prison-style discipline for special-ed children in a local school

  • Thread starter Thread starter Hildegarda
  • Start date Start date
H

Hildegarda

Guest
http://www[].desmoinesregister.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070805/NEWS/708050358/1001/RSS01

3-hour timeout in school raises discipline doubts
An autistic child's parents want to curb the use of timeout rooms after watching a video of the incident in a Waukee elementary school

By JENNIFER JACOBS
REGISTER STAFF WRITER

August 5, 2007
144 Comments


Doug and Eva Loeffler stared at the videotape of their daughter.

It showed 8-year-old Isabel, who has autism, in a timeout room in her Waukee elementary school for more than three hours, even after she'd wet her pants and struggled to obey the rules so that she could be let out.

The teachers, who watched Isabel continuously through a window, placed her in the secluded, empty room because she didn't want to complete a reading assignment.

"It was more than shock. It was pure mortification," her father later testified during a legal proceeding. "We saw her hitting herself in the head. We saw her just looking like a wild animal, essentially, for well over an hour, someone who had just lost all control of herself and all hope."

The Loefflers immediately decided to pull Isabel out of school. Then they called a lawyer.

The Loefflers and the Waukee Community School District engaged in a 10-day hearing that focused on whether the school district failed to provide Isabel with public education in the least restrictive environment possible.

The administrative law judge ruled in favor of the Loefflers earlier this year, sparking attention from advocates in the autism field who hope it will persuade other educators in Iowa and across the country to curb use of seclusion and restraint.

The Waukee district and the Heartland Area Education Agency, which helped prepare the learning plan for Isabel, are adamant that they did nothing wrong and are appealing the decision.

The Iowa Department of Education offers guidelines for timeouts, but schools are not required to follow the suggestions. The Loefflers hope the department will use its rule-making powers to create legally required time limits on restraint and seclusion.


Timeout rooms common, often prove effective

Many experts - and the Loefflers - agree that timeout rooms can be effective for children with aggressive behavior, but only as a last resort, only for short periods, and only as a way to calm a child, not as punishment for not completing a task.

"We are not opposing timeouts as a concept in and of itself," the Loefflers' lawyer, Curt Sytsma, said during the administrative law hearing in the winter of 2006. "We are no more opposing them than we oppose salt in a recipe, but if you add a whole cup of salt, it's an entirely different matter."

School records used as evidence in the hearing show Isabel was aggressive at times - she kicked, spit, hit students and teachers, jumped on tables, and overturned desks.

But the Loefflers argued that Isabel's disruptive behavior was triggered and worsened because educators used restraints and seclusion to an extreme, with methods not based on peer-reviewed research. Records show Isabel was in timeout for 100 sessions between September and December 2005, for as many as five sessions in a single school day, and sometimes for an hour or more.

The educators believed they were working cooperatively with the Loefflers to provide an appropriate education for Isabel in the least restrictive environment appropriate, said Roxanne Cumings, Waukee's director of student services. The strategies they used were supported by education research, she said.


School, parents decide to videotape Isabel

Isabel enrolled at Waukee Elementary for the 2004-05 school year. Her teacher at her previous school in Colorado said Isabel was a pleasant child who made good progress in second grade.

She was never restrained by her teachers and was never placed in a timeout room, but she did have a hard time keeping her hands to herself.

Waukee educators placed Isabel in a classroom with nondisabled children for about 35 percent of her day. She'd spent about 75 percent of her school day with nondisabled students in Colorado.

For the 2005-06 school year, Isabel was switched to Walnut Hills Elementary with the same teacher and same one-on-one aide. After a few months, her behavior became "more intense," and the district and Heartland began working with the Loefflers to develop a new plan, Cumings said.

"It is difficult to find a balance that satisfies everyone, especially when a child's conduct can be disruptive to other students," she said.

Isabel's educators and parents agreed to videotape more than three hours of Isabel's day at Walnut Hills Elementary School on Dec. 7, 2005. Everyone wanted to analyze what was happening just before the girl's outbursts.

When the video begins, Isabel is seated at a desk in the timeout room, a concrete-block room formerly used for storage. Because the room serves as punishment, it's deliberately neutral in decoration and is sparsely furnished.

Teacher Patti Brinkmeyer asks Isabel to choose her own assignments. Isabel seems cheerful and eager to please. As the girl completes worksheets, the teacher encourages her with comments like "Good job!"

After about 20 minutes, school psychologist Monica McKevitt comes to help with reading. She calmly tells Isabel three times she needs to keep working. Isabel loudly says no. McKevitt tells Isabel she has chosen a timeout.

Isabel climbs up on her desk, then jumps down and flops on the floor. Two teachers whisk all the furniture out of the room.

