Came across this business today while reading Peter Meyers' newsletter:
_http://www.pehi.eu/index.html
I wrote back to Peter my impressions about it as follows:
_http://www.pehi.eu/index.html
I wrote back to Peter my impressions about it as follows:
So, perhaps some digging on this group is in order?On 27 Feb 2008 at 22:45, Peter Myers wrote:
(someone else wrote)
> I know for many who stop by to browse the experience will be painful. So
> are tetanus shots, but you need them. You need to see what's on this
> site, too, if you are really interested in truth-seeking. You see, for
> the past two years I have had an open letter on the Internet asking Mr.
> Sitchin to answer some very simple, straightforward questions. If you
> have the courage to take the red pill and enter this site, I believe
> you'll also think these questions are entirely fair. They have gone
> unanswered.
>
> Yes, Mr. Sitchin's webmaster has responded to a few items, and I have
> reproduced his response and my rejoinder on this site - not only for
> comic relief, but also explanatory value. What do these exchanges
> explain? That Mr. Sitchin's arguments, so ably reproduced by his
> webmaster, have zero academic credibility. I can't say it any other way
> and remain honest. If academia (as we often hear) is supposed to serve
> the public interest, consider this my contribution. Although I would
> disagree with the academic mainstream's fear of testing its own assured
> conclusions, I agree that it is irresponsible to allow blatant untruths
> to go uncontested. ==
The above sure caught my eye since we, too, had a strange exchange with
Sitchin's webmaster who really tried to intimidate us. Instead of being
intimidated, we just published the exchange here:
http://www.cassiopaea.org/cass/eparker.htm
The exchange is very revealing about Sitchin and how he operates and maybe
who is behind him. What they were so hostile about was an article I wrote
entitled:
Has Nibiru/Planet X Been Sighted?
http://www.cassiopaea.org/cass/sitchin.htm
We were able to confirm the statement made by Sitchin and so we did NOT edit
out the remark as he demanded.
Another interesting thing about that situation was the fact that either the
guy was lying when he claimed that my husband wrote the email that is
included in the correspondence, or someone was producing such emails in my
husband's name. Since we were, at that time, in a state of shell shock (so
to say) at the violent attacks from a gang of cyberpaths under the
leadership of a guy named Vincent Bridges, we assumed that it was Vinnie
doing it. You can read about him here:
http://www.cassiopaea.com/archive/most.htm
Vinnie is an interesting character (aside from the fact that his full-time
job seems to be defaming me) because of his links to Drunvalo Melchizidek,
Jeff Rense (via Jay Weidner), Ray Flowers, J.J. Hurtak, and so on. There
are links on the left bar of the above article that lead to all kinds of
interesting stuff.
But, anyway, what next caught my attention in your latest newsletter - with
a bit of a startle, I must add - was this link from Virginia Raines:
_http://www.pehi.eu/archives_2006.htm
I clicked it and saw that there was a group called "Le Cercle."
You see, the thing that "caught" me in the interaction with the Bridges
character mentioned above was an email from some individual implying that
he/she was a member of a group called "Le Cercle." I've reproduced it on
the page linked above about Bridges. But, for convenience sake, here is
what it said:
<<<<
From: "Christaofer Richarde"
To: Laura Knight-Jadczyk
Subject:
Date sent: Tue, 11 Jul 2000 19:25:39 -0700
Oh, it is possible to even concoct the wanderings that you have
concocted. Nevertheless, there is more to this story of Rennes, than meets
the eye...as the king might say.
Laughed my way, wholeheartedly, through your article! Le Cercle would be
most amused, in fact.
May Saturn husk hexagonal corn for you.....
D- >>>>>>>>
The reference was to my deconstruction of the Rennes-le-Chateau business
found beginning here: http://www.cassiopaea.org/cass/wave13a.htm
In fact, it seems that the writing of The Wave series is what precipitated
the attacks against me that began in 1999, escalated in 2001 with the "anti-
semitism" and "cult" rants that have continued up to the present day.
Anyway, to get back to "Le Cercle," back at the time, I found absolutely
nothing about any group called "Le Cercle" anywhere on the net or in any
literature that was available to me. My assumption was that the email was
sent to me by Bridges himself as a way of insinuating himself into my life.
His "explanation" for it (he's a psychopath, so you can't believe anything
he says) was that someone who was "after him" was trying to shake me up.
It all sounds pretty infantile and puerile to me.
