Peaches thwart breast cancer

[JEEP]

From All News Network:

Peaches Make Cancer Cells Commit Suicide

Three peaches a day keeps breast cancer away, in fact, it induces metastatic breast cancer cell death, says food science researcher Giuliana Noratto at Washington State University. Professor Giuliana Noratto in concert with researchers at Texas A & M said that when exposed to polyphenol chemicals in peaches, cell signals become activated to “drive them to commit suicide”.

If you want to do your own research, Noratto and her team’s findings were published in the Journal of Nutritional Biochemistry and The Journal of Agriculture and Food Chemistry.

Breast cancer is the most common cancer among woman living in the United States and cancer-related deaths. Naturally, Noratto and her team’s findings offer a practical and simple addition to every woman’s daily routine intended to prevent cancer. The equivalent of the polyphenol peach extract used in the study was equivalent to a 132 pound woman eating approximately three peaches per day.

The benefits of peaches as a chemopreventive food therapy

To test the effects of peaches on breast cancer cells, mice were injected first with breast cancer cells, then fed varying doses of the peach extract. After the mice fed high levels of the polyphenol chemicals extracted from peaches, researchers observed slow-growing tumors in these mice.

Researchers, already understanding that these compounds exert protective antioxidant activity against breast cancer cells, were not particularly surprised with these initial findings however. What Noratto and her team found most surprising was observing cancer cells dying off; slowing the metastatic process (the spread of cancerous cells throughout the body). Noratto said of the surprising findings, “we didn’t even think about metastasis at that time.”

After 12 days, researchers observed that rats fed the high levels of peach polyphenols experienced less formation of blood vessel activity that is responsible for the spread of cancerous cells. Less enzymatic activity involved in both the invasion and spread of cancer was also observed.

While many conventional oncology teams still rely exclusively on harsh synthetic chemotherapy pharmaceuticals, Novatto and her team stand apart, setting the bar high for the future of evidence-based food therapies that prevent and treat cancer effectively.

Compounds in peaches prevent breast cancer without harming healthy cellular activity

Peaches, considered to belong to the “stone fruit” family because of their large stone-like seed, contain potent polyphenol activity known as chlorogenic and neochlorogenic compounds. While these compounds are present in other stone fruits, they are of particularly high concentration in peaches.

Novatto’s studies have confirmed that these two polyphenols are the compounds responsible for killing cancerous breast cells. Unlike giving body taxing, high-dose chemotherapy to patients that is not cellularly-selective (kills healthy cells along with atypical cells), researchers are positive about offering high-dose peach extract without the associated side effects.

This is really good anticancer news for everyone. Beyond breast cancer, researchers found in further animal studies that the polyphenols prevented other cancers from continuing to grow, making them a practical anti-cancer food therapy. Never underestimate the healing power of natural foods.

_http://www.allnews.network/index.php/51-health/138-peaches-make-cancer-cells-commit-suicide

 

[Pierre]

The title of the Allnews article: "Peaches Make Cancer Cells Commit Suicide" can be misleading in the sense that it is actually one of the molecules found in peaches (and other fruits) that displays anti-cancer properties.

Peaches also contain a lot of sugar (fructose) which has pro-cancer properties. It would be interesting to know if whole peaches (polyphenols + fructose) increase of reduce the development of cancerous cells.

 

[SlavaOn]

The answer to starving cancer cells by blocking their energy production (despite high levels of consumed sugar) could be in the use of pawpaw extracts. Acetogenins in paw paw cut the energy supply to cancer cells!

From http://www.alternativecancer.us/pawpaw.htm

One of the effects of Paw Paw is to reduce the ATP energy in each cell of our body. Our cells have an electrical potential that effects how the cell processes energy producing substances mostly blood sugar and oxygen from our blood supply By reducing this voltage level from 70 to 110 mv to something in the 50 mv region, normal cells can still function. However, cancer and viral cells cannot process energy at this low voltage level and start to starve. The process of starving is a slower process than being poisoned which is why Paw Paw works slower than chemo. When Paw Paw does not work, it is usually because it is not absorbed sufficiently into the cells of the body to cause this voltage reduction

This is a link to research article published in 1999 that the above web site references: http://www.alternativecancer.us/acetogenins1999.pdf

SlavaOn

 

[JEEP]

The title of the Allnews article: "Peaches Make Cancer Cells Commit Suicide" can be misleading in the sense that it is actually one of the molecules found in peaches (and other fruits) that displays anti-cancer properties.

