New FCC Rules Remove Obstacles to Media Monopoly

QueenVee

Jedi
Mmmmmmm, wonder what brought this on?


US media ownership rules relaxed
BBC News, December 18, 2007


US regulators are to relax local media ownership rules preventing firms from controlling both a TV channel and a newspaper in its largest cities.

The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) voted to scrap a 32-year old rule preventing dual ownership of print and broadcast outlets in 20 cities.

In a 3-2 split vote, Republican members said the move "struck a balance" between competition and plurality.

But dissenting Democrats said it would create new loopholes, not close them.

The Republican chairman of the FCC, Kevin Martin, cast the deciding vote.

He called the move a "relatively minimal loosening of the ban", adding it "may help to forestall the erosion in local news coverage".

Political issue

The issue is politically contentious, with groups within both houses of Congress pressing the FCC to delay its judgement and threatening to pass legislation to revoke the decision.

However, the White House has warned it will veto any bill coming out of Congress which waters down the proposed changes.

The decision overturns rules in place since 1975 designed to support diversity of opinion and competition among news suppliers.

Proponents of reform argued that the proliferation of cable TV channels and the growth of the internet meant such safeguards were now obsolete.

But critics said that while the number of media outlets had exploded, the amount of different news providers had not risen.

"The law says we are to serve the public interest," said Jonathan Adelstein, one of the two Democrat commissioners on the FCC panel.

"And the public has repeatedly told us they are not interested in further media consolidation."

The new rules will apply to the largest 20 local media markets in the country.

For dual ownership of a newspaper and TV channel to be permitted under the new system, eight independently owned media businesses must exist in the market concerned, while the TV channel cannot be among the four most-watched.

.
 
Yes, the Lendman article discusses the move in some detail - it was carried on Sott on the 13th, before the actual vote - http://www.sott.net/articles/show/145525-FCC-Proposes-Greater-Media-Consolidation
 
Happy to report that the Canadian media regulator (the CRTC) is moving in the OPPOSITE direction:

CRTC Puts New Restrictions on Media Ownership
Globe and Mail Update
January 15, 2008 at 12:54 PM EST

Canada's broadcast regulator has put in place new rules on media ownership in Canada that will restrict how big the country's broadcasters can get, following a year of unprecedented deals in the sector.

After hearings were held last fall to probe media ownership rules, the Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission introduced three significant rule changes Tuesday:

* No person or company will be allowed to control more than two of types of media in one local market, including local TV, local radio and a local newspaper.
* No company will be allowed to control more than 45 per cent of the total television audience in Canada, which could restrict the acquisition of specialty cable channels by major broadcasters.
* Deals between television distributors, such as cable and satellite TV companies, will not be allowed if they result in one company or person controlling the delivery of programming in a market....


Full article can be read HERE.
 
PepperFritz said:
Happy to report that the Canadian media regulator (the CRTC) is moving in the OPPOSITE direction:

CRTC Puts New Restrictions on Media Ownership
Globe and Mail Update
January 15, 2008 at 12:54 PM EST

Canada's broadcast regulator has put in place new rules on media ownership in Canada that will restrict how big the country's broadcasters can get, following a year of unprecedented deals in the sector.

After hearings were held last fall to probe media ownership rules, the Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission introduced three significant rule changes Tuesday:

* No person or company will be allowed to control more than two of types of media in one local market, including local TV, local radio and a local newspaper.
* No company will be allowed to control more than 45 per cent of the total television audience in Canada, which could restrict the acquisition of specialty cable channels by major broadcasters.
* Deals between television distributors, such as cable and satellite TV companies, will not be allowed if they result in one company or person controlling the delivery of programming in a market....


Full article can be read HERE.
Seems like hot air. public appeasement that will have no effect.
article said:
That change was considered inconsequential by critics of media consolidation who said it will have little effect since CanWest doesn't own radio assets across Canada and CTVglobemedia isn't invested in local papers.

“There are no cases in Canada where somebody owns all three,” said Lise Lareau, president of the Canadian Media Guild. “It doesn't change anything.[...]

”The rules will not apply to completed deals. Mr. von Finckenstein said that had the new rules been in place two years ago, the recent spate of media deals would still have been approved by the CRTC.
Rules such as this can always be creatively bypassed. So I don't really think it is celebration time Pepperfritz, nor 'opposite' just more covert. could the law be governmental protectionism to maintain their media interest share of audience?
article said:
For the purpose of this rule, The Globe and Mail, owned by CTVglobemedia, and CanWest's National Post are considered national publications by the regulator and not subject to this rule.
or is it just a pacifier to send people back to sleep?
 
Back
Top Bottom