Almost immediately after the door is shut, Isabel folds her legs and sits quietly. She clearly knows from past timeouts that she has to prove she is ready to focus on her next activity by sitting cross-legged on the floor. Her learning plan calls for five minutes.

Isabel says she has to go to the bathroom. A teacher, watching through a small window, says no. School staff later testified that students sometimes use the bathroom as an excuse to escape punishment.

Before the required five minutes are up, Isabel gets restless and crawls across the floor. The teacher starts the timeout all over again.

Isabel returns to the proper sitting position, called "body basics," at least 10 times for two to four minutes.

Whenever she fidgets, the clock stops and she has to sit for another five minutes straight.

At times, Isabel looks like she's playing. At times, she looks uncomfortable. She struggles to open the door. She pounds on her head with her fist. There are sounds of children going about their school day outside her concrete room.

By the end of the day, she has wet her pants, has lost her temper and has gone ballistic, her father said.

That night, the teacher, the school psychologist and Principal Deb Snider watched the video together, brainstorming what to do better the next day, including shortening the length of time Isabel had to sit to prove she was ready to go back to her studies.

The Loefflers watched the video later and decided to pull Isabel out of the school.

"What kind of killed us is that she tried so hard to get out of it," Doug Loeffler said in an interview. "She's sitting on the linoleum and then they say, 'Oh, you moved,' and you can hear her sigh. She was literally physically incapable of getting out of that. It became counterproductive."


Timeouts can be helpful, some experts testify

Autism experts watched the video before testifying at the hearing.

Keith Allen, a professor of pediatrics and psychology at the University of Nebraska Medical Center, testified that the preferable duration for a timeout is between 30 seconds and four minutes. Timeouts beyond 30 minutes are not effective as a behavior-changing technique, he said.

Vincent Carbone, a New York-based behavior analyst who has designed learning environments for autistic children for more than 30 years, testified that school timeouts can be appropriate at times.

But if the procedure isn't used effectively, it's predictable that a child will respond negatively. Isabel's reaction didn't surprise him, he said.

Kevin Took, a psychiatrist at Blank Children's Hospital in Des Moines, said he deals with children who have been severely traumatized.

Took testified that he did not see anything traumatic about Isabel's videotaped timeout, even though she wet her pants. Urination and defecation are fairly common issues with children with autism spectrum disorders, he said.

"I will say it made me uncomfortable watching it," he testified. "I think sometimes that the timeout process seemed to go - I kept wanting to say, 'Gosh, let her out. Why is it, you know, taking so long?' "


Isabel's behavior becomes aggressive

The Waukee and Heartland educators testified that they kept the Loefflers updated on Isabel's progress and punishment. They sent a notebook home each day. Eva Loeffler, who walked her two daughters to school, spoke with the teachers regularly. The teachers e-mailed Doug Loeffler.

The teachers tried all sorts of strategies, including giving Isabel "sensory breaks" where she could skip in the hallways, listen to music, jump on a trampoline, or have Junie B. Jones books read out loud to her.

But in an effort to help her become a functioning member of society, they also set high standards for her.

Sue Seitz, a lawyer for Heartland, which serves 1,300 students with characteristics of autism, said during the hearing that the educators did their best to keep Isabel in her neighborhood school.

"In most cases, this child would have been removed and put in a special school," Seitz said.

The teachers, at times, dealt with Isabel's aggression by using hand-over-hand, a strategy the administrative law judge called controversial.

Hand-over-hand is a prompting technique in which a teacher guides a student's hand until she understands, for example, how puzzle pieces fit together or how to write a letter of the alphabet.

At first, if Isabel refused to complete a worksheet, her teachers would help her do it using hand-over-hand.

But as time passed, they used the technique if Isabel refused to do any task.

Isabel resisted, and it became a physical battle.

The teachers' notes show they used up to three staff members to hold her in her chair while a fourth teacher forced her hand to color. In at least four episodes in November 2005, hand-over-hand continued for more than an hour while Isabel insisted throughout that she could color by herself, records show.

"Even if this worked and produced some sort of good for the child, we would have opposed it," Sytsma said during the hearing. "The girl is being exposed to aggression. She is learning aggression and she is reacting to what is happening to her."

Isabel's behavior disintegrated during the first few months of the school year.

One September day after she was aggressive with students in gym class, she was placed in timeout in a conference room. She threw chairs and climbed on tables.

She spit at the teachers restraining her. The judge noted that she hit passing students as she was walking to timeout.

During two days in December, the teachers logged nine incidents of aggression, "the likes of which had never, ever appeared in this young lady's history at any point in time," Sytsma said during the hearing.