Peaches also contain a lot of sugar (fructose) which has pro-cancer properties. It would be interesting to know if whole peaches (polyphenols + fructose) increase of reduce the development of cancerous cells.

It's possible the sugar/fructose plays a positive role in the effectiveness of the polyphenols. Many have heard the case of Vernon Johnston who cured his own Stage 4 prostate cancer w/ baking soda & molasses. Story detailed here: _http://drleonardcoldwell.com/2013/11/01/stage-4-cancer-gone-with-baking-soda-treatment/comment-page-1/

From the article:

Dr. Sircus also recommends oral administration of baking soda. Many of his patients debate whether to mix it with maple syrup, molasses, honey, water or any other beverage. Since normal cells are starved in cancer patients, the oncologist recommends healthy energy sources such as honey, black strap molasses and maple syrup.

Dr. Simoncini, on the other hand, gives glucose intravenously along with sodium bicarbonate for the same purpose.

Also from the article:

How Baking Soda Can Help “Cure” Cancer

Basically, malignant tumors represent masses of rapidly growing cells. The rapid rate of growth experienced by these cells means that cellular metabolism also proceeds at very high rates.

Therefore, cancer cells are using a lot more carbohydrates and sugars to generate energy in the form of ATP (adenosine triphosphate).

However, some of the compounds formed from the energy production include lactic acid and pyruvic acid. Under normal circumstances, these compounds are cleared and utilized as soon as they are produced. But cancer cells are experiencing metabolism at a much faster rate. Therefore, these organic acid accumulate in the immediate environment of the tumor.

The high level of extracellular acidity around the tumor is one of the chief driving force behind the metastasis of cancer tumors.

Basically, cancer cells need an acidic environment to grow and spread rapidly.

Some cancer experts, therefore, believe that by buffering the tumor microenvironment with an alkalizing compound, the pH of tumors can be raised enough to starve them and stop their growth and spread.

Curiously, this rather simple solution to cancer has been proven right.

What is even more remarkable is that there is no need to cook up some fancy synthetic drug to lower the acidity in the immediate environment of the tumor. A simple, commonly obtained compound like sodium bicarbonate will do.

I was familiar w/ the use of apricot pits/B17/laetrile for treating cancer. Eating whole peaches to combat cancer definitely surprised me if indeed that really works rather than just the separate administration of the polyphenol extracts. One should probably look into Noratto's published findings for more definitive answers.

 

[LQB]

Peaches also contain a lot of sugar (fructose) which has pro-cancer properties. It would be interesting to know if whole peaches (polyphenols + fructose) increase of reduce the development of cancerous cells.

Not to mention that peaches are one of the most pesticide-laden fruits you can buy.

 

[JEEP]

On the same page of the link previously referenced [_http://drleonardcoldwell.com/2013/11/01/stage-4-cancer-gone-with-baking-soda-treatment/comment-page-1/] is an interview w/ Dr. Leonard Coldwell:

Dr. Leonard Coldwell Speaks About Cancer & Flu Shots
https://www.youtube.com/watch?t=1&v=fXYLl67vouI

During the introductory part of the interview, Dr. Coldwell discusses his immediate family members who were diagnosed w/ cancer & those who succumbed to cancer. He is very familiar w/ cancer: "Throughout Dr. Coldwell’s successful career, he has to date, cured over 35,000 cancer patients (studies have concluded that he has a 92.3% cancer cure rate)". At 8:25, he talks about sugar in the diet of his cancer patients - refined sugar is a no, but natural sugar is OK & that all his cancer patients eat fruit. He goes on to stress the importance of ORGANIC and nonGMO foods.

