Primer Fields

trendsetter37

trendsetter37

The Living Force
Topics Discussed

Pulsars

nebulas

photons

galaxies

planets

and much more....I will not try to write about the vast amount of information contained in this series. Enjoy.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=siMFfNhn6dk

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2NogyJ0k8Kw

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lpI6ikj1G-s
 
Hi trendsetter37,
Can you make a little summary on what it is about? It would be considerate.
 
Ok I would like to sum these videos up in as little words as possible. The reason being that it is a delight for those who are interested in a pervasive structure of energy that can explain everything from atomic particle and elements up to the formation of galaxies and maybe beyond.

The guy in these three videos compellingly disproves dark matter and energy and explains how pulsars are NOT neutron stars and explains the mechanism as to why and how they pulse. This is all done through the plasma research in their lab, which is then overlaid on top of cosmic and molecular structures.
 
Interesting update on his youtube channel:

The rest of the PF series has been canceled. I will leave the existing videos up. I will be posting an explanation for all of this later this week. I have many concerns, but mainly I am just too busy with work to continue any further work on these...
Click to expand...
 
I began watching his videos. The science seems sound so far, but I will reserve analysis on them until all of them have been viewed. Like AI, I find the recent posting to his channel concerning the cancelling of the video series rather interesting. I will wait for his explanation "later this week" instead of assuming something that simply may not be, even though I suspect what may have happened.

It is difficult not to anticipate when, historically, so many researchers that have made true breakthroughs have been suppressed, silenced, or co-opted. Time will tell (or possibly it will not).
 
Thank a bunch trendsetter37!

I'm into the second part and I find it very interesting. Of course, my knowledge in physics is quite restricted but so far, it is well explained. And the fact that they can demonstrate their theories in a lab makes it much more interesting as opposed to mainstream physics which relies on math and assumptions alone (or at least in majority).

I'm looking forward to your analysis QuantumLogic (and others). The fact the series was canceled sure is interesting.
 
Great documentary. Just saw part 1. Came just in time to kind of complement chapter 3 from Laura's "Hornes of Moses" book.

Just one thing i don't understand. at around minute 25 the author states something like this: "the only difference between the bowls is magnetic polarity, one is south, the other is north". Is he referring that this bowl shape magnets are actually monopoles?

The rest of the PF series has been canceled. I will leave the existing videos up. I will be posting an explanation for all of this later this week. I have many concerns, but mainly I am just too busy with work to continue any further work on these...
Click to expand...

That is a shame, since it seemed he was going to tie it with ancient megalith structures and some other interesting subjects on those future parts.
 
Green_Manalishi said:
Just one thing i don't understand. at around minute 25 the author states something like this: "the only difference between the bowls is magnetic polarity, one is south, the other is north". Is he referring that this bowl shape magnets are actually monopoles?
Click to expand...

This is also one of the first and most important question that came to my mind. I would think so but I can't confirm. Ark discussed about his interest in monopoles so I wonder how this Primer Fields theory fits his own theory about magnetism. Seems like they can reproduce a lot of phenomenon within the lab in the first place and that's always a good thing.

That is a shame, since it seemed he was going to tie it with ancient megalith structures and some other interesting subjects on those future parts.
Click to expand...

Too bad indeed. I wonder what those "many concerns" are besides time.
 
At least the similarities between the plasma in the magnetic confinement of the bowl shape and the various phenomena in the cosmos are visually very similar.

This is also one of the first and most important question that came to my mind. I would think so but I can't confirm. Ark discussed about his interest in monopoles so I wonder how this Primer Fields theory fits his own theory about magnetism. Seems like they can reproduce a lot of phenomenon within the lab in the first place and that's always a good thing.
Click to expand...

At 10:55 min in part 2 that image seems to indicate that the bowl actually as a north and south poles. The author states that red arrows indicate magnetic north and blue arrows indicate magnetic south.
 
Green_Manalishi said:
Great documentary. Just saw part 1. Came just in time to kind of complement chapter 3 from Laura's "Hornes of Moses" book.

Just one thing i don't understand. at around minute 25 the author states something like this: "the only difference between the bowls is magnetic polarity, one is south, the other is north". Is he referring that this bowl shape magnets are actually monopoles?

The rest of the PF series has been canceled. I will leave the existing videos up. I will be posting an explanation for all of this later this week. I have many concerns, but mainly I am just too busy with work to continue any further work on these...
Click to expand...

That is a shame, since it seemed he was going to tie it with ancient megalith structures and some other interesting subjects on those future parts.
Click to expand...

In reference to the north and south pole bowls I try to think about it in conjunction with parabolic algebra. If a bar magnet always has a north and south pole (i know this is an assumption), think about a three dimensional plane, containing both north and south poles. Then shape it into a parabola. The convex side could contain the north pole and the concave side would conversely contain the south pole. This allows for there to be two bowls with different pole orientations. Hence the red bowl described as magnetic north (north = concave) and the blue bowl is described as the south pole (south = concave). Yet they both still have both pole orientations. In this manner polarity that describes each bowl would be the physical polarity of the concave side. This is the side that would concentrate the magnetic force at its parabolic focal point.

If we extrapolate that through the other side of the parabola we will witness diverging magnetic force lines. What happens if we place to parabolas (different geometric/magnetic pole orientations) back to back, as featured in his videos, I think you would witness that the diverging magnetic lines of each parabola would intersect at definite points around the center. These could form orbits! In fact he illustrates this in the videos with the steel balls but doesn't definitively say that this could in fact be how orbits are formed in solar systems and galaxies. i think that he is thinking it maybe but knows that such information would result in suppression as it goes against "conventional" gravity theories.



The universe strives for balance. This is what I've come to realize over the past month and realize that this simple notion can apply to everything, even physics and the way galaxies are formed. Hmm.
 
Upon further analysis, it seems to me that the magnetic bowls are acting as artificial monopoles. This appears to take place because the geometry allows for them to inherently posses two different polarities while simultaneously significantly concentrating one at a focal point. Consequently, the pole that is NOT being concentrated at the parabolic focal point is dissipated or greatly reduced in strength.

This effectively creates a magnetic monopole (Their magnetic strengths are greatly imbalanced. This is contigent on which side of the parabola they reside; consequently one polarity's "existence" will overshadow the others. Hence a relative monopole!) in relative theoretical terms atleast. The guy in the video seems to be observing this phenomenon, if in fact that is what it is.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Trending content

Back
Top Bottom