Paul LaViolette's Galactic Superwave

nofretete1969

Padawan Learner
Sorry for my bad English.

Here in gemany i could find a lot of sides the call "the new wave is coming"

_http://www.deepspace4.com/pages/prophecy/fatima/fatima4.htm

Starburst Foundation researcher Paul LaViolette in his Ph.D. dissertation (1980 - 83), was the first to suggest that the galactic core explosions of this type recur much more frequently than it was previously thought, about every 10.000 to 15.000 years and that this, for practical reasons mostly invisible events, last from several hundred to a few thousand years.

Any other sids:

_http://www.cyberspaceorbit.com/bluecosmic.htm
_http://www.uforc.com/news040105/geobiology/uforc_DrLaViolette_032205.html
_http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/display.php?id=20151&utm_source=inform&utm_medium=hibox&utm_campaign=InformBox

Is it possible he/that mean "the wave"????
 
Laura once asked the C's about this:

Q: There is also a theory of Paul La Violette, that there is a
wave that comes from explosions in the galactic core, and that
THIS is what is behind this increased activity.
A: Such waves exist.
Q: Are these waves part of the cataclysmic double
catastrophes that are predicted to be "on the way?"
A: Who says?
Q: Well, Paul La Violette and Vincent Bridges, and Jay
Weidner, for example.
A: You are not capable of predicting such things yet.

So the C's say they exist, but they didn't seem to encourage the idea as being related to THE wave or associated cataclysms.
 
Interesting video interview with Paul LaViolette. These Superwaves described by LaViolette seem to be related to the coming Wave, at least from what he says, and the effect of Supernovae with gamma ray bursts:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oURVtGKW420

Dr Paul LaViolette is the measured counterpart to Patrick Geryl, whose interview we have released simultaneously. A brilliant and maverick astrophysicist, Paul is best known for his research into a new theory of matter he calls Subquantum Kinetics - based on systems theory, which he studied for his PhD thesis - and for his carefully argued hypothesis, first formulated in 1983, that our galactic center periodically emits devastating waves he termed superwaves.

Galactic superwaves are intense cosmic ray particle bombardments that originate from the center of our Galaxy, and that last for periods of up to a few thousand years. Paul explains that astronomical and geological evidence indicates that the last major superwave impacted our solar system around 12,000 to 16,000 years ago, and produced abrupt changes of the Earth's climate.

The land animal extinction episode which occurred during this interval was the worst in several million years, and Paul estimates that approximately one or two superwaves strong enough to trigger an ice age are presently on their way to us from their birthplace at the galactic core... 23,000 light years away. Paul states that there is a real chance that one such event could arrive within the next few decades. Importantly - because they travel at the speed of light - we would not see them coming.

Paul explains that less intense superwaves, which recur with considerable frequency, could also pose a threat. He cites evidence that the galactic center has erupted as many as ten times in the last 2,000 years, the most recent event occurring about 700 years ago. While these low intensity events could have passed unnoticed in earlier centuries, today they could be extremely hazardous. The EMP [electromagnetic pulse] accompanying such a superwave could knock out electrical power grids and communication networks on a global scale. Consequently, argues Paul, study of this phenomenon deserves a very high priority, and he founded The Starburst Foundation to do this.

Of some considerable interest is the testimony from our insider source Jake Simpson, who told us in October 2008 that there was a 'wave' coming - but that it would not arrive here for quite a few years: possibly around 2017-2020. When asked how he knew, his response was that highly advanced and classified superluminal [faster-then-light] craft had been out to "take a look", and had then returned to report back with the information. Jake told us that the effect could either be cataclysmic, or "just a puff of wind"... and that exactly what would happen, and when, was simply not known.

Of interest also is the anonymous testimony from a senior Electrical Engineer, whose wife contacted us in April 2009 to report an anticipated major breakdown of national power supplies a few years from now. These reports - and others (such as that from Dan Sherman) - all weave together to form an unsettling picture. While we have said separately that we do not agree with Patrick Geryl's conclusions, it does seem that the Earth, and the human race, may possibly be in for a bit of a rough ride... from a number of different causes.
Category: Science & Technology
 
I was not terribly impressed with LaViolette's idea because it is describing what must be a random event. After reading his book, we asked the Cs about it:

25 Sept 1999 said:
Q: Now, there IS an awful lot of weird stuff going on! There was the earthquake in Turkey; there was an earthquake in Taiwan; there were hurricanes; a fireball in Turkey; strange radar anomalies, as they call them. In fact, one of these circular things showed up on our local radar when the tropical storm was heading our way. Could you tell us what is behind all of these ...

A: Well, first of all, it is true that some heavenly bodies transiting the Solar System, such as some comets, do indeed interract electrically with the Sun and the planets. This does cause an increase in natural calamities, but this is not new.

Q: There is also a theory of Paul La Violette, that there is a wave that comes from explosions in the galactic core, and that THIS is what is behind this increased activity.

A: Such waves exist.

Q: Are these waves part of the cataclysmic double catastrophes that are predicted to be "on the way?"

A: Who says?

Q: Well, Paul La Violette and Vincent Bridges, and Jay Weidner, for example.

A: You are not capable of predicting such things yet.