Now, the fact is, since we have moved to France we have certainly become
aware of some sort of Masonic/Rosicrucian occultist network that extends
into even the uppermost reaches of society and government here in France.
It's really creepy, but I've heard some first-hand accounts that are
credible. I also was asked at one point if I would like to go to a meeting
of such individuals. I declined. I was later invited to a party held in a
big chateau owned by a guy who raises grapes to make armagnac and saw many
of the local politicos in the group. The owner/host asked me a most
peculiar question when I was introduced to him: "Madame Jadczyk, do you
think I have a soul?"
I don't remember his name, but I encountered him again at a function at the
Ministry of the Reform of State in Paris a year later. It was a small,
private party, and I ended up sitting between a Bourbon-Parme and a
Rothschild. (Both young ladies.)
Another year went by and we were contacted and visited by a fellow who
represented an alleged anti-fascist political group. We were invited to
join with them only the requirement was that we had to give up any
researches into extraterrestrial phenomena. We declined.
Within a few months of that event, we were contacted by a member of the
French DST - a cryptographer, of all things - who claimed to be interested
in my husband's work on "time." Rather than play footsie or cat and mouse,
we did what we always do: gave him copies of all our material so he could
figure it out for himself if he had what it takes. After a few months, his
"raison" for being in the district evaporated and back to Paris he went.
Anyway, coming back again to this term "Le Cercle." I had been looking for
a clue about that for some years and hadn't found a thing until this link in
your newsletter. But, of course, I am suspicious. The only place I had
seen it written up to this time was on a little sign showing a path up the
hill at Rennes-les-Bains where we went to see a "trembling rock" - a
prehistoric megalith that is supposed to manifest anti-gravity properties
under some circumstances. (Yes, we found the rock, no, it didn't float.)
Now, this link that you have shared tells me this:
Funny, that's something that seems to be connected (according to some"Otto von Habsburg and together with his Opusian associates Jean Violet and
Antoine Pinay he founded Le Cercle in the 1950s, one of the branches of this
Vatican-Paneuropa network. At least, that's how things started out. In later
years extremist Cold War warriors from the US and the UK became more
involved with Le Cercle. Many participants already knew each other through
the CIA-sponsored anti-communist networks in Europe."
researchers) with the whole Rennes-le-Chateau thing as well as the "Left
Behind Network" (CIA) that we were told about by the young man who came to
see us from the alleged anti-Fascist group mentioned above. I can't tell
you much about this because I don't speak or read much French. Henry, one
of our researcher/editors who does, is far more familiar with this material.
Now, regarding the synarchist movement and how it relates to the so-called
New Age, long ago I wrote a little bit about this (not having as much data
as I do now, it is still interesting historically and offers more of an
explanation for why I have been so viciously attacked and defamed for over 8
years now by the New Agey types - even accused of trying to create a "cult,"
for god's sake!) See:
Schwaller de Lubicz and the Fourth Reich
http://www.cassiopaea.org/cass/schwaller_de_lubicz_1.htm
Well, anyway, I kept poking along through the Virginia Raines website (is it
hers or is it just a link she sent?) and finally came to this:
Okay, let's set the alien abduction thing aside for a moment and just have a"Now, I hardly claim authority on any issue, but I definitely claim some
with the Pentagon crash. I still regard my article, which was first
published in early 2005, as the most extensive in refuting all "evidence"
that something else than a 757 might have hit the Pentagon. I sent the
article to most of the prominent 9/11 researchers. Some agreed, usually from
the start, but most said (if they even replied) they disagreed without ever
refuting any of the points made. These researchers just ignore the article
and keep blabbing their theories to their audience. Biggest wake up call I
ever had. This doesn't mean we have to stop asking for the Pentagon videos,
but building theories on non-existent evidence isn't exactly the smartest
thing to do.
Back to One Nation again. Rima Laibow is the wife of general Albert
Stubblebine. In his film Wilson forgets to mention her background of
building the Alien Abduction movement."
look at this piece about the Pentagon. I gave it a read and immediately
realized that whoever wrote it is either 1) an agent of disinformation or 2)
a schizoid psychopath.