On one day, Isabel hit the girl who was assigned to sit next to her. That girl later approached her desk to get something, but was to scared to be near Isabel. The girl was shaking and "absolutely terrified," a one-on-one aide testified.

What's next for state, Waukee and Isabel

Barb Rankin, who heads Heartland's challenging behavior and autism team, said she thinks all the educators did what they thought was in the best interest of Isabel - and the other children.

"In hindsight, are there things we might change? Absolutely," Rankin said. "After her first day, some things were changed."

Meanwhile, many school districts in Iowa have timeout rooms, she said.

"I can't say exactly what percentage, but it's a very high percentage," Rankin said. "In some they're being used appropriately - and some of them less appropriately - to keep the child safe and other children safe and staff safe."

Timeout rooms sound archaic, but they are an acceptable practice, according to Sue Baker, autism services consultant for the Iowa Department of Education.

However, educators must carefully monitor whether the technique is actually benefiting a child, she said. They should ask: Does seclusion calm the child so that afterward he or she can come up with the right answer? Strategies, and success, vary with each child, Baker said.

"That's why you can't go, 'Oh yes, that's our state rule on timeout,' " Baker said. "It's so individual."

The judge's ruling would have forced the district to educate Isabel differently, but Doug Loeffler recently left his job as an investment consultant with Principal Financial Group and moved his family to California.

As a result, Waukee is not bound to change the way it uses timeout rooms.

Because it was an administrative hearing, the Loefflers cannot seek damages, although they could seek reimbursement for their $80,000 in legal fees. They also have the right to sue for damages in civil court.

There was no penalty for the school district.

Isabel's experience in Waukee has left her unable to tackle a full day of school, her father said.

This fall, Eva Loeffler will homeschool Isabel, now 11, and she'll go to school for short sessions. Isabel's parents hope to gradually add hours as she becomes comfortable with the staff and the environment.
*****

Some background:

Least Restrictive Environment (LRE) is a provision of a federal law that insures integration of people with disabilities into society, specifically, integration of special needs children into mainstream schools. LRE posits that each special needs child has a right to public education with the least restrictions, as close as the mainstream education offered to the average peers as that individual child can handle. LRE essentially transfers the idea a of special need education from PLACE to SET OF SERVICES, which is the whole point.

To insure that LRE is being upheld, the school officials meet with parents and the Area Education Agency (a federal outposts that oversees special programs) and develops an Individual Education Plan (IEP). This is an Iowa procedure, but other states have similar ones. IEP specifies exactly which special services the child will receive (time in a mainstream classroom, one-one-one aid, individual instruction, behavioral modification techniques, etc). The parties are required to upheld the contract, and the child's progress is monitored.

This is a bureaucratic system that is supposed to insure checks and balances, maintain clear communication and protect the interests of the child.

IN practice, however, it seems that way too often the system is more interested in self-maintenance (mature pathocracy, anyone?), and those inconvenient are chewed up and spat out on a roadside.

This is what happened to the girl in the article. The school didn't uphold its side of the contract and didn't follow the IEP. They used improper and counterproductive teaching methods and techniques, without notifying the parents. The system hurt the girl and caused a regression, which is always a danger in autism. In the end, the parents and the child are being blamed.

Contrary to what may seem, this lawsuit is a part of an administrative due process. It was not due to the parents' desire to make quick bux in a lawsuit-driven society. They got nothing other than pain, misery and financial loss out of the situation.

This is something that should become a precedent and make people rethink school punishments. It concerns average children as well as the special need ones. In many states corporal punishment is still legal
(http://www[].stophitting.com/disatschool/statesBanning.php). Those states that do not allow corporal punishment allow 'use of reasonable force', which may be stretched if need be.

It is actually possible for a child to come home black and blue from a hand of a teacher -- or to lose bowel control in a detention room while being denied bathroom access -- and that would be lawful. Ironically, if social services were to catch a parent in the doing that, or putting a kid in time-outs for 3 hours to the point that she wets herself, that would be considered a bona fide child abuse -- and people have lost their kids for less than that. The double standard just floors me.

The comments to the article, too, make one's hair stand on end. Too many people have come out and shared similar experiences. Below is one of the more poignant comments:

A good friend of mine works at the Newton Correctional facility. He called yesterday to ask how I felt about the administrative decision regarding escessive timeout. He was a great friend to our family when the school closeted our son for 6.5 hours per day. He was one of many people who told me enough was enough and to pull him out of school. This individual has been employed at the prison for 25 years and stated that even criminals are not subjected to this type of treatment and that it is clearly documented that solitary confinement does not change an individual's behavior.
of course that the solitary confinement DOES change the individual's behavior -- to the worse, because it promotes personality disintegration -- which is supposedly exactly opposite from what the schools are trying to achieve.
 
