gray a creature, as it is created. That's me, of course. AND, I believe it's important to use clear words to convey meaning A that is understood to be meaning A by the greatest possible number of people.

Some questions:

1. Is it true to call a soulless "being", a being?

2. a. What makes a being, a being?
2. b. What can we call soulless beings and what's a good name for beings with a soul, just to have clarity and differentiate both from each other?

3. Maybe a question for Chu and others versed in phonosemantics: If we were to dissect BE-ING phonosemantically as was done with the words "Vallirana" and "esclavo" in "Sounds and Meaning - Part 3: Each syllable has meaning!" -- what would we get?

4. a. Are all 4D STS beings either Lizzards or Grays?
4. b. Are there others?

you may want to read casswiki site for all the basic concepts.

Welcome to Casswiki

CassWiki is a project of the Cassiopaea.org community, aiming to provide an organized overview of the main subjects discussed on the Cassiopaea Forum.

casswiki-quartz.pages.dev

Note: ignore the open graph image (Quartz 4) in the link displayed.