I'm not even going to write any refutations here, however I'll provide some
links below that make mincemeat of this ridiculous piece of drivel. What is
most significant to me is the lengths that some groups promoting the "Yes,
Virginia, a 757 Hit the Pentagon" nonsense went to to try to keep this topic
under wraps. You might want to have a look at our experience with the
"abovetopsecret.com" crown and their neocon atty Wayne Jaeschke, member of
MoFo when they shut our servers down after we published a point by point
refutation of their "Yes, a 757 Hit the Pentagon" piece. You will also find
it interesting to note that this same crowd was involved in creating the
"Project SERPO" nonsense. See the following links:
http://laura-knight-jadczyk.blogspot.com/2006/03/abovetopsecretcom-project-serpo-psy.html
http://www.ufomystic.com/wake-up-down-there/serpo-was-disinformation/
http://www.cassiopaea.org/forum/index.php?topic=523&p=1
In this link above I have included the entire email exchange between myself
and Bill Ryan as well as the ATS guys. It is, basically, an anatomy of yet
another attempt to set me up.
The following is what I wrote on the topic back in 2002 with updates.
http://www.cassiopaea.org/cass/boeing.htm
So, coming back to Le Cercle. After finding this big red flag in the
Virgina Raines site, I'm sorry, I have to consider everything else included
as highly questionable, even her story about "Le Cercle." Like I said, some
years back, there was no such thing... I could find nothing at all about any
such entity. Doesn't mean it didn't exist, but it is highly suspicious that
now, all of a sudden, it is there with a whole history, theory and
conspiracy theory behind it that does, in some ways, match a reality that I
am personally aware of by virtue of not only research, but direct
interaction with some of the principals. I've been approached by so many
of them, attempts have been made to buy me, blackmail me, entrap me,
physically harm me (and my children), and when all that failed, simple
defamation seems to have been what they fell back on.
Where have we heard about this type of behavior before?
Didn't Douglas Reed point out that it was phenomenally present even as far
back as post French Revolution? And isn't it precisely the format for
control of information that is outlined in Protocol 12?
You could even say that Protocol 12 is the Bible for COINTELPRO.
Confusion, confusion and more confusion. Hign noise to signal ratio so that
the signal will be lost amidst the confusion, factionalization, and general
disorder.
Yes indeedy, I've tasted this before. You may want to check out our podcast
on the topic here:
http://www.sott.net/signs/editorials/signs_TheProtocolsofthePathocrats.php
Sounds to me like Virginia Raines is an agentur of the Pathocrats.In this week's podcast we discuss what we have identified as the very first problem that must be
solved in order for positive changes to be undertaken in American and elsewhere in the world: the
Media.
Knowledge is power. Those who control information can control the masses; it's that simple.
As we researched the subject of the media, we came across The Protocols of the Learned Elders of
Zion. As everyone knows, this is a vicious anti-Semitic hoax. We agree. We do not for a minute think
that this represents Judaism or ordinary Jewish people.
What was shocking for us was our realization that the Protocols is being implemented almost line by
line by many of the members of the Bush Administration and the various government 'think-tanks' that
formulate their policy. In other words, the Protocols is not a hoax because it is nonsense, but
rather it is only a hoax because it was attributed to Jews.
Here, we present the text of Protocol 12 from which several excerpts were read on the podcast and
which we jokingly referred to as "The Gospel According to Karl Rove."
Read it and understand that this is, indeed, the number one issue that America must deal with before
they can do a single other thing.
PROTOCOL No. 12 Control of the Press
1. The word "freedom," which can be interpreted in various ways, is defined by us as follows -
2. Freedom is the right to do what which the law allows. This interpretation of the word will at the
proper time be of service to us, because all freedom will thus be in our hands, since the laws will
abolish or create only that which is desirable for us according to the aforesaid program.
3. We shall deal with the press in the following way: what is the part played by the press to-day?
It serves to excite and inflame those passions which are needed for our purpose or else it serves
selfish ends of parties. It is often vapid, unjust, mendacious, and the majority of the public have
not the slightest idea what ends the press really serves. We shall saddle and bridle it with a tight
curb: we shall do the same also with all productions of the printing press, for where would be the
sense of getting rid of the attacks of the press if we remain targets for pamphlets and books? The
produce of publicity, which nowadays is a source of heavy expense owing to the necessity of
censoring it, will be turned by us into a very lucrative s ource of income to our State: we shall
lay on it a special stamp tax and require deposits of caution-money before permitting the
establishment of any organ of the press or of printing offices; these will then have to guarantee
our government against any kind of attack on the part of the press.