Truly horrific. What is just as frightening (maybe more so) as a child being subjected to such a harsh punishment/torture in a school situation is the attitude of some parents who are desensitized to how very wrong such 'disciplinary treatment' is for any child. They accept such behavior because the educators are professionals. Thankfully, this child was removed from the pervue of such 'professionals.'

I turned to homeschooling after an incident involving middle school bullies and a despicable teacher who, according to both adult and student witnesses, egged the bullies on in their harassment of my son. The school administrators weren't really interested in dealing with the situation, so I pulled him out. He received a decent education from my husband (who is extremely good at math and science) and learned a few things from me...although I'm not very brainy. Physical fitness involved fencing instruction...a lot more fun and intensive than playing dodge ball or dealing with a psychopathic teacher/jock. My son now attends college and does well academically. As for the dreaded "what-about-his-socialization?" question asked by busy bodies of almost every homeschooling parent I've spoken with...he's okay in that department, too.

Public education here in the USA is mediocre at best, with an undue emphasis on crowd control. Even the university systems are not immune to mediocrity and ponerization. It's chilling to see how the apathetic public accepts taser use, warrantless searches, and more and more control over protests from the student body.
 
freetrinity said:
Before the required five minutes are up, Isabel gets restless and crawls across the floor. The teacher starts the timeout all over again.

Isabel returns to the proper sitting position, called "body basics," at least 10 times for two to four minutes.

Whenever she fidgets, the clock stops and she has to sit for another five minutes straight.

At times, Isabel looks like she's playing. At times, she looks uncomfortable. She struggles to open the door. She pounds on her head with her fist. There are sounds of children going about their school day outside her concrete room.

By the end of the day, she has wet her pants, has lost her temper and has gone ballistic, her father said.
That is a scary article. Prediction of things to come- a bigger better control system for the kids? I don't have children and don't plan to, but it seems to me that this is just plain child abuse.
 
freetrinity, this article has been uploaded to SotT and I've taken the liberty of using your comments on it as the editorial comments on the site (with some minor revisions). I hope that is ok - it is too important an issue to not highlight, osit.
 
anart said:
freetrinity, this article has been uploaded to SotT and I've taken the liberty of using your comments on it as the editorial comments on the site (with some minor revisions). I hope that is ok - it is too important an issue to not highlight, osit.
thank you -- I do think it is an important issue; it has raised a lot of local attention and discussion, and has far-reaching national implications. The case is now being appealed in the Eighth Federal Circuit, and if the court decision stands, it will become a precedent throughout Iowa, Minnesota, Illinois, Arkansas, Missouri, North and South Dakota.

I do want to make one correction: AEA is a state\local regulatory and overseeing agency, not federal as I have erroneously stated. Could you please edit my commentary on the SOTT page accordingly??
 
NormaRegula said:
I turned to homeschooling after an incident involving middle school bullies and a despicable teacher
I also homeschool my two kids, although they are younger. I am not sure though whether for the child featured in the article, homeschooling exclusively is the best option. Autism requires professional attention on all fronts and real team work from education professionals and the parents. Plus, there is the issue of integration. This right didn't come to people easily, and people rightly hold on to every opportunity to exercise it. I have seen countries\cultures where people with disabilities are segregated, and it makes for a very xenophobic environment, beyond what many in the US remember.

If you look at the comments to the article, there is enough jerks who say 'all this special ed kids should be corralled and locked up , so that they don't hit out normal bright kids and don't pull the resources away from productive members of society". This sentiment is alive and well, it is scary.

When it comes to homeschooling, a lot of home educators have experienced pressure from the school district, and attempts to conrtol them beyond what the law requires. However, I bet that the incident described in the article would be of a kind when the school district wouldn't mind someone being homeschooled, and wouldn't as much as look at the family and the child once they left the system. Because once the problematic family and the problematic child are gone, they are no longer the district's problem, plain and simple. I am surprised the school is even appealing. They aren't required to do anything anyway, because the family has left the state -- how convenient.

The school system in the US positions itself as a SERVICE -- and a service to parents (taxpayers), not even kids. I have heard this repeatedly straigh from the mouth of a local school district super-intendant, and I remember it made me cringe at a time. However, for all this lip-service to the people's interests, the blame ALWAYS goes to children and parents if there is ever a slightest conflict. Some professional observers agree as well:

http://www[]fetaweb.com/02/schculture.alessi.htm
The primary role of the school psychologist is to evaluate children to determine the reasons for learning and behavior problems. According to Dr. Alessi, when a child has trouble learning or behaving in school, the source of the child's problem can usually be traced to one or more of five causes.

