nothing in this book is true

[blackrain]

Hi I would like some advice about the book entitled 'nothing in this book is true, but it's exactly how things are' written by bob frissell' I can't find it in the glossary. Yes I know, I'm being a bit thick !!!!

 

[cholas]

Hi blackrain. It's been quite a few years since I read it but from what I remember, at the time I thought it was pretty good. Then again, I once thought Icke was pretty good too.

My guess now is that there are likely small pieces of truth mixed in with large pieces of disinfo. Might be entertaining to look over if you have it laying around, but nothing new truthwise that you won't find here.

Fwiw, I definitely wouldn't go out and buy it. There are far better reads to spend your money on imo.

edit: Just remembered that I had also read Frissell's second book(name escapes me) but like Icke, subsequent books just got more and more misleading.

 

[shijing]

One big clue about Frissell and his books is that he is a follower of Drunvalo Melchizadek, and really pushes his Flower of Life workshops. If you do a search on Drunvalo, you should be able to find more.

 

[Turgon]

I read this book quite a few years ago. It was an entertaining read, but from what I remember, the impression I got was that he talked about a lot of subjects, aliens, atlantis, etc, the whole gamut of stuff, but then his conclusions seemed rushed and somewhat lacking. Almost like he was filling in gaps for the sake of creating a neat, happy ending, which always stood out in the back of my mind. I can't go into detail about it because I literally don't remember much about this book other than that... which says a lot about the book.

Hope this helps, fwiw

 

[shijing]

One other thing I remember from either his first or second book is that he says the Grays got together sometime in the '90s and decided not to do abductions anymore. Somehow I don't think so....

 

[Keit]

I read this book quite a few years ago. It was an entertaining read, but from what I remember, the impression I got was that he talked about a lot of subjects, aliens, atlantis, etc, the whole gamut of stuff, but then his conclusions seemed rushed and somewhat lacking. Almost like he was filling in gaps for the sake of creating a neat, happy ending, which always stood out in the back of my mind. I can't go into detail about it because I literally don't remember much about this book other than that... which says a lot about the book.

Hope this helps, fwiw

I didn't read the book but just wanted to remark on what you wrote about author's conclusions being rushed and lacking. It seems like many books, on paranormal/hyperdimantional or UFO subject in particular, have the same problem. Some of them are really good, detailed, and a great read in general until you reach the final chapters with author's conclusions. :D Sometimes it is really surprising that after everything the author recounted in the book, somehow his/her conclusions end up being so off.

On the other hand, who knows if I would be able to see it if I didn't have a chance to read a few books with not only interesting data but also good conclusion. ;)

 

[Franco]

Truth mixed with junk, the usual.

He also pushes things like rituals, chanting hindu phrases alone will change your life and so on.

Not really that useful once you have found this resource.

 

[Turgon]

It seems like many books, on paranormal/hyperdimantional or UFO subject in particular, have the same problem. Some of them are really good, detailed, and a great read in general until you reach the final chapters with author's conclusions. Sometimes it is really surprising that after everything the author recounted in the book, somehow his/her conclusions end up being so off.

Yes indeed. I wonder if sometimes its a case of the author wanting to find an answer, any answer to the issues of paranormal/ufo phenomena regardless of whether it may be true or not. They are such abstract subjects in general with no 'smoking gun' to be found, that a search for truth only brings more questions into light, rather than concrete conclusions. Maybe this scares authors into conforming to an easily explained conclusion because 'reality' seems to much to deal with. Too many unanswered questions and/or questions to answer.

When I first start reading the Wave series, it was almost instantaneous recognition of something 'different' because it seemed to be more of a stream-line of thoughts and data coming together in an effort to piece together pieces of a giant puzzle. It wasn't so clear-cut and concrete, and didn't offer definitive answers, at least not in a conventional way, yet it seemed closer to the true nature of paranormal/ufo phenomena than anything I ever read, watched or heard of before in my life. Go figure!

 

[durabone]

Thanks for the reviews. This book sits on my shelf beside some others like it. I have not sat down and read it because I can find in it no references or bibliography, or even a "For Further Reading" section. And it makes some pretty audacious claims. But then I haven't studied Drunvalo yet. From my skimmings, I do find that the Merkada is everything in this book, at least as regards the authors convictions. Also there is a point where he claims to have had contact with Babaji Krishna, which is a seeming non-sequitir. Perhaps figure 9-56 "The morphogenic structure of all eyes" and other odd figures in the book are why I keep it around for 'someday.'