Q: (A) We are not able to predict many things. You are able to predict better than us.

A: Maybe so, but we do so oh so discreetly.
 
In this recent video he discuss the open nature of the universe. Which in my opinion is significantly contrary to mainstream closed-system opinion held by many astrophysicist. I found it interesting, but i'm not sure I follow him with everything he says but he seems to be closer to what's going on in our cosmos than what many astrophysicist purport.

He also discusses the possibility of some sort of a superwave that could arrive around april of next year (2014). That's interesting and may even be
Q: (L) Is there any particular reason you made the announcement about 5 years to go?

A: Just reminding you.

Q: (L) You normally have never been date-specific.

A: This is not "day" specific but close enough for horseshoes.

_http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dxp8qDV9o_c

Enjoy and let me know what you think.
 
I didn't watch the interview yet, but in another interview in 2009, he wasn't giving any exact date for such a superwave.

Personally, my standpoint is, from all the work I’ve done, I can only talk about probabilities, that we’re overdue for one, but I don’t know when it’s going to come. I can say that within the next 400 years, there’s over 90 percent chance we’re going to have one. Whether it’s a small one or a large one, I don’t know. So that’s the best I can do.

_http://projectcamelot.org/lang/en/paul_laviolette_interview_en.html
 
un chien anadolu said:
I didn't watch the interview yet, but in another interview in 2009, he wasn't giving any exact date for such a superwave.

Personally, my standpoint is, from all the work I’ve done, I can only talk about probabilities, that we’re overdue for one, but I don’t know when it’s going to come. I can say that within the next 400 years, there’s over 90 percent chance we’re going to have one. Whether it’s a small one or a large one, I don’t know. So that’s the best I can do.

_http://projectcamelot.org/lang/en/paul_laviolette_interview_en.html

Yea I've seen that one. I feel as though he tries to maintain that attitude (in this recent interview), while saying look we are past due so we are guessing soon. Really Soon even within the next year or so. Because they have new data on radio isotopes in tree rings iirc and other clues.

It was more the host Kerry Cassidy that get's hung up on the date. And was driven by his "Should be soon, within the next year or so" prognosis. I will re-watch to see what I find.
 
trendsetter37 said:
un chien anadolu said:
I didn't watch the interview yet, but in another interview in 2009, he wasn't giving any exact date for such a superwave.

Personally, my standpoint is, from all the work I’ve done, I can only talk about probabilities, that we’re overdue for one, but I don’t know when it’s going to come. I can say that within the next 400 years, there’s over 90 percent chance we’re going to have one. Whether it’s a small one or a large one, I don’t know. So that’s the best I can do.

_http://projectcamelot.org/lang/en/paul_laviolette_interview_en.html

Yea I've seen that one. I feel as though he tries to maintain that attitude (in this recent interview), while saying look we are past due so we are guessing soon. Really Soon even within the next year or so. Because they have new data on radio isotopes in tree rings iirc and other clues.

It was more the host Kerry Cassidy that get's hung up on the date. And was driven by his "Should be soon, within the next year or so" prognosis. I will re-watch to see what I find.

I watched the first 15 minutes so far, but i have lost the desire to watch the rest because of :

- he mentions about ISON's debris, as chunks of ice
- cometary dust could be a good thing to help to stop global warming (not his exact words, but similar to these)
 
Yea that's the exact point where I almost stopped watching as well. Despite those unsavory blurbs of his I continued watching and heard some opinions that were (seemingly) colinear with what we study here on the forum...but i don't now if it's work sitting through the entire interview.

I would say it would need to be more densely packed useful information for that.
 
un chien anadolu said:
- cometary dust could be a good thing to help to stop global warming (not his exact words, but similar to these)

He might have a point here. Over the past years there's been discussions among the scientific community about the possible consequences of atmospheric dust. Does dust induce a net warming because it absorbs radiation more than it reflects? Or does it induce a net cooling since it reflects radiation more than it absorbs? In 2008, atmospheric scientist Richard Hansell tested and measured the net effect of atmospheric dust particles on temperatures and concluded that although atmospheric dust absorbed and also reflected solar radiations, it induced an overall cooling:

The analysis showed that over half of dust's cooling effect is compensated for by its warming effect. The finding, published in the Journal of Geophysical Research, Atmospheres, could clarify scientists' understanding of how dust influences moisture fluctuations in the atmosphere and surface temperatures around the planet.

While Hansell’s research demonstrated the cooling effect of dust, several scientists have demonstrated that a global dimming trend, i.e. an increase in atmospheric dust concentration, has been occurring all over the planet for decades.
 
That's a good point. If Ice ages are usually preceded by cometary impact I'd say that the cooling effect tends to win out.

Hmm...if there are more dust particles in the air then consequently you will begin to form more water droplets that would nucleate from/on those particular particles. If I recall correctly this is how clouds form. And water droplets have less energy (cooler temperatures) than water vapor. Ergo you'd have an overall cooler environment. So that may be the tipping point. Moving the planet into ice age territory. Especially if there is enough dust in the atmosphere.

That coupled with less sunlight getting through might exacerbate the condition as well. Adding more proverbial fuel to the ice age fire.
 

Trending content

Back
Top Bottom