* First, the child may be misplaced in the curriculum, or the curriculum may include faulty teaching routines.
* Second, the teacher may not be implementing effective teaching and/or behavioral management practices.
* Third, the principal and/or other school administrators may not be implementing effective school management practices.
* Fourth, the parents may not be providing the home-based support necessary for effective learning.
* Fifth, the child may have physical and/or psychological problems that contribute to learning problems.

School psychologists from different areas of the country were interviewed and asked to complete an "informal survey." First, each school psychologist was asked if they agreed that the five factors listed above play a "primary role in a given school learning or behavior problem." (Page 148) The school psychologists agreed that these factors, alone or together, played a significant role in children’s learning problems.

The school psychologists were surveyed about the number of children they evaluated during the past year for learning problems. The average number was about 120 cases (or kids). These numbers were rounded to 100 cases for each of the 50 psychologists for a total of 5,000 cases.

Alessi asked these psychologists how many reports they wrote in which they concluded that the child’s learning problem was mainly due to curriculum factors. "The answer was usually none. All cases out of the 5,000 examined confirmed that their schools somehow had been fortunate enough to have adopted only the most effective basal curricula." (Page 148)

Next, he asked how many reports concluded that the referring problem was due primarily to inappropriate teaching practices. "The answer also was none. All cases out of the 5,000 examined proved that their districts had been fortunate enough to have hired only the most skilled, dedicated, and best prepared teachers in the land." (Page 149)

Then, he asked the psychologists how many of their reports found that the problem was due mainly to faulty school administrative factors. "The answer again was none. All cases out of 5,000 examined demonstrated that their districts had hired and retained only the nation’s very best and brightest school administrators." (Page 149)
When asked how many reports concluded that parent and home factors were primarily responsible, the answer ranged from 500 to 1,000 (10% to 20%). These positive findings indicated that we were finally getting close to the source of educational problems in schools. Some children just don't have parents who are smart, competent, or properly motivated to help their children do well in school.

Finally, I asked how many reports concluded that child factors were primarily responsible for the referred problem. The answer was 100%. These 5,000 positive findings uncovered the true weak link in the educational process in these districts: the children themselves.

If only these districts had better functioning children with a few more supportive parents, there would be no educational difficulties. (Page 149)
Alessi noted that in IEP disputes, "family factors are invoked most often when the parent does not attend the meeting, or if the parent is involved in a way deemed ‘inappropriate’ by the school staff. Otherwise, child factors alone seem to carry the explanatory burden for school learning and behavior problems." (Page 149)

Based on the results of these 5,000 reports prepared by school psychologists, "the results indicate clearly no need to improve curricula, teaching practices, nor school administrative practices and management. The only needs somehow involve improving the stock of children enrolled in the system, and some of their parents." (Page 149)
thank you for your comment and for sharing your story. You were strong and have made your own choice. Too bad there are many others who don't n similar situations -- and it does happen way too often.
 
I pulled my son out of a public high school, at the protest of the school board. A gang member had taken a loaded .22 out of his locker and shoved it in my son's face. The Broward County School Board insisted that they could find no gun (no kidding, three days later they finally looked in the kids locker.) They were more worried about this other students civil rights (a gang member), and could care less about the safety of my son. They insisted I send him back to school.

I pulled him out of that school and sent him to another state.
 
freetrinity said:
I do want to make one correction: AEA is a statelocal regulatory and overseeing agency, not federal as I have erroneously stated. Could you please edit my commentary on the SOTT page accordingly??
Done.
 
FT said:
It is actually possible for a child to come home black and blue from a hand of a teacher -- or to lose bowel control in a detention room while being denied bathroom access -- and that would be lawful. Ironically, if social services were to catch a parent in the doing that, or putting a kid in time-outs for 3 hours to the point that she wets herself, that would be considered a bona fide child abuse -- and people have lost their kids for less than that. The double standard just floors me.
This is what got me, also. And it's just appalling that this sort of thing goes on with those children who are least equipped to cope with it.

I know you said that you don't agree that special needs children ought to be put in special schools, but maybe that's the other side of this coin. How can we possibly expect there to be a large enough number of teachers and aides with the competence and understanding to deal with these children throughout the larger school system?

This is such a thorny problem. We certainly want all our children to be involved in a decently functioning society to as great an extent as they are capable, but how to do it without hurting kids on either side of the issue?

Maybe the whole concept of "all men are created equal" needs to be re-examined? They obviously are not all created equal, though certainly each individual should have the right to "life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness" to whatever extent they are capable of supporting such an ideal.