I am aware that an overabundance of fructose consumption has been linked to pancreatic cancer. Like most things, moderation is the key. If one were to adopt the 3 peaches a day routine (organic peaches BTW), than it would seem imperative not to consume any additional fructose or other sugars. And if I did have a breast cancer diagnosis, I wouldn't rely on peaches for a cure. There are plenty of options to consider that don't include chemotherapy, radiation, or surgery. However, peach polyphenols may be another component in natural treatment for cancer in the vein of 'let food be thy medicine and medicine be thy food'.

 

[JEEP]

From a Dr. Mercola article:

Short answer, no, it wouldn't be wise to eliminate fruit entirely. Fruit is definitely a source of fructose, and one that can harm your health if you eat it in vast quantities, but eating small amounts of whole fruits is fine if you are healthy.

In vegetables and fruits, the fructose is mixed in with fiber, vitamins, minerals, enzymes, and beneficial phytonutrients, all of which help moderate the negative metabolic effects. However, if you suffer with any fructose-related health issues, such as insulin resistance, metabolic syndrome, heart disease, obesity or cancer, you would be wise to limit your total fructose consumption to 15 grams of fructose per day. This includes fructose from ALL sources, including whole fruit.

If you are not insulin resistant, you may increase this to 25 grams of total fructose per day on average.

If you received your fructose only from vegetables and fruits (where it originates) as most people did a century ago, you'd consume about 15 grams per day. Today the average is 73 grams per day which is nearly 500 percent higher a dose and our bodies simply can't tolerate that type of biochemical abuse. So please, carefully add your fruits based on the following table to keep your total fructose below 15-25 grams per day, depending on your current health status.

The table indicates that 1 medium peach has 5.9 grams of fructose, so the daily consumption of 3 small peaches would fall within the 15 grams per day recommended limit if one has cancer.

Article at: _http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2013/02/11/all-fruit-diet.aspx

 

[Yupo]

My mother tried to order apricot pits at a local health food store. I imagine she heard a story on Coast to Coast on the subject of a cancer remedy using these. She told me that the store owner told her that they have to keep a registry of people ordering/requesting these. She is a bit hard of hearing, so I don't assume she understood correctly.
I don't think it would be so hard to grow apricots if one wanted a lot of these.
Anyone heard anything about these being a controlled substance?
Pretty easy to buy apricots at the store.
OTOH, it easy to grow poppies, too.

 

[JEEP]

My mother tried to order apricot pits at a local health food store. I imagine she heard a story on Coast to Coast on the subject of a cancer remedy using these. She told me that the store owner told her that they have to keep a registry of people ordering/requesting these.

From: _http://www.rawapricotseeds.com/faq.html

Q39. Are raw apricot seeds, Laetrile, or B17 illegal to buy in the USA? They are banned in North America, so what’s the difference?

No. How could they ever be? There is one apricot seed in each apricot fruit, and you can buy fresh apricots in almost any supermarket in any neighborhood in the world. If the raw apricot seed was illegal, the fresh fruit would be taken off the market completely! (If that ever happens we're all in BIG, BIG trouble let me tell you!)

What it means is: If any hospital uses laetrile, the law says that they jeopardize any grants from the government as well as any money from Medicaid and other hospital insurance originating from the government. Since nearly all of hospital revenues come from patient insurance, not one hospital in the U.S. will take the chance and use any banned substance including, Amygdalin (also called vitamin B17, Laetrile, or raw apricot seeds.)

Any Doctor that wants to use the substance from raw apricot seeds must have his/her patient fill out a form and then the doctor must submit the form to the FDA. Again, doctors don't want to get involved in this and would rather keep their names off of the FDA watch lists. Additionally, the doctor's malpractice insurance will not be valid if they prescribe laetrile (B17, amygdalin, or raw apricot seeds) to a patient. The American Medical Association (AMA) treats any doctor that prescribes laetrile as a renegade (traitorous) and as though he has violated the AMA's membership policies and will be subject to membership termination. Therefore any doctor that prescribes laetrile may destroy his career as a doctor. They're NOT going to do that for ANY patient EVER!

Any individual that sells laetrile must not claim that it does anything in his place of business. Many health food stores in the past were raided and had to give up their supplies of B17 because the B17 was near books that claimed that the B17 was the answer to cancer. In other words, the books were near the B17 in the stores and was therefore considered "labeling" which is a term used by the FDA. Labeling, according to the FDA, is against the law and you can be prosecuted for it. However on the Internet, it is different.

