Pryamidal Primes

christx11

Jedi Master
Could this be a confirmation on the clues about primes?


The Product Over All Primes is 4π2
E. Muñoz García, R. Pérez Marco

Institute for the International Education of Students, IES, Avda Seneca 7, 28040-Madrid, Spain.
E-mail: emunoz@iesmadrid.org
2 LAGA, CNRS UMR 7539, Université Paris 13, 93430-Villetaneuse, France.
E-mail: ricardo@math.univ-paris13.fr
Received: 24 October 2006 / Accepted: 27 May 2007
Published online: 19 October 2007 – © Springer-Verlag 2007
Communications in Mathematical Physics 277, 69–81 (2008)
Digital Object Identifier (DOI) 10.1007/s00220-007-0350-z

http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs00220-007-0350-z


Super-Regularization of Infinite Products
E. Muñoz García, R. Pérez Marco

Institut des Hautes Etudes Scientifiques
35, route de Chartres
91440 -- Bures-sur-Yvette (France)
Aout 2003
IHES/M/03/52

http://preprints.ihes.fr/M03/M03-52.ps.gz


I have been looking at this for over a year now and haven't been able to find any one posting about it.
Excuse me if I missed it somewhere or if it seems too far fetched.
Some of this may be nonsense but hopefully not all of it.
I can't find anything regarding it by searching on the forum.

4π2 is missing two variables to be a torus. Big R and little r. The two radii that make up the two loops of the cylinder.

If we include the two radii and if big R is equal to little r then we have the horned torus (in perfect balance?).

The surface area of the horned torus is 4π2r2

or

22π2r2

(A triplicative connecting clue?).
"both times 2, is your square, perfect balance."
"reality begins to reveal its perfectly squared nature."

"Most likely. You will just "stumble" on the method."

And we have Ark's paper -


Geometry and Shape of Minkowski's Space Conformal Infinity
Arkadiusz Jadczyk

Center CAIROS, Institut de Math´ematiques de Toulouse
Universit´e Paul Sabatier, 31062 TOULOUSE CEDEX 9, France
September 15, 2011

http://arxiv.org/pdf/1107.0933v2.pdf


25jfs5j.png


wl9n44.png


Sphere-like_degenerate_torus.gif

As the distance to the axis of revolution decreases,
the ring torus becomes a horn torus, then a spindle
torus, and finally degenerates into a sphere.
Wikimedia Commons


If 4π2 represents the rim of the cylinder, the surface of the torus,
and if 4π2 represents the product of all primes,
then the surface of a torus is I think the primorial function?


If the rim of the cylinder is represented by the primes (4π2),
then when the two variables (radii) are equal (horned torus), then at the core (window),
there is primary convergence.


How can gravity be constant if there are unstable gravity waves?
If the two variables (radii) are not equal, then we have all the other forms of the torus (not in perfect balance, unstable?).
When the two variables (radii) are equal (in perfect balance?), the wave is considered stable.
Regardless of whether the radii are equal or not, the 4π2remains constant (unchanging).




It is also interesting that E. Muñoz García, R. Pérez Marco mention in their paper that,
"We observe that the value 4π2 obtained for the super-regularized product over all prime numbers coincides with the regularized determinant of the Laplacian on the circle."

I do not totally understand this but I read in a wiki that the Laplace equation is used for among other things, calculating the potential generated by a point particle, for an inverse-square law force, arising in the solution of Poisson equation.

That would be things like light, sound, (sonoluminescence), electric charge, magnetism, electromagnetism, gravity, ...
Were all of the clues about primes to get at this 4π2, (2π)2;, information?

And a second question that may be even more silly. In looking at all the clues also about gravity, I am wondering if gravity is 4π2 ?
 
Pyramidal Primes.
I note that 4(pi)squared is a constant, which would imply that gravity is a constant.
Even if it is, then your torus/sphere would be a special case of that, and does not include such a concept as the moebius, or twisted, torus.
If the C's stated that Gravity is equated to thought, then I would suggest that Gravity is NOT constant. Constantly changing, perhaps.
 

Trending content

Back
Top Bottom