A friend of mine used to work for Goodwill which provided employment for the handicapped. She supervised a number of young women whose job it was to sort the donated items and put price tags on them for sale in the thrift stores. My friend told me that this one particular young woman would take a plastic flower and put a price tag on it of $5 or more, and if she found a piece of jewelry that was real gold with diamonds, would mark it something like 5 cents because it was not big, bright and colorful like the plastic flower. In her reality, big, bright, plastic flowers were far more valuable than gold and diamonds. She could function more or less according to the social demands of the job: sorting and putting on price tags, but she could never get any real "feel" for the reality she was expected to comprehend.

The point is, we have to consider the perspectives of the handicapped and other special needs people when we are trying to help them, otherwise, our help is NOT help at all. Perhaps, in many cases, they are neither capable, nor do they WISH to be "integrated" into society the way many people think they surely MUST want!

Yes, I understand that parents really want to integrate their children no matter what their special needs are, but is that always really the correct thing to do? Is it ethical to take this autistic girl and demand that she function in normal society the way other kids do and to invent systems that are supposed to be designed to get her to do that? Geeze, "normal society" is already so rotten that even normal kids are broken by it.

I don't have any clearly formulated ideas about this, I'm just asking some questions here that are bugging me about this that I don't think very many people are asking.
 
Laura said:
The point is, we have to consider the perspectives of the handicapped and other special needs people when we are trying to help them, otherwise, our help is NOT help at all. Perhaps, in many cases, they are neither capable, nor do they WISH to be "integrated" into society the way many people think they surely MUST want!
This is something I am learning about as we speak of it.
There are things I would wish my brother could do, and basically, way down deep, it has more to do with making things easier on myself to assist him.

There are simply things he does not and will not bend to, simply because it's the way he lives and the way he sees things. And why should I change that? I don't live with him, so it would only complicate his life to try to do something foreign to his being.

This was something we dealt with before the head trauma, which just seems to be exaggerated because of the head trauma. He was slightly autistic as a child, dyslexic, and often retreated into his own world for hours. So based on this information, complicated by later factors, one can only observe and try to work around it. Make him as comfortable as he can be in his own way, even if it doesn't work for anyone else, it works beautifully for him.

There are those around him (neighbors and do-gooders) are quite pushy about the "rehabilitation and integration" ideas. What they don't know is that this has been his condition, not just for the last 19 years, but that there were factors from the very beginning. He never was one to be integrated into "society". It didn't work for him pre-injury, I don't know why they would think it would work for him post injury. Sometimes I would observe that his injury is a direct result of him never having been able to assimilate into society. Now post trauma, it's certain that he never will go past a certain point in his "rehabilitation".

Peg
 
I know you said that you don't agree that special needs children ought to be put in special schools,
...
Now post trauma, it's certain that he never will go past a certain point in his "rehabilitation".
Well, I really don't think that ALL special needs children should NOT be put into special schools. I think that SOME of them will be -- and ARE -- well served by such schools. I think that everybody should be able to take on as much of life's opportunities, and manage them independently, as much as they can. This is exactly what LRE says.

Integration or rehabilitation don't mean whipping the person up to the level of an 'average peer' by all means available, even against that individual's own nature, will and potential. It means, first and foremost, recognizing the person as a HUMAN, with basic physical, emotional and intellectual needs. And making effort to make those needs met -- specifically, the need to be valued and accepted, as a person that s\he is.

I also think that integration of special needs people is just as important for the society as a whole as it is for those people.

The opposite of integration is NOT less schools, less aids, less money spend on special needs education. It is something a lot more ugly.

The lady who works in Goodwill may not comprehend reality, all right. But -- she has a job that allows her to feed and cloth herself, people talk to her, she talks to them, people help her, she helps them, she is doing something useful, she feels fulfilled as a member of society, she IS a member of society. Somebody who is dealing with her is learning about life, that there ARE people who don't comprehend reality -- and they have the right to exist regardless.

One of the alternatives for this lady in a non-integrated society would be to:

-be abandoned by her parents because she is special need and it is a shame to have a special needs child,
-grow up in an orphanage, where she would be corralled in a crib all day, urinating and defecating under herself,
-as an adult, be down to a half of a normal person's height and weight and unable to take care of her elementary physical needs

if her parents didn't abandon her, the family would exist in a vacuum, people would stare at her on the streets, people wouldn't shy of calling her a 'moron' or an 'idiot' to her (and her parent's) face. She would never play with average peers, because they would shun her, and after a while she wouldn't even MEET them, because she would be corralled in a special institution with concrete walls with those like her. The state-provided special services would be unadequate, others would be hard to get.