Internet law is tricky and not the same as U.S. commercial law. In one case, Ken Kholas took the FDA to court and won his B17 back. That court case proved it wasn't wrong for him to have or to sell it. Bottom line TO YOU is that you can purchase, use, and have B17 or raw apricot seeds.


Q40. Why is B17, raw apricot seeds, and Laetrile banned in the USA by the Food and Drug Administration(FDA)?

Simple math...Pharmaceutical companies CAN’T PATENT IT, and if they can’t patent something, then they can’t make tens of billions of dollars a year from it. If they can’t make money off of something, then they certainly don’t want to at the least LOSE tens of billions a YEAR. Because 99.9 % of people, if they knew about these mother-nature-produced-products would no longer take the expensive drugs, chemotherapy, radiation, and have the cancer-related surgeries! "It is estimated that if people had a CHOICE, lack of demand would shrink Doctors and Drugs to less than 10% of its current size, with the remainder almost entirely related to trauma related medicine. That would be a $900,000,000,000.00 (Nine Hundred BILLION Dollars!) loss to them. They are NOT going to take this loss without a good fight,” states Dr. Richard Shulze, N.D.

A good read re one doctor's fight to treat his cancer patients w/ laetrile:
_http://www.whale.to/m/binzel.html

 

[JEEP]

Just finished watching Episode 4 of The Truth About Cancer: The Global Quest. Episode 4 is entitled: Excitotoxins that Fuel Cancer, Nature's Pharmacy and Healing Cancer with Sound & Light. At 48:05, Dr. Patrick Quillin, PH.D.,R.D.,C.N.S., who was doing a tour/presentation of his garden of 60 fruit trees, begins talking about his peaches and he brings up the fact that there was a Harvard study (dated Aug 21, 2014) that found eating 2 servings of peaches a week reduced the risk of certain types of breast cancer by 40% (the study was of postmenopausal women).

There's way too much information contained in each episode to even begin to summarize and I'm finding a wealth of new information that I previously had no knowledge of. It is a most enlightening series and well worth the investment of time to view - plus it's being presented for a limited time for free. Here's the link to Episode 4:

_https://go2.thetruthaboutcancer.com/global-quest/episode-4/?a_aid=

Next up is Episode 5: Cancer Causing Blindspots, Toxic Vaccines, Homeopathy & The Power of Emotions
(October 17th)
- See more at: https://go.thetruthaboutcancer.com/sneak-peek/?a_aid=%E2%80%8B#sthash.bj3XQYKO.dpuf

 

[casper]

You might be interested, link:

https://translate.google.hr/translate?sl=hr&tl=en&js=y&prev=_t&hl=hr&ie=UTF-8&u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.nezavisne.com%2Fzivot-stil%2Fzdravlje%2FVitamin-B17-ubija-celije-raka-i-izgradjuje-sistem-imuniteta%2F229578&edit-text=


quote from the article:
Hunza tribe's old tribe stationary in northern Pakistan, whose members typically experience more than 100 years, and cancer as a disease they do not know. Their food has a rich content of vitamin B17. The wealth of the tribe of Hunza measure the amount of apricot trees, which has more trees, a member of the tribe is prominent and rich, because they dried apricot special food. Dried apricot seeds are the richest nitriloside (vitamin B17).

Protectors "cancer industry" are the biggest opponents of natural anti-cancer drug vitamin B17
After detailed research and action of vitamin B17 to patients with cancer Dr. Krebs has collected enough evidence to promote vitamin B17 as a cure for cancer. Registered are many successful cases of healing cancer with high doses of vitamin B17. Dr John A Richardson and Dr. Harold Mannesr successfully used vitamin B17 therapy to cancer patients in the terminal stage, confirming the theory of Krebs.

Dean Burk renowned biochemist in American Nacional Institute for Cancer Research has supported the vitamin B17 after successful animal studies. Linus Pauling stated that supports the use of vitamin B17 in the treatment of cancer (The New England Journal of Medicine, 8 July 1982). However, this alarmed patrons 'cancer industry', which earns billions of dollars on this disease.