For any attempt to attack us, if such still be possible, we shall inflict fines without mercy. Such
measures as stamp tax, deposit of caution-money and fines secured by these deposits, will bring in a
huge income to the government. It is true that party organs might not spare money for the sake of
publicity, but these we shall shut up at the second attack upon us. No one shall with impunity lay a
finger on the aureole of our government infallibility. The pretext for stopping any publication will
be the alleged plea that it is agitating the public mind without occasion or justification. I BEG
YOU TO NOTE THAT AMONG THOSE MAKING ATTACKS UPON US WILL ALSO BE ORGANS ESTABLISHED BY US, BUT THEY
WILL ATTACK EXCLUSIVELY POINTS THAT WE HAVE PRE -DETERMINED TO ALTER. WE CONTROL THE PRESS
4. NOT A SINGLE ANNOUNCEMENT WILL REACH THE PUBLIC WITHOUT OUR CONTROL. Even now this is already
being attained by us inasmuch as all news items are received by a few agencies, in whose offices
they are focused from all parts of the world. These agencies will then be already entirely ours and
will give publicity only to what we dictate to them.
5. If already now we have contrived to possess ourselves of the minds of the GOY communities to such
an extent the they all come near looking upon the events of the world through the colored glasses of
those spectacles we are setting astride their noses; if already now there is not a single State
where there exist for us any barriers to admittance into what GOY stupidity calls State secrets:
what will our positions be then, when we shall be acknowledged supreme lords of the world in the
person of our king of all the world ....
6. Let us turn again to the FUTURE OF THE PRINTING PRESS. Every one desirous of being a publisher,
librarian, or printer, will be obliged to provide himself with the diploma instituted therefore,
which, in case of any fault, will be immediately impounded. With such measures THE INSTRUMENT OF
THOUGHT WILL BECOME AN EDUCATIVE MEANS ON THE HANDS OF OUR GOVERNMENT, WHICH WILL NO LONGER ALLOW
THE MASS OF THE NATION TO BE LED ASTRAY IN BY-WAYS AND FANTASIES ABOUT THE BLESSINGS OF PROGRESS. Is
there any one of us who does not know that these phantom blessings are the direct roads to foolish
imaginings which give birth to anarchical relations of men among themselves and towards authority,
because progress, or rather the idea of progress, has in troduced the conception of every kind of
emancipation, but has failed to establish its limits .... All the so-called liberals are anarchists,
if not in fact, at any rate in thought. Every one of them in hunting after phantoms of freedom, and
falling exclusively into license, that is, into the anarchy of protest for the sake of protest....
FREE PRESS DESTROYED
7. We turn to the periodical press. We shall impose on it, as on all printed matter, stamp taxes per
sheet and deposits of caution-money, and books of less than 30 sheets will pay double. We shall
reckon them as pamphlets in order, on the one hand, to reduce the number of magazines, which are the
worst form of printed poison, and, on the other, in order that this measure may force writers into
such lengthy productions that they will be little read, especially as they will be costly. At the
same time what we shall publish ourselves to influence mental development in the direction laid down
for our profit will be cheap and will be read voraciously. The tax will bring vapid literary
ambitions within bounds and the liability to penalties wi ll make literary men dependent upon us.
And if there should be any found who are desirous of writing against us, they will not find any
person eager to print their productions. Before accepting any production for publication in print,
the publisher or printer will have to apply to the authorities for permission to do so. Thus we
shall know beforehand of all tricks preparing against us and shall nullify them by getting ahead
with explanations on the subject treated of.
8. Literature and journalism are two of the most important educative forces, and therefore our
government will become proprietor of the majority of the journals. This will neutralize the
injurious influence of the privately-owned press and will put us in possession of a tremendous
influence upon the public mind .... If we give permits for ten journals, we shall ourselves found
thirty, and so on in the same proportion. This, however, must in no wise be suspected by the public.
For which reason all journals published by us will be of the most opposite, in appearance,
tendencies and opinions, thereby creating confidence in us and bringing over to us quite
unsuspicious opponents, who will thus fall into our trap and be rendered harmless.
9. In the front rank will stand organs of an official character. They will always stand guard over
our interests, and therefore their influence will be comparatively insignificant.
10. In the second rank will be the semi-official organs, whose part it will be to attack the tepid
and indifferent.
11. In the third rank we shall set up our own, to all appearance, opposition, which, in at least one
of its organs, will present what looks like the very antipodes to us. Our real opponents at heart
will accept this simulated opposition as their own and will show us their cards.
12. All our newspapers will be of all possible complexions -- aristocratic, republican,
revolutionary, even anarchical - for so long, of course, as the constitution exists .... Like the
Indian idol "Vishnu" they will have a hundred hands, and every one of them will have a finger on any
one of the public opinions as required. When a pulse quickens these hands will lead opinion in the
direction of our aims, for an excited patient loses all power of judgment and easily yields to
suggestion. Those fools who will think they are repeating the opinion of a newspaper of their own
camp will be repeating our opinion or any opinion that seems desirable for us. In the vain belief
that they are following the organ of their party they will, in fact, follow the flag which we hang
out for them.
13. In order to direct our newspaper militia in this sense we must take special and minute care in
organizing this matter. Under the title of central department of the press we shall institute
literary gatherings at which our agents will without attracting attention issue the orders and
watchwords of the day. By discussing and controverting, but always superficially, without touching
the essence of the matter, our organs will carry on a sham fight fusillade with the official
newspapers solely for the purpose of giving occasion for us to express ourselves more fully than
could well be done from the outset in official announcements, whenever, of course, that is to our
advantage.
14. THESE ATTACKS UPON US WILL ALSO SERVE ANOTHER PURPOSE, NAMELY, THAT OUR SUBJECTS WILL BE
CONVINCED TO THE EXISTENCE OF FULL FREEDOM OF SPEECH AND SO GIVE OUR AGENTS AN OCCASION TO AFFIRM
THAT ALL ORGANS WHICH OPPOSE US ARE EMPTY BABBLERS, since they are incapable of finding any
substantial objections to our orders. ONLY LIES PRINTED
15. Methods of organization like these, imperceptible to the public eye but
absolutely sure, are the best calculated to succeed in bringing the
attention and the confidence of the public to the side of our government.
Thanks to such methods we shall be in a position as from time to time may be
required, to excite or to tranquillize the public mind on political
questions, to persuade or to confuse, printing now truth, now lies, facts or
their contradictions, according as they may be well or ill received, always
very cautiously feeling our ground before stepping upon it .... WE SHALL
HAVE A SURE TRIUMPH OVER OUR OPPONENTS SINCE THEY WILL NOT HAVE AT THEIR
DISPOSITION ORGANS OF THE PRESS IN WHICH THEY CAN GIVE FULL AND FINAL
EXPRESSION TO THEIR VIEWS owing to the aforesaid methods of dealing with the
press. We shall not even need to refute them except very superficially.
16. Trial shots like these, fired by us in the third rank of our press, in
case of need, will be energetically refuted by us in our semi-official
organs.
17. Even nowadays, already, to take only the French press, there are forms
which reveal masonic solidarity in acting on the watchword: all organs of
the press are bound together by professional secrecy; like the augurs of
old, not one of their numbers will give away the secret of his sources of
information unless it be resolved to make announcement of them. Not one
journalist will venture to betray this secret, for not one of them is ever
admitted to practice literature unless his whole past has some disgraceful
sore or other .... These sores would be immediately revealed. So long as
they remain the secret of a few the prestige of the journalist attacks the
majority of the country - the mob follow after him with enthusiasm.
18. Our calculations are especially extended to the provinces. It is
indispensable for us to inflame there those hopes and impulses with which we
could at any moment fall upon the capital, and we shall represent to the
capitals that these expressions are the independent hopes and impulses of
the provinces. Naturally, the source of them will be always one and the same
- ours. WHAT WE NEED IS THAT, UNTIL SUCH TIME AS WE ARE IN THE PLENITUDE
POWER, THE CAPITALS SHOULD FIND THEMSELVES STIFLED BY THE PROVINCIAL OPINION
OF THE NATIONS, I.E., OF A MAJORITY ARRANGED BY OUR AGENTUR. What we need is
that at the psychological moment the capitals should not be in a position to
discuss an accomplished fact for the simple reason, if for no other, that it
has been accepted by the public opinion of a majority in the provinces.
19. WHEN WE ARE IN THE PERIOD OF THE NEW REGIME TRANSITIONAL TO THAT OF OUR
ASSUMPTION OF FULL SOVEREIGNTY WE MUST NOT ADMIT ANY REVELATION BY THE PRESS
OF ANY FORM OF PUBLIC DISHONESTY; IT IS NECESSARY THAT THE NEW REGIME SHOULD
BE THOUGHT TO HAVE SO PERFECTLY CONTENDED EVERYBODY THAT EVEN CRIMINALITY
HAS DISAPPEARED ... Cases of the manifestation of criminality should remain
known only to their victims and to chance witnesses - no more.
I could be wrong, but, like I said, I've tasted this before.
Laura