The parents in the article were trying to break the wall with their heads for 2 years -- NOT to insure that the education system makes their daughter like everybody else against her nature, but to ensure she has a CHANCE to live up to her potential, whatever it is, that she wouldn't be artificially dumbed down. The life of the parents of that other not-so-hypothetical girl in a not-integrated society would be breaking the wall with their heads EVERY DAY, trying to get the BASICS for her.

Rehabilitation after trauma ... the number of services the person would receive in a non-integrated society would be MUCH less, and again it would be about the BASICS. One can wait for a prosthetic arm for months. And one most likely will have to go around asking for money because it would be very, very expensive. If one is in a wheelchair (if one is ever ABLE to get a wheelchair, it is likely one may have to wait for months), one wouldn't be able to get out of the house -- like EVER. Because the stairs are not made for that. If one gets out of the house, one wouldn't be able to go ANYWHERE. Because the roads and the doors in the stores are not made for that. An able, intellectually sound individual on a wheelchair wouldn't be able to get a job -- any job. Because he\she can't get out of the house and because she\he is handicapped and therefore subhuman.

Like I said, the Americans and other westerners -- thankfully -- just CANNOT imagine what it is like elsewhere. the mistreatement of the girl in the article is ten times better that business-as-usual in other parts of the world. But -- this wasn't that far back and can ALL return. There is enough hidden sentiment against special needs and handicapped individuals, as the comments to that artcle showed, and it is SCARY.

Hitler first went after special needs people, if I remember correctly.
 
My eldest son has ADHD (Attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder) and is on the Autistic spectrum. I know from experience that children with this problem do not need 3 hour time outs, my son does have time outs dont get me wrong but his time outs are measured by his age, he is 8 so his time out is for 8 minutes, never any more than that, he is in a safe room were he can not cause too much damage to him self mainly, then once his time out is over he is asked " OK you have had your time out, did you think why you had it?" if the answer is "yes" then he is allowed to rejoin the family, if he says "no" he is sat down and had his bad behavior explained to him.. quietly, then he rejoins the family. When a kid with autism throws a tantrum it is like nothing on earth, these children need stability, understanding and a routine not 3 hours in lock up.
God my son would go into a full scale melt down.

A truly horrific story. I would have pulled my son out of that school so fast if that had happened to him.
 
Laura said:
How can we possibly expect there to be a large enough number of teachers and aides with the competence and understanding to deal with these children throughout the larger school system?
And this is indeed a question. I have heard education professionals say that to make a robust system, independent of human error, the government has to be spending five times more than it is spending now.

However, right next to the school featured in the article here is another school with a wonderful program for autistic children. Somehow with the same budget money they were able to do a much better job.

I don't think good teaching is all about money, and the more money is spend the better teaching will be. I think that it is about people. Every special needs family is looking for 'good teacher', because a person makes all the difference. I think the system should simply value good teachers more than it does now.

In this particular case, described in the article, I think it comes down to some very, very human qualities in those teachers, and not their teaching qualifications. If a child wets herself, why did they deny the child the right to get changed? Did they get a kick out of it? If they are doing this hand-on-hand thing, and the child goes ballistic, why didn't they stop and say, hey, it isn't working? It is obvious they were hurting the girl -- why did they continue doing those things for months? Again, I think those are human problems and issues, which the system feeds somehow -- and not educational or financial.

That town, Waukee, is fast growing, brand new and spanking clean; they have water slides and play fountain in the Y pool, for crying out loud. Money is NOT a problem there. People are.
 
Being a "deaf person" myself, I KNOW what it is like being in a institution
and what it is like being mainstreamed into a public school. My hearing
loss is severe, and for some reason the "experts" thought this translated
to "deaf and dumb [as in "intellectually challenged"]" )

Please bear with me as this is a difficult subject for me to explain in such a
compressed format.

------------------------------

If you are institutionalized, would you be intellectually marginalized at the level of that
of your peers, depending on the severity of the handicap? So the question is, could the
child be properly placed in an "special ed" school or would this child be better off
being mainstreamed into a public school system? In either case, how well "equipped" is
the school in providing for the special needs of this child and how is it, that any such
handicap this child has will be sufficiently addressed? Would you take the school-systems
"expert" advice that "they know what is best for your child" on their word or credentials
alone? Should you investigate to ensure that their program would work for you and your
child? Obviously, this in an area of intense debate on my part and I would personally challenge
the "experts" in many areas due to my particular lifetime experiences but then again, my
handicap needs are known only to myself and not to these so-called "experts" who claims
to understand my condition and therefore my whole being.

In my case, I was born, had NORMAL hearing for two years, got rubella and high fever,
lost 50% hearing in BOTH ears, lived like a "normal kid", sent to an institution at 3 yrs old,
learning lip reading and sign language skills (common for deaf-world environment) but still
my peer group consisted of "crazy" kids, some of whom I could not socialize with, but not
due to a lack of desire on my part, but simply because they were in their private world. So,
I guess I learned empathy at a very young age and I continue to be so.

Meanwhile, my parents are told repeatedly that it is best to keep me institutionalized, left to
live there, for which my parents repeatedly refused to do, and promptly picked me up from
"school" every day, and brought me home. All seems normal, right? Meanwhile, my hearing
has deteriorated and I was losing up to 75% hearing and it was going down fast.

As luck would have it, due to my father being transferred to a different city and job, I had
been "mainstreamed" into the public school at age 8 (entered 2nd grade). I was up to the
challenge, being very young, however there was some "deprogramming issues" that had
to be dealt with. For example, in the "deaf world", there is a LOT of contact and this is "normal"
at the institution, but at a public school, patting the behinds of girls is taboo and this was
promptly stopped. I also learned that there is NO special help in the classroom. You either
"get it" or you don't. Sink or swim. Never mind I could not read my teacher's lips, never mind
that there was a different teacher for different subjects and the one thing that teachers did not
get was that it is VERY hard to read a pin-prick of a lip the farther back you are seated from the
front row!

So, here I was, faced with VERY challenging situations, but somehow I was able to will myself to
take on these challenges at full force and to prove my "experts" and teachers that they are WRONG
to be negatively subjective of my abilities in spite of my severe hearing loss. I had managed to
adapt and maintained "A/B/C" grades. So, imagine if you will, what if there was no challenges for
me to face had the decision be made to put me into "special education" classes? I KNOW I
would have suffered GREATLY - but then how would I have known that until much later in my
life to have realized the precariousness of the whole situation? And what IF?

So, how is it, for an evaluator to absolutely know if a child has the mental faculty and
the stamina to be able to meet very challenging situations? To what yardstick can this
be measured and evaluated without subjective bias? I can tell you from direct personal
experience that the answer actually rests with the child and luck? Seems this was such a
case. regarding myself?

Please note that having a 'hearing' or 'handicap' issue means that for the most part, it is
a fact of life and it does NOT simply go away. This is something I had to deal with all of
my life and I had a hard time accepting it even when it *seems* that I do NOT have a handicap
and yet, there it is, it never escapes my attention. Sometimes I would wallow in defeat but at
times shake off that thought, pick up the challenge again and carry it forward.

I have met odd situations many times, like being challenged by a teacher directly, one
who accused me as a psychological liar because my speech was "too good" to pass her
"litmus test" and thought I was taking advantage of such a situation to cause class interruptions
by either asking the teacher to repeat missed words or by asking my peers to repeat what
was said by her. It was quite appalling and this was in the 8th grade (Jr. High School). There
are many other examples and others who felt that I was inferior to them, left me out of their
social groups, and so on, but I think you get the idea. They were "above" me.

I also want to add that I have been placed into "special ed" classes once, and I can tell you I
was "in for a deep shock" with the degradation of my social status, of not being challenged
with "intellectual subjects", and was otherwise being told that I will NEVER rise to an academic
level and will fail to enter into advanced education due my severe hearing loss. I thank God that
my parents were smarter than these mainstream advisers who otherwise thought what was
best for me. My parents were fighters, and if it had not been for them, I would probably had
to be on welfare, McDonalds, as a janitor, or something that requires no intellect whatsoever.
But as it is, I am degreed and worked for many large corporation as as of now, I am semi-retired.

Unfortunately, many parents are not given all of the pertinent facts for the specific handicap at
issue nor are they always given the best advice from the "experts". But my recommendations is
for the parents to take the time to study the issue and try to become more informed and become
experts themselves on the subject so that they can tell the difference between bad advice and good
advice and act in the best interest of their children rather than hand the children over to these "experts".

When I was in high school, I have been contacted several times by my local University, to have students
evaluate me, ask questions regarding my handicap, been put before a class room of 100 or more people
to be give them rundown of my life-experiences regarding my handicap and you'd ask... what the hell is
really going on!? The simple answer seemed to me: "To learn the mystery of how one is able to overcome
the challenges with many severe handicaps, despite the odds?"

So - it is not easy, to determine what is best for your child - but in my case, as luck would have it,
I proved the "experts" wrong, many times over. So, please THINK and CAREFULLY analyze the issues
and try to be OBJECTIVE and go with your INSTINCT as to what is best for your children. I would
think not twice, but THRICE before handing your children over to the "experts". OSIT.
 
Back
